Irrigation Efficiency and Uniformity R Troy Peters Ph

  • Slides: 102
Download presentation
Irrigation Efficiency and Uniformity R. Troy Peters, Ph. D, PE

Irrigation Efficiency and Uniformity R. Troy Peters, Ph. D, PE

Average Annual Rainfall

Average Annual Rainfall

USGS 1995 Consumptive Use Numbers

USGS 1995 Consumptive Use Numbers

% Consumptive Use of Renewable Supply • • • Entire Colorado River Basin California

% Consumptive Use of Renewable Supply • • • Entire Colorado River Basin California – Nevada Montana – Wyoming – Nebraska Entire Mississippi River Basin Washington – Oregon – Idaho 103% 35% 30% 9% 4% • 80% of WA water withdrawals is for Agriculture • Greater % of consumptive use is irrigation

Irrigated Acres

Irrigated Acres

Market Value of Ag. Products Sold

Market Value of Ag. Products Sold

Washington Irrigation • • 1. 8 M irrigated acres 80% sprinkler, 15% surface (gravity),

Washington Irrigation • • 1. 8 M irrigated acres 80% sprinkler, 15% surface (gravity), 5% drip 75% surface water, 25% groundwater Today irrigators apply ¾ the amount of water that they were in the early 1970’s and getting much better yields • Recently (2002) the total sprinkler irrigated acres in the U. S. surpassed surface irrigated acres 2003 Census of Agriculture. Farm and Ranch Irrigation Survey

Courtesy Michael Dukes Univ. Florida

Courtesy Michael Dukes Univ. Florida

Courtesy Michael Dukes Univ. Florida

Courtesy Michael Dukes Univ. Florida

Courtesy Michael Dukes Univ. Florida

Courtesy Michael Dukes Univ. Florida

Courtesy Michael Dukes Univ. Florida

Courtesy Michael Dukes Univ. Florida

Courtesy Michael Dukes Univ. Florida

Courtesy Michael Dukes Univ. Florida

Christiansen Coefficient of Uniformity where: CU = coefficient of uniformity z = individual catch

Christiansen Coefficient of Uniformity where: CU = coefficient of uniformity z = individual catch (in) m = average catch (in)

DU= 43. 8%; CU=58. 8%

DU= 43. 8%; CU=58. 8%

DU = 76. 4%; CU = 84. 3%

DU = 76. 4%; CU = 84. 3%

Uniformity • • Better yields Improved crop quality (more uniform) Less water used =

Uniformity • • Better yields Improved crop quality (more uniform) Less water used = $$ savings Less lost fertilizers Less mess Better for the environment Chemigate or fertigate with confidence

Improve Uniformity • Run at pressure and flow rate that the sprinkler package was

Improve Uniformity • Run at pressure and flow rate that the sprinkler package was designed for. • Keep correct nozzle sizes in correct position – Keep your sprinkler chart. Double check it. • More sprinkler overlap – closer spacing – larger wetted diameter (sprinkler throw distance) • Replace nozzles every 3 -5 years (inexpensive) • Rotator/Wobblers are better, but must be rotating. Fix leaks. Fix and unplug heads.

Center Pivot Uniformity • Replace sprinklers about every 7 years. • Use pressure regulators

Center Pivot Uniformity • Replace sprinklers about every 7 years. • Use pressure regulators on sloping fields (depends on operating pressure; > 10 -15 ft elevation difference). • Run at the pressure and flow rate specified in the nozzle package. If pressure or flow rate changes, renozzle. • End gun and cornering system uniformity is typically poor.

Irrigating Potatoes • Large yield & quality losses caused by water stress in all

Irrigating Potatoes • Large yield & quality losses caused by water stress in all stages of development • Deficit irrigating is not economically justified on potatoes. • Large differences in profitability on potato production due solely to irrigation management

Irrigation Efficiency

Irrigation Efficiency

Irrigation Efficiency Defined

Irrigation Efficiency Defined

Forms of Water Loss • • • Wind Drift Droplet Evaporation from Foliage Evaporation

Forms of Water Loss • • • Wind Drift Droplet Evaporation from Foliage Evaporation from Soil Surface Runoff Deep Percolation – Overwatering – Non Uniformity

Runoff

Runoff

Irrigation Efficiencies Highly dependant on: – System Design – Management – Maintenance – Weather

Irrigation Efficiencies Highly dependant on: – System Design – Management – Maintenance – Weather – Operating Conditions

Irrigation Efficiencies

Irrigation Efficiencies

Irrigation Efficiencies

Irrigation Efficiencies

Improve Efficiencies By: • Get a good design • Maintain your system – Replace

Improve Efficiencies By: • Get a good design • Maintain your system – Replace worn nozzles – Fix leaky pipes • Improve management – Irrigation Scheduling – Operate at designed pressure and flow – Irrigate on calm cool days – Increase Application Rate

Why Should I Care? • Even if the water is free, poor irrigation management

Why Should I Care? • Even if the water is free, poor irrigation management has very real costs • Yields and quality are very strongly correlated with irrigation water management • Expensive fertilizers washed out • Environmental damage

cabbage Marketable Yields for Various Vegetable Crops rape carrot tomato Imtiyaz, M. , N.

cabbage Marketable Yields for Various Vegetable Crops rape carrot tomato Imtiyaz, M. , N. P. Mgadla, B. Chepete, and S. K. Manase. 2000. Response of six vegetable crops to irrigation schedules. Agricultural Water Management. 45(3): 331 -342 spinach onion

Over-Irrigating • Increased incidence of plant diseases – Blights, molds, rots, wilts • Reduced

Over-Irrigating • Increased incidence of plant diseases – Blights, molds, rots, wilts • Reduced storability • Difficulty with harvesting and cultural operations • Less oxygen in root zone, yield loss • Additional labor, pumping, fertilizer costs

Water Costs • Assumptions: – – 130 acres 100 ft deep well Center Pivot

Water Costs • Assumptions: – – 130 acres 100 ft deep well Center Pivot (40 psi required at pump) 56% irrigation efficiency (85% application efficiency, 30% loss to deep percolation, additional water for poor uniformity) – Growing corn (seasonal water req’d: 36 in) – $0. 04/k. W-hr • Unnecessary electric power costs paid $3, 200 (compared to 80% efficiency)

Pumping Costs • $1. 29/acre-in pumping costs • At 80% irrigation efficiency and 85%

Pumping Costs • $1. 29/acre-in pumping costs • At 80% irrigation efficiency and 85% uniformity $1. 90/acre-in of plant water requirements • About $250 to apply 1 inch to a ¼ mile pivot.

Fertilizer Losses • Assume: – – silt loam soil (2 in/ft), growing potatoes, 1.

Fertilizer Losses • Assume: – – silt loam soil (2 in/ft), growing potatoes, 1. 5 ft root zone at field capacity even concentration of fertilizer throughout profile and leached water • Over-irrigating 1 inch = about 14% of soluble fertilizers percolated out of the root zone. • Results in lost $, lower yield and potato quality

Benefits • Most things that decrease your irrigation costs also benefit the environment –

Benefits • Most things that decrease your irrigation costs also benefit the environment – More flow for fish, less dirty water returning to rivers – Less consumption of energy – Less fertilizer, pesticides in streams and groundwater – More carbon sequestration (takes CO 2 out of the air)

But Make Some Real Money! • Saving money small compared to the yield increases

But Make Some Real Money! • Saving money small compared to the yield increases and crop quality improvements common from improved irrigation water management.

Management

Management

Good Irrigation Scheduling

Good Irrigation Scheduling

Methods Used in Washington to Determine When to Irrigate

Methods Used in Washington to Determine When to Irrigate

Levels of Irrigation Scheduling • • Guessing / Same schedule all season Kicking the

Levels of Irrigation Scheduling • • Guessing / Same schedule all season Kicking the dirt / Looking at the plants Less profitable • Look and feel method using shovel or soil probe Checkbook method / ET (Ag. Weather. Net) Soil moisture monitoring Neutron probe + checkbook (consultant) Profitable growers Worst • • • especially cost effective for high value vegetable crops Best

2003 Census of Agriculture. Farm and Ranch Irrigation Survey

2003 Census of Agriculture. Farm and Ranch Irrigation Survey

Questions?

Questions?

Center Pivot Sprinkler Packages

Center Pivot Sprinkler Packages

Pivot Sprinkler Packages: The Goals • • High uniformity High efficiency Maintain soil structure

Pivot Sprinkler Packages: The Goals • • High uniformity High efficiency Maintain soil structure No ponding or runoff – good infiltration Low pressure (saves $$$) Low initial costs Long life

Sprinkler Packages Droplet Size Distribution • Large drops compared to small: – Higher efficiency

Sprinkler Packages Droplet Size Distribution • Large drops compared to small: – Higher efficiency – less surface area – Less wind distortion • Large drops break up soil surface structure (“don’t treat soil like dirt”) – Especially in heavier textured soils (silts and clays) • Small droplets better for bare soil • Large droplets better after full cover, hay • Higher pressure = smaller droplet size

What sprinkler package should I specify? (gpm/acre)

What sprinkler package should I specify? (gpm/acre)

Simple Unit Conversion 1 in/day = 18. 86 gpm/acre (use 19 to get close)

Simple Unit Conversion 1 in/day = 18. 86 gpm/acre (use 19 to get close) • Multiply maximum water use requirement in inches per day by 18. 86 gpm/acre. • Divide gpm/acre by 18. 86 to get in/day. Examples: 0. 2 in/day = 3. 8 gpm/acre 7. 5 gpm/acre = 0. 4 in/day

Dual Sprinkler Packages • Low flow package (4 -6 gpm/acre) good in spring –

Dual Sprinkler Packages • Low flow package (4 -6 gpm/acre) good in spring – Gentler on the soil – maintains soil structure, doesn’t cause surface sealing (easier for small seeds to break through surface crust – Not an issue on sandy soils (no need for dual packages) • Higher flow packages (6 -8. 5 gpm/acre) needed in summer – Required to keep up with higher crop water use rates during hot summer months

DUAL FLOW SPRINKLER PACKAGES NELSON 3 TN Dual Nozzle Clip Evapotranspiration (ET): net demand

DUAL FLOW SPRINKLER PACKAGES NELSON 3 TN Dual Nozzle Clip Evapotranspiration (ET): net demand that must be replenished to maintain available supply of water for crop production.

Height. . . The lower you go… • Higher efficiency (more of pumped water

Height. . . The lower you go… • Higher efficiency (more of pumped water gets to crop) • Less uniformity distortion by wind • Slightly poorer uniformity (less overlap) under low wind conditions • Smaller wetting pattern – possible infiltration problems • Lower pressure required (save $$ on pumping energy) • Poor uniformity when rotated into corn • Requires more drops/span

Pressure Regulators • Pressure changes = flow changes = poor uniformity Senninger Irrigation

Pressure Regulators • Pressure changes = flow changes = poor uniformity Senninger Irrigation

Pressure Regulators • Needed for: – Steeply sloped fields – If delivery pressure is

Pressure Regulators • Needed for: – Steeply sloped fields – If delivery pressure is highly variable – If end gun doesn’t have booster pump • 5 psi > regulated pressure required to work properly • Regulators cost money ~$8 -12/each – Would like to not use them if possible: flat fields, single source supply

Pressure Regulators Maximum elevation difference that will cause a 10% flow variation

Pressure Regulators Maximum elevation difference that will cause a 10% flow variation

Pumps and Energy

Pumps and Energy

Water and Power Pay for power (k. W) over time (hrs) = k. W-hr

Water and Power Pay for power (k. W) over time (hrs) = k. W-hr (KWH)

Centrifugal Pumps

Centrifugal Pumps

3 phase vs. Single phase • • • Power is generated in 3 phase

3 phase vs. Single phase • • • Power is generated in 3 phase is ideal for electric induction motors Higher starting torque More efficient Less expensive Smaller motor Simple and reliable (less vibration) 3 phase motors are more efficient at higher hp Necessary for pumps > 10 hp Not typically supplied to residences

Variable Frequency Drives • • Changes motor spin speed. AC→DC→AC Solid state. No moving

Variable Frequency Drives • • Changes motor spin speed. AC→DC→AC Solid state. No moving parts. Cost ↓ Quality ↑ Works with existing motor and pump. Can use a 3 -phase motor on single phase power source www. joliettech. com

Variable Frequency Drives • Power savings. – No burning up pressure across valves. –

Variable Frequency Drives • Power savings. – No burning up pressure across valves. – Soft starts – longer pump life • Produce heat that must be vented. • ~ $100/hp installed • Possible cost share from power company. (BPA) • Cost effective if flows vary widely and for long periods of time.

Cost Sharing • EQUIP – USDA, NRCS – Major efficiency upgrades, surface to sprinkler

Cost Sharing • EQUIP – USDA, NRCS – Major efficiency upgrades, surface to sprinkler • Conservation districts • Bonneville Power Administration – For energy saving projects. – Through electric utility provider. – SIS - $5/acre. Grower must get weekly report. – $0. 15/KWH saved or 70% of improvement, whichever is less. – Must verify energy savings

http: //irrigation. wsu. edu

http: //irrigation. wsu. edu

Chemigation

Chemigation

Chemigation General term that includes: • Fertigation • Herbigation • Insectigation • Fungigation •

Chemigation General term that includes: • Fertigation • Herbigation • Insectigation • Fungigation • Nematigation

Advantages of Chemigation • • Economics Timeliness Reduced soil compaction and crop damage Operator

Advantages of Chemigation • • Economics Timeliness Reduced soil compaction and crop damage Operator safety Disadvantages • High management (need to know algebra) • Additional equipment required

Calculating Injection Rates 1. Batch/Bulk Applications – Drip, Hand-line, Wheel-lines, Solid set 2. Continuous

Calculating Injection Rates 1. Batch/Bulk Applications – Drip, Hand-line, Wheel-lines, Solid set 2. Continuous Move Injections – Center pivots, Linear Moves, Travelers, Booms 3. Controlling water chemistry – Drip (algae/bacteria growth control, root intrusion)

Batch/Bulk Applications Timing is Key

Batch/Bulk Applications Timing is Key

Batch Applications – Herbicides and Insecticides • Apply during the last few minutes (follow

Batch Applications – Herbicides and Insecticides • Apply during the last few minutes (follow the label) – Fertilizers • Time to put the chemical in the active root zone, and so that the injection is finished before irrigation is done. Rate is less critical

Batch Injection Rates Applied Early in the Irrigation Cycle Drip Tape Soil 40% 30%

Batch Injection Rates Applied Early in the Irrigation Cycle Drip Tape Soil 40% 30% 20% 10% More danger of leaching.

Batch Injection Rates Applied Late in the Irrigation Cycle Drip Tape Soil Don’t leave

Batch Injection Rates Applied Late in the Irrigation Cycle Drip Tape Soil Don’t leave chemicals in the lines. 40% 30% 20% 10% Less danger of leaching.

Batch Application • Weight Method – Mix desired amount of material in a convenient

Batch Application • Weight Method – Mix desired amount of material in a convenient amount of water. – Inject until it is gone. – Injection rate set to limit irrigation line concentration and injection time. • Volume Method – Similar except applying a set volume.

Injection Rate Ic = Injection Rate (gpm) Vol = Volume of Chemical to inject

Injection Rate Ic = Injection Rate (gpm) Vol = Volume of Chemical to inject (gallons) T = Injection Time (min)

Question • Given: – Need 50 lbs/acre N – Mixture is 4. 7 lbs

Question • Given: – Need 50 lbs/acre N – Mixture is 4. 7 lbs N/gallon – Wheel-move: 60 ft between sets, 40 ft between sprinklers, 30 heads operating. – 24 hour sets • • How many gallons of liquid fertilizer needed? What is a good injection time period? What should we set the injection rate at? When should we start injecting?

Checking Maximum Solution Concentration in Lines (Will it corrode my lines? ) Cs =

Checking Maximum Solution Concentration in Lines (Will it corrode my lines? ) Cs = Solution Concentration in Irrigation Lines (%) Ic = Chemical Injection Rate (gal/min) Qw = Water Flow Rate (gal/min)

Question • Given: – Irrigation pipeline flow rate of 1000 gpm – Injecting 3

Question • Given: – Irrigation pipeline flow rate of 1000 gpm – Injecting 3 gpm – Maximum line concentration from the label is 2% • Are we underneath the maximum line concentration?

Continuous Move Injection Rate is Critical

Continuous Move Injection Rate is Critical

Calculate Injection Rate by Mass (given lb/acre specs) Ic Qw A C T =

Calculate Injection Rate by Mass (given lb/acre specs) Ic Qw A C T = = = Chemical Injection Rate (gal/min) Quantity of chemical to be applied (lb/acre) Area (acres) Concentration of injected solution (lb/gal) Injection Time (min)

Question • Given: – 100 acre pivot – Want to apply 20 lbs/acre N

Question • Given: – 100 acre pivot – Want to apply 20 lbs/acre N – Fertilizer is UAN 32 which has 2. 5 lb/gallon N – Takes 2000 min for full rotation • What is the injection rate (gpm)?

Calculate Injection Rate by Volume (given pint/acre specs) Ic Qv A T = =

Calculate Injection Rate by Volume (given pint/acre specs) Ic Qv A T = = Chemical Injection Rate (gal/min) Quantity of chemical to be applied (gal/acre) Area (acres) Injection Time (min)

Question • Given: – 125 acre pivot – 10 hour full rotation time –

Question • Given: – 125 acre pivot – 10 hour full rotation time – Want to apply 1 gallon/acre fungicide • What is the required injection rate? (gallons/hour)

Water Chemistry Control Goal is ppm water concentration

Water Chemistry Control Goal is ppm water concentration

Water Chemistry Control Ic Fw Cw P = = Chemical Injection Rate (gal/hr) Flow

Water Chemistry Control Ic Fw Cw P = = Chemical Injection Rate (gal/hr) Flow rate of the Irrigation water (gpm) Desired chemical concentration (ppm) Percentage of chemical in solution (%)

Question • Given: – Irrigation system flow rate of 1000 gpm – Need 5

Question • Given: – Irrigation system flow rate of 1000 gpm – Need 5 ppm chlorine in water to kill bugs – Using household bleach (5. 25% chlorine) • What is the required injection rate? (gallons/hour units on the pump settings)

Venturi Valves and other proportional rate injectors Tank mixture concentration is key

Venturi Valves and other proportional rate injectors Tank mixture concentration is key

Question Determining amount of solution for fixed ratio injectors Given: IR = 0. 571

Question Determining amount of solution for fixed ratio injectors Given: IR = 0. 571 gal/hr of bleach 1. Calculate total flow of irrigation system in one hour 100 gpm x 60 min/hr = 6000 gallons per hour 2. Calculate total gallons of solution to be injected (divide Step 1 by ratio) 6000 gph ÷ 100 = 60 gallons of solution 3. Mix the 0. 571 gallons of bleach with 60 gallons of water in the injection tank

Mixing Dry Chemicals Total Chemical to be Applied (How much dry chemical to mix

Mixing Dry Chemicals Total Chemical to be Applied (How much dry chemical to mix with water) Wt A Rm Pcnt = = Weight of chemical to be applied (lbs) Area (acres) Rate to apply by mass (lb/acre) Percent concentration in mix (%)

Mixing Dry Chemicals Minimum Volume for mixing dry (Minimum amount of water to use)

Mixing Dry Chemicals Minimum Volume for mixing dry (Minimum amount of water to use) Vmin = Minimum volume (gallons) Wt = Weight of chemical to be applied (lbs) S = Solubility of chemical (lb/gal)

Mixing Dry Chemicals Weight of dry to get ppm level Wt = Raw chemical

Mixing Dry Chemicals Weight of dry to get ppm level Wt = Raw chemical per 100 gallons of water (lbs) Ci = Desired concentration (ppm)

Calibration of Equipment • Small differences in injection rates make large differences in total

Calibration of Equipment • Small differences in injection rates make large differences in total amount of chemical applied - Insufficient or excessive ($$) application • • Calibration involves injecting water and checking the actual volume of water injected Set/check injector rate by injecting water for 1 minute