Investigation of Geometry Descriptions of End Cap Toroid

  • Slides: 44
Download presentation
Investigation of Geometry Descriptions of End. Cap Toroid Magnet for ATLAS Simulation Software Infrastructure

Investigation of Geometry Descriptions of End. Cap Toroid Magnet for ATLAS Simulation Software Infrastructure Besik Kekelia Georgian Technical University SCCTW’ 2016 South-Caucasus Computing and Technology Workshop Oct 6, 2016

Outline § Investigation of End-Cap Toroid § Simplification of End-Cap Toroid § Integration Conflict

Outline § Investigation of End-Cap Toroid § Simplification of End-Cap Toroid § Integration Conflict Checking of End-Cap Toroid SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Investigation of End-Cap Toroid SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Investigation of End-Cap Toroid SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Sources Source geometry has been taken from Smar. Team Engineering Database: Path : ATLAS

Sources Source geometry has been taken from Smar. Team Engineering Database: Path : ATLAS CURRENT/Detector System/Magnets ATLAS/Toroid Magnets ATLAS/Barrel Toroid Magnet ATLAS/End-cap Toroid Magnet Model: ST 0268528 ECT assembly side C (id: CAD 000628534 ) Missing parts have been created from CDD Drawings (902 drawings): Vacuum vessel ECT Cold Mass SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 Drawings 1 Cover 90 2 Shield 219 3 Tie Rods 64 4 Bore Tube 4 5 Turret 6 Coil 4 7 Keystone box 27 8 Services 135 9 Supports 13 10 Joke 12 11 Tower 30 268

Vacuum Vessel / Cover CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 57’ 966 kgs Difference: +781

Vacuum Vessel / Cover CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 57’ 966 kgs Difference: +781 kgs 1. 3 % Mass: 57’ 185 kgs Cover Geometry from CATIA Total Cover Aluminum 2700 20. 81 8 x Bracket SSteel 8000 0. 22 Geometry from XML Envelop Attachmant Cryo. Stop. Outside SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 20. 8 m³ Difference Total Aluminium Iron Carbon 56180. 52 1785. 6 20. 3 m³ 2700 7870 2265 57’ 185 kgs 52191 2430 270 2203. 6 90. 6 19. 33 0. 9 0. 1 0. 28 0. 04 57’ 966 kgs +781 kgs 1. 3 %

Vacuum Vessel / Thermal Shielding Thermal Shilding CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 15’ 988

Vacuum Vessel / Thermal Shielding Thermal Shilding CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 15’ 988 kgs Difference: +31 kgs 0. 2 % Mass: 15’ 957 kgs Thermal Shielding Geometry from CATIA shild Total Aluminum 5. 9216 Geometry from XML Thermel. Sielding TC_Cerntral. Tube 6. 1 m³ Aluminium Aluminum Difference SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 45. 6 m³ 2700 15’ 957 kgs 15309 648 5. 67 0. 24 15988 2700 Total 15’ 988 kgs +31 kgs 0. 2 %

Tie Rod CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 3’ 077 kgs Mass: 1’ 268 kgs

Tie Rod CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 3’ 077 kgs Mass: 1’ 268 kgs Difference: +1’ 809 kgs 58. 8 % Tie Rod Geometry from CATIA Total 0. 39 m³ 16 X Tie Rod 7850 0. 39 Steel Geometry from XML Cryo. Stop. Inside Difference SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 Total Aluminium Iron 0. 2 m³ 2700 7870 0. 05 0. 144 3’ 077. 2 kgs 3077. 2 1’ 268 kgs 135 1133. 28 +1’ 809 kgs 58. 8 %

Vacuum Vessel / Bore. Tube (Central Tube) Bore Tube CATIA Model XML Model Mass:

Vacuum Vessel / Bore. Tube (Central Tube) Bore Tube CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 13’ 433 kgs Mass: 10’ 208 kgs Difference: +3’ 225 kgs 24. 0 % Bore Tube Geometry from CATIA Total Bore Tube(centr. tube) S Steel 8000 Geometry from XML Total EV_Central. Tube Difference Shiel. Stwwl 1. 68 m³ 1. 6791 1. 28 m³ 8000 1. 276 13’ 433 kgs 13432. 8 10’ 208 kgs 10208 SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 +3’ 225 kgs 24. 0%

Turret CATIA Model XML Model Turret Mass: 2’ 476 kgs Mass: 1’ 512 kgs

Turret CATIA Model XML Model Turret Mass: 2’ 476 kgs Mass: 1’ 512 kgs Difference: +964 kgs 38. 9 % Turret Geometry from CATIA Total Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Aluminum Cooper BS C 101 Epoxy Glass 2 X Assembly Part 2 Part 3 Aluminum Cupper Turret SCT Turret Coil connection Aluminum 2700 8920 1800 SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 Difference 0. 0564 2700 8920 0. 577 0. 07 2700 0. 647 0. 0249 Aluminium Total 0. 56 m³ 2700 0. 56 2’ 476 kgs 54. 27 55. 304 3. 42 225. 988 1557. 9 624. 4 2182. 3 67. 23 1’ 512 kgs 1512 0. 0201 0. 0062 0. 0019 Geometry from XML Serv. Tur 0. 73 m³ +964 kgs 38. 9 %

Cold Mass Coil CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 116’ 740 kgs Difference: -6’ 272

Cold Mass Coil CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 116’ 740 kgs Difference: -6’ 272 kgs 5. 4 % Mass: 123’ 012 kgs Cold. Mass Geometry from CATIA Total 43. 24 m³ 116740 kgs Coil inner web 8 X Coil 8 X Key. Box Aluminum 2700 0. 0019 3. 4439 0. 1799 5. 1 9298. 5 485. 7 Aluminum 2700 35. 08 8. 157 94716 22024 Total 45. 6 m³ Geometry from XML ECT_Cold. Mass Key. Box Difference Aluminium 2700 SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 123012 45. 56 123012 kgs -6272 kgs 5. 4 %

Yoke CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 1’ 820 kgs Difference: +483 kgs 26. 5%

Yoke CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 1’ 820 kgs Difference: +483 kgs 26. 5% Mass: 1’ 338 kgs Yoke Geometry from CATIA 2 X Yoke Steel Geometry from XML Yoke SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 Iron Difference Total 0. 2319 m³ 8000 0. 2319 Total 0. 17 m³ 8000 0. 17 1’ 820 kgs 1855, 2 1’ 338 kgs 1338 +483 kgs 26. 5 %

Stay Tube CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 2’ 028 kgs Difference: -186 kgs 9.

Stay Tube CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 2’ 028 kgs Difference: -186 kgs 9. 2% Mass: 2’ 214 kgs Stay Tube Geometry from CATIA 8 X Stay Tube Total Aluminum 2700 Geometry from XML Align. Tube SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 0. 82 m³ 2700 2’ 214 kgs 2214 0. 82 2’ 028 kgs 2027. 7 0. 751 Total Aluminium Difference 0. 75 m³ -186 kgs 9. 2 %

JTV Shielding JTV Shilding CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 4’ 161 kgs Difference: -349

JTV Shielding JTV Shilding CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 4’ 161 kgs Difference: -349 kgs 8. 4% Mass: 4’ 510 kgs JTV Shilding Geometry from CATIA JTV Shilding JTV rings Total Polyboron 2520 Geometry from XML JTV_Shielding JTV_Ring SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 Difference 1. 65 m³ Poly. Born. B 4 C 0. 9534 0. 6978 Total 1. 79 m³ 2520 1. 02 2570. 4 2520 0. 77 1940. 4 4’ 161 kgs 2402. 568 1758. 456 4’ 510 kgs -349 kgs 8. 4 %

Bolts / Services CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 3’ 834 kgs Geometry Don’t exist

Bolts / Services CATIA Model XML Model Mass: 3’ 834 kgs Geometry Don’t exist Difference: +3’ 834 kgs 100 % M 42 x 200 M 42 x 130 Bolts / Nuts Geometry from CATIA Total 0. 3706 m³ 2’ 965 kgs Bolts, Nuts Stainless Steel 8000 0. 3706 2965 Services Geometry from CATIA M 20 x 90 Services Pipes 1 Services Pipes 2 SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 Total Aluminum Stainless Steel 0. 2 m³ 869 kgs 2700 0. 1377 372 8000 0. 0621 497

Tower have not been calculated SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Tower have not been calculated SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

End-Cap Toroid Result of Investigation CATIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

End-Cap Toroid Result of Investigation CATIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Total XML Difference 116740 15988 57966 13433 1855 2028 4161 2476 3077 2965 869 Cold Mass Thermal Silding Cover Bore. Tube Yoke Stay Tube JTV Shilding Turret Tie Rod Bolts/ Services kgs kgs kgs 123012 15957 57185 10208 1338 2214 4510 1512 1268 kgs kgs kgs 221558 5. 4% 0. 2% 1. 3% 24. 0% 26. 5% 9. 2% 8. 4% 38. 9% 58. 8% 100. 0% 217204 SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Simplification of End-Cap Toroid SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Simplification of End-Cap Toroid SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Cold Mass Detailed Simplifield Volume/ m³ 43, 24 Volume/ m³ 43, 23 Difference/ m³

Cold Mass Detailed Simplifield Volume/ m³ 43, 24 Volume/ m³ 43, 23 Difference/ m³ 0, 01 Detailed Simplifield Mass/ kgs 116`748 Mass/ kgs 116`721 Material Difference/ kgs 27 Aluminum Density 2700 Simplifield model Detailed model SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Thermal Shielding Thermal Silding Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 6, 057 Volume/ m³ 6, 056

Thermal Shielding Thermal Silding Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 6, 057 Volume/ m³ 6, 056 Difference/ m³ 0, 001 Detailed Simplified Mass/ kgs 16`353 Mass/ kgs 16`351 Material Difference/ kgs 2, 7 Aluminum Density 2700 Simplifield model Detailed model SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Cover/ Brackets Cover Brackets Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 20, 8 0, 22 Detailed model

Cover/ Brackets Cover Brackets Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 20, 8 0, 22 Detailed model SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 Volume/ m³ 20, 804 0, 2201 Detailed Simplified Difference/ m³ -0, 004 -0, 0001 Mass/ kgs 56`160 1760 Mass/ kgs 56`170, 8 1760, 8 Material Difference/ kgs -10, 8 -0, 8 Aluminum Steel Density 2700 8000 Simplifield model Brackets

Bore. Tube/ Yoke Bore. Tube Yoke Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 1, 679 0, 231

Bore. Tube/ Yoke Bore. Tube Yoke Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 1, 679 0, 231 Volume/ m³ 1, 678 0, 231 Detailed model SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 Detailed Simplified Difference/ m³ 0, 001 0 Mass/ kgs 13`432 1848 Yoke Bore Tube Mass/ kgs 13`424 1848 Material Difference/ kgs 8 0 Steel Density 8000 Simplifield model

Stay Tube Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 0, 751 Difference/ m³ 0 Detailed Simplified Mass/

Stay Tube Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 0, 751 Difference/ m³ 0 Detailed Simplified Mass/ kgs 2027, 7 Detailed model Material Difference/ kgs 0 Aluminum Density 2700 Simplifield model SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

JTV Shielding JTV Shilding Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 1, 65 Volume/ m³ 1, 649

JTV Shielding JTV Shilding Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 1, 65 Volume/ m³ 1, 649 Difference/ m³ 0, 001 Detailed Simplified Mass/ kgs 4158 Mass/ kgs 4155, 48 Detailed model Material Difference/ kgs 2, 52 Polyboron Density 2520 Simplifield model SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Tie Rod Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 0, 393 Difference/ m³ 0 Detailed Simplified Mass/

Tie Rod Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 0, 393 Difference/ m³ 0 Detailed Simplified Mass/ kgs 3144 Material Difference/ kgs 0 Steel Density 8000 Simplifield model Detailed model SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Bolts/ Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 0, 371 Difference/ m³ 0 Detailed Simplified Mass/ kgs

Bolts/ Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 0, 371 Difference/ m³ 0 Detailed Simplified Mass/ kgs 2968 Detailed model Material Difference/ kgs 0 Steel Density 8000 Simplifield model SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Services Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 0, 06 Difference/ m³ 0 Detailed Simplified Mass/ kgs

Services Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ 0, 06 Difference/ m³ 0 Detailed Simplified Mass/ kgs 480 Detailed model Services SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 Material Difference/ kgs 0 Steel Density 8000 Simplifield model

End-Cap Toroid Simplification Result of Simplification Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ Difference/ m³ Mass/ kgs

End-Cap Toroid Simplification Result of Simplification Detailed Simplified Volume/ m³ Difference/ m³ Mass/ kgs Detailed Simplified Mass/ kgs 1 Material Difference/ kgs Density 27 Aluminum 2700 2 Aluminum 2700 -10, 8 Aluminum 2700 Cold Mass 43, 24 43, 23 0, 01 116`748 116`721 Thermal Silding 6, 057 6, 056 0, 001 16`353 16`351 Cover 20, 804 -0, 004 56`160 56`170, 8 Brackets 0, 2201 -0, 0001 1760, 8 4 -0, 8 Steel 8000 Bore. Tube 1, 679 1, 678 0, 001 13`432 13`424 8 Steel 8000 Yoke 0, 231 0 1848 5 0 Steel 8000 Stay Tube 0, 751 0 2027, 7 6 0 Aluminum 2700 JTV Shilding 1, 65 1, 649 0, 001 4158 4155, 48 2, 52 Polyboron 2520 Tie Rod 0, 393 0 3144 7 Steel 8000 Bolts/ 0, 371 0 2968 8 0 0 Steel 8000 Services 0, 06 0 480 9 0 Steel 8000 2 3 10 SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 11

XML code of ECT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

XML code of ECT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 11

Integration Conflict Checking of End-Cap Toroid SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Integration Conflict Checking of End-Cap Toroid SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Internal Conflicts of ECT After Modification There Was Internal Conflicts SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6

Internal Conflicts of ECT After Modification There Was Internal Conflicts SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Modification of End-Cap ECT Cover –Smar. Team Model Before Modification y z 5000 mm

Modification of End-Cap ECT Cover –Smar. Team Model Before Modification y z 5000 mm 10411 mm SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 10411 mm

Modification of End-Cap ECT Cover –As Built Model After Modification y z 4950 mm

Modification of End-Cap ECT Cover –As Built Model After Modification y z 4950 mm 10406 mm SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 10406 mm

Internal Conflicts of ECT Clash 24, 555 mm Between Cover and Bore Tube There

Internal Conflicts of ECT Clash 24, 555 mm Between Cover and Bore Tube There Are No Clash Bore Tube After Geometry Modification Bore Tube Before Geometry Modification Clash 24, 555 mm Volume 1, 678 m³ 1, 679 m³ SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016

Internal Conflicts of ECT Clash 24, 555 mm Between Cover and Bolts New Position

Internal Conflicts of ECT Clash 24, 555 mm Between Cover and Bolts New Position Bolts Old Position After Move and Geometry Modification y Bolts z 2463. 85 mm Bolts 2482. 525 mm Total Volume of Bolts (old) 0, 147 m³ Clash 24, 555 mm Total Volume of Bolts (New) 0, 147 m³ SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 There Are No Clash

Internal Conflicts of ECT Clash 24, 555 mm Between Cover and Bolts Side A

Internal Conflicts of ECT Clash 24, 555 mm Between Cover and Bolts Side A Bolts Old Position Bolts New Position After Move and Geometry Modification y z 2391. 55 mm 2421. 55 mm Bolts side A Total Volume of Bolts (old) 0, 147 m³ Clash 24, 555 mm Total Volume of Bolts (New) 0, 147 m³ SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 There Are No Clash

Internal Conflicts of ECT Clash 24, 555 mm Between Cover and Bolts Side C

Internal Conflicts of ECT Clash 24, 555 mm Between Cover and Bolts Side C Bolts Old Position Bolts New Position After Move and Geometry Modification y z 2397. 65 mm 2421. 55 mm Bolts side C Total Volume of Bolts (old) Total Volume of Bolts (New) 0, 147 m³ Clash 24, 555 mm SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 0, 147 m³ There Are No Clash

Internal Conflicts of ECT Clash 5, 02 mm Between Cover and TV Shielding Old

Internal Conflicts of ECT Clash 5, 02 mm Between Cover and TV Shielding Old Position TV Shielding New Position After Move y 2345. 7 mm z 2370. 7 mm TV Shielding Clash 5, 02 mm SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 TV Shielding There Are No Clash

Internal Conflicts of ECT JTV IP New Position Clash 87, 501 mm Between Cover

Internal Conflicts of ECT JTV IP New Position Clash 87, 501 mm Between Cover and JTV IP Old Position After Move y 2200 mm z 2204 mm JTV IP Clash 87, 501 mm SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 JTV IP There Are No Clash

Internal Conflicts of ECT Clash 24, 555 mm Between Cover and JTV IP Cover

Internal Conflicts of ECT Clash 24, 555 mm Between Cover and JTV IP Cover Connection Box Old Position Cover Connection Box New Position After Move and Geometry Modification y Cover Connection Box 2338 mm Cover Connection Box z 2354 mm Clash 24, 555 mm SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 There Are No Clash

Integration Conflicts of ECT Checked Clashes With Following Geometries: End-Cap Toroids N Name Source

Integration Conflicts of ECT Checked Clashes With Following Geometries: End-Cap Toroids N Name Source 1 Solenoid GDML, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 2 Feet GDML, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 3 Rail. Assembly GDML, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 4 pp 2 GDML, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 5 sercices. At. ZO GDML, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 6 MBAP_Access. Platform GDML, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 7 MBWH_Big. Wheels GDML, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 8 SADL_Calorimeter. Saddle GDML, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 9 MDTRail GDML, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 10 HFTruck. Rail GDML, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 11 RUN 2_Services GDML, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 13 SHIELD VP 1, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 14 MDT VP 1, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 15 TGC VP 1, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 16 CSC VP 1, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 17 INN VP 1, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 18 OUTER VP 1, AGDD/XML version R. 07. 01 SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 40

Integration Conflicts of ECT After New Move and Geometry Modification ECT Before New Move

Integration Conflicts of ECT After New Move and Geometry Modification ECT Before New Move and Geometry Modification Clash 2, 73 mm Between ECT and CSC 5000 4950 y z CSC 10406 mm 10411 mm CSC Clash 2, 73 mm SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 There Are No Integration Conflicts

Integration Conflicts of ECT Before New Move and Geometry Modification ECT After New Move

Integration Conflicts of ECT Before New Move and Geometry Modification ECT After New Move and Geometry Modification Clash 2, 73 mm Between ECT and Shield 5000 4950 y z 10406 mm 10411 mm Clash 4, 4 mm SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 There Are No Integration Conflicts

Integration Conflicts of ECT Before New Move and Geometry Modification ECT After New Move

Integration Conflicts of ECT Before New Move and Geometry Modification ECT After New Move and Geometry Modification Clash 2, 73 mm Between ECT and MDT 5000 4950 y z 10406 mm 10411 mm MDT Clash 2, 86 mm SCCTW’ 2016, Tbilisi, 6 October 2016 There Are No Integration Conflicts

Thank you for Attention • Besik Kekelia • Georgian Technical University

Thank you for Attention • Besik Kekelia • Georgian Technical University