Is There a God Science and Christian Apologetics

  • Slides: 180
Download presentation
Is There a God? Science and Christian Apologetics JOHN OAKES, Ph. D 3/27/2021

Is There a God? Science and Christian Apologetics JOHN OAKES, Ph. D 3/27/2021

Our Outline n n n Science and Religion: The Limits of Science The History

Our Outline n n n Science and Religion: The Limits of Science The History of Science and Christianity The “Christian” Response The Age of the Universe and the Age of the Earth Genesis 1 and Creation The Flood Evolution The Anthropic Principle: Evidence for Design Scientific Materialism/Scientism/Naturalism Science and the Bible (other than creation and the flood) Science and Other Religions

Suggested Reading Is There a God By John Oakes Darwin's Black Box by Michael

Suggested Reading Is There a God By John Oakes Darwin's Black Box by Michael J. Behe Nature's Destiny by Michael J. Denton, (The Free Press, 1998) The Science of God, by Gerald L. Schroeder (Broadway Books, 1997) The Privileged Planet, by Guillermo Gonzalez (Regnery Publ. , 2004) The Language of God, by Francis S. Collins (Free Press, 2006) Coming to Peace With Science, by Darrel R. Falk (Inter Varsity Press, 2004) The Source by John Clayton The Fingerprint of God, by Hugh Ross, Ph. D (Whitaker House, 2000) None of These Diseases, by S. I Mc. Millan, M. D. (Revell, 1984) Signature in the Cell Steven Meyer (Harper, 2009) Finding Darwin's God, by Kenneth Miller (Harper Collins, 1999)

n n n Science and religion Science and Religion

n n n Science and religion Science and Religion

Science The use of experiment to test theories about the laws of nature.

Science The use of experiment to test theories about the laws of nature.

Science Scientific knowledge is quantitative n Scientific knowledge is progressive and tentative n Scientific

Science Scientific knowledge is quantitative n Scientific knowledge is progressive and tentative n Scientific knowledge is neither true nor false, but rather consistent with the observations and consistent with prior knowledge n

Religion is a belief in something n The belief is not necessarily substantiated by

Religion is a belief in something n The belief is not necessarily substantiated by physical or material evidence n Religious knowledge obtained through holy writings, authority, revelations and religious experiences n Religionists have faith or trust in such knowledge n

Religion Religious knowledge is qualitative not quantitative. n In religion knowledge is taken as

Religion Religious knowledge is qualitative not quantitative. n In religion knowledge is taken as either true or false. n Religious knowledge is neither progressive, nor tentative. n

Questions Science Can Answer When? n What? n Where? n How many? n By

Questions Science Can Answer When? n What? n Where? n How many? n By what means? n

Questions Science Cannot Answer: (That Religion Does Answer) Why am I here? n Is

Questions Science Cannot Answer: (That Religion Does Answer) Why am I here? n Is that the right thing to do? n How valuable am I? n Does God exist? Does God act (theism)? n Will that God respond if I pray? n Do supernatural events (miracles) happen? n

A statement a scientist should not make (if he or she is well trained

A statement a scientist should not make (if he or she is well trained and is not manipulating you): Evolution is true. The Big Bang happened. Better statements: The theory of evolution is by far the best model we have to explain both the fossil evidence and the genetic evidence with regard to the origin of all species. The Big Bang model is in dramatic agreement will all known facts about the origin and history of the universe. Science seeks consistency, not “truth. ” What is the simplest and most consistent explanation of the observation.

Assumptions of Science n There exists a single, unchanging set of laws which govern

Assumptions of Science n There exists a single, unchanging set of laws which govern all events in the physical universe. n Human beings are able to understand the workings of the physical universe. n The laws which govern the universe are describable by mathematics.

Basic Assumptions of Science n Assumptions are accepted without proof n Form the basis

Basic Assumptions of Science n Assumptions are accepted without proof n Form the basis of all scientific thinking n In other words, the basic assumptions of science are accepted on faith.

Predictions Based on Christian Theology: 1. The universe will follow a single, unchanging set

Predictions Based on Christian Theology: 1. The universe will follow a single, unchanging set of laws. 2. The universe will be understandable to human beings. 3. The universe will be describable by mathematics. 4. The universe will be designed so that we can observe it - (“The Priveleged Planet” Gonzalez and Richards)

Melvin Calvin (atheist expert on the chemical origin of life): “The fundamental conviction that

Melvin Calvin (atheist expert on the chemical origin of life): “The fundamental conviction that the universe is ordered [cosmos] is the first and strongest tenet [of scientists]. As I try to discern the origin of that conviction, I seem to find it in a basic notion discovered 2000 or 3000 years ago, and enunciated first in the Western world by the ancient Hebrews: namely that the universe is governed by a single God, and is not the product of the whims of many gods, each governing his own province, according to his own laws. This monotheistic view seems to be the historical foundation of modern science. ”

Conclusions about Science and Religion and science ask different kinds of questions and define

Conclusions about Science and Religion and science ask different kinds of questions and define words differently Religion and science appear as if they were two incommensurate paradigms addressing the identical information area Are they “Non-Overlapping Magisteria? (NOMA) as Stephen Jay Gould suggests? No! They inform one another to some extent.

Questions which both science and religion “own. ” Consciousness (What is consciousness, Why are

Questions which both science and religion “own. ” Consciousness (What is consciousness, Why are we self-aware? What is a person? ) Origins of life Origin of the universe. Why is there anything (as opposed to nothing)?

The History of Science and Religion Chaos vs Cosmos

The History of Science and Religion Chaos vs Cosmos

Roger Bacon (1214 -1292) Bacon’s advice: To study Natural Philosophy, use; “External experience, aided

Roger Bacon (1214 -1292) Bacon’s advice: To study Natural Philosophy, use; “External experience, aided by instruments, and made precise by mathematics. ” From Christian theology, Bacon reasoned: a. A single set of unchanging laws in the universe b. The universe should be understandable c. The laws of nature should be describable by mathematics.

William of Ockham (1285 -1349) His philosophy of science: “Nothing is assumed as evident

William of Ockham (1285 -1349) His philosophy of science: “Nothing is assumed as evident unless it is known per se or is evident by experience, or is proved by authority of scripture. ” Deduction, Induction, Revelation Ockham’s Razor; That which is explained by fewer assumptions is exlained in vain by more

Nikolai Copernicus (1473 -1543) “True assumptions must save the appearances. ”

Nikolai Copernicus (1473 -1543) “True assumptions must save the appearances. ”

Galileo Galilei (1564 -1642) “The Bible was written to tell us how to go

Galileo Galilei (1564 -1642) “The Bible was written to tell us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go” “In discussions of physical problems we ought to begin not from the authority of scriptural passages, but from the sense-experiences and necessary demonstrations. ”

Galileo on Revelation n “For the Holy Bible and the phenomena of nature proceed

Galileo on Revelation n “For the Holy Bible and the phenomena of nature proceed alike from the divine Word, the former as the dictate of the Holy Spirit and the latter as the observant executor of God’s commands. ” (the debate over this view rages even today) n General and Special Revelation

Sir Isaac Newton (1642 -1727) Whence is it that we see all the order

Sir Isaac Newton (1642 -1727) Whence is it that we see all the order and beauty in the universe? “The Mechanical Universe” Is God the primary mover?

The Enlightenment: The rise of Deism and skepticism Voltaire (1694 -1778) Creator of Modern

The Enlightenment: The rise of Deism and skepticism Voltaire (1694 -1778) Creator of Modern Religious Skepticism

David Hume Says the skeptic: “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. ” (1711 -1776)

David Hume Says the skeptic: “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. ” (1711 -1776)

Statue of Joseph Priestley Founder of the Unitarian Church

Statue of Joseph Priestley Founder of the Unitarian Church

La. Place (1749 -1827) About God: “I have no need of that hypothesis”

La. Place (1749 -1827) About God: “I have no need of that hypothesis”

How Old is the Earth? Hutton Lyell

How Old is the Earth? Hutton Lyell

How Old is the Earth? n James Hutton, 1795 Uniformitarianism “No vestige of a

How Old is the Earth? n James Hutton, 1795 Uniformitarianism “No vestige of a beginning, no concept of an end. ”

“It is mere rubbish to think at this point of the origin of life.

“It is mere rubbish to think at this point of the origin of life. One might as well think of the origin of matter. ” Charles Darwin A Deist

“Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind. ” A. Einstein A

“Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind. ” A. Einstein A Deist

The Conservative Christian Reaction Scopes “monkey trial” 1925 Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan

The Conservative Christian Reaction Scopes “monkey trial” 1925 Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan

1940’s and afterward: Creationism Movement Very Bad Science!

1940’s and afterward: Creationism Movement Very Bad Science!

Intelligent Design: An Improvement? n Irreducible Complexity Does this “disprove evolution? ” n Accept

Intelligent Design: An Improvement? n Irreducible Complexity Does this “disprove evolution? ” n Accept great age, but doubt evolution n Beware of “God of the Gaps” arguments. n Is ID “scientific”? Do they do experiments? Are their conclusions refutable by an experiment? n Behe, Ross, Meyer, etc. n The Anthropic Principle n A possible explanation for “why” the laws of the universe are what they are. n The laws of the universe are what they are so that we (ie human beings) can exist.

A Christian Response Remember Galileo vs Roman Curia Remember that science and religion are

A Christian Response Remember Galileo vs Roman Curia Remember that science and religion are incommensurate The Bible and science do NOT contradict one another! Remember, science is your friend: materialism/naturalism is the “enemy” Be confident. The universe was created, life was created.

Can Science and Religion peacefully coexist? n The Language of God

Can Science and Religion peacefully coexist? n The Language of God

Reasons Collins believes in God 1. There is something instead of nothing. 2. The

Reasons Collins believes in God 1. There is something instead of nothing. 2. The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics. 3. The Big Bang. 4. Nature does not solve the problem of why. 5. The existence of time. 6. Fine tuning of the universe. The “Goldilocks Paradox. ” 7. Ockham’s Razor. 8. The existence of moral law.

The Age of the Universe and the Age of the Earth Bishop Ussher 1640:

The Age of the Universe and the Age of the Earth Bishop Ussher 1640: The universe was created on Sunday October 23, 4004 BC

Cosmic Speedometer n When a galaxy is receding, light waves travelling to us are

Cosmic Speedometer n When a galaxy is receding, light waves travelling to us are red-shifted n Hubble measured the spectrum of these galaxies and found the spectral lines to be red-shifted n The faster the recession, the greater the red-shift

Galaxies: islands of stars making up the universe

Galaxies: islands of stars making up the universe

Hubble constant graph: Distance vs. speed of regression

Hubble constant graph: Distance vs. speed of regression

Expansion of the Universe … ‘winding’ backwards, the universe must have had a beginning

Expansion of the Universe … ‘winding’ backwards, the universe must have had a beginning

Image of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation From COBE satellite red = slightly warmer The

Image of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation From COBE satellite red = slightly warmer The “smoking gun” of the Big Bang

Tests of the Big Bang Theory n Expansion of the universe n Cosmic microwave

Tests of the Big Bang Theory n Expansion of the universe n Cosmic microwave background n Relative abundances of hydrogen, deuterium, helium and lithium

Obtaining the Age of the Universe n Extrapolate the current expansion rate (Hubble constant)

Obtaining the Age of the Universe n Extrapolate the current expansion rate (Hubble constant) back to the Big Bang n n Look for the oldest stars (in globular clusters) n n 13. 5 billion years 13. 0 billion years old Best current estimate is 13. 4 ± 1. 6 billion years M 10 Globular Cluster

How Old is the Earth? n James Hutton, 1787 Uniformitarianism “No vestige of a

How Old is the Earth? n James Hutton, 1787 Uniformitarianism “No vestige of a beginning, no concept of an end. ”

WILLIAM SMITH: Index Fossils “Each stratum contains fossils peculiar to itself” Cenozoic (new life)

WILLIAM SMITH: Index Fossils “Each stratum contains fossils peculiar to itself” Cenozoic (new life) 65 mya to present Mesozoic (middle life) 250 mya to 65 mya Paleozoic (old life) 530 mya to 250

William Smith 1769 -1839

William Smith 1769 -1839

Index fossils give the relative age of a rock

Index fossils give the relative age of a rock

Radiometric Dating Techniques mother/daughter isotope pair half-life U 238 → Pb 206 4. 5

Radiometric Dating Techniques mother/daughter isotope pair half-life U 238 → Pb 206 4. 5 billion years U 235 → Pb 207 K 40 → Ar 40 704 million years 1. 25 billion years Th 232 → Pb 208 14. 8 billion years U/Pb: age of moon and asteroids: 4. 55 billion yrs Earth/moon distance: 3 -5 billion yrs etc.

Genesis Chapter One: Creation n n Young Earth Theory n In agreement with science

Genesis Chapter One: Creation n n Young Earth Theory n In agreement with science n With an appearance of age (disagrees with science) Day/Age Theory Framework Theory n Literary rather than historical account. Days 1 -3 and 4 -6 are parallel triads describing how God created the heavens (1, 4), the seas and land(2, 5) and life (3, 6) Gap Theory n A huge “gap” of time between Genesis 1: 1 and 1: 2 It’s all just a myth

A Quick Summary of Genesis One: a. God pre-existed the universe b. God created

A Quick Summary of Genesis One: a. God pre-existed the universe b. God created the universe: “Let there be light” c. God created the earth d. God created life e. Last of all, God created mankind

A More Detailed Summary of Genesis One From the Viewpoint of an Observer on

A More Detailed Summary of Genesis One From the Viewpoint of an Observer on the Earth: a. The earth created and is spinning: night and day. Day 1 b. Water covers earth, Very thick atmosphere forms. Day 2 c. The earth cools, land appears out of the water. Day 3 d. Life appears on the earth. Day 3 e. (Photosynthetic life dramatically changes the chemistry of the atmosphere from reducing to oxidizing. ) f. Finally, the heavenly objects appeared in the sky Day 4 g. More advanced life forms; first in the water, later on the land Day 5 h. Even more advanced life forms. Last of all human beings Day 6

Is Genesis 1 a Myth? n Yes! It is a true myth. n A

Is Genesis 1 a Myth? n Yes! It is a true myth. n A myth is a simplified story, given to explain the gods (or God) to common people.

Creation Myths n Babylonian Creation Myth n n Egyptian Creation Myth n n Primeval

Creation Myths n Babylonian Creation Myth n n Egyptian Creation Myth n n Primeval ocean “Nun” from which arrises a Primeval hill. Greek Creation Myth n n Primeval swamp. Marduk kills Tiamat. Blood + mud = humans Prometheus and Epimetheus form clay molds. Earth supported by Atlas. Iroquois Creation Myth n Enigorio and Enigohahetgea: Good and evil brothers battle Genesis One is an obvious exception to this pattern

Babylonian Creation Myth: Marduk kills Tiamat

Babylonian Creation Myth: Marduk kills Tiamat

Egyptian Creation Myth

Egyptian Creation Myth

Iroquois Creation Myth: Enigorio and Enigohahetgea Battling the Ronnongwetowanca (Stone Giants)

Iroquois Creation Myth: Enigorio and Enigohahetgea Battling the Ronnongwetowanca (Stone Giants)

Is the Metaphorical Day a Reasonable Interpretation? Pre-Science Theologians Who Said Yes. n Philo

Is the Metaphorical Day a Reasonable Interpretation? Pre-Science Theologians Who Said Yes. n Philo 1 st century n Origen early 3 rd century n Augustine early 5 th century n Thomas Aquinas 13 th century

Translations of yom in the Old Testament (NIV) n n n n 1181 times

Translations of yom in the Old Testament (NIV) n n n n 1181 times as “day” (but with several different connotations of the word, some not being literal) n Isaiah 4: 2 In that day the Branch of the Lord will be beautiful… 67 times as “time” 30 times as “today” 18 times as “forever” 10 times as “continuously” 6 times as “age” 4 times as “life” 2 times as “perpetually”

The Flood: Genesis 6 -8

The Flood: Genesis 6 -8

Explanations of the Flood n Just an unfounded myth. n Worldwide flood. n n

Explanations of the Flood n Just an unfounded myth. n Worldwide flood. n n n With a “scientific” explanation A unique and completely miraculous event Local flood

Did all this happen in a single, cataclysmic flood?

Did all this happen in a single, cataclysmic flood?

Can an opening of “the fountains of the deep” explain the flood?

Can an opening of “the fountains of the deep” explain the flood?

Ancient Cultures With Flood Stories n n n n Hindus Burma (Myanmar) New Guinea

Ancient Cultures With Flood Stories n n n n Hindus Burma (Myanmar) New Guinea Aborigines of Australia New Zealand Iroquoi Incas Aztecs Greeks Babylonians Sumerians Celts Hottentots (Southern Africa)

Common Elements 1. The flood a judgment. 2. Massive or world wide in effect.

Common Elements 1. The flood a judgment. 2. Massive or world wide in effect. 3. Some humans saved from this flood and repopulate the earth.

The Bible and the Flood n New Testament writers clearly believe this was a

The Bible and the Flood n New Testament writers clearly believe this was a historical event. Matthew 24: 38 -39 n It happened as judgment for sin 2 Peter 3: 6 -7 n It is a prefigure of final judgment n It is a miracle, not a “natural” event—like the fire which will destroy the world n Belief in the flood based chiefly on faith in the Bible, certainly not on science.

Evolution and the Bible n What does the Bible say? n What does the

Evolution and the Bible n What does the Bible say? n What does the physical evidence say? n n Fossil evidence Genetic/DNA evidence Is there “Irreducible Complexity? ” Human evolution?

Finches discovered And drawn by Charles Darwin Evidence of Evolution?

Finches discovered And drawn by Charles Darwin Evidence of Evolution?

Evolution of whales over time?

Evolution of whales over time?

Fossil evidence for elephant evolution

Fossil evidence for elephant evolution

But………. . n The Cambrian Explosion n “Punctuated Equilibrium? ” n Theistic Evolution n

But………. . n The Cambrian Explosion n “Punctuated Equilibrium? ” n Theistic Evolution n ARS Forum: Four Christian Views of Evolution

Fossils from creatures which appeared in the “Cambrian Explosion”

Fossils from creatures which appeared in the “Cambrian Explosion”

Human chromosome #2 and Great Ape chromosome #2 a, 2 b: evidence for common

Human chromosome #2 and Great Ape chromosome #2 a, 2 b: evidence for common descent.

More Genetic Evidence for Common Descent n Pseudogenes n Vitamin C Pseudogene in great

More Genetic Evidence for Common Descent n Pseudogenes n Vitamin C Pseudogene in great apes and humans n Retroposons, SINEs (short interspersed elements), etc. n Viral insertions

table 1 Chimpanzee Gene sequence that codes for protein Random DNA segment between genes

table 1 Chimpanzee Gene sequence that codes for protein Random DNA segment between genes 100% 98% Dog 99% 52% Mouse 99% 40% Chicken 75% 4% Fruitfly 60% ~0% Roundworm 35% ~0% Typical random point mutation rates are about 1 x 10 -5 – 1 x 10 -7 mutations/generation. 5 million years = 250, 000 generations. Sufficient for random mutations to explain the change without the intervention of a guiding hand?

Some Tentative Conclusions Evolution has happened. Microevolution has been observed. Fossil evidence strongly supports

Some Tentative Conclusions Evolution has happened. Microevolution has been observed. Fossil evidence strongly supports the idea of change over time, but that change often happens in surprisingly sudden bursts. The Cambrian explosion raises real questions. Genetic evidence gives rather strong support to the idea of common descent. Like it or not, this is true of humans as well. Statistical and other arguments give support for evolution being theistic, rather than deistic, but this is not a scientific argument. God invented evolution; let us give him credit for a

The Teleological Argument Evidence for Design in Nature The Anthropic Principle Boeing 747 Design

The Teleological Argument Evidence for Design in Nature The Anthropic Principle Boeing 747 Design or Accident?

The Anthropic Principle n The laws of nature are what they are and the

The Anthropic Principle n The laws of nature are what they are and the fundamental constants which underlie them have the values they have by design; in order that advanced life forms, such as humans, can exist in the universe. Aristotle → Copernicus → Herschel → Hubble Aristotle? Is the “universe” getting smaller again?

Two Versions of the Anthropic Principle n n WAP Weak Anthropic Principle. The properties

Two Versions of the Anthropic Principle n n WAP Weak Anthropic Principle. The properties of the universe must be extremely precisely fine-tuned so that galaxies, stars, planets, life, and especially advanced selfconscious beings can exist. In fact, the universe has these necessary finely tuned properties. SAP Strong Anthropic Principle. WAP is true and this is not a coincidence. It must be because there exists a purposeful designer who intentionally created the universe we live in so that we could experience it.

Thomas Huxley, Darwin’s “bulldog” “We are as much the product of blind forces as

Thomas Huxley, Darwin’s “bulldog” “We are as much the product of blind forces as is the falling of a stone to earth, or the ebb and flow of the tides. We have just happened, and man was made flesh by a series of singularly beneficial accidents. ”

Richard Dawkins n In the universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication, some

Richard Dawkins n In the universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt and other people are going to get lucky: and you won’t find any rhyme or reason to it, nor any justice. The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is at the bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good. Nothing but blind, pitiless indifference. DNA neither knows nor cares. DNA just is, and we dance to its music.

Accident or Design? The Anthropic Principle William Paley

Accident or Design? The Anthropic Principle William Paley

Antony Flew Considers God. . . Sort Of n Flew is increasingly persuaded that

Antony Flew Considers God. . . Sort Of n Flew is increasingly persuaded that some sort of Deity brought about this universe. He says he has in mind something like the God of Aristotle, a distant, impersonal "prime mover. " It might not even be conscious, but a mere force. In formal terms, he regards the existence of this minimal God as a hypothesis that, at present, is perhaps the best explanation for why a universe exists that can produce complex life

Physics: The Finely Tuned Universe

Physics: The Finely Tuned Universe

Fine Tuning of the Gravitational Constant . 0000000000000000000001

Fine Tuning of the Gravitational Constant . 0000000000000000000001

Gravity Dominant force on astronomical size scale. n Need very close balance of gravity

Gravity Dominant force on astronomical size scale. n Need very close balance of gravity and cosmic expansion for stable universe. n If gravity weaker by 1 in 1060, universe expands too quickly, no galaxies or stars. n If gravity stronger by 1 in 1060, universe collapses without forming galaxies or stars. n n Gravity is fine-tuned to 1 part in 1060.

Fine Tuning of the Universe Constant A Little Bigger A Little Smaller 1. Gravitational

Fine Tuning of the Universe Constant A Little Bigger A Little Smaller 1. Gravitational constant very short-lived stars no stars 2. Ratio of electrons to protons no stars or galaxies 3. Strong Nuclear Force no hydrogen, fusion only hydrogen 4. Weak Nuclear Force all H 2 He at big bang no heavy elements 5. Electric Force no chemical bonding 6. Expansion rate of universe no galaxies universe collapses quickly 7. Ratio of matter to antimatter too much radiation for life not enough matter for galaxies to form and many more….

The Strong Force Holds nucleus together. n 5% weaker, no deuterium, stars won’t burn

The Strong Force Holds nucleus together. n 5% weaker, no deuterium, stars won’t burn n 5% stronger, diproton stable, stars explode n The strong force is tuned to ± 5% on the basis of these considerations alone. n

The Weak Force Holds neutron together. n Few % weaker, few neutrons, little He,

The Weak Force Holds neutron together. n Few % weaker, few neutrons, little He, few heavy elements; even these stay trapped in stars. n Few % stronger, too many neutrons, too much He, too many heavy elements; but these, too, stay trapped in stars. n The weak force is tuned to a few percent. n

Electromagnetism n n n Both repulsive & attractive, due to existence of positive &

Electromagnetism n n n Both repulsive & attractive, due to existence of positive & negative charges. + and – charges must be almost exactly equal in number, to better than one part in 1040. Yet protons (+) and electrons (-) drastically different in mass, and froze out at quite different times in the early universe. If not for this equality, electromagnetic forces would dominate gravity, so no galaxies, no stars, no planets. Electromagnetic forces tuned to one part in 1040.

Summary on Fine-Tuning n n n Combining these cases gives fine-tuning of better than

Summary on Fine-Tuning n n n Combining these cases gives fine-tuning of better than one part in 10100. Do we really have any evidence for 10100 universes to make this likely merely by chance? How big is 10100? n n n There are estimated to be some 1080 elementary particles in our universe. So we need to 1020 universes to get 10100 particles. Imagine the chances of randomly picking one marked particle from all these universes!

A finely-tuned instrument built by humans. Good to one part in a billion?

A finely-tuned instrument built by humans. Good to one part in a billion?

Fred Hoyle on Fine-Tuning “… a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as

Fred Hoyle on Fine-Tuning “… a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology. ”

Spiral The Right Kind of Galaxy Irregular Eliptical

Spiral The Right Kind of Galaxy Irregular Eliptical

The Right Galaxy Our galaxy is a spiral, which produces stars over much of

The Right Galaxy Our galaxy is a spiral, which produces stars over much of its history. n Not an elliptical, where star formation ends before there are many heavy elements. n Not an irregular, where radiation events would have destroyed life. n

The Right Sun: Location n Right distance from center of galaxy: n n n

The Right Sun: Location n Right distance from center of galaxy: n n n Right relation to supernovae: n n n Closer – too much radiation, disruptive gravity Further – too few heavy elements More or closer – exterminate life Less or further – too few heavy elements Right number of stars in system n n Zero – pretty cold! Two or more – unstable orbits if planets at all.

The Right Kind of Star The Goldilocks Star

The Right Kind of Star The Goldilocks Star

The Right Sun: Character n Mass in right range: Heavier – luminosity changes too

The Right Sun: Character n Mass in right range: Heavier – luminosity changes too quickly n Lighter – life zone too narrow, tidal forces too large n n Temperature (color) in right range: Redder – insufficient photosynthesis n Bluer – insufficient photosynthesis n n The Sun’s main radiation is right in the region where our atmosphere is transparent.

The Right Kind of Planet Right distance Rocky planet with plenty of oxygen and

The Right Kind of Planet Right distance Rocky planet with plenty of oxygen and water Thin, light planetary “crust” (allowing for plate tectonics) Huge moon for stable planetary rotation Tilted axis to spread energy around

The Right Planet: Temperature n Varies substantially on Earth, but: Only a few spots

The Right Planet: Temperature n Varies substantially on Earth, but: Only a few spots above boiling n Some below freezing n Contrast Venus, about 900 o. F (500 o. C). n Contrast Mars, barely above freezing in midsummer at the equator. n Earth is warm enough for water to be liquid, cool enough not to destroy biomolecules. n

The Right Moon: Size & Distance Our Moon is unique in the Solar System,

The Right Moon: Size & Distance Our Moon is unique in the Solar System, one of the largest, and by far the largest compared with its planet. n If it were smaller (or further away), Earth’s climate would be unstable, and tides too small for mixing. n If it were larger (or closer), tidal effects on Earth’s rotation, ocean & atmosphere too large. n

The Right Moon & Earth’s Crust If Earth’s crust thicker, it would eat up

The Right Moon & Earth’s Crust If Earth’s crust thicker, it would eat up the atmospheric oxygen. n If Earth’s crust thinner, too much volcanism and plate movement. n The Moon apparently formed from the Earth’s crust, when we were struck by a Mars-sized planet, a very flukey event! n

Water 1. Ideal solvent to support life (dissolves ions and molecules 2. Right boiling

Water 1. Ideal solvent to support life (dissolves ions and molecules 2. Right boiling and melting points 3. High specific heat 4. Solid floats on liquid 5. Contracts from 0 to 4 degrees centigrade

Designed Elements?

Designed Elements?

Carbon: The Central Element of Life 3 -D molecules Large, complex yet flexible molecules

Carbon: The Central Element of Life 3 -D molecules Large, complex yet flexible molecules

Iron: an essential element

Iron: an essential element

The Ozone Layer: Is oxygen a designed element?

The Ozone Layer: Is oxygen a designed element?

No uranium, no plate tectonics

No uranium, no plate tectonics

DNA a) b)

DNA a) b)

Protein

Protein

Simplest life form: break it down • E. coli: about 1 trillion bits of

Simplest life form: break it down • E. coli: about 1 trillion bits of information. • E. coli have 3000 -4000 different proteins. • DNA and RNA to make and be made by these proteins. • Lipids (membrane), Carbohydrates, etc. • The simplest living cell is an unimaginably complex self-regulating nano factory

Fred Hoyle on Living Things “The chance that higher life forms might have emerged

Fred Hoyle on Living Things “The chance that higher life forms might have emerged [by chance] is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein. ”

Nature creates order, but not information

Nature creates order, but not information

A House of Cards: Order and Information. A much better analogy for living things.

A House of Cards: Order and Information. A much better analogy for living things.

Is prayer simply chemicals moving around in the brain? If “God is love, ”

Is prayer simply chemicals moving around in the brain? If “God is love, ” then is God just the firing of particular neurons?

What you see depends on your “world view. ” n The Christian world view

What you see depends on your “world view. ” n The Christian world view predicts that a human brain will be designed so that those made in God’s image can experience love, joy, anger, compassion, spirituality, jealousy, empathy, oneness and other feelings, some of which have an extremely dubious evolutionary advantage.

Conclusion: “Since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine

Conclusion: “Since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. ” Romans 1: 20 Did we “just happen? ”

Scientific Materialism n Only that which can be observed and measured through the technique

Scientific Materialism n Only that which can be observed and measured through the technique of Scientific Method is real, and everything else is unreal.

Scientism n Scientism is the acceptance of scientific theory and scientific methods as applicable

Scientism n Scientism is the acceptance of scientific theory and scientific methods as applicable in all fields of inquiry about the world, including morality, ethics, art, and religion

Materialism n “We exist as material beings in a material world, all of whose

Materialism n “We exist as material beings in a material world, all of whose phenomena are the consequences of material relations among material entities. " In a word, the public needs to accept materialism, which means that they must put God in the trash can of history where such myths belong. ” Richard Lewontin Retrospective essay on Carl Sagan in the January 9, 1997 New York Review of Books,

If Materialism/Naturalism is right then: n “I” do not exist. Consciousness is just random

If Materialism/Naturalism is right then: n “I” do not exist. Consciousness is just random moving around of chemicals. n No soul, no spirit, no non-physical reality. n Belief in God is just a “meme” the unfortunate accidental result of brain evolution. n Life has no value. Human beings have no value. What is value?

A Response to Naturalism/Materialism/Scientism n It is a faith/religious belief based on circular reasoning.

A Response to Naturalism/Materialism/Scientism n It is a faith/religious belief based on circular reasoning. n It is patently and demonstrably false. n It is dangerous. It is very bad philosophy.

Circular Reasoning Unprovable assumptions of science: There exist universal and inviolable natural laws. The

Circular Reasoning Unprovable assumptions of science: There exist universal and inviolable natural laws. The universe is observable and understandable. The universe is governed by mathematically precise laws. None of these assumptions can be proved by experiment. In a sense, science is not scientific.

A recent BBC broadcast forum: n Questioner: How do you know that physical reality

A recent BBC broadcast forum: n Questioner: How do you know that physical reality is all there is: that there is no God? n Response of a vehement materialist (after much prodding): I simply believe it to be true. n Questioner: Well, now we at least have it out on the table! n In other words, the strongest argument I have that physical reality is “all there is” is that I believe physical reality is “all there is. ”

Materialism is Patently False Because…. n The universe was created. n Life was created.

Materialism is Patently False Because…. n The universe was created. n Life was created. n The Anthropic Principle. The universe is ridiculously well fine-tuned for us to exist. n Even the materialist believes in good and evil (for example, religion is evil) n The Bible is inspired by God.

If the Materialist is right, then… n Religious thought is absolute nonsense. Prayer is

If the Materialist is right, then… n Religious thought is absolute nonsense. Prayer is chemical moving around in your brain. n Art, Literature, Music have no intrinsic value. n Justice is a meaningless word. n Human rights have no basis. n Etc….

Naturalism is a Dangerous (Evil? ) Philosophy If the naturalist is right then: n

Naturalism is a Dangerous (Evil? ) Philosophy If the naturalist is right then: n Good and evil are meaningless ideas. n Stealing is not wrong. n Any kind of sexual behavior as right or wrong as any other. n There is nothing evil about genocide. n Racism is not only acceptable, it is supported.

If the Materialist is Right Then… n Violence and greed are acceptable behavior. n

If the Materialist is Right Then… n Violence and greed are acceptable behavior. n Justice is a meaningless construct. n The words “ought and should” are meaningless. n There is no such thing as sin or wrong behavior. n Consider the only societies in human history controlled by atheists. USSR, Communist China, Khmer Rouge….

Science and the Bible Delos B. Mc. Kown: “Christianity is scientifically unsupported and probably

Science and the Bible Delos B. Mc. Kown: “Christianity is scientifically unsupported and probably insupportable, philosophically suspect at best and disreputable at worst, and historically fraudulent. ”

Papyrus Ebers

Papyrus Ebers

The Ebers Papyrus: “To prevent hair from turning gray, anoint it with the blood

The Ebers Papyrus: “To prevent hair from turning gray, anoint it with the blood of a calf which has been boiled in oil or with the fat of a rattlesnake. ” “A mixture of six fats, namely those of the horse, the hippopotamus, the crocodile, the cat, the snake and the ibex. . to prevent hair loss. ”

Drugs of Choice in Papyrus Ebers: • • • Lizards blood Swine’s teeth Putrid

Drugs of Choice in Papyrus Ebers: • • • Lizards blood Swine’s teeth Putrid meat Moisture from Pigs’ ears Excreta from animals including human beings, donkeys, antelope, dogs, cats and flies

“I will not bring on you any of these diseases. . . ” Exodus

“I will not bring on you any of these diseases. . . ” Exodus 15: 26 “The pig. . . is unclean for you. . . those that walk on their paws. . . the weasel, the rat. . . are unclean for you. ” Leviticus 11

“The sting of a hornet is healed by the house-fly, crushed and applied to

“The sting of a hornet is healed by the house-fly, crushed and applied to the wound. ” “The gnat, feeble creature, taking in food but never secreting it is a specific against the poison of the viper. ” An ancient Hebrew medical manuscript.

“Whoever touches the dead body of anyone will be unclean for seven days. He

“Whoever touches the dead body of anyone will be unclean for seven days. He must purify himself with the water on the third and seventh day. . . take some hyssop, dip it in the water and sprinkle the tent and furnishings and the people who were there. ” Numbers 19

Semelweiss

Semelweiss

Death Rate falls from 18% to 0. 5%

Death Rate falls from 18% to 0. 5%

Vienna, 1847 • In maternity wards one out of every six women dies. •

Vienna, 1847 • In maternity wards one out of every six women dies. • Obstetricians ascribe deaths to constipation, fear and poisonous air.

Thymol

Thymol

Leviticus 13: 46 “As long as he has the infection he remains unclean. He

Leviticus 13: 46 “As long as he has the infection he remains unclean. He must live alone; he must live outside the camp. ” Quarantine for infectious disease

LEPROSY • Killed millions of people in Europe and around the world for thousands

LEPROSY • Killed millions of people in Europe and around the world for thousands of years. • “Fear of all other diseases taken together can hardly be compared to the terror spread by leprosy. ” —Dr. George Rosen

Leprosy

Leprosy

MEDICAL COMMUNITY HAD NO ANSWERS They taught that it was brought on by eating

MEDICAL COMMUNITY HAD NO ANSWERS They taught that it was brought on by eating hot food, pepper, garlic and the meat of diseased hogs. Other physicians said it was caused by a malign conjunction of the planets. Leviticus 13: 46 “As long as he has the infection he remains unclean. He must live alone; he must live outside the camp. ”

The life is in the blood Leviticus 17: 14 “… the life of every

The life is in the blood Leviticus 17: 14 “… the life of every creature is in its blood. That is why I have said to the Israelites, ‘You must not eat the blood of any creature, because the life of every creature is its blood; anyone who eats it must be cut off. ’ ”

Bloodletting The most common medical practice in 1700 s and 1800 s

Bloodletting The most common medical practice in 1700 s and 1800 s

Bloodletting Instruments from 1800 s 1693). George Tiemann & Co. American armamentarium

Bloodletting Instruments from 1800 s 1693). George Tiemann & Co. American armamentarium

“For the generations to come, every male among you who is eight days old

“For the generations to come, every male among you who is eight days old must be circumcised. . . ” Genesis 17: 12 Vitamin K Prothrombrin: a clotting protein.

Clotting Protein Peaks on Day Eight Available Prothrombin

Clotting Protein Peaks on Day Eight Available Prothrombin

Abraham’s Experiment Day Circumcised Number of Hebrew Boys Number of Deaths 1 823 4

Abraham’s Experiment Day Circumcised Number of Hebrew Boys Number of Deaths 1 823 4 3 759 6 5 693 8 7 855 3 9 770 2 11 698 4

The Bible and Cosmology “The flood was produced by a union of the male

The Bible and Cosmology “The flood was produced by a union of the male waters, which are above the firmament, and the female waters issuing from the earth. The upper waters rushed through the space left when God removed two stars out of the constellation Pleaides. Afterward, to put a stop to the flood, God had to transfer two stars from the constellation of the Bear to the constellation of the Pleaides. That is why the Bear runs after the Pleaides. She wants her children back, but they will be restored to her only in the future world. ” —A Jewish manuscript of New Testament times.

“He spreads out the northern skies over empty space; He suspends the earth over

“He spreads out the northern skies over empty space; He suspends the earth over nothing” Job 26: 8 The water cycle. . . Job 36: 27, Amos 5: 8

Science and World Religions n Is this (the seemingly unexplainable scientific wisdom of the

Science and World Religions n Is this (the seemingly unexplainable scientific wisdom of the Old Testament) the exception or the rule? n What is the cosmology/view of the natural world of other major world religions?

Cosmology and World Religions

Cosmology and World Religions

HINDUISM n The principle religion of India. n Approximately 900, 000 adherents. n Began

HINDUISM n The principle religion of India. n Approximately 900, 000 adherents. n Began as animism/polytheism n Evolved into polytheism/pantheism n Syncretistic. Hinduism is not really a single religion. Ganesh: a Hindu deity God of wisdom and intellect

Hinduism and Time n n Time is cyclic. There is a “wheel of time.

Hinduism and Time n n Time is cyclic. There is a “wheel of time. ” World is cyclically created by Brahma, sustained by Vishnu and destroyed by Shiva. Creative/destructive cycles called Yugas A universe lasts for one Brahma day = 4, 320, 000 years n n Satya yuga (Krita yuga): - 1, 728, 000 Human years (already past) Treta yuga: - 1, 296, 000 Human years (already past) Dwapar yuga: - 864, 000 Human years (already past) Kali yuga: - 432, 000 Human years (5, 110 years have passed; 426, 890 years remain). Kaliyuga started in 3, 102 B. C. ; CE 2008 corresponds to

Hindism and Time (cont) n One full cycle = 100 “Brahma years” 311 trillion

Hindism and Time (cont) n One full cycle = 100 “Brahma years” 311 trillion years. n Then Brahma himself dies and is reborn

Hindu Cosmology n n Many different levels of heavens/worlds/hells These levels are horizontal (flat)

Hindu Cosmology n n Many different levels of heavens/worlds/hells These levels are horizontal (flat) The physical world is illusory and it is evil Lower levels are even more evil than ours

Angkor Wat: Mount Meru

Angkor Wat: Mount Meru

Popular Hindu Cosmology The earth is on the back of four elephants standing on

Popular Hindu Cosmology The earth is on the back of four elephants standing on top of a turtle, encircled by a serpent, swimming in a sea of milk… The Sutras The physical world is an illusion maya.

Hindu Cosmology

Hindu Cosmology

Jainism n Founder: Mahavira ~600 -540 BC n Last of 24 gurus. Parshva 750

Jainism n Founder: Mahavira ~600 -540 BC n Last of 24 gurus. Parshva 750 BC? n Location: India mostly. n About 5, 000 practitioners n A reaction to worldly, priestly Hinduism

Jaina Cosmology n n The Svastika a symbol of samsara (rebirth) n n n

Jaina Cosmology n n The Svastika a symbol of samsara (rebirth) n n n The universe has existed forever. A cyclic wheel of time. Utsarpini: A period of progressive happiness and purity. Time spans ages and sizes of people get much larger. Avsarpini: A period of progressive sorrow and immorality. Time spans, ages and sizes of people get much smaller. Great teachers in the past lived for millions or billions of years and were thousands of meters tall. In the future, people will be even less religious, smaller and live shorter time. An extremely complicated cosmology with multiple levels of worlds/heavens.

Buddhism n Principle religion of Korea, Japan, Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, Burma Sri Lanka and

Buddhism n Principle religion of Korea, Japan, Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, Burma Sri Lanka and China? n 400, 000 adherents. n A reaction against the rigid priestly system of Hinduism. n Pantheistic, or arguably non-theistic. A philosophy, a psychology.

Buddhist Cosmology n Like Jaina, Hinduism, a vertical cosmology, with multiple levels/earths/heavens/lokahs n 31

Buddhist Cosmology n Like Jaina, Hinduism, a vertical cosmology, with multiple levels/earths/heavens/lokahs n 31 planes of existence, each with 3 realms. n Higher ones more blissful, lower ones more like hell. n Endless cycle of time Cosmic wheel.

Buddhist Cosmology

Buddhist Cosmology

Borodbur in Indonesia: A Buddhist concept of the world

Borodbur in Indonesia: A Buddhist concept of the world

Questions: Can we take the Eastern ideas about cosmology seriously in the context of

Questions: Can we take the Eastern ideas about cosmology seriously in the context of modern science? How does this compare to biblical cosmology and ideas about creation?

Islamic Cosmology n The cosmology of Islam is not unlike that of the Bible,

Islamic Cosmology n The cosmology of Islam is not unlike that of the Bible, except that it takes incorrect popular ideas more literally. n The main difference is that the Qur’an is not inspired, so the statements contained in the Muslim scripture has rather obvious scientific problems.

Scientific Errors in the Qur’an 23: 14—Creation from the clot of blood “Then we

Scientific Errors in the Qur’an 23: 14—Creation from the clot of blood “Then we made the sperm into a clot of congealed blood; then from that clot we made a lump; and we made out of that lump bones and clothed the bones with flesh. ” 18: 86—Traveling west… “… till, when he reached the setting-place of the sun, he found it setting in a muddy spring. ”

Scientific errors in Qur’an (II) 21: 33—Sun and stars orbit the earth 41: 12

Scientific errors in Qur’an (II) 21: 33—Sun and stars orbit the earth 41: 12 7 --“heavens”, stars, comets in “lowest heaven 34: 9, 52: 44—Piece of sky falls and kills someone 36: 4, 23: 14 --Man deposits child into the mother