JET AIR Vs Cambium e PMP 2000 April
JET AIR Vs. Cambium e. PMP 2000 April 2017
Cambium e. PMP 2000 Intro. • e. PMP Access Point in 5 GHz Sector antenna Tx • Communicates SMs through two antennas • Downlink (Tx)– 90° or 120° sector antenna 11/22/2020 Access Point • Uplink (Rx)– “Beamforming Antenna” • Up to 210 Mbps Theoretical , QAM 64, 40 MHz Beamforming Antenna Rx • Best effort service for residential (No SLA) • Supports external GPS antenna 2
RADWIN JET Introduction Fast & Reliable Broadband, Cost Effective and Scalable Network Bi-Directional Beamforming Base station SU RADWIN SU AIR up to 100 Mbps, IP 66 16 dbi integrated antenna HSU Turbo. Gain 22 dbi antenna extender 11/22/2020 JET Win. Touch Installation application JET AIR – 750 Mbps Interference immunity as Pt. P High gain antenna 100 & 250 Mbps, IP 67 23 dbi integrated antenna Connectorize antenna 3
JET AIR vs. e. PMP 2000 - Executive Summary § Sector capacity § JET delivers 50% more capacity and supports double distance § Network capacity § JET delivers 3 times more capacity per given Spectrum § Interference immunity § JET delivers over 4 times more capacity than e. PMP 2000 under uplink reasonable interference § RADWIN SU delivers x 1. 5 to x 17 more capacity under downlink interference § Actual sector capacity under CPE load § JET maintains the sector capacity fixed while loading additional CPEs and small packets size while e. PMP 2000 capacity declines dramatically to less than half 4
JET AIR Delivers More Downlink Capacity and Longer Range (1) § Greater in system gain due to : • Greater Antenna Gain (20 vs. 16 dbi) 11/22/2020 • Fixed Tx power for all modulations (25 dbm vs. decreased Tx Power ) • QAM 256 vs. QAM 64 • Wider Channel BW (80 vs. 40 MHz) § Benefits: • 50% greater capacity at given range • More than double range vs. given capacity 5
JET Delivers More DL Capacity and Longer Range (2) JET 110 Mbps 9 km JET 110 Mbps 4 km 110 Mbps 9 km 70 Mbps 25 km 2 km 5 km 70 Mbps e. PMP 2000 70 Mbps 9 km 5. 4 / 5. 8 UNI No EIRP limitation e. PMP 2000 70 Mbps 5. 8 FCC /ETSI 36 d. Bm EIRP 9 km e. PMP 2000 70 Mbps 5 km 5. 4 FCC / ETSI/WPC 30 Bm EIRP SU antenna -22 dbi, SM antenna -24 dbi, BW-20 MHz , DL/UL-3: 1 6
JET AIR Delivers 3 Times more Downlink Capacity Per given Spectrum JET e. PMP-2000 JET 4 channels per network 2 channels per network Guard band between Channels 5 MHz No need Sector channel BW Assuming 100 MHz 20 MHz 40 MHz Sector DL capacity (DL: UL-3: 1) 70 Mbps 180 Mbps 1. 1 Gbps 2. 9 Gbps Frequency reuse Network DL capacity 11/22/2020 e. PMP 2000 1/3 # of JET base stations is required (save in tower rental fee and in number of towers) Tower rental cost : $80 to $300 monthly per unit 7
§ Ruggedized IP 67 vs. IP 55 22 cm § ¼ height of that of e. PMP 2000 88 cm RADWIN JET AIR Save Tower Space 8
11/22/2020 JET AIR Vs. e. PMP 2000 – Field and Lab Test Results Capacity @ interference Capacity @many CPEs and traffic load 9
JET AIR Uplink Interference Immunity is by far better than e. PMP 2000 – uplink capacity is reduced from 94 Mbps to 20 Mbps when interference level is added JET – Uplink capacity is stable although the interference is added, delivering 121 -107 Mbps JET AIR vs. e. PMP 2000 Uplink capacity vs. uplink interference level 140 Mbps 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 No interference Inter. = -75 d. Bm e. PMP 2000 Inter. = -65 d. Bm Inter. = -60 d. Bm JET Test set up: field, 40 MHz, DL: UL ratio- 50: 50%, RADWIN: JET , SU, CAMBIUM: e. PMP 2000, SM (23 dbi) Interference: Wi. Fi, Transmission duty cycle -80% , Co-channel, BW =40 MHz 10
JET AIR Downlink Capacity is Much Higher under Uplink Interference e. PMP 2000 – Downlink capacity declines from 94 Mbps to 46 Mbps when uplink interference level is added JET – Downlink capacity is stable although uplink interference is added JET AIR vs. e. PMP 2000 Downlink TCP capacity vs. Uplink interference level 140 Mbps 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 No interferance Inter. = -75 d. Bm e. PMP 2000 Inter. = -65 d. Bm Inter. = -60 d. Bm JET Test set up: field, 40 MHz, DL: UL ratio- 50: 50%, RADWIN: JET, SU CAMBIUM: e. PMP 2000, SM (23 dbi), Traffic – TCP Interference: Wi. Fi, Transmission duty cycle -80% , Co-channel, BW =40 MHz 11
Interference Test Set-up JET/e. PMP 2000 under test 250 m 900 m Interference 17 d. Bi 13° Ant SU / CMB e. PMP 1000 (SM) 23 d. Bi under test (23 d. Bi)
Real Life Performance e. PMP 2000
Interference Source Location -1 e. PMP 2000 /JET Interference
Interference Source Location -2 Interference Source Location -3 e. PMP 2000 /JET Interference
RADWIN SU Downlink Interference Immunity is by far better than e. PMP 1000 e. PMP SM Downlink capacity is reduced much faster when interference level is added RADWIN SU deliver between 15% to 1700% more capacity than e. PMP SM under downlink interference Bm Bm +380% +1700% -6. = er In t er . = -6 1 d 3 d Bm 5 d -6 er In te e. PMP SM +300% . = -7 r. = -7. = er In t +59% 3 d Bm +15% 6 d Bm 8 d Bm +16% -7 r. = -8 In te r. = -8 r. = In te +15% 1 d Bm +9% In te 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 6 d Bm Mbps RADWIN SU vs. e. PMP SM Downlink capacity vs. downlink interference level RADWIN SU Test set up: field, 20 MHz, DL: UL ratio- 50: 50%, RADWIN: JET, SU CAMBIUM: e. PMP 2000, SM Interference: Wi. Fi, Transmission duty cycle -80% , Co-channel, BW =40 MHz 16
Downlink Performance Under Variable Interference level - Set Up test
JET AIR Delivers 3 Times more Capacity per Given Number of CPEs and Given Packet Size e. PMP 2000 – The more CPEs are served and the shorter is the packet size , The lower is the actual capacity JET – Actual capacity is fixed as per data sheet (250 Mbps) JET AIR vs. e. PMP 2000 Base station capacity vs. number of CPEs and packet size 300 200 Using HSU-250 Mbps 250 100 50 0 2 CPEs P. S-1522 B P. S – Packet size 5 CPEs, P. S-1522 B e. PMP 2000 5 CPEs, P. S - 1024 B 5 CPEs, Typical mix of P. S (Note 1) JET Test set up: Zero range between Base & CPE, 40 MHz, DL: UL ratio- 75: 25%, RADWIN: JET, SU CAMBIUM: e. PMP 2000, SM Note 1: The capacity of 5 CPEs with typical mix of packet size is calculated based on the other results in the graph 18
Pt. MP Lab Test Pt. MP
Thank You! Any Questions?
- Slides: 20