Investigation of the Crash of Valu Jet Flight









- Slides: 9

Investigation of the Crash of Valu. Jet Flight 592, the Relevant Stakeholders, Crisis System, and Crisis Mechanisms Matt Williams Dr. Petkov LAC 130

Background • May 11, 1996 • Valu. Jet flight 592 transporting 105 passengers and 5 crew members from Miami, Florida to Atlanta, Georgia • Shortly after takeoff, the Mc. Donnell Douglas DC-9 -32 crashed into the Florida Everglades • Resulted in the deaths of all 110 passengers aboard the aircraft

Background (cont. ) • Caused by a fire that started in the cargo area of the aircraft • The fire was ignited by oxygen generators • The oxygen tanks were the responsibility of Sabre. Tech, Valu. Jet’s maintenance contractor • They were loaded onto the plane in five large boxes and labeled as COM (Company-Owned Material) • The required warnings for shipping hazardous materials were not on the boxes • The shipping ticket said that the canisters were empty • Some of the oxygen generators lacked safety caps for the firing pins

Background (cont. ) • Valu. Jet failed to properly supervise the loading of cargo onto their aircraft • The airline assumed no responsibility for the crash • They were grounded by the Federal Aviation Administration for three months • Valu. Jet was forced to lay off employees and make pay cuts • They faced many lawsuits against the families of the victims

Background (cont. ) • Sabre. Tech was responsible for mislabeling and misrepresenting the oxygen generators • The implications of the containers being labeled as “empty” were that they were harmless • Also, Valu. Jet wasn’t qualified to transport oxygen in the first place, as it is classified as a hazardous chemical • Along with the lawsuits they faced, Sabre. Tech faced criminal charges, a $2 million fine, and $9 million in restitution

Relevant Stakeholders • • • Victims of the crash Friends and family of victims Valu. Jet Sabre. Tech Federal Aviation Administration Millions of people who vested interest in the crisis

Valu. Jet Before the Crash • Extremely low budget • Flights cost immensely less than competition • Outsourced maintenance to cheap repair places, rather than having their own facilities and mechanics • More accidents and emergency landings than other airlines • Low quality flight experience

Changes in Crisis System • In 1998, the Federal Aviation Administration issued new standards that increased both the detection and suppression of fire in cargo areas • Valu. Jet merged with Air. Tran Airways and kept the Air. Tran name

Works Cited • FISHMAN, D. 1999. Valu. Jet Flight 592: Crisis Communication Theory Blended and Extended. Communication Quarterly. 47(Fall) 345 -375 • MACNEAL, E. 1997. Fatal Words. Et Cetera. (Spring) • ENGLEHARDT, K. 2004. Compassion Without Blame: Testing the Accident Decision Flow Chart With the Crash of Valu. Jet Flight 592. Journal of Public Relations Research. 16(2) 127 -156