IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Milano Universit VitaSalute San

  • Slides: 71
Download presentation
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Milano Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele Pharmacological pre-emptive strategies to reduce

IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Milano Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele Pharmacological pre-emptive strategies to reduce peri-operative risk: give me the magic bullet, please Speaker: Landoni G INTERCEPT 2009 S Donato Milanese, Milan, April 17 h 2009

MAGIC BULLETS TO REDUCE MORTALITY IN CARDIAC SURGERY z THERE ARE NO GUIDELINES z

MAGIC BULLETS TO REDUCE MORTALITY IN CARDIAC SURGERY z THERE ARE NO GUIDELINES z THERE IS NO CONSENSUS CONFERENCE z THERE IS NO LARGE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY ADEQUATELY POWERED TO SUGGEST A REDUCTION IN MORTALITY

AN OVERVIEW OF META-ANALYSIS z. PEXELIZUMAB z. LEVOSIMENDAN z. FENOLDOPAM z. VOLATILE AGENTS (Intercept

AN OVERVIEW OF META-ANALYSIS z. PEXELIZUMAB z. LEVOSIMENDAN z. FENOLDOPAM z. VOLATILE AGENTS (Intercept 2006)

AN OVERVIEW OF META-ANALYSIS z MAGIC BULLET z NNT TO PREVENT ONE DEATH z

AN OVERVIEW OF META-ANALYSIS z MAGIC BULLET z NNT TO PREVENT ONE DEATH z PEXELIZUMAB z LEVOSIMENDAN z FENOLDOPAM z VOLATILE AGENTS z 100 z 12 z 19 or 26 z 84

LEVOSIMENDAN 1

LEVOSIMENDAN 1

LEVOSIMENDAN 2

LEVOSIMENDAN 2

Description of the ten studies included in the meta-analysis. First author Journal Year Cardiac

Description of the ten studies included in the meta-analysis. First author Journal Year Cardiac surgery procedures Control Al-Shawaf J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2006 Elective CABG* Milrinone Alvarez 2005 Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2005 Cardiac surgery with CPB† Dobutamine Alvarez 2006 Rev Esp Cardiol 2006 Cardiac surgery with CPB† Dobutamine Barisin J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2004 OPCABG‡ Placebo De Hert 2007 Anesth Analg 2007 Elective cardiac surgery with CPB† Milrinone De Hert 2008 J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008 Cardiac surgery with CPB† Milrinone Husedzinovic Croat Med J OPCABG‡ Placebo Jarvela J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008 Aortic valve surgery Placebo Levin Rev Esp Cardiol 2008 CABG* with CPB† Dobutamine Tritapepe Br J Anaesth 2006 CABG* with CPB† Placebo * CABG: coronary artery bypass graft † CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass ‡ OPCABG: off-pump coronary artery bypass graft 2005

Number of patients and interventions of included studies. First author Time of administration Setting

Number of patients and interventions of included studies. First author Time of administration Setting Bolus dose Continuous infusion dose Length of infusion Al-Shawaf LCOS# 12 mg/kg 0. 1 -0. 2 mg/kg/min 24 hours Alvarez 2005 LCOS# 12 mg/kg 0. 2 mg/kg/min 24 hours Alvarez 2006 LCOS# 12 mg/kg 0. 2 mg/kg/min 24 hours Barisin Before surgery 12/24 mg/kg no no No bolus 0. 1 mg/kg/min 19+4 hours No bolus 0. 1 mg/kg/min 22+4 hours in the first group, 23+3 hours in the second one Husedzinovic Before surgery 12 mg/kg no no Jarvela After induction No bolus 0. 2 mg/kg/min 24 hours Levin LCOS# 10 mg/kg 0. 1 mg/kg/min 24 hours Tritapepe Before CPB† 24 mg/kg no no De Hert 2007 After CPB† De Hert 2008 First group : after induction of anesthesia Second group : after CPB† † CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass # LCOS: low cardiac output syndrome

Levosimendan and Mortality in Cardiac Surgery

Levosimendan and Mortality in Cardiac Surgery

Levosimendan and Mortality in Cardiac Surgery 711/235=4. 7% v 26/205=12. 7% 7 P=0. 007

Levosimendan and Mortality in Cardiac Surgery 711/235=4. 7% v 26/205=12. 7% 7 P=0. 007 7 NNT = 12

Levosimendan and Myocardial Infarction

Levosimendan and Myocardial Infarction

Evidence! LEVOSIMENDAN VS CONTROL Myocardial Infarction in cardiac surgery 72/183=1. 1% v 9/153=5. 9%

Evidence! LEVOSIMENDAN VS CONTROL Myocardial Infarction in cardiac surgery 72/183=1. 1% v 9/153=5. 9% 7 P=0. 04

Levosimendan and Acute Renal Failure NNT = 6

Levosimendan and Acute Renal Failure NNT = 6

LEVOSIMENDAN 2

LEVOSIMENDAN 2

ITACTA ONGOING RCTs TOPICS HOSPITALS PATIENTS GRANTS z VOLATILE ANESTHETICS z 4 200 AIFA

ITACTA ONGOING RCTs TOPICS HOSPITALS PATIENTS GRANTS z VOLATILE ANESTHETICS z 4 200 AIFA 2006 z FENOLDOPAM z 34 1. 000 MINISTRY 2008 z DESMOPRESSIN z 3 200 3 10 3 200 1. 000 150 z z z ESMOLOL LEVOSIMENDAN VALVOLE PERCUTANEE landoni. giovanni@hsr. it www. itacta. org z z z

AIM OF THE STUDY To evaluate the renoprotective action of fenoldopam in a selected

AIM OF THE STUDY To evaluate the renoprotective action of fenoldopam in a selected high-risk group of patients undergoing cardiac surgery

RESULTS Variables Fenoldopam N=40 ARF(25%Creatinine 17(42. 5%) 16(40. 0%) 0. 9 ARF(50% Creatinine increase),

RESULTS Variables Fenoldopam N=40 ARF(25%Creatinine 17(42. 5%) 16(40. 0%) 0. 9 ARF(50% Creatinine increase), n(%) 10(25%) 0. 8 Renal Replacement Therapy. , n(%) 4(10%) 0. 9 Exitus, n(%) 4(10%) 3(7. 5%) 0. 5 Transfusion, n(%) 21(56. 8) 18(51. 4) 0. 8 Post-operative inotropes, n(%) 27(67. 5) 26(65. 0) 0. 9 Post-operative hemolysis, n(%) 6(15) 1(2. 5) 0. 054 Mechanical ventilation hours 20. 5(11. 5 -77) 21(10. 5 -96) 0. 7 ICU stay, days 3(1 -6) 3(1 -8. 5) 0. 9 Hospital stay, days 13(7 -19) 10. 5(6 -20. 5) 0. 8 increase), n(%) z Post-operative data Dopamine N=40 p

Am J Kidney Dis. 2007; 4956 -68. IF 4. 4

Am J Kidney Dis. 2007; 4956 -68. IF 4. 4

Fenoldopam and Death in Critically ill patients 81/487(17%) versus 109/531 (21%) p=0. 01 NNT=26

Fenoldopam and Death in Critically ill patients 81/487(17%) versus 109/531 (21%) p=0. 01 NNT=26

Pooled estimates of risk for need for renal replacement therapy 34/526 (6%) versus 59/570

Pooled estimates of risk for need for renal replacement therapy 34/526 (6%) versus 59/570 (10%) p=0. 007 NNT=26

Fenoldopam and Death in Cardiovascular Surgery 28/503 (6%) versus 55/503 (11%) p=0. 002 NNT=19

Fenoldopam and Death in Cardiovascular Surgery 28/503 (6%) versus 55/503 (11%) p=0. 002 NNT=19

Fenoldopam and renal replacement therapy in cardiovascular surgery 30/528 (6%) versus 71/531 (13%) p<0.

Fenoldopam and renal replacement therapy in cardiovascular surgery 30/528 (6%) versus 71/531 (13%) p<0. 001 NNT=13

ITACTA ONGOING RCTs TOPICS HOSPITALS PATIENTS GRANTS z VOLATILE ANESTHETICS z 4 200 AIFA

ITACTA ONGOING RCTs TOPICS HOSPITALS PATIENTS GRANTS z VOLATILE ANESTHETICS z 4 200 AIFA 2006 z FENOLDOPAM z 34 1. 000 MINISTRY 2008 z DESMOPRESSIN z 3 200 3 10 3 200 1. 000 150 z z z ESMOLOL LEVOSIMENDAN VALVOLE PERCUTANEE landoni. giovanni@hsr. it www. itacta. org z z z

FENOLDOPAM E INSUFFICIENZA RENALE FENO-HSR

FENOLDOPAM E INSUFFICIENZA RENALE FENO-HSR

DESIGN • Fenoldopam vs placebo • randomized • double blind • multicenter (32 centers,

DESIGN • Fenoldopam vs placebo • randomized • double blind • multicenter (32 centers, 1000 patients)

Which patients? “R” (RIFLE) after cardiac surgery Serum creatinine increase by 50% or Urinary

Which patients? “R” (RIFLE) after cardiac surgery Serum creatinine increase by 50% or Urinary output <0, 5 ml/kg/h for 6 h Planned ICU stay > 24 hours

AIM OF THE STUDY Reduction of the need for renal replacement therapy From 10%

AIM OF THE STUDY Reduction of the need for renal replacement therapy From 10% to 5%

DESFLURANE versus PROPOFOL (fentanyl-based cardiac anesthesia)

DESFLURANE versus PROPOFOL (fentanyl-based cardiac anesthesia)

RCT (382 PATIENTS) OFF-PUMP CABG (112 PATIENTS) ON-PUMP CABG (150 PATIENTS) MITRAL SURGERY (120

RCT (382 PATIENTS) OFF-PUMP CABG (112 PATIENTS) ON-PUMP CABG (150 PATIENTS) MITRAL SURGERY (120 PATIENTS)

Peak TROPONIN I ng/ml OFF-PUMP CABG ON-PUMP CABG MITRAL SURGERY 1. 2 (0. 9

Peak TROPONIN I ng/ml OFF-PUMP CABG ON-PUMP CABG MITRAL SURGERY 1. 2 (0. 9 -1. 9) versus 2. 7 (2. 1 -4. 0) 2. 5 (1. 1 -5. 3) versus 5. 5 (2. 3 -9. 5) 11. 0 (7. 5 -17. 4) versus 11. 5 (6. 9 -18. 8) *P<0. 001 P=0. 7

Troponin I after OFF-PUMP CABG

Troponin I after OFF-PUMP CABG

Troponin I after CABG (CPB)

Troponin I after CABG (CPB)

Troponin I after MITRAL SURGERY

Troponin I after MITRAL SURGERY

Volatile Anesthetics

Volatile Anesthetics

META-ANALYSIS (cardiac anaesthesia) 4 22 randomized studies (15 CPB-CABG; 6 OP-CABG; 1 mitral valve

META-ANALYSIS (cardiac anaesthesia) 4 22 randomized studies (15 CPB-CABG; 6 OP-CABG; 1 mitral valve surgery) 4 1922 patients (904 TIVA and 1018 DES or SEVO) 4 16 studies administered volatile anesthetics throughout all the procedure (6 studies for 5 -30 minutes)

Evidence! Mortality

Evidence! Mortality

Evidence! Mortality 74/977=0. 4% v 14/872=1. 6% 7 NNT=84 7 RRR=(1, 6 -0, 4)/1,

Evidence! Mortality 74/977=0. 4% v 14/872=1. 6% 7 NNT=84 7 RRR=(1, 6 -0, 4)/1, 6=75% 7 OR: 0. 31(0. 12 -0. 80) 7 P=0. 02

Evidence! Myocardial infarction

Evidence! Myocardial infarction

Evidence! Myocardial infarction 724/979=2. 4% v 45/874=5. 1% 7 NNT=37 7 RRR: (5. 1

Evidence! Myocardial infarction 724/979=2. 4% v 45/874=5. 1% 7 NNT=37 7 RRR: (5. 1 -2. 4)/5. 1 = 53% 7 OR: 0. 51(0. 32 -0. 84) 7 p=0. 008

RISK-ADJUSTED MORTALITY (%) 8 P=0. 022 6 4 2 0 NO USE ONLY INCISION/

RISK-ADJUSTED MORTALITY (%) 8 P=0. 022 6 4 2 0 NO USE ONLY INCISION/ STERNOTOMY PART OF THE OPERATION ALL OF THE OPERATION DURATION OF USE OF INHALATORY ANESTHETICS DURING SURGERY

RISK-ADJUSTED MORTALITY (%) 8 P=0. 007 6 4 2 0 0% TO <50% OF

RISK-ADJUSTED MORTALITY (%) 8 P=0. 007 6 4 2 0 0% TO <50% OF CASES ≥ 50% OF CASES USE OF INHALATORY ANESTHETICS

NON-CARDIAC SURGERY

NON-CARDIAC SURGERY

Cardioprotection & anaesthesia Volatile Anesthetics C b blockers “recommended” C Statins “suggested” in selected

Cardioprotection & anaesthesia Volatile Anesthetics C b blockers “recommended” C Statins “suggested” in selected pts C a 2 agonists “may be considered” in selected pts C Ca++ antagonists “may be considered” in selected pts C Insulin “reasonable” in hyperglycaemic pts C Volatile Anesthetics “can be beneficial”

Every 1. 000 patients receiving extended release METOPROLOL z PREVENTION OF 15 MYOCARDIAL INFARCTON

Every 1. 000 patients receiving extended release METOPROLOL z PREVENTION OF 15 MYOCARDIAL INFARCTON z PREVENTION OF 3 CABG z PREVENTION OF 7 ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Every 1. 000 patients receiving extended release METOPROLOL z EXCESS OF 8 DEATHS z

Every 1. 000 patients receiving extended release METOPROLOL z EXCESS OF 8 DEATHS z EXCESS OF 5 STROKE z EXCESS 53 HYPOTENSION z EXCESS 42 BRADICARDIA

Evidence? A meta-analysis in noncardiac surgery 6219 patients 2842 sevoflurane 609 desflurane 2768 propofol

Evidence? A meta-analysis in noncardiac surgery 6219 patients 2842 sevoflurane 609 desflurane 2768 propofol

Evidence? A meta-analysis in noncardiac surgery Total 79 Anesth analg 20 BJA 14 EJA

Evidence? A meta-analysis in noncardiac surgery Total 79 Anesth analg 20 BJA 14 EJA 11 Acta anaesthesiol scand 8 Anaesthesia 5 J Anesth 4 Anesthesiology 3 Minerva anestesiol 2 Altri 13

Evidence? A meta-analysis in noncardiac surgery 4 400 authors 4 240 reviewers 4 90

Evidence? A meta-analysis in noncardiac surgery 4 400 authors 4 240 reviewers 4 90 editors 0 deaths 0 myocardial infarctions

TAKE HOME MESSAGE z MAGIC BULLET z NNT TO PREVENT ONE DEATH z PEXELIZUMAB

TAKE HOME MESSAGE z MAGIC BULLET z NNT TO PREVENT ONE DEATH z PEXELIZUMAB z LEVOSIMENDAN z FENOLDOPAM z VOLATILE AGENTS z 100 z 12 z 19 or 26 z 84

“PERCHE’ NON SIAM POPOLO PERCHE’ SIAM DIVISI” MAMELI

“PERCHE’ NON SIAM POPOLO PERCHE’ SIAM DIVISI” MAMELI

ITACTA ONGOING RCTs TOPICS HOSPITALS PATIENTS GRANTS z VOLATILE ANESTHETICS z 4 200 AIFA

ITACTA ONGOING RCTs TOPICS HOSPITALS PATIENTS GRANTS z VOLATILE ANESTHETICS z 4 200 AIFA 2006 z FENOLDOPAM z 34 1. 000 MINISTRY 2008 z DESMOPRESSIN z 3 200 3 10 3 200 1. 000 150 z z z ESMOLOL LEVOSIMENDAN VALVOLE PERCUTANEE landoni. giovanni@hsr. it www. itacta. org z z z

GRUPPI DI INTERESSE ITACTA (COORDINATI DA ANESTESISTI UNDER 40) Gruppi esistenti ad oggi 27

GRUPPI DI INTERESSE ITACTA (COORDINATI DA ANESTESISTI UNDER 40) Gruppi esistenti ad oggi 27 -3 -2009 (per piu’ informazioni www. itacta. org), aperti ad iscrizioni z 1. Sostituzioni valvolari percutanee (covello. remodaniel@hsr. it) z 2. Monitoraggio emodinamico mini-invasivo (giuliamaj@hotmail. com) z 3. Statistica in anestesia e terapia intensiva (monaco. fabrizio@hsr. it) z 4. Analgesia selettiva in chirurgia toracica (drpiraccini@gmail. com)

For these and further slides on these topics please feel free to visit the

For these and further slides on these topics please feel free to visit the metcardio. org website: http: //www. metcardio. org/slides. html