IS 4800 Empirical Research Methods for Information Science

IS 4800 Empirical Research Methods for Information Science Class Notes January 18 and 20, 2012 Instructor: Prof. Carole Hafner, 446 WVH hafner@ccs. neu. edu Tel: 617 -373 -5116 Course Web site: www. ccs. neu. edu/course/is 4800 sp 12/

Research with Human Subjects Ethical issues Confidentiality & Identification NU IRB & Student projects Eligibility and Recruitment Compensation Deception

Ethical Principles in Human Subjects Research - History Nazi Experiments 1939 -1945 - Thousands of ‘subjects’ Tuskegee Syphilis Study of 616 black males by US Public Health Svc, 1930’s – 1972 No consent (‘special treatment’) No treatment – just observation US Govt Radiation Experiments 1944 -1974 – exposed thousands to radiation NY Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital Study 1963 – injected live cancer cells into subjects Improper (oral only) consent, deception NY Willowbrook School Study 1956 -70 – infected mentally retarded children with hepatitis (“would get it anyway”) See: http: //osp. ua. edu/site/PRCO_History. html

Stanley Milgram Experiment 1963 - Obedience (65% full compliance)

Replicated by Jerry Burger of Santa Clara University

Stanford Prison Experiment 1971 – study power & roles

Ethical Principles in Human Subjects Research - History 1947: Nuremberg Code 1948: Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by UN 1953: 1 ST NIH Federal Policy 1964: Declaration of Helsinki (Int’l) 1974: 1 st Federal legal protection 1979: Belmont report – ‘cornerstone’ of federal ethical principles 1991: ‘Common Rule’ – federal guidelines for most agencies (DHHS, NSF, NASA, Defense, etc) 7

The Ten Points of the Nuremberg Code 1. Participation of the subjects must be totally voluntary, and the subjects should have the capacity to give consent to participate. Further, the subjects should be fully informed of the purposes, nature, and duration of the experiment. 2. The research should yield results that are useful to society and that cannot be obtained in any other way 3. The research should have a sound footing in animal research and be based on the natural history of the problem under study 4. Steps should be taken in the research to avoid unnecessary physical or psychological harm to subjects

5. Research should not be conducted if there is reason to believe that death or disability will occur to the subjects 6. The risk involved in the research should be proportional to the benefits to be obtained from the results 7. Proper plans should be made and facilities provided to protect the subject against harm 8. Research should be conducted by highly qualified scientists only

9. The subject should have the freedom to withdraw from the experiment at any time if he or she has reached the conclusion that continuing in the experiment is not possible 10. The researcher must be prepared to discontinue the experiment if it becomes evident to the researcher that continuing the research will be harmful to the subjects

The Belmont Report 1979 Respect for persons Beneficience Justice Included in all subsequent federal guidelines http: //ohsr. od. nih. gov/guidelines/belmont. html

Terminology Federal guidelines still refer to human participants as “subjects” Some people object to this term 12

Respect for Persons Individuals should be treated as autonomous agents Choice whether to participate Informed consent Persons with diminished autonomy may need special protections Who?

Beneficience Maximize benefits to society, science Minimize possible harm to subjects The benefits must outweigh risks of harm

Justice Individual justice: subjects should get some potential benefit or compensation Benefits of research supported by public funds should be available to all classes Distributive justice: applies in selecting subjects IT example might be evaluation of a system to assess potential injury from prolonged use Carpal tunnel syndrome Eyestrain

During the 19 th and early 20 th centuries the burdens of serving as research subjects fell largely upon poor ward patients, while the benefits of improved medical care flowed primarily to private patients. Subsequently, the exploitation of unwilling prisoners as research subjects in Nazi concentration camps was condemned as a particularly flagrant injustice. In this country, in the 1940 s, the Tuskegee syphilis study used disadvantaged, rural black men to study the untreated course of a disease that is by no means confined to that population. These subjects were deprived of demonstrably effective treatment in order not to interrupt the project, long after such treatment became available. * Added reading for this week on that study

The same holds true for U. S. -sponsored research conducted in other countries. If people in developing countries are recruited as participants in research, two conditions must be fulfilled to meet the requirements of the distributive conception of justice: • The design and determination of acceptable risk-benefit ratios must be evaluated with the same standards as when such research is carried out in the United States. • Beneficiaries of the research outcomes must include people in the developing countries where the research is conducted, as well as in the United States. National Academies Press, 1994

Research with Human Subjects Ethical issues Confidentiality & Privacy Eligibility Recruiting Compensation NU IRB & Student projects

Protection of Privacy & Confidentiality Privacy Having control over the extent, timing and circumstances of sharing oneself with others. Confidentiality the treatment of information an individual has disclosed in a relationship of trust

Privacy & Confidentiality How related to 3 ethical principles? How to ensure?

Summary of APA Ethical Guidelines Research proposals submitted to an IRB must be accurate Informed consent shall fully inform participants of the nature and requirements for participation Informed consent shall fully inform participants of the parameters of the study Special steps must be taken to protect research participants in a subordinate position

Informed consent may be waived under certain circumstances Excessive inducements for participation are to be avoided Deception is allowed if no other alternative is available Participants must be given timely feedback about the nature, results, and conclusions of the research

Informed Consent pg 1/10 Consent to Participate in a Research Study We are inviting you to take part in a research study. This form will tell you about the study, but the researcher will explain it to you first. You may ask this person any questions that you have. When you are ready to make a decision, you may tell the researcher if you want to participate or not. You do not have to participate if you do not want to. If you decide to participate, the researcher will ask you to sign this statement and will give you a copy to keep.

Informed Consent Pg 2/10 Why am I being asked to take part in this research study? You are being asked to participate in this study because you are an English speaking adult. Why are you doing this research study? The purpose of this research is to learn how to build new computer systems that will assist people in making positive changes in their health behavior.

Informed Consent pg 3/10 What will I be asked to do? If you decide to take part in this study, we will have you sit at a desk with computer, fill out questionnaires on your background and your current mood, and then answer a series of simple math problems, all on the computer. You may be asked to interact with an animated computer character. While you are doing all of this you will wear a small clip on one of your fingers, which monitors your heart rate, and straps on two other fingers to monitor your skin conductivity. The researcher will show you how to use the computer system, but during the tests the researcher will leave the room. Your activity during the test may be videotaped, but you may request that the tape segment be erased after we analyze it.

Informed Consent pg 4/10 Where will this take place and how much of my time will it take? The study will take place in the Human-Computer Interaction Laboratory here at Northeastern University and it will take approximately one hour.

Informed Consent pg 5/10 Will there be any risk or discomfort to me? You will give up approximately one hour of your time in the laboratory. The experiment involves your answering a series of simple math problems on a computer. There is a possibility that you may feel some emotional distress or discomfort due to your performance on this test. Also, there is a possibility that some of the questions you will be asked might make you feel uncomfortable. In that case, you are free to refuse answering those questions. In addition, the study may have risks that are not now known. You will be told if new information becomes available that may affect your willingness to participate.

Informed Consent pg 6/10 Will I benefit by being in this research? You will receive no direct benefit from your participation in this study. However, your participation may help the investigators learn to build new computer systems that will help people make healthy changes in their behavior.

Informed Consent pg 7/10 Who will see the information about me? Information from this study may be used for research purposes and may be published; however, your name will not be used in any publications. Note that all videotapes will be stored in a locked cabinet, accessible only to the researchers, and will be destroyed at the end of the study unless you give explicit permission for them to be used for teaching purposes. In rare instances, authorized people may request to see research information about you and other people in this study. This is done only to be sure that the research is done properly. We would only permit people who are authorized by organizations such as Northeastern University or the federal government to see this information.

Informed Consent pg 8/10 If I don’t want to take part in the study, what choices do I have? You have the option to not participate in the study. What will happen if I suffer any harm from this research? No special arrangements will be made for compensation or for payment for treatment solely because of your participation in this research. Can I stop my participation in this study? Your participation in this research is completely voluntary. You do not have to participate if you do not want to. Even if you begin the study, you may quit at any time. If you do not participate or if you decide to quit, you will not lose any rights, benefits, or services that you would otherwise have.

Informed Consent pg 9/10 Who can I contact if I have questions or problems? If you have questions or concerns at any time, or if you need to report an injury while participating in this research, contact TIMOTHY BICKMORE at (617) 373 -5477. Who can I contact about my rights as a participant? If you have any questions about your rights as a participant, you may contact Nan C. Regina, Coordinator, Human Subjects Research Protection, Division of Research Integrity, 413 Lake Hall, Northeastern University Boston, MA 02115 tel. 617 -373 -7570. You may call anonymously if you wish.

Informed Consent pg 10/10 Will I be paid for my participation? You will be paid $10 for participating in this laboratory session. Will it cost me anything to participate? There are no costs to you for participating in this research study. Is there anything else I need to know? You must be at least 18 years old to participate. You will be one of approximately 350 subjects to be asked to participate in this study. I agree to take part in this research. Signature _________ Date_______

Top 10 Unethical Psychological Experiments http: //listverse. com/2008/09/07/top-10 -unethical-psychological-experiments/

Exercise What are the issues? Middlemist, Knowles, and Matter (1976) conducted a study investigating whether or not invasions of personal space are physiologically as well as psychologically arousing. The experiment was run in a men’s lavatory, in which the investigators closed off one or another urinal. Participants were forced to urinate either in the urinal next to a male confederate of the experimenter or in the urinal one away from the confederate. A second confederate positioned in a toilet stall adjacent to the urinals observed the subjects via periscope and recorded the latency to onset of urination and its duration.

Exercise What are the issues? In a simulation study of plea bargaining, Gregory, Mowen, and Linder (1978) gave false feedback to undergraduate participants. Participants sat in a waiting room for an experiment to begin. In one condition, another participant who had just been in the experiment (actually a confederate of the experimenter) told the waiting participant that most of the answers to the test that would be taken are “B. ” In a secondition, no information was given to the waiting participant. After the participant took the test, the experimenter accused the participant of cheating and said that it was a serious matter that would have to be presented to a review board for action. Participants were led to believe that the consequences of the accused cheating were severe. The participants were told that if they admitted cheating they would simply lose credit for participating in the experiment.

Research with Human Subjects Ethical issues Confidentiality & Identification NU IRB & Student projects Eligibility Recruiting Compensation

Northeastern University IRB Division of Research Integrity Application process takes 2 -8 weeks http: //www. northeastern. edu/research_integrity/human_subjects/review_board/

NU Guidelines for Informed Consent Statement that study involves research. Explanation of the purpose of study. Expected duration of subject’s participation. Description of procedures. Identification of any experimental procedures. Any foreseeable risks or discomforts. Any benefits that may be reasonably expected (including compensation). Any alternatives to participation. Confidentiality of records. If more than minimal risk: compensation and/or medical treatment available. Whom to contact for more information. Participation is voluntary. No penalty for refusal or withdrawal.

NU Guidelines for Student Research Projects Involving Human Subjects If… Intent is to gain practice in the process of doing research Study is “small” Results will not be published Participants are not identified Subject matter is “benign” No (active) deception Then, can proceed without IRB approval. But, Must submit proposal to instructor first. Must obtain verbal consent. Must give instructor as point of contact if any questions.

Example Verbal Consent “Hi, I’m conducting a survey to find out what people think about putting computers in the Curry center food court. I’d like to ask you some questions and it will just take 5 minutes. It’s for a course I’m taking in Research Methods from Prof. Timothy Bickmore in the College of Computer and Information Science. Your participation is voluntary and you can stop anytime and ask that your data not be used. Can you help me out with this? ”

Research with Human Subjects Ethical issues Confidentiality & Identification NU IRB & Student projects Eligibility and Recruiting Compensation

Eligibility You should state precisely what your study population consists of. “Eligibility criteria” (aka “inclusion criteria”) Set of tests that participants must pass to be used in your study e. g. , right-handed males between the ages of 18 and 35 Exclusion criteria Additional tests usually to identify candidate subjects for whom participation would be harmful, or who are expected to have low adherence to study protocols. Another common take: Eligibility criteria = what you put on recruitment ads Exclusion criteria = additional screening performed

Eligibility & Recruitment Eligibility criteria and recruitment method must match How are you going to find subjects? How are you going to find enough?

Eligibility & Recruitment Example Study: performance gains with new word processor after 2 weeks of use. Eligibility criteria Administrative assistants in Big. Bucks, Inc. Have worked at BBI for more than a year. Currently use Word. Wize software. Exclusion criteria Typing rate < 25 wpm.

Eligibility & Recruitment Example Recruit via email to admins in company. Past response rate to email recruitment = 35% Estimate 10% of admins have been at BBI for less than a year. Estimate 80% of admins use Word. Wize. Estimate 90% of admins type at > 25 wpm. Estimate 90% retention. Want to base conclusions on 10 subjects. How many admins do we need to email?

Research with Human Subjects Ethical issues Confidentiality & Identification NU IRB & Student projects Eligibility and Recruiting Compensation Deception

Compensation $$$ Gift certificate for… Extra credit Altruism Fun “Hallway methodology” used in Olympic Message System – workers asked to find their name in the system Free coffee and doughnuts to Nth person who successfully performed a certain task Announce winners via email to department What is IRB’s primary concern with compensation?

Research with Human Subjects Ethical issues Confidentiality & Identification NU IRB & Student projects Eligibility and Recruiting Compensation Deception

Deception Examples? Milgram experiment “Wizard of Oz” studies

Active Deception in Research Misrepresentation of the purpose of the research False statements about the identity of the researcher False promises made to the participant Violations of a promise of anonymity Misleading statements about equipment and procedures

Active Deception, cont’d Use of pseudosubjects (or “pseudocomputers”) False diagnoses and other reports False interaction Using placebos or secret administration of drugs Misleading settings and behavior of the experimenter

Passive Deception in Research Doing unrecognized conditioning Provoking and secretly recording negative behavior of participants Making concealed observations Doing unrecognized participant observation Using projective techniques and other personality tests

Problems Involved in Using Deception? Deceived participants act differently from nondeceived participants Deceived participants may feel duped and experience a loss of self-esteem Participants may find out something negative about themselves Deception may violate requirements of informed consent Deceived participants may be suspicious of future research participation

Solutions to the Problems of Deception Role Playing Obtaining Prior Consent to be Deceived Fully informed participants are asked to act as though they were exposed to an experimental treatment Participants told that some experiments may involve deception Only those agreeing to deception are used in deception research Debriefing Inform participants of deception AFTER participation

Effective Debriefing Make a full disclosure of purposes of research Give a complete description of and justification for the deception Discuss the problem of perseverance Provide a convincing argument for the need for deception

Demonstrate bogus equipment, or show participants that actual responses were never seen by the experimenter Have participants observe a subsequent session showing deception in action Make the individual an active participant in the research (e. g. , a confederate)