Introduction to the physics of the Quark Gluon

  • Slides: 29
Download presentation
Introduction to the physics of the Quark. Gluon Plasma and the relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Introduction to the physics of the Quark. Gluon Plasma and the relativistic heavy-ion collisions Villa Gualino-Torino, 7 -3 -2011

Matter under extreme conditions… Fermi Notes on Thermodynamics QGP Eleven Science Questions for the

Matter under extreme conditions… Fermi Notes on Thermodynamics QGP Eleven Science Questions for the New Century NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES… No. 7 - What Are the New States of Matter at Exceedingly High Density and Temperature? QGP is at T>1012 K and r > 1040 cm-3

Let’s start from 100 years ago … 1911 - Rutherford discovered the Nucleus In

Let’s start from 100 years ago … 1911 - Rutherford discovered the Nucleus In ’ 30 started the study of a new force: Nuclear Force between nucleons Bashing nucleons with increasing energy … p p p, n, L, S, D, . . It became clear that nucleons and more generally hadrons are made of quarks exchanging gluons p, r, w, f, K, . . In 1974 theory of the strong interaction was written down and called Quantum Chromodynamics

Quantum Chromodynamics electric charge Similar to QED but 3 charges + gauge invariance imply

Quantum Chromodynamics electric charge Similar to QED but 3 charges + gauge invariance imply that the gauge field (gluons) self-interact: - Asymptotic freedom - Confinement colour charge Two regimes: - Q>>LQCD one can use perturbative QCD (p. QCD) - Q ~LQCD , Q >LQCD non perturbative methods : lattice QCD (l. QCD) and effective lagrangian approach

Quark-Gluon Plasma Inside nuclei strong interaction manifest in an extremely non-perturbative regime (LQCD~ 1

Quark-Gluon Plasma Inside nuclei strong interaction manifest in an extremely non-perturbative regime (LQCD~ 1 fm-1) and quarks are not the relevant degrees of freedom Several arguments already in the ’ 70 -’ 80 lead to think that at some temperature and/or density quarks “can roam freely in a medium”-> QGP 1) ASYMPTOTIC FREEDOM At large T there are interaction q 2 ~ (3 T)2 and the coupling is weak 2) OVERLAP (percolation) Hadrons Overlap does not allow to identify the hadrons itself: T 0 ~ 150 Me. V 3) BAG PRESSURE MODELING Pressure of pion gas smaller than the quark gas one: T 0 ~ 150 Me. V 4) HAGERDON LIMITING TEMPERATURE Hadron gas partition function has a singularity at T 0 ~ 160 Me. V

Hagerdon’s limiting temperature From the Hadronic side increasing temperature leads to the production of

Hagerdon’s limiting temperature From the Hadronic side increasing temperature leads to the production of higher mass hadronic states, but the density of states grows exponentially with the mass Partition functon for a gas o particle with density of states r(m) m>>T Hagerdon, Nuovo Cimento (1965): T 0 is a limiting temperature for hadronic systems Cabibbo-Parisi, PLB 59(1975): Divergency of the partition function has to be associated with a phase transition of hadronic matter to quark-gluon matter

Quark-anti. Quark free energy in l. QCD We cannot observe quarks, but at large

Quark-anti. Quark free energy in l. QCD We cannot observe quarks, but at large T we can envisage a weakly interacting gas of quarks and gluons Asymptotic value Charm Quarks String breaking vacuum l. QCD Kaczmarek et al. , PPS 129, 560(2004)

Order Parameters of the Phase Transition l. QCD Polyakov Loop Chiral Condensate T~170 Me.

Order Parameters of the Phase Transition l. QCD Polyakov Loop Chiral Condensate T~170 Me. V What is the order of the phase transition? [Ratti]

The basic relations of reference Ideally our reference is a gas of non-interacting massless

The basic relations of reference Ideally our reference is a gas of non-interacting massless quarks and gluons x d. o. f Multiplied by degrees of freedom dq+q=2*2*3*Nf =24 -30 , dg=8*2

From lattice QCD Enhancement of the degrees of freedom towards the QGP RHIC Stefan-Boltzmann

From lattice QCD Enhancement of the degrees of freedom towards the QGP RHIC Stefan-Boltzmann limit not reached by 20 % for e : QGP as a weak interacting gas? ! m. B=0 In Ads/CFT this can be a very strong Interaction measure interacting system [Cotrone] RH IC LHC No interaction means also e=3 p (for a massless gas)

QGP in the Early Universe Evolution • e. m. decouple (T~ 1 e. V

QGP in the Early Universe Evolution • e. m. decouple (T~ 1 e. V , t ~ 3. 105 ys) “thermal freeze-out “ • but matter opaque to e. m. radiation • Atomic nuclei (T~100 Ke. V, t ~200 s) “chemical freeze-out” • Hadronization (T~ 0. 2 Ge. V, t~ 10 -5 s) • Quark and gluons Bang

Degrees of freedom in the Universe 5 10 - s g(T) HIC D. J.

Degrees of freedom in the Universe 5 10 - s g(T) HIC D. J. Schwartz, Ann. Phys. 2004 Quark-Gluon Plasma

How to produce a matter with e >>1 Ge. V/fm 3 lasting for t

How to produce a matter with e >>1 Ge. V/fm 3 lasting for t > 1 fm/c in a volume much larger than an hadron? Let’s bash again at higher energy…

High Energy Heavy Ion Collision Facilities Accelerator Lab. Ebeam [AGe. V] AGS (’ 80

High Energy Heavy Ion Collision Facilities Accelerator Lab. Ebeam [AGe. V] AGS (’ 80 s) BNL 10 (*) 4. 5 2 SPS (94 -…) CERN 160(*) 17. 3 9 RHIC (00 -…) BNL 100 +100 200 100 LHC (09 -…) CERN 2750+2750 5500 Fixed target Contrac tion 2750 Max energy density complete stopping Collider RHIC -> emax~ 102 Ge. V/fm 3 LHC -> emax~ 3 103 Ge. V/fm 3

LHC Exploring the phase diagram RHIC SPS nuclei new medium created from the energy

LHC Exploring the phase diagram RHIC SPS nuclei new medium created from the energy deposited m. B=0 (quark=antiquarks) Hotter-denser-longer increasing Ebeam Time – 5 -15 fm/c = 15 -45 ys~10 -22 s Increasing beam energy -> transparency Energy distributed in a larger volume How to make simple estimates?

Statistical Model analysis Temperature Chemical Potential T Yield Mass Quantum Numbers F. Becattini Hagerdon

Statistical Model analysis Temperature Chemical Potential T Yield Mass Quantum Numbers F. Becattini Hagerdon limiting temperature AGS (BNL) SPS(CERN) RHIC (BNL)

Energy Density and Temperature Estimate I Particle streaming from origin Energy density a la

Energy Density and Temperature Estimate I Particle streaming from origin Energy density a la Bjorken: theory estimate experiments t. RHIC ~0. 6 -1 fm/c d. ET/dy ~ 720 Ge. V We can estimate the initial e 0 Is this correct?

Energy Density and Temperature Estimate II Entropy Conservation 1 D expansion But this means

Energy Density and Temperature Estimate II Entropy Conservation 1 D expansion But this means that the previous estimate cannot be correct because it supposes that e ~ t-1, but to conserve entropy e ~ t-4/3 So with u. RHIC Estimate of QGP lifetime (t 0~0. 6 fm/c at RHIC) e 0>>ec RHIC - T=2 Tc -> t. QGP=0. 6*23 =5 fm/c t. QGP>1 fm/c LHC - T=3. 5 Tc -> t. QGP=0. 4*3. 53 =15 fm/c V> 103 fm 3

Different stages of the Little Bang System expands and cools down 2 Freeze-out t

Different stages of the Little Bang System expands and cools down 2 Freeze-out t ~20 fm/c Hadron Gas Phase Transition t ~5 fm/c Plasma-phase t ~0. 6 fm/c Pre-Equilibrium t <0. 2 fm/c

Soft and Hard probes SOFT (p. T ~LQCD, T) driven by non perturbative QCD

Soft and Hard probes SOFT (p. T ~LQCD, T) driven by non perturbative QCD Hadron yields, collective modes of the bulk, strangeness enhancement, fluctuations, thermal radiation, dilepton enhancement HARD (p. T >> LQCD) Early production, p. QCD applicable, comparable with pp, p. A jet quenching, heavy quarks, quarkonia, hard photons 95% of particles

The Several Probes [Romatschke], [Snellings], [Beraudo] Initial Conditions Quark-Gluon Plasma Hadronization BULK (p. T~T)

The Several Probes [Romatschke], [Snellings], [Beraudo] Initial Conditions Quark-Gluon Plasma Hadronization BULK (p. T~T) CGC (x<<1) Gluon saturation [Albacete] MINIJETS (p. T>>T, LQCD) [Bruna] Heavy Quarks (mq>>T, LQCD) [Arnaldi] Microscopic Mechanism Matters! [Becattini] [Blume] § Initial Condition – “exotic” non equilibrium CGC § Bulk – Hydrodynamics BUT finite viscosities (h, z) § Minijets – perturbative QCD BUT strong Jet-Bulk “talk” § Heavy Quarks – Brownian motion (? ) BUT strongly dragged by the Bulk § Quarkonia – Are suppressed (only resonances? ) or regenerated § Hadronization – Microscopic mechanism can modify QGP observables

RHIC LHC v Dominance of QGP phase (t. QGP> 10 fm/c) § Vanishing hadronic

RHIC LHC v Dominance of QGP phase (t. QGP> 10 fm/c) § Vanishing hadronic contamination? v A new QGP phase: perturbative plasma? § Larger h/s we get close to the p. QCD estimates? Hopefully with several other surprise v Very large yield of. Enjoy heavy quark (m >>T ) and jets (p >>T) the School! § Increasing relevance of non-equilibrated “objects”! q v Existence of a primordial non-equilibrium phase T § Color Glass Condensate (CGC) as high-energy limit of QCD?

Collective Expansion of the Bulk v 2/e measures efficiency in converting the eccentricity from

Collective Expansion of the Bulk v 2/e measures efficiency in converting the eccentricity from Coordinate to Momentum space x c 2 s=d. P/de - Eo. S The fluid with lowest ever observed h/s Viscosity h/s For the first time close to ideal Hydrodynamics IC SPS px h/s viscosity z y py RH QGP Transverse Density [fm-2]

Color Glass Condensate initial conditions? d. N/d 2 p. T Parton distr. funct Ideal

Color Glass Condensate initial conditions? d. N/d 2 p. T Parton distr. funct Ideal Sketch Qsat(s) At small x (p. T) dense gluon matter Gluons of small x (p. T) -> larger size >1/Qs overlap and the gluon dostribution stops growing p. T At RHIC Q 2 ~ 2 Ge. V 2 At LHC Q 2 ~ ? What is the impact of a different intial condition?

Jet Quenching y x Suppression of minijets Jet triggered angular correl. near Suppression should

Jet Quenching y x Suppression of minijets Jet triggered angular correl. near Suppression should increase with density and temperature. Allows a further measure of energy density. It is due to gluon radiation? Jet energy loss produce mach cones? Medium away

Heavy Quarks dragged by the medium? - mc, b >> LQCD produced by p.

Heavy Quarks dragged by the medium? - mc, b >> LQCD produced by p. QCD processes (out of equil. ) - t 0 << t. QGP they go through all the QGP lifetime -mc, b >> T 0 no thermal production A better test of p. QCD scattering and energy loss: - m. Q>>mq small drag from the bulk Indirect measurement from semileptonic decay (D->Ken) came as a surprise: Strong suppression Large elliptic Flow

Quarkonia Suppression? QQ Quarkonium dissoved by charge screening: Thermometer cc, J/Y, cb, Y, …

Quarkonia Suppression? QQ Quarkonium dissoved by charge screening: Thermometer cc, J/Y, cb, Y, … More binding smaller radius higher temperature Suppression at SPS! More suppression at RHIC because of high the higher temperature? ! and even more at LHC?

Hadronization Modified Baryon/Mesons Au + u A Quark number scaling n Ba o ry

Hadronization Modified Baryon/Mesons Au + u A Quark number scaling n Ba o ry Meson p+p PHENIX, PRL 89(2003) Use medium and not vacuum -> Quark coalescence More easy to produce baryons! Hadronization is modified Dynamical quarks are visible Fries-Greco-Sorensen - Ann. Rev. Part. Sci. 58, 177 (2008)

Hadronization Modified Baryon/Mesons Quark number scaling Au + u A p+p PHENIX, PRL 89(2003)

Hadronization Modified Baryon/Mesons Quark number scaling Au + u A p+p PHENIX, PRL 89(2003) v 2 q fitted from v 2 p GKL Coalescence scaling Enhancement of v 2 Dynamical quarks are visible Collective flows