Iron limitation in SO waters and DMS emissions

  • Slides: 5
Download presentation
Iron limitation in SO waters and DMS emissions to the atmosphere S. Belviso (LSCE,

Iron limitation in SO waters and DMS emissions to the atmosphere S. Belviso (LSCE, Gif-sur-Yvette) Scientific background: 0 -65 m In the patch Outside the patch SOIREE DMS increased markedly after deliberated iron fertilisation of SO waters (Boyd et al. 2000) but the origin of the DMS enhancement is unclear The questions to be addressed experimentally during KEOPS: • How important are iron-mediated blooms for DMS production in SO waters? • Which biogeochemical processes are involved in DMS production in iron-mediated blooms?

Oxidation pathways of DMS in the atmosphere Wet Dry SO 2 OH NO 3

Oxidation pathways of DMS in the atmosphere Wet Dry SO 2 OH NO 3 DMS OH, H 2 O 2 Dry Wet SO 4 O 3 OH OH OH DMS aqueous DMSO Dry OH Wet Monthly distribution of volume weighted mean (VWM) concentration of methanesulfonate (MSA) in rain water samples from Kerguelen Island. Courtesy of Vagelis Baboukas (Univ. of Crete) MSA Dry Wet Port aux Français KEOPS 1 will take place during the late phase of the high DMS season Are iron-mediated blooms responsible for DMS production in SO waters in late summer? We will describe with high spatial resolution the sea surface DMS concentration

DMSP in the Kerguelen area during late summer Results from cruise ANTARES 2 (Feb.

DMSP in the Kerguelen area during late summer Results from cruise ANTARES 2 (Feb. 1994) Particulate DMSP in the top 50 m 36. 1 ± 6. 9 n. M 28. 2 ± 2. 2 n. M M 2 DMSP is the algal precursor of DMS During cruise ANTARES 2, particulate DMSP in the Plateau was twice higher than offshore. 18. 6 ± 1. 3 n. M During the KEOPS experiments we will: • describe with high spatial resolution the concentration of particulate DMSP in surface waters on the grid and along the transects • investigate the factors controlling the availability of particulate DMSP (algal taxonomy, nutritional status and growth limitation of phytoplankton communities) OBEX 1

The impact of grazing on the release to solution of DMSPp OBEX 2 •

The impact of grazing on the release to solution of DMSPp OBEX 2 • Microzooplankton and mesozooplankton grazing experiments using 55 Fe-radiolabelled nano- and microphytoplancton. -determination of the DMSPp-to- 55 Fe ratio of phytoplancton DMS(P)d release during grazing = DMSPp/ 55 Fe x 55 Fe release -determination of gross release rates of DMS(P) d (Christaki et al. 96) DMS(P)d release during grazing = net release + DMS(P) d loss rates On-deck incubation d. DMS(P) d /dt of < 0. 8µm seawater Demethylation of DMSPd Bact. Removal of DMS Photochemical removal of DMS

The impact of bacteria and solar radiation on the degradation of DMSPd and DMS:

The impact of bacteria and solar radiation on the degradation of DMSPd and DMS: OBEX 3 Effect of solar radiation: The experimental protocols are under discussion and will be tested during the June 2004 workshop in Banyuls/mer in the framework of the UVECO project Bacteria: According to the bacterial production, how much DMSPd is demethylated, how much DMSPd is cleaved to DMS, how much DMS is removed by bacteria? Short incubations of 0. 8 µm filtered water (in the dark) where specific inhibitors will be used (Glycine betaine GBT, dimethyldisulfide DMDS) GBT DMSPd products DMDS DMS products