JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM JCIDS AND

JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (JCIDS) AND THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM (DAS) REQUIREMENTS AND ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT IN THE 21 ST CENTURY Date: June 8, 2015 Presented by: Thomas Fritz

LESSON OBJECTIVE Summarize the relationship between the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) and the Defense Acquisition System (DAS). • • Highlight recent changes to the DAS Link JCIDS to Milestones and Phases of the DAS Emphasize current strategic guidance Highlight Better Buying Power Initiatives Related to Capability Requirements 1

CHANGES – 2008 DEFENSE ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM No longer on Materiel Development Decision precedes entry into any phase of the • The model acquisition management system User Needs • Entrance Criteria met before entering phase • Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability Technology Opportunities & Resources CDD Validation New Development RFP Release A Materiel Solution Analysis Materiel Development Decision Ao. A B Technology Development PDR Pre-Systems Acquisition Name changed to Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction (same activities) New EA dropped from policy Program Initiation C Engineering & Manufacturing Development PDR Post PDR Assessment CDR IOC FOC PDR & CDR still required; Production & Operations & but not as decision points Deployment Support Post CDR Assessment Systems Acquisition FRP Decision Review Sustainment Three Categories Deleted • No longer called “Defense Acquisition Management System (DAMS)”, or “Defense Acquisition Management Framework”. • Now referred to as the “Defense Acquisition System (DAS)” and “Program Models” 2

DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM DODI 5000. 02, JANUARY 7, 2015 Materiel Development Decision (MDD) CDD Validation Development RFP Release A B draft ICD CDD Materiel Solution Analysis IOC C CDD Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction CPD Engineering & Manufacturing Development FOC FRP Decision Low-Rate Initial Production (LRIP) OT&E Operations & Support Production & Deployment Program Model 1, Hardware Intensive Program Ø 5 Phases Ø 3 Milestone Decisions – A, B, C Ø 4 Other Decision Points: − Materiel Development Decision (MDD) − Capability Development Document (CDD) Validation Decision Development RFP Release Decision − Full-Rate Production (FRP) Decision Ø “Mandatory” Entry at Materiel Development Decision (MDD) 3 • CPD: Capability Production Document

JCIDS and Acquisition President, SECDEF & Chairman: • Strategic Guidance OSD/Joint Staff • Support for Strategic Analysis Products • Joint Concepts Activity Identification of Capability Requirements • Analysis of Alternatives • Technology Demonstrated • Final Design (Ao. A) • Key Performance • Developmental T&E • Acquisition Strategy (AS) Parameters/ Key System (DT&E) • Operational • Test & Evaluation (T&E) Attributes/ Additional Perf Assessments (OA) Master Plan (TEMP) Attributes (KPPs/ • Revise KPPs/ • System Engineering Plan KSAs/APAs) KSAs/APAs (SEP) • AS • Life Cycle Sustainment Plan • TEMP • Acq Program (LCSP) • SEP Baseline (APB) • Concept of Operations • LCSP • TEMP (CONOPS) • CONOPS • SEP • Operational Mode • OMS/MP • LCSP Summary/Mission Profile • CONOPS (OMS/MP) • OMS/MP • CBAs & Other Studies • Transition of Rapidly • Operational Planning Fielded Solutions • Exercise/Warfighting • Business Process Lessons Learned Reengineering • JCTDs/Other Experiments Outputs • Mission & Problem • Assessment of Prior Studies • Tasks • Capability Requirements & Gaps Select Joint Develop Concept CONOPS • Operational Risks • Non-Materiel Approaches • Potential S&T Efforts • Recommendations Capabilities-Based Assessment / Other Study Materiel Development Decision ICD CCMD MS A Materiel Solution Analysis of Alternatives (Ao. A) Draft CDD RFP Val Rel Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction Competitive Prototyping MS C MS B CDD • Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) • Initial Operational T&E (IOT&E) • Full-Rate Prod (FRP) • AS • APB • TEMP • SEP • LRIP • FOT&E • LCSP • CONOPS • OMS/MP Engineering & Manufacturing Development CPD FRP Production & Deployment Develop, test, LRIP & Full Rate Production, deploy to warfighter, IOC Military Services Validates ICD SECDEF Policy Joint Staff / Joint Requirements Oversight Council / OSD JROC action for JROC Interest programs (ACAT I & IA) Reviews Ao. A Validates Results CDD Validates CPD OSD (AT&L, CAPE), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC) Identify Capability Requirements Select Materiel Solution Develop, Test, Produce & Field ver. 25 Feb 2015 Getting The Front End Right is Key 4

CAPABILITY MISSION LATTICE FIGURE B-2, JCIDS MANUAL 17 JUN 2015

DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM DODI 5000. 02, JANUARY 7, 2015 Materiel Development Decision (MDD) CDD Validation Development RFP Release A B draft ICD CDD Materiel Solution Analysis IOC C CDD Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction CPD Engineering & Manufacturing Development FOC FRP Decision Low-Rate Initial Production (LRIP) OT&E Operations & Support Production & Deployment Program Model 1, Hardware Intensive Program Ø 5 Phases Ø 3 Milestone Decisions – A, B, C Ø 4 Other Decision Points: − Materiel Development Decision (MDD) − Capability Development Document (CDD) Validation Decision Development RFP Release Decision − Full-Rate Production (FRP) Decision Ø “Mandatory” Entry at Materiel Development Decision (MDD) 6 • CPD: Capability Production Document

PROGRAM MODELS AND THE REQUIREMENTS MANAGER • Examples of Model 1: Major Weapons Platform • This may be considered the classic model but with large software components in most programs program managers are now likely to use a hybrid model. (Hybrid A - chart 8) • Program models are starting points from which to tailor an acquisition program • Tailored program models reflect the type of program and the PM’s acquisition strategy, however, the responsibilities of the RM are essentially the same regardless of model. 7

MODEL 2: DEFENSE UNIQUE SOFTWARE INTENSIVE PROGRAM CDD Validation Materiel Development Decision Development RFP Release Decision A Full Deployment Decision (FDD) C B Risk Reduction Build 0. 1 Build 1. 2 Build 1. 3 Build 1. 5 Legend: Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction = Milestone Decision Limited Deployment Build 1. 1 Build 1. 4 Materiel Solution Analysis Full Deployment (FD) IOC Integration Build 2. 1* Engineering & Manufacturing Development = Decision Point Sustainment OT&E Production & Deployment Disposal Operations & Support Need for Defined Requirements Potential for slip in Rqmts delivery • Complex, usually defense unique, software program that will not be fully deployed until several software builds have been completed. • Examples: command control systems and significant upgrades to the combat systems found on major 8 weapons systems such as surface combatants and tactical aircraft.

MODEL 3: INCREMENTALLY FIELDED SOFTWARE INTENSIVE PROGRAM Materiel Development Decision CDD Development RFP Full Deployment Validation Release Decision (FDD) Limited Fielding Decisions A IOC B Risk Reduction Build 1. 1 Build 0 Materiel Solution Analysis Full Deployment (FD) Build 1. 2 . . . Build 1. n OT&E Development & Deployment Risk Reduction Development RFP Release Decision Limited Fielding Decisions IOC FDD FD B Increment 2 • This model will apply in cases where commercial off-the-shelf software, such as commercial business systems with multiple modular capabilities, are acquired and adapted for Do. D. This model is distinguished by the rapid delivery of capability through multiple acquisition increments, each of which provides part of the overall required program capability. Sustainment Operations & Support Build 2. 1 Build 2. 2 OT&E Risk Reduction . . . Sustainment Operations & Support Development & Deployment Development RFP Release Decision Increment N Build 2. n Limited Fielding Decisions IOC FDD FD B Build n. 1 Build n. 2 OT&E Risk Reduction . . . Development & Deployment Build n. n Sustainment Disposal Operations & Support 9

MODEL 4: ACCELERATED ACQUISITION PROGRAM Materiel Development Decision Preliminary Design Review IOC A/B C OT&E Materiel Solution Analysis FOC Concurrent Technology Maturation, Risk Reduction, and Development Legend: Sustainment Concurrent Production and Deployment = Milestone Decision Disposal Operations & Support = Decision Point • Applies when schedule considerations dominate over cost and technical risk considerations. • Compresses or eliminates phases of the process and accepts the potential for inefficiencies in order to achieve a deployed capability on a compressed schedule. • Used when technological surprise by a potential adversary necessitates a higher-risk acquisition program. • Shows one example of tailoring for accelerated acquisition and many others are possible. 10

MODEL 5, HYBRID PROGRAM A (HARDWARE DOMINANT) CDD Validation Materiel Development Decision Development RFP Release A FRP FOC C B LRIP Build 1. 1 Risk Reduction Build 0. 1 Build 1. 2 Build 3. 1 Build 1. 3 Build 1. 4 Integration Build 1. 5 Materiel Solution Analysis IOC Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction Engineering & Manufacturing Development Build 2. 1 Build 3. 2* OT&E Production & Deployment Sustainment Disposal Operations & Support • Combines hardware development as the basic structure with software intensive development that is occurring simultaneously with the hardware development program. • In hardware intensive development, the design, fabrication, and testing of physical prototypes may determine overall schedule, decision points, and milestones, but software development will often dictate the pace of program execution and must be tightly integrated and coordinated with hardware development decision points. 11

MODEL 6. HYBRID PROGRAM B (SOFTWARE DOMINANT) CDD Validation Materiel Development Decision A Development RFP Release FDD IOC C B Limited Deployment LD) Build 1. 1. 1 Build 1. 1. 2 Build 1. 0. 1 Build 1. 3. 1 Build 1. 1. 3 Integration Build 1. 3. 2* Build 1. 2 Materiel Solution Analysis Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction Engineering & Manufacturing Development Sustainment OT&E Production and Deployment Operations & Support Development RFP Release Decision Increment 2 FD IOC FDD FD C B Build 2. 1. 1 Build 2. 1. 2 Build 2. 1. 3 Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction LD Build 2. 3. 1 Integration Build 2. 2 Engineering & Manufacturing Development Sustainment OT&E Disposal Build 2. 3. 2 Production and Deployment Operations & Support Depicts how a software intensive product development can include a mix of incrementally fielded software 12 products or releases that include intermediate software builds.

JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (JCIDS) / DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM (DAS) CDD Validation Development RFP Release FRP ICD Strategic Guidance Joint Concepts President SECDEF CJCS Joint Community MDD Draft CDD A CDD Technology Maturation Materiel Capabilities - Based & Risk Reduction Solution Analysis Assessment B CPD Engineering & Manufacturing Development C Production & Deployment Operations & Support Sustainment Disposal JCIDS DAS • CDD: Capability Development Document • CPD: Capability Production Document • FRP: Full-Rate Production • ICD: Initial Capabilities Document • MDD: Materiel Development Decision • RFP: Request for Proposal 13

CURRENT NATIONAL STRATEGIES • • • National Security Strategy , (link to Fact Sheet) − Feb 2015, President Barack Obama. Strong and sustainable American leadership; Maintain national defense ; End the draconian cuts National Defense Strategy − March 2014, QDR 2014, Builds on NDS 2012 with a broader strategic framework National Military Strategy (NMS) − June 2015, The National Military Strategy (link to News Release) “Congress may wish to consider whether the 2015 NSS qualifies as a true strategy in terms of linking ends to means and ways, as well as in terms of establishing priorities among goals. ” Congressional Research Service Report #R 44023. The 2015 National Security Strategy: Authorities, Changes, Issues for Congress Nathan 14 J. Lucas. Section Research Manager July 2, 2015

QDR 2014 – DEFENSE STRATEGY The 2014 QDR embodies the 21 st century defense priorities outlined in the 2012 Defense Strategic Guidance. The Department’s defense strategy emphasizes three pillars: • Protect the homeland, to deter and defeat attacks on the United States and to support civil authorities in mitigating the effects of potential attacks and natural disasters. • Build security globally, in order to preserve regional stability, deter adversaries, support allies and partners, and cooperate with others to address common security challenges. • Project power and win decisively, to defeat aggression, disrupt and destroy terrorist networks, and provide humanitarian assistance and disaster relief. More Recently: WASHINGTON, August 20, 2015. Secretary Carter. “This is no way to run a department strategy…”. “Strategy isn't a one-year-at-a-time thing. Aircraft carriers are not something you build in a year. Our troops, our force -- they deserve to know where things are going. ” See student reference folder for more information on QDR 2014 15

NMS 2015 - NATIONAL MILITARY OBJECTIVES • Deter, deny, and defeat state adversaries • Disrupt, degrade, and defeat violent extremist organizations • Strengthen our global network of allies and partners JOINT FORCE PRIORITIZED MISSIONS • • • Maintain a secure and effective nuclear deterrent Provide for military defense of the homeland Defeat an adversary Provide a global, stabilizing presence Combat terrorism Counter weapons of mass destruction Deny an adversary’s objectives Respond to crisis and conduct limited contingency operations Conduct military engagement and security cooperation Conduct stability and counterinsurgency operations Provide support to civil authorities Conduct humanitarian assistance and disaster response 16

BETTER BUYING POWER (BBP) 3. 0: ACHIEVING DOMINANT CAPABILITIES THROUGH TECHNICAL EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION 17

BETTER BUYING POWER (BBP) IMPACT ON REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT • Achieve Affordable Programs. − Mandate affordability as a requirement – require Milestone Decision Authority (MDA)relief to exceed affordability caps – similar to requiring requirements validation authority relief to exceed KPP thresholds • Achieve Dominant Capabilities While Controlling Lifecycle costs − Implement should-cost management – may free-up funds to buy more warfighting capability − Build stronger relationships with the requirements community to control costs − New in 3. 0 - Institutionalize stronger Do. D level Long Range R&D Program Plans − New in 3. 0 - Strengthen cybersecurity throughout the product lifecycle 18

JULY-AUGUST, 2015 – SPECIAL ISSUE Page 29 Getting the Requirements Right Sean J. Stackley, USN 19

JOINT CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM (JCIDS) / DEFENSE ACQUISITION SYSTEM (DAS) CDD Validation Development RFP Release FRP ICD Strategic Guidance Joint Concepts President SECDEF CJCS Joint Community MDD Draft CDD A CDD Technology Maturation Materiel Capabilities - Based & Risk Reduction Solution Analysis Assessment B CPD Engineering & Manufacturing Development C Production & Deployment Operations & Support Sustainment Disposal JCIDS DAS • CDD: Capability Development Document • CPD: Capability Production Document • FRP: Full-Rate Production • ICD: Initial Capabilities Document • MDD: Materiel Development Decision • RFP: Request for Proposal 20

RESOURCES BBP 3. 0 http: //bbp. dau. mil NSS http: //www. whitehouse. gov/sites/default/files/docs/2015_national_security_strate gy. pdf QDR http: //www. defense. gov/pubs/2014_Quadrennial_Defense_Review. pdf Joint Electronic Library + JDEIS CAC enabled https: //jdeis. js. mil/jdeis/index. jsp JCIDS CAC enabled https: //intellipedia. intelink. gov/wiki/JCIDS Do. D 5000. 02 http: //www. dtic. mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/500002 p. pdf Generic Acquisition Process (Pre-Tailoring) Acquisition Decision Points and Phases Acquisition Waterfall Chart with color enhancements 17 Dec final (3). pdf Congressional Research Service: Reports on National Strategies http: //www. fas. org/sgp/crs/natsec/R 44023. pdf https: //fas. org/sgp/crs/natsec/IN 10333. pdf http: //www. fas. org/sgp/crs/natsec/R 43403. pdf http: //www. fas. org/sgp/crs/natsec/R 43174. pdf 21

STRATEGIC GUIDANCE – JOINT CONCEPTS – JCIDS – ACQUISITION Strategic Guidance National Security Strategy National Defense Strategy National Military Strategy Unified Command Plan Defense Planning Guidance Quadrennial Defense Review Current Joint Warfighting Capabilities Future Joint Warfighting Capabilities Capstone Concept for Joint Operations (CCJO) Chairman’s vision for how Joint Force will defend the nation MDD Joint Operating Concepts (JOCs) Link strategic guidance to future military operations Supporting Concepts Capabilities. Based Assessment ICD JCIDS A B C CDD CPD FRP Acquisition Depth and detail to single & multiple JOCs Family of Joint Concepts Service concepts, multiservice concepts, & Affordability JCAs Cost 22