Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System JCIDS and

Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) and the Defense Acquisition System (DAS) RQM-310, 24 April 2017

Lesson Objective • Summarize the relationship between the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) and the Defense Acquisition System (DAS) – Highlight recent changes to the DAS – Link JCIDS to Milestones and Phases of the DAS – Emphasize current strategic guidance – Highlight Better Buying Power Initiatives Related to Capability Requirements 2

Changes – 2008 to 2015 Defense Acquisition System No longer on model User Needs • The Materiel Development Decision precedes entry into any phase of the acquisition management system • Entrance Criteria met before entering phase • Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability Technology Opportunities & Resources CDD Validation New Development RFP Release A Materiel Solution Analysis Materiel Development Decision Ao. A B Technology Development PDR Pre-Systems Acquisition Name changed to Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction (same activities) New EA now called Incremental Program Initiation C Engineering & Manufacturing Development PDR Post PDR Assessment CDR Post CDR Assessment IOC FOC PDR & CDR still required; Production & Operations & but not as decision Deployment Support points FRP Systems Acquisition Decision Review Sustainment Three Categories Deleted • No longer called “Defense Acquisition Management System (DAMS)”, or “Defense Acquisition Management Framework”. • Now referred to as the “Defense Acquisition System (DAS)” and “Program Model” 3

Defense Acquisition System Do. DI 5000. 02 change 2, 2 Feb 2017 CDD Validation Materiel Development Decision (MDD) Development RFP Release A draft ICD Materiel Solution Analysis CDD IOC B C CDD Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction FOC FRP Decision CPD Engineering & Manufacturing Development Production & Deployment Operations & Support Program Model 1, Hardware Intensive Program Ø 5 Phases Ø 3 Milestone Decision Points – A, B, C Ø 4 Other Decision Points: − − Materiel Development Decision (MDD) Capability Development Document (CDD) Validation Decision Development Request for Proposal (RFP) Release Decision Full-Rate Production (FRP) Decision Ø “Mandatory” Entry at Materiel Development Decision (MDD) Ø Deleted Enclosure 12 (now DODI 5000. 75) for DBS Ø Added Cybersecurity - Enclosure 14 (18 pages) 4

Risk Reduction Decision Development Decision The pieces are Offer industry in place money Do we really need something new? A draft ICD What do we develop? CDD Defense Acquisition System Development 101 LRIP Decision B CDD Make prototypes C Can we make one copy/multiple copies on cost, on time, on spec? Ready to fight? to fight! Should we build all of them? CPD OK. Build it! Keep it rolling, floating, or flying Program Model 1, Hardware Intensive Program Ø 5 Phases Ø 3 Milestone Decisions – A, B, C Ø 4 Other Decision Points: − − Materiel Development Decision (MDD) Capability Development Document (CDD) Validation Decision Development Request for Proposal (RFP) Release Decision Full-Rate Production (FRP) Decision Ø “Mandatory” Entry at Materiel Development Decision (MDD) 5

Model 1: Hardware Intensive Program CDD Validation Materiel Development Decision (MDD) Development RFP Release A draft ICD CDD Materiel Solution Analysis IOC B C CDD Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction FOC FRP Decision CPD Engineering & Manufacturing Development Production & Deployment Operations & Support • There are six program models that provide the PM with a baseline approach. • Regardless of model, the RM’s responsibilities are essentially the same • Each program is tailored to the characteristics of the product being acquired. • Model 1 is a model of a hardware intensive program such as a major weapons platform. This is the classic model that has existed in some form in all previous editions of Do. DI 5000. 02. It is the starting point for most military weapon systems; however, these products almost always contain software development resulting in some form of Model 5, Hybrid Model A. 6

Model 2: Defense Unique Software Intensive Program Materiel Development Decision CDD Validation A Development RFP Release Decision Full Deployment Decision IOC (FDD) C B Limited Deployment Build 1. 1 Risk Reduction Build 0. 1 Build 1. 2 Build 1. 3 Build 1. 4 Build 1. 5 Materiel Solution Analysis Full Deployment (FD) Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction Integration Build 2. 1* Engineering & Manufacturing Development OT&E Production & Deployment Sustainment Disposal Operations & Support • Complex, usually defense unique, software program that will not be fully deployed until several software builds have been completed. • Examples: command control systems and significant upgrades to the combat systems found on major weapons systems such as surface combatants and tactical aircraft. • Several software builds are typically necessary to achieve a deployable capability. 7

Model 3: Incrementally Fielded Software Intensive Program Materiel Development Decision CDD Development Full Deployment Validation RFP Release Decision (FDD) Limited Deployment Decisions A IOC B Risk Reduction Build 1. 1 Build 0 Materiel Solution Analysis Full Deployment (FD) Risk Reduction Build 1. 2 OT&E . . . Build 1. n Development & Deployment Limited Deployment Decisions Development RFP Release Decision Increment 2 Sustainment Operations & Support IOC FDD FD B Build 2. 1 This model will apply in cases where Build 2. 2. . . Build 2. n commercial off-the-shelf software, OT&E Development & Risk such as commercial business systems Deployment Reduction with multiple modular capabilities, Limited Development RFP are acquired and adapted for Do. D. Deployment Release Decisions This model is distinguished by the rapid delivery of capability through B multiple acquisition increments, each Increment N Build n. 1 of which provides part of the overall Build n. 2. . . OT&E required program capability. Risk Reduction Development & Deployment Sustainment Operations & Support IOC Build n. n FDD FD Sustainment Disposal Operations & Support 8

Model 4: Accelerated Acquisition Program Materiel Development Decision Preliminary Design Review A/B IOC FOC C OT&E Materiel Solution Analysis Concurrent Technology Maturation, Risk Reduction, and Development Concurrent Production and Deployment Sustainment Disposal Operations & Support • Applies when schedule considerations dominate over cost and technical risk considerations. • Compresses or eliminates phases of the process and accepts the potential for inefficiencies in order to achieve a deployed capability on a compressed schedule. • Used when technological surprise by a potential adversary necessitates a higher-risk acquisition program. • Shows one example of tailoring for accelerated acquisition; many others are possible. 9

Model 4: Accelerated Acquisition Program Materiel Development Decision Preliminary Design Review A/B IOC FOC C Model 4 is not used for Sustainment Disposal OT&E urgent needs. See Do. DI Concurrent Technology Materiel Operations & Support 5000. 02, Encl. 13, for the and Production Maturation, Risk Reduction, Solution and Development Analysis Urgent Capability. Deployment Acquisition dominate process for • Applies when schedule considerations over cost and technical risk urgent needs. considerations. • Compresses or eliminates phases of the process and accepts the potential for inefficiencies in order to achieve a deployed capability on a compressed schedule. • Used when technological surprise by a potential adversary necessitates a higher-risk acquisition program. • Shows one example of tailoring for accelerated acquisition; many others are possible. 10

Model 5: Hybrid Program A (Hardware Dominant) Materiel Development Decision Development CDD Validation RFP Release A FRP FOC C B LRIP Build 1. 1 Risk Reduction Build 0. 1 Build 1. 2 Build 1. 5 Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction Build 3. 1 Build 1. 3 Build 1. 4 Materiel Solution Analysis IOC Integration Build 2. 1 Engineering & Manufacturing Development Build 3. 2* OT&E Production & Deployment Sustainment Disposal Operations & Support • Combines hardware development as the basic structure with software intensive development that is occurring simultaneously with the hardware development program. • In hardware intensive development, the design, fabrication, and testing of physical prototypes may determine overall schedule, decision points, and milestones, but software development will often dictate the pace of program execution and must be tightly integrated and coordinated with hardware development decision points. 11

Model 6: Hybrid Program B (Software Dominant) Materiel Development Decision CDD Development Validation RFP Release A FDD IOC C B Limited Deployment LD) Build 1. 1. 1 Build 1. 1. 2 Build 1. 0. 1 Build 1. 3. 1 Build 1. 1. 3 Integration Build 1. 3. 2* Build 1. 2 Materiel Solution Analysis Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction Engineering & Manufacturing Development Sustainment OT&E Production and Deployment Development RFP Release Decision Increment 2 FD Operations & Support IOC FDD FD C B Build 2. 1. 1 Build 2. 1. 2 Build 2. 1. 3 Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction LD Build 2. 3. 1 Integration Build 2. 2 Engineering & Manufacturing Development Sustainment Disposal OT&E Build 2. 3. 2 Production and Deployment Operations & Support Depicts how a software intensive product development can include a mix of incrementally fielded software products or releases that include intermediate software builds. 12

JCIDS and the DAS CDD Validation ICD Strategic Joint Guidance Concepts President SECDEF CJCS MDD Capabilities - Based Assessment Draft CDD Materiel Solution Analysis A Development RFP Release CDD Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction B CPD Engineering & Manufacturing Development FRP C Production & Deployment Operations & Support Sustainment Disposal Joint Community JCIDS DAS • CDD: Capability Development Document • CPD: Capability Production Document • FRP: Full-Rate Production • ICD: Initial Capabilities Document • MDD: Materiel Development Decision • RFP: Request for Proposal 13

National Strategies • National Security Strategy (NSS), Feb 2015 • National Defense Strategy (NDS), Jan 2012, updated by QDR 2014 – Defense Strategy Review (DSR) replace QDR • National Military Strategy (NMS), Nov 2016 – Classified See student references and RM Co. P for copies of latest national strategy documents 14

National Security Strategy (NSS) The President, February 2015 • NSS Part II, Security – – – – Strengthen Our National Defense Reinforce Homeland Security Combat the Persistent Threat of Terrorism Build Capacity to Prevent Conflict Confront Climate Change Assure Access to Shared Spaces – Cyber, Space, Air and Oceans Increase Global Health Security 15

National Defense Strategy (NDS) – QDR 2014 The Secretary of Defense QDR 2014 embodies the 21 st century defense priorities outlined in the 2012 Defense Strategic Guidance*. The Department’s defense strategy emphasizes three pillars: • Protect the homeland, to deter and defeat attacks on the United States and to support civil authorities in mitigating the effects of potential attacks and natural disasters. • Build security globally, in order to preserve regional stability, deter adversaries, support allies and partners, and cooperate with others to address common security challenges. • Project power and win decisively, to defeat aggression, disrupt and destroy terrorist networks, and provide humanitarian assistance and disaster relief. *Sustaining U. S Global Leadership: Priorities for 21 st Century Defense, Jan 2012 16

National Military Strategy (NMS) 2015 The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff National Military Objectives: • Deter, deny, and defeat state adversaries • Disrupt, degrade, and defeat violent extremist organizations • Strengthen our global network of allies and partners JOINT FORCE PRIORITIZED MISSIONS • • • Maintain a secure and effective nuclear deterrent Provide for military defense of the homeland Defeat an adversary Provide a global, stabilizing presence Combat terrorism Counter weapons of mass destruction Deny an adversary’s objectives Respond to crisis and conduct limited contingency operations Conduct military engagement and security cooperation Conduct stability and counterinsurgency operations Provide support to civil authorities Conduct humanitarian assistance and disaster response 17

USD(AT&L) Better Buying Power Initiative USD(AT&L) Guidance • USD(AT&L) launched BBP in 2010 to restore affordability and productivity to Defense spending • BBP Challenges the way we think about our programs to achieve greater efficiency • BBP 3. 0 builds on BBP 1. 0 and 2. 0 with a shift in emphasis toward achieving dominant capabilities through innovation and technical excellence 18

Better Buying Power - Objectives USD(AT&L) wanted to implement guidance within his span of control - without it being “reform” but rather the use of best practices that would achieve: • • Delivering warfighting capability we need for the dollars we have Getting better buying power for the warfighter and taxpayer Restoring affordability to defense goods and services Improving defense industry productivity Removing government impediments to leanness Avoiding program turbulence Maintaining a vibrant and financially healthy defense industry Developing our acquisition workforce See student references for BBP implementation directives 19

Better Buying Power 1. 0, 2. 0 and 3. 0 Comparison Better Buying Power Gateway: http: //bbp. dau. mil 20

Better Buying Power (BBP) Impact on Requirements Management • Achieve Affordable Programs. – Mandate affordability as a requirement – require Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) relief to exceed affordability caps – similar to requiring requirements validation authority relief to exceed KPP thresholds • Achieve Dominant Capabilities While Controlling Lifecycle costs – Implement should-cost management – may free-up funds to buy more warfighting capability – Build stronger relationships with the requirements community to control costs • New in 3. 0 – Institutionalize stronger Do. D level Long Range R&D Program Plans – Strengthen cybersecurity throughout the product lifecycle 21

Strategic Guidance – Joint Concepts – JCIDS – Acquisition Strategic Guidance National Security Strategy National Defense Strategy National Military Strategy Unified Command Plan Defense Planning Guidance QDR/Defense Strategy Review Current Joint Warfighting Capabilities Future Joint Warfighting Capabilities Capstone Concept for Joint Operations (CCJO) Chairman’s vision for how Joint Force will defend the nation MDD Joint Operating Concepts (JOCs) Link strategic guidance to future military operations Capabilities. Based Assessment A ICD C CDD CPD FRP Acquisition JCIDS Supporting Concepts B Depth and detail to single & multiple JOCs Family of Joint Concepts Service concepts, multiservice concepts, & CONOPS written within the joint community JCAs Affordability Intelligence Cost Threat 22

JCIDS and Acquisition Summary View President, SECDEF & Chairman: • Strategic Guidance OSD/Joint Staff • Support for Strategic Analysis Products • Joint Concepts Activity Identification of Capability Requirements • Analysis of Alternatives (Ao. A) • Acquisition Strategy (AS) • Test & Evaluation (T&E) Master Plan (TEMP) • System Engineering Plan (SEP) • Life Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP) • Concept of Operations (CONOPS) • Operational Mode Summary/Mission Profile (OMS/MP) • CBAs & Other Studies • Transition of Rapidly Fielded Solutions • Operational Planning • Business Process • Exercise/Warfighting Reengineering Lessons Learned • JCTDs/Other Experiments Outputs • Mission & Problem • Assessment of Prior Studies • Tasks • Capability Requirements & Gaps Select Joint Develop Concept CONOPS • Operational Risks • Non-Materiel Approaches • Potential S&T Efforts • Recommendations Capabilities-Based Assessment / Other Study Materiel Development Decision ICD CCMD • Technology Demonstrated • Final Design • Low Rate Initial • Key Performance • Developmental T&E Production (LRIP) Parameters/ Key System (DT&E) • Initial Operational T&E (IOT&E) Attributes/ Additional Perf • Operational Assessments (OA) • Full-Rate Prod Attributes (KPPs/ • Revise KPPs/ (FRP) KSAs/APAs • AS • APB • TEMP • Acq Program • TEMP • SEP Baseline (APB) • SEP • LRIP • LCSP • TEMP • FOT&E • LCSP • CONOPS • SEP • CONOPS • OMS/MP • LCSP • OMS/MP • CONOPS • OMS/MP MS A Materiel Solution Analysis of Alternatives (Ao. A) Draft CDD RFP Val Rel Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction Competitive Prototyping MS C MS B CDD Engineering & Manufacturing Development CPD FRP Production & Deployment Develop, test, LRIP & Full Rate Production, deploy to warfighter, IOC Military Services Requirements Validator action (JROC for JROC Interest programs - ACAT I & IA) Reviews Ao. A Validates Results CDD CPD Validates ICD SECDEF Policy Joint Staff / Joint Requirements Oversight Council / OSD (AT&L, CAPE), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC) Identify Capability Requirements Select Materiel Solution Develop, Test, Produce & Field ver. 25 Feb 2015 Getting The Front End Right is Key 23