JBI Scoping Reviews WIDSIT Walsh 2016 personal communication

JBI Scoping Reviews “WIDS’IT’”- Walsh, 2016 (personal communication) Presented by Micah Peters micah. peters@adelaide. edu. au -

�Indications �Objectives, Questions, Inclusion Criteria �A brief model of scoping reviews �Frameworks for scoping reviews �Breadth not quality �Implications for research, policy, and practice Outline

�Map disparate or unknown evidence �Precede a systematic review �Map concept use �Map how research has been done �Develop a policy map �Gaps analysis Indications

Research objectives and Review objectives - Congruence between objectives - - Do you have the right review objective for your research objective? - Review Objectives and Questions - Are you asking the right questions? - Questions and Sub-questions - How many questions do you have? Objectives and Questions

�Congruence between questions and review inclusion criteria ◦ Do you have the right parameters to find the right evidence? ◦ P - opulation ◦ C - oncept ◦ C - ontext Questions and Inclusion Criteria

Scoping the evidence Synthesising the evidence A model

Synthesising the evidence Scoping the evidence A model

Previous Frameworks

� 1. � 2. � 3. � 4. � 5. � 6. � 7. � 8. � 9. Identifying the research objective Clarifying the review objective and questions Determining the inclusion criteria Developing the a-priori protocol Searching for and identifying the evidence Extracting the Data Mapping the Data Discussing the Evidence Making conclusions and giving recommendations The JBI Framework

�Breadth of the evidence, not the quality �Implications for policy and practice? �Implications for research ◦ - Primary research ◦ - Secondary research What? ! No critical appraisal? !

Joannabriggslibrary. org jbi. synthesis@adelaide. edu. au micah. peters@adelaide. edu. au - Scoping review protocol template Methodological discussion, support, and publishing JBI Scoping Reviews

�JBI Scoping Reviews Methodology Chapter Further reading