July 2001 doc IEEE 802 15 01356 r

July 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/356 r 0 Project: IEEE P 802. 15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Comment Resolution for D 0. 92 of 802. 15. 1 Draft Standard] Date Submitted: [10 July 2001] Source: [Tom Siep] Company: [] Address: [] Voice: [(972) 496 -0766], FAX: [], E-Mail: [tom. siep@ieee. org] Re: [WPAN-802. 15. 1 LB 11 Comment Resolution Results] Abstract: [This presentation represents the results of the deliberations of the Ballot Resolution Committee for comments received in Letter Ballot 11] Purpose: [Inform the WG] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P 802. 15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P 802. 15. Submission 1 Tom Siep

July 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/356 r 0 LB 11 Comment Resolution • LB 11 was a Recirculation Ballot • The Recirculation Ballot Review process considers: – Changes made to the Draft D 0. 9. 2 since the last ballot. • The “must” to “shall” modification • Minor editorial changes – Unresolved negative comments from the previous ballot • All comments were resolved in LB 10. Resolutions were either: – Accepted – Declined • One voter was unsatisfied with the disposition of his comments, but a decline letter was sent and that resolved the outstanding comments Submission 2 Tom Siep

July 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/356 r 0 LB 11 Comment Analysis • • 13 New comments 3 Carried forward from LB 10 44 Carried forward from LB 8 No comments on changes made from LB 10 to LB 11 were made Submission 3 Tom Siep

July 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/356 r 0 Consideration of LB 11 Comments • The BRC considered all comments lodged against the draft – 48 were editorial and would not prevent the proper implementation of interoperable systems – 12 were technical but have been considered and declined before – All declines were re-considered and previous decisions were confirmed – There were no new never-before-seen technical comments Submission 4 Tom Siep

July 2001 doc. : IEEE 802. 15 -01/356 r 0 Going Forward MOTION: The Working Group instructs the Chair of 802. 15 to submit Draft D 0. 9. 2 to the SEC for review to forward the Draft to Sponsor Ballot. Moved: Tom Siep Second: Michael Camp Vote: For: Against: Abstain: NOTE: All comments from LB 10 that were declined and not withdrawn will be forwarded with the draft in document 01310 r 4 a. P 802 -15_WG-LB 11 -Comment-Form. pdf Submission 5 Tom Siep