Introducing the GEF International Waters Focal Area Study

  • Slides: 13
Download presentation
Introducing the GEF International Waters Focal Area Study Negombo, Sri Lanka, May 9 -13,

Introducing the GEF International Waters Focal Area Study Negombo, Sri Lanka, May 9 -13, 2016 Andrea Merla

ELEMENTS Synthesis of previous IW evaluations Portfolio Analysis: trends in the IW focal area

ELEMENTS Synthesis of previous IW evaluations Portfolio Analysis: trends in the IW focal area P 2 I Analysis: review of recent TE reports (after OPS 5) Quality at Entry: Assess coherence of projects approved during GEF 6 with Programming Directions Others: Verifying stress reduction; interviews; survey

TIMELINE APRIL 1 ST IWC 8 JULY 2016 DRAFT REPORT NOVEMBER 2016 SEPTEMBER 2016

TIMELINE APRIL 1 ST IWC 8 JULY 2016 DRAFT REPORT NOVEMBER 2016 SEPTEMBER 2016 PRESENTATION TO GEF FINAL REPORT COUNCIL

NUMEBR OF PROJECTS AND GEF ALLOCATIONS PER REPLENISHMENT CYCLE

NUMEBR OF PROJECTS AND GEF ALLOCATIONS PER REPLENISHMENT CYCLE

NUMBER AND GEF ALLOCATION OF APPROVED PROJECTS PER YEAR

NUMBER AND GEF ALLOCATION OF APPROVED PROJECTS PER YEAR

Global 15% GLOBAL, REGIONAL AND SINGLE COUNTRY PROJECTS Single Country Projects 25% Regional 60%

Global 15% GLOBAL, REGIONAL AND SINGLE COUNTRY PROJECTS Single Country Projects 25% Regional 60% Global, Regional, and Single Country Projects Global 80, 00% Single Country Projects Regional 67, 79% 70, 00% 59, 73% 60, 00% 50, 68% 50, 00% 42, 58% 40, 00% 24, 91% 30, 00% 21, 74% 15, 36% 10, 47% 6, 74% 10, 00% Count of GEF_ID % Sum of GEFAmount % Global Single Country Projects Sum of Cofin Amt % Regional

Projects By Region 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 05% 00% AFR Asia ECA

Projects By Region 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 05% 00% AFR Asia ECA Count of GEF_ID LAC Sum of GEFAmount Sum of Cofin Amt MENA Global

SINGLE COUNTRY PROJECTS: THE TOP TEN

SINGLE COUNTRY PROJECTS: THE TOP TEN

Highly Satisfactory; 5 Unsatisfactory; 3 Highly Unsatisfactory; 1 Moderately Unsatisfactory; 25 Satisfactory; 34 Moderately

Highly Satisfactory; 5 Unsatisfactory; 3 Highly Unsatisfactory; 1 Moderately Unsatisfactory; 25 Satisfactory; 34 Moderately Satisfactory; 48 Outcome Ratings of Completed Projects

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR AGENCY EXPERTS, PROJECT MANAGERS, AND COUNTRY REPRESENTATIVES The Questionnaire is divided in

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR AGENCY EXPERTS, PROJECT MANAGERS, AND COUNTRY REPRESENTATIVES The Questionnaire is divided in parts, each addressing a different project type. Participants to the survey should answer ONLY the questions related to the project they are involved in. FOUNDATIONAL TDA – SAP PROJECTS SAP IMPLEMENTATION PROJECTS SMALL ISLAND DEVELOPING STATES PROJECTS PROGRAMMATIC APPROACHES OR EQUIVALENT PROGRAMS GLOBAL PROJECTS For all survey participants: KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

PROJECTS REPRESENTED AT IWC 8 As of May 1 st 39 REGIONAL PROJECTS 1

PROJECTS REPRESENTED AT IWC 8 As of May 1 st 39 REGIONAL PROJECTS 1 SIDS PROJECT 11 CHILD PROJECTS 8 GLOBAL PROJECTS

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION! ISLAND OF CRETE

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION! ISLAND OF CRETE