January 2019 doc IEEE 802 24 19 0002

  • Slides: 20
Download presentation
January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 802. 24 Vertical

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 802. 24 Vertical Applications TAG January 2019 St. Louis, MO, USA Submission Slide 1 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 802. 24 Overview

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 802. 24 Overview • Officers – TAG Chair: – Secretary & TAG Vice Chair: Tim Godfrey Ben Rolfe • Task Groups – 802. 24. 1 Smart Grid TG – 802. 24. 2 Io. T TG Tim Godfrey Chris Di. Minico • 26 Voting Members • Agenda: 24 -19 -0001 -00 • Meetings for the Week – Wednesday PM 2 – Thursday PM 2 24. 1 • Manual attendance tracking for 802. 1 & 802. 3 members Submission Slide 2

January 2019 Agenda – 802. 24 -19 -0001 r 0 802. 24 Agenda -

January 2019 Agenda – 802. 24 -19 -0001 r 0 802. 24 Agenda - January 2019 - St. Louis, MO, USA 1 24 -19 -0001 -00 -0000 Wednesday PM 2 session 1. 1 1. 2 1. 3 1. 4 1. 5 1. 6 1. 7 Call session to order, present “Guidelines for IEEE SA meetings”, Quorum Review of Agenda / Approval of Agenda Approve minutes from prior TAG meeting Introduction/meeting objectives / Review action items from previous meeting Liaison Review 802. 24. 1 Smart Grid Task Group ITU and regulatory items 1. 8 Collaboration with 802. 21: 'Network Enablers for Seamless HMD-based VR (Virtual Reality)’ Recess 1. 9 2 2. 1 2. 2 2. 3 2. 4 2. 5 2. 6 2. 7 2. 8 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Godfrey Godfrey/ Holcomb 5 5 10 0 4: 00 PM 4: 05 PM 4: 10 PM 4: 15 PM 4: 20 PM 4: 30 PM Godfrey / Das Godfrey 40 4: 50 PM 0 5: 30 PM Godfrey 0 4: 00 PM 15 4: 15 PM 15 4: 30 PM Godfrey / Rolfe Godfrey 15 15 15 5 0 20 4: 30 PM Thursday PM 2 session Call to Order 802. 24 TAG Follow up on "Network Integration" discussion from November Discussion on Low Latency White Paper proposal Liasion Discussion of IEC SEG 8 report "Monitoring and impact assessment of emerging technologies and architectures" Comments and feedback from NIST on Smart Grid Wireless Standards Matrix Coordination with 802. 19 on 802. 15. 4 g and 802. 11 ah Coexistence project 802. 24 New Action Items, New Activities, AOB Adjourn Submission Slide 3 4: 45 PM 5: 00 PM 5: 15 PM 5: 20 PM Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Guidelines for IEEE-SA

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Guidelines for IEEE-SA Meetings l All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. l Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. l Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. l Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. l l Technical considerations remain primary focus Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. l Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. l Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object. -------------------------------- If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@ieee. org or visit http: //standards. ieee. org/about/sasb/patcom/index. html See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5. 3. 10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. This slide set is available at https: //development. standards. ieee. org/myproject/Public/mytools/mob/preparslides. ppt Submission IEEE 802 Executive Committee

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Participation in IEEE

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Participation in IEEE 802 Meetings Participation in any IEEE 802 meeting (Sponsor, Sponsor subgroup, Working Group subgroup, etc. ) is on an individual basis • Participants in the IEEE standards development individual process shall act based on their qualifications and experience. (https: //standards. ieee. org/develop/policies/bylaws/sb_bylaws. pdf section 5. 2. 1) • IEEE 802 Working Group membership is by individual; “Working Group members shall participate in the consensus process in a manner consistent with their professional expert opinion as individuals, and not as organizational representatives”. (subclause 4. 2. 1 “Establishment”, of the IEEE 802 LMSC Working Group Policies and Procedures) • Participants have an obligation to act and vote as an individual and not under the direction of any other individual or group. A Participant’s obligation to act and vote as an individual applies in all cases, regardless of any external commitments, agreements, contracts, or orders. • Participants shall not direct the actions or votes of any other member of an IEEE 802 Working Group or retaliate against any other member for their actions or votes within IEEE 802 Working Group meetings, see https: //standards. ieee. org/develop/policies/bylaws/sb_bylaws. pdf section 5. 2. 1. 3 and the IEEE 802 LMSC Working Group Policies and Procedures, subclause 3. 4. 1 “Chair”, list item x. By participating in IEEE 802 meetings, you accept these requirements. If you do not agree to these policies then you shall not participate. (Latest revision of IEEE 802 LMSC Working Group Policies and Procedures: http: //www. ieee 802. org/devdocs. shtml ) Submission Slide 5 IEEE 802 Executive Committee

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Administration • Attendance

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Administration • Attendance take on IMAT – Reciprocal rights for most WGs • Web page – http: //www. ieee 802. org/24 • Mailing list – stds-802 -24@listserv. ieee. org – 802 -24 -voters@listserv. ieee. org (voters list) • Document archive – http: //mentor. ieee. org/802. 24/documents • IEEE 802 announcement reflector, stds-802 -all@listserv. ieee. org – Send email to listserv@listserv. ieee. org with no subject and with the – following 2 lines appearing first in the body of the message Subscribe stds-802 -all end Submission Slide 6 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 802. 24 TAG

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 802. 24 TAG • Approve November minutes – 24 -18 -0029 r 0 • TAG Action Items from November: Submission Slide 7 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Sub 1 GHz

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Sub 1 GHz White Paper • Requested that the paper title was changed from "IEEE 802. 24 Vertical Applications TAG“ to "Smart Grid Standards for Operation in Sub 1 GHz Bands“ Submission Slide 8 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Wednesday 802. 24.

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Wednesday 802. 24. 1 Smart Grid TG Submission Slide 9 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 ITU and Radio

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 ITU and Radio Regulatory Items • Update from 802. 18 – Jay Holcomb • Discussion: Ireland consultation on 400 MHz – Further Consultation on the Release of the 410 – 415. 5 / 420 – 425. 5 MHz Sub-band – Com. Reg 18/92 • 1. 4 GHz spectrum recently announced is being used for telemetry in oil/gas industry with 802. 16 s • Traditional license model – geographic ownership • Part 90 Submission Slide 10 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 TSN White Paper

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 TSN White Paper • Comment Collection – The 802. 24 TAG and 802. 1 TSN TG solicit comments on 802. 24 -18 -0011 -00 -sgtg "Utility Applications of Time Sensitive Networking White Paper" – Comment submittal spreadsheet provided • Will remain open until Meeting • Expect to finalize in March and start publishing process Submission Slide 11 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Collaboration with 802.

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Collaboration with 802. 21 • 'Network Enablers for Seamless HMDbased VR (Virtual Reality)’ • Subir Das Submission Slide 12 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Thursday 802. 24

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Thursday 802. 24 TAG Submission Slide 13 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 “Network Integration” action

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 “Network Integration” action item • Action assigned from 802 EC leadership conference in July. – Discussion on role and positioning of IEEE 802 in standards, especially with respect to 3 GPP and the publicity on “ 5 G” • What is meant by Network Integration? – Does the IEEE 802 architecture provide a unique value to vertical market? – Is IEEE 802 more suited to deployment in the communication infrastructure of private enterprise, industry, and the individual user? (Compared to 3 GPP, which is more oriented towards service providers? ) – The IEEE 802 architecture enables networks that are like Ethernet: Well understood, mature, predictable. A “cleaner” integration of disparate technologies under the common architecture and addressing. • Can we develop a clearer definition and description of this distinction and the value for the user / implementer? • Can this be developed into a white paper? Submission Slide 14 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Network Integration: Notes

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Network Integration: Notes from November • • Max Riegel contribution 24 -18 -0026 r 0 Thoughts on IEEE 802 network integration with respect to P 802. 1 CF • Based on many discussions of the place of 802. 11 in 5 G. • 5 G SC – – Conclusions – AANI integrating 802. 11 into 5 G domain. Nothing corresponding in 3 GPP Industry connections – NENDICA • • • What’s missing – a picture of 802 as a peer to 5 G 5 G promises they will do “everything” – • But, they don’t do anything wired 5 G requires an extensive PLMN to support it. – • • Flexible Factory Io. T, Data Center Bridging It is designed to help the cellular operator grow their market Verticals might not want an operator in the middle of their network Value proposition: 802 networks are customer-owned – Submission Example – Santa Clara Emergency services issues Slide 15 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 “Low latency” White

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 “Low latency” White Paper • Achieving low latency with IEEE 802 standards – Including wired and wireless communications – An alternative (or complement) to 5 G URLLC • • A set of vertical applications enabled by low latency The challenges of reliable low latency in unlicensed spectrum. – Adapting TSN’s “FRER” feature – Adapting 802 wireless to licensed spectrum? – Operating over multiple bands or channels? • Special cases for high data rates for immersive video • • Several people interested in contributing Action: – Post call for contributions – Start reviewing contributions in January – Contribution from Oliver Holland (who cannot attend in January) Submission Slide 16 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Liaison with IEC

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 Liaison with IEC SEG 8 • Scope of SEG 8: – Assess, provide an overview and prioritization of the evolution of technical development and standardization in the field of communication technologies and architectures – The report includes aspects relevant to both Smart Grid and Io. T. • Document shared in 802. 24 Private Area – IEC_SEG 8_Deliverable 2_draft_181118_ext_clean. pdf – Updated version uploaded to private area with annotations • Key chapters relevant to input from 802. 24 – – – • Io. T Technologies Single-pair Ethernet (SPE) Deterministic Networking Low-Power Wide-Area Networks (LPWAN) V 2 V, V 2 I, V 2 P and V 2 N communication technologies Call for other 802 WGs to participate in review and provide comments Submission Slide 17 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 802. 15. 4

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 802. 15. 4 g and 802. 11 ah Coexistence • 802. 24 will develop a whitepaper/document for applicationspecific use cases. Identifying where each standard is most suitable, and how to make best use of other changes. • Identify use cases where 802. 15. 4 g is not sufficient and both are needed • Could be choices of applications, channel guidelines, duty cycle, • Avoid perception that 802 standards are unable to coexist • Evaluate and describe potential application-level implications of delay/latency increases due to mutual interference • If NS-3 simulation models can be shared, others in IEEE 802 could progress that work. – MERL will share simulation models on Github. – New modules for 11 ah 15. 4 g Submission Slide 18 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 2019 TAG Activity

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 2019 TAG Activity Plan • “Low latency” White Paper – Start in January • A whitepaper/document for application-specific use cases of Sub 1 GHz standards 802. 15. 4 g and 802. 11 ah. Identifying where each standard is most suitable, and how to make best use of mechanisms proposed in 802. 19 TG. – Can this also include applying 802. 15. 4 s in sub-1 GHz spectrum? • 802. 24 white paper on Io. T and P 2413 – P 2413 entering Sponsor Ballot • Update of first Smart Grid white paper to address latest amendments of 802. 15. 4 u, v, w, x, y • Nendica – Collaborate on Nendica Factory Io. T? Submission Slide 19 Tim Godfrey, EPRI

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 802. 24 TAG

January 2019 doc. : IEEE 802. 24 -19 -0002 r 0 802. 24 TAG closing • Action Items from this meeting • Any New Business? Submission Slide 20 Tim Godfrey, EPRI