Jets and QCD in D 0 Experiment Physics

  • Slides: 21
Download presentation
Jets and QCD in D 0 Experiment Physics at Extreme Energies Hanoi, Vietnam July

Jets and QCD in D 0 Experiment Physics at Extreme Energies Hanoi, Vietnam July 23, 2000 V. Šimák Institute of Physics ASCR, Prague for the DÆ Collaborations Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák

Outline • Inclusive Jet Cross Section : – at 1800 Ge. V – at

Outline • Inclusive Jet Cross Section : – at 1800 Ge. V – at 630 Ge. V – Ratio of Inclusive Jet Cross Sections • Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section • Dijet Mass Spectrum All theoretical comparisons done with JETRAD Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 2

y _ p p x z h = - ln [ tan (q /

y _ p p x z h = - ln [ tan (q / 2) ] |h| < 4. 2 l int> 7. 2 (total) Transverse segmentation Dh x D = 0. 1 x 0. 1 Electrons: s. E / E = 15% /ÖE + 0. 3% Pions: s. E / E = 45% /ÖE + 4% Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák

Inclusive Jet Cross Section at Ös = 1800 Ge. V ½h½<0. 5 ± 8%

Inclusive Jet Cross Section at Ös = 1800 Ge. V ½h½<0. 5 ± 8% Hanoi, July 23, 2000 +12% -10% V. Šimák +24% -20% 4

Inclusive Jet Cross Section at Ös = 1800 Ge. V (DÆ) ½h½<0. 5 •

Inclusive Jet Cross Section at Ös = 1800 Ge. V (DÆ) ½h½<0. 5 • JETRAD m. F= m. R= ETMax /2 , Rsep=1. 3, for |h|< 0. 5 For all PDF’s probabilities between 47 -90% Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 5

Inclusive Jet Cross Section at Ös = 630 Ge. V = 536 nb-1 ½h½<0.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section at Ös = 630 Ge. V = 536 nb-1 ½h½<0. 5 Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 6

Inclusive Jet Cross Section at Ös = 630 Ge. V • Some discrepancy at

Inclusive Jet Cross Section at Ös = 630 Ge. V • Some discrepancy at low ET, errors are large , but there is overall agreement. Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 7

Ratio of Inclusive Jet Cross Sections Same discrepancy exists in ratio of the scaled

Ratio of Inclusive Jet Cross Sections Same discrepancy exists in ratio of the scaled cross sections. QCD predictions seem to be 20% higher than expected. Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 8

Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section 1994 -1995 Collider run (run 1 b): =92 ±

Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section 1994 -1995 Collider run (run 1 b): =92 ± 6 pb-1 preliminary results Require at least two reconstructed jets Trigger Jet: ET > 60 Ge. V Probe Jet : ET > 30 Ge. V No restriction on additional jets. Measurement as input to PDF’s: gluon distribution is most interesting. Both experiments use JETRAD for theoretical comparisons with different PDF’s. Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 9

Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (DÆ) OS SS Beam line • Divide data sample

Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (DÆ) OS SS Beam line • Divide data sample into four eta bins: -- 0. 0<|h|<0. 5, 0. 5<|h|<1. 0, 1. 0<|h|<1. 5, 1. 5<|h|<2. 0 • Divide each eta bin into two subsamples: -- events with 2 jets on the Opposite Side (OS) -- events with 2 jets on the Same Side (SS). • ET of both jets are measured so there are two entries per event into each of the eight the cross sections. • JETRAD using m = E/2 Note that the renormalization and factorization scale are chosen to be: -- mf = mr = E/2 ( max jet ) Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 10

Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (DÆ) 0. 0<|h|<0. 5 1. 0<|h|<1. 5 0. 5<|h|<1.

Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (DÆ) 0. 0<|h|<0. 5 1. 0<|h|<1. 5 0. 5<|h|<1. 0 1. 5<|h|<2. 0 Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 11

Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (DÆ) m = ET/2 0. 0<|h|<0. 5<|h|<1. 0<|h|<1. 5<|h|<2.

Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (DÆ) m = ET/2 0. 0<|h|<0. 5<|h|<1. 0<|h|<1. 5<|h|<2. 0 Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 12

Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (DÆ) m = E/2 0. 0<|h|<0. 5<|h|<1. 0<|h|<1. 5<|h|<2.

Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (DÆ) m = E/2 0. 0<|h|<0. 5<|h|<1. 0<|h|<1. 5<|h|<2. 0 Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 13

Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (DÆ) m = E/2 0. 0<|h|<0. 5<|h|<1. 0<|h|<1. 5<|h|<2.

Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (DÆ) m = E/2 0. 0<|h|<0. 5<|h|<1. 0<|h|<1. 5<|h|<2. 0 Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 14

Dijet Mass Distribution Smeared Cross Section Unsmeared 200 -220 Ge. V: 8% Error 800

Dijet Mass Distribution Smeared Cross Section Unsmeared 200 -220 Ge. V: 8% Error 800 -1400 Ge. V: 30% Error Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 15

“Typical DØ Dijet Event” MJJ = 1. 18 Te. V Q 2 = ET,

“Typical DØ Dijet Event” MJJ = 1. 18 Te. V Q 2 = ET, 1×ET, 2= 2. 2 x 105 Ge. V 2 ET, 1 = 475 Ge. V, h 1 = -0. 69, x 1=0. 66 ET, 2 = 472 Ge. V, h 2 = 0. 69, x 2=0. 66 Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 16

Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 17

Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 17

Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák

Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák

Compositeness Contact Predictions QCD + M Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák cos 19

Compositeness Contact Predictions QCD + M Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák cos 19

Compositeness Calculations Eichten et al. , Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, 579 (84) Eichten et

Compositeness Calculations Eichten et al. , Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, 579 (84) Eichten et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett 50, 811 (83) Chivukula et al. , Phys. Lett. B 380, 92 (96) Lee, Phys. Rev. D 55, 2591 (97) Lane, hep-ph/9605257 (96) Suggested Scale: 1. 6 Te. V (LL) PRL 77, 438(1996) Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák 20

Conclusions 1800 Inclusive Cross Sec. No significant excess Excellent agreement with theory 630 Inclusive

Conclusions 1800 Inclusive Cross Sec. No significant excess Excellent agreement with theory 630 Inclusive Cross Sec. NLO predictions ~20% high Experimental measurements consistent Ratios 630/1800 NLO predictions ~20% high. Experimental measurements consistent Triple Differential Cross Section: NLO QCD with recent PDF’s (CTEQ 3 M, CTEQ 4 HJ, MRST, …) with agreement with D 0 within the systematic uncertainties Cross sections for possible inputs to PDF’s 1800 Dijet Mass NLO QCD in agreement with the data Compositeness Scale > 2. 4 Te. V no new physics so far Hanoi, July 23, 2000 V. Šimák