Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment Name Data

  • Slides: 6
Download presentation
Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment Name, Data for Impact Meeting or event Date

Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment Name, Data for Impact Meeting or event Date

Objectives • Understand the purpose of the RDQA tool. • Describe the components of

Objectives • Understand the purpose of the RDQA tool. • Describe the components of the RDQA tool. • Define and identify the type of FP data that can be assessed using the RDQA tool.

Purpose of RDQA • Assess five functional areas of a data management and reporting

Purpose of RDQA • Assess five functional areas of a data management and reporting system: o M&E Structure, Functions, and Capabilities o Indicator Definitions and Reporting Guidelines o Data Collection and Reporting Forms and Tools o Data Management Processes o Use of Data for Decision Making • Verify the quality of reported data against data recorded in the primary source documents: o Accuracy o Timeliness o Completeness

Components of the RDQA • Data Verification: o Recount data of selected indicators from

Components of the RDQA • Data Verification: o Recount data of selected indicators from source documents. o Compare recounted data with reported data. o Assess time data reported against deadline. o Assess number of available reports against expected reports. o Assess data records against expected data records. • System management: o Assess strengths and weaknesses of core functional areas of: § Data management system § Data reporting system

Type of FP Planning Data to Assess with RDQA • Quantitative: o Accuracy o

Type of FP Planning Data to Assess with RDQA • Quantitative: o Accuracy o Timeliness o Completeness • Qualitative: o Data management and reporting competencies o Availability of procedures o Availability of data sources and reporting o Use of data

This presentation was produced with the support of the United States Agency for International

This presentation was produced with the support of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of the Data for Impact (D 4 I) associate award 7200 AA 18 LA 00008, which is implemented by the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in partnership with Palladium International, LLC; ICF Macro, Inc. ; John Snow, Inc. ; and Tulane University. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government. www. data 4 impactproject. org