Introduction South Halls Renovation and New Construction The

  • Slides: 5
Download presentation
Introduction South Halls Renovation and New Construction The Pennsylvania State University Park, PA Penn

Introduction South Halls Renovation and New Construction The Pennsylvania State University Park, PA Penn State Architectural Engineering Senior Capstone Project Quaid Spearing | Construction Option Advisor: Dr. Anumba April 15, 2014

Project Overview Analysis 1: Modular Bathrooms Background Information Planning & Procurement Design Evaluation Results

Project Overview Analysis 1: Modular Bathrooms Background Information Planning & Procurement Design Evaluation Results Analysis 2: SIPS Background Information Approach Results Analysis 4: Phase Resequencing Background Information Process Results Final Recommendation Acknowledgements Project Team • • Size: 71, 002 GSF Stories: Four plus Basement Function: Residential & Assembly Construction Dates: 05/13 – 12/13 Total Project Cost: $94. 1 M Phase Project Cost: $15. 2 M Delivery Method: Design-Build Quaid Spearing| Construction Option South Halls Renovation | Penn State University

Project Overview Analysis 1: Modular Bathrooms Background Information Planning & Procurement Design Evaluation Results

Project Overview Analysis 1: Modular Bathrooms Background Information Planning & Procurement Design Evaluation Results Analysis 2: SIPS Background Information Approach Results Analysis 4: Phase Resequencing Background Information Process Results Final Recommendation Acknowledgements Analysis 1: Modular Bathrooms Design Evaluation Proposed New Bathroom Layout Quaid Spearing| Construction Option South Halls Renovation | Penn State University Original Bathroom Layout • Reduced number of layouts from 10 down to 6 ▫ Increase benefits of modularization by optimizing layout Potential Solution

Analysis 1: Modular Bathrooms Background Information Planning & Procurement Design Evaluation Results Analysis 2:

Analysis 1: Modular Bathrooms Background Information Planning & Procurement Design Evaluation Results Analysis 2: SIPS Background Information Approach Results Analysis 4: Phase Resequencing Background Information Process Results Final Recommendation Acknowledgements Approach Analysis 2: SIPS Project Overview SIPS Methodology Crew Size Adjustments • • • Student Room SIPS 2013 June Parallel production of dorm wings 5 Day work weeks; Saturday serves as catchup day Float built into Activities 23 & 24 Quaid Spearing| Construction Option South Halls Renovation | Penn State University Area Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 6/3 1 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 Zone 8 Zone 9 1 6/10 2 1 July 6/17 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 August September October November 6/24 4 3 2 1 7/1 5 4 3 2 7/8 6 5 4 3 7/15 7 6 5 4 7/22 8 7 6 5 7/29 9 8 7 6 8/5 10 9 8 7 8/12 11 10 9 8 8/19 12 11 10 9 8/26 13 12 11 10 9/2 14 13 12 11 9/9 15 14 13 12 9/16 16 15 14 13 9/23 17 16 15 14 9/30 18 17 16 15 10/7 19 18 17 16 10/14 20 19 18 17 10/21 21 20 19 18 10/28 22 21 20 19 11/4 23 22 21 20 11/11 24 23 22 21 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 7 6 5 4 3 8 7 6 5 4 9 8 7 6 5 10 9 8 7 6 11 10 9 8 7 12 11 10 9 8 13 12 11 10 9 14 13 12 11 10 15 14 13 12 11 16 15 14 13 12 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 19 18 17 16 15 20 19 18 17 16 21 20 19 18 17 22 21 20 19 18 23 22 21 20 19 24 23 22 21 20 Layout and Top Track Perim. Bedroom Framing/Insulation Ductwork MEP Coring Elec. Rough In & Tele-Data 6 7 8 9 10 Perim. Bedroom Piping Door Frames & Clg/Bulkhead Framing Sprinkler Rough In Plumbing Rough In Hang GWB 11 12 13 14 15 Finish GWB Windows Prime & Paint Lights & Final Tele-Data Install Flooring 16 17 18 19 20 FCU & Mech Trim Out Doors & Hardware Adjust Sprinkler Heads Elec/Tele/Fire Alarm Trim Out Suite/Lobby Case & Window Treat 21 22 23 24 Final Paint Carpet Final Clean & Punchlist Owner FF&E December 11/18 11/25 12/2 24 23 24 24 23 22 21 24 23 22 24 23 12/9 24 12/16 12/23 12/30

Project Overview Analysis 1: Modular Bathrooms Background Information Planning & Procurement Design Evaluation Results

Project Overview Analysis 1: Modular Bathrooms Background Information Planning & Procurement Design Evaluation Results • No additional costs incurred Analysis 2: SIPS Background Information Approach Results Analysis 4: Phase Resequencing Background Information Process Results Final Recommendation Acknowledgements Results Analysis 2: SIPS Cost Analysis • Manhours remained the same • No perceivable cost savings due to schedule reduction Quaid Spearing| Construction Option South Halls Renovation | Penn State University Schedule Analysis Constructability • Decreased by 10 working days • Increased Collaboration • Allows owner to begin FF&E sooner • Material Delays • Timely Deliveries • Subcontractor Buy-in • Other Construction Activities • Enclosure • Bathrooms