International Workshop on Structure and Spectroscopy 19 21

  • Slides: 43
Download presentation
International Workshop on Structure and Spectroscopy 19 -21 March 2007 University Freiburg Nucleon Spin

International Workshop on Structure and Spectroscopy 19 -21 March 2007 University Freiburg Nucleon Spin Structure with Hadronic Collisions at COMPASS Marco Radici Pavia In collaboration with: A. Bianconi F. Conti (Univ. Brescia) (Univ. Pavia) Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 1

Examples of unexplained asymmetry data Single Spin Asymmetry (SSA) h 1 h 2 !

Examples of unexplained asymmetry data Single Spin Asymmetry (SSA) h 1 h 2 ! SSA data H X h 1 H h 2 X Single Spin Asymmetry in Drell-Yan ? Azimuthal Asymmetry in Drell-Yan Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy Drell-Yan 2

Examples of large SSA Ex. : Heller et al. , P. R. L. 41

Examples of large SSA Ex. : Heller et al. , P. R. L. 41 (‘ 78) 607 but also other data for p-Be at higher s Adams et al. (STAR), P. R. L. 92 (‘ 04) 171801 AN ~ 20%-40% as for s < (20)2 Ge. V 2 experiments! Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 3

Chiral oddness of SSA helicity basis transverse basis helicity flip QCD : massless coll.

Chiral oddness of SSA helicity basis transverse basis helicity flip QCD : massless coll. partons + collinear fact. th. several contributions to Ex. : 6 independent interference of amplitudes quark-quark elastic scattering Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 4

Collinear massless quark spinors = 1 p. QCD: helicity flip suppressed SSA suppressed !

Collinear massless quark spinors = 1 p. QCD: helicity flip suppressed SSA suppressed ! + interfer. suppressed as loops [ Kane et al. , P. R. L. 41 (78) 1689 ] Moreover rotational collinear partons ! SSA ~ 0 ! distribution fragmentation invariance NLO, higher twist, etc. . do not explain data ! Need intrinsic parton p. T ? Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy list 5

Ex. : Conway et al. (E 615), P. R. D 39 (‘ 89) 92

Ex. : Conway et al. (E 615), P. R. D 39 (‘ 89) 92 fixed target with E = 252 Ge. V (see also NA 10, Z. Phys. C 31 (’ 86) 513 ; C 37 (’ 88) 545 with 140 E 286 Ge. V ) p. QCD: massless collinear partons no dependence ) » 1 , » 0 Lam-Tung sum rule ( P. R. D 21 (80) 2712 ) 1 - – 2 = 0 exp. ) » 1 » 0. 3 sum rule violated ! Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 6

 • observed large SSA in hadronic collisions with transverse polarization mix parton helicity

• observed large SSA in hadronic collisions with transverse polarization mix parton helicity (=chirality at twist 2) and require ampl. interference • but QCD with collinear massless partons preserves helicity and interference is suppressed by loop contributions need chiral-odd nonperturbative mechanisms • observed also large azimuthal asymmetries in unpolarized Drell-Yan • QCD with collinear partons generates only radiative (=DGLAP) p. T parton distributions and small asymmetries • need intrinsic (=non DGLAP) p. T parton distribution • interaction between transverse polarization and orbital motion of partons need (naïve) T-odd nonperturbative mechanisms SSA = 0 for p"p ! X for years because of T reversal invariance! Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 7

Drell-Yan kinematics c. m. energy invariant mass factorization theorem DIS regime Collins, Soper, Sterman

Drell-Yan kinematics c. m. energy invariant mass factorization theorem DIS regime Collins, Soper, Sterman N. P. B 250 (85) 199 dominant contribution if M resonances Collins-Soper frame [P. R. D 16 (77) 2219] T momenta in plane Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 8

parton-parton correlator 0 gauge link • decomposition of (x, p. T, S) upon •

parton-parton correlator 0 gauge link • decomposition of (x, p. T, S) upon • hermiticity • parity invariance • time-reversal “ project out only the leading-twist content of number density interpretation of parton distributions how does look like? Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 9

correlator at leading twist including transverse momentum & polarization s ST def. : number

correlator at leading twist including transverse momentum & polarization s ST def. : number density of q in p following Trento Conventions [ Bacchetta et al. , P. R. D 70 (04) 117504 ] 4 possible cases: Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 10

Sivers Boer-Mulders transversity Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 11

Sivers Boer-Mulders transversity Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 11

transversity h 1 from Collins effect in SIDIS k £ Ph ¢ s. T

transversity h 1 from Collins effect in SIDIS k £ Ph ¢ s. T combine SIDIS and e+e- parametrization of h 1 [ Efremov et al. , P. R. D 73 (06) 094025 Prokudin talk Anselmino et al. , hep-ph/0701006 ] Airapetian et al. (HERMES) [ P. R. L. 94 (’ 05) 012002 ] on 6 Li. D Magnon for COMPASS @ SPIN 2006 Martin talk list Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 12

Sivers funct. f 1 T from Sivers effect in SIDIS ST 0 Lq 0

Sivers funct. f 1 T from Sivers effect in SIDIS ST 0 Lq 0 asymmetric distribution of q in transverse plane [ Burkardt, Phys. Rev. D 66(’ 02) 114005 ] parametrizations: Anselmino et al. , Prokudin talk P. R. D 72 (05) 094007 Vogelsang, Yuan, P. R. D 72 (05) 054028 Collins et al. , hep-ph/0510342 Airapetian et al. (HERMES) [ P. R. L. 94 (’ 05) 012002 ] on 6 Li. D Magnon for COMPASS @ SPIN 2006 Martin talk Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 13

“universality” theorem for Sivers function 0 T future pointing gauge link 0 past pointing

“universality” theorem for Sivers function 0 T future pointing gauge link 0 past pointing gauge link Collins P. L. B 536 (02) 43 list Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 14

Drell-Yan cross section at leading twist Boer, P. R. D 60 (’ 99) 014012

Drell-Yan cross section at leading twist Boer, P. R. D 60 (’ 99) 014012 Tangermann & Mulders, P. R. D 51 (’ 95) 3357 1 - 2 is hadronic effect? Or as QCD vacuum pol. ? [Brandenburg et al. , Z. P. C 60 (93) 697] Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 15

Monte-Carlo simulation [ Conway et al. (E 615), assume q. T dependence ! break

Monte-Carlo simulation [ Conway et al. (E 615), assume q. T dependence ! break convolution P. R. D 39 (89) 92 for -A Anassontzis et al. (E 537), P. R. D 38 (88) 1377 for p-A ] event distribution LLA QCD corrections NLLA corrections (compensate in SSA? ! f 1 (x, log Q 2) see Kawamura et al. , hep-ph/0703079 NLL+LO JPARC kin. : s=100 Ge. V 2, Q=2 Ge. V, y=0) Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 16

Generate the asymmetry 1. 2. 3. 4. select the SSA ci Si i=2 -4

Generate the asymmetry 1. 2. 3. 4. select the SSA ci Si i=2 -4 and model/parametrize it generate events in q. T, , , x 1, x 2 at fixed S 2 using A F ~ d 0 sum upon q. T, , x 1 (and also S 2 for i=2) for some for each x 2 accumulate events with F[ (, S 2)] > 0 $ U F[ (, S 2)] < 0 $ D SSA (x 2) = (U-D) / (U+D) 5. for each case, repeat simulation independently for 5 -10 times 6. build mean value and variance of SSA for each x 2 7. only statistic errors Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 17

Monte Carlo kinematics and cuts (anti-p ? ) beam on (polarized) NH 3 E

Monte Carlo kinematics and cuts (anti-p ? ) beam on (polarized) NH 3 E = 50 - 200 Ge. V s » 2 Mp E = 100 - 400 Ge. V 2 Q M range explored: (J/ & ’) 4 M 9 (Y) Ge. V avoid resonances & higher twists ~ Mp / M in “valence” region: 0. 1 x 1/2 0. 5 Moreover: 0. 5 -1 q. T 3 Ge. V/c (loose 50% of data!) 60 o 120 o (only for sin 2 distributions) Bianconi & Radici, P. R. D 71 (05) 074014 target dilution factor: # ( -NH 3) collision ~ 14/17 ( -N) + 3/17 ( -H ) only 20% of polarized events! Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 18

SSA from the Sivers effect: param. #1 Anselmino et al. P. R. D 72

SSA from the Sivers effect: param. #1 Anselmino et al. P. R. D 72 (05) 094007; D 72 (05) 099903 E fit HERMES+COMPASS SIDIS SSA data c 4 results <p. T 2>=0. 25 (Ge. V/c)2 Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 20

The flavor-average approximation neglect sea (anti)quarks + flavor average nq statistical weight consistent with

The flavor-average approximation neglect sea (anti)quarks + flavor average nq statistical weight consistent with HERMES analysis of Sivers effect assume no strong flavor dependence of sea Bianconi & Radici hep-ph/0610317 Sivers Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 21

100 K events (before dilut. ) E =100 Ge. V s=200 Ge. V 2

100 K events (before dilut. ) E =100 Ge. V s=200 Ge. V 2 4 M 9 Ge. V 0. 5 q. T 2. 5 Ge. V/c - 100 K + 25 K Bianconi & Radici P. R. D 73 (06) 114002 param. # 1 + + Nu = 0. 32 Nd = -1. 0 Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 22

Running time for Monte Carlo sample Program ! total for absorption of pions per

Running time for Monte Carlo sample Program ! total for absorption of pions per nucleon producing Drell-Yan event in the selected kinematics luminosity L x = # of “good” Drell-Yan events per nucleon and per sec. COMPASS beam L=4 x 1031 (cm-2 s-1) PRELIMINARY! (see Denisov talk) PANDA L~1031 (cm-2 s-1) ~ 40 days of running! Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 23

SSA from the Sivers effect: param. #2 Bianconi & Radici P. R. D 73

SSA from the Sivers effect: param. #2 Bianconi & Radici P. R. D 73 (06) 034018; D 73 (06) 114002 x dependence <p. T 2>=0. 25 (Ge. V/c)2 p. T “ pp 0 X SSA as Sivers effect Vogelsang & Yuan, P. R. D 72 (05) 054028 Adler et al. (PHENIX), P. R. L. 95 (05) 202001 c 4 Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 24

100 K events (before dilut. ) E =100 Ge. V s=200 Ge. V 2

100 K events (before dilut. ) E =100 Ge. V s=200 Ge. V 2 4 M 9 Ge. V 0. 5 q. T 2. 5 Ge. V/c - 100 K + 25 K Bianconi & Radici P. R. D 73 (06) 114002 param. # 2 + + Nu = 0. 7 Nd = -0. 7 Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 25

Violation of Lam-Tung sum rule no parametrizations of h 1 available, but: 0. 3

Violation of Lam-Tung sum rule no parametrizations of h 1 available, but: 0. 3 x 0. 7 fit (q. T) from NA 10 exp. [Guanziroli et al. , Z. P. C 37 (88) 545] Boer, P. R. D 60 (’ 99) 014012 Models 10% 2 p. T 3 Ge. V/c MIT [Yuan, P. L. B 575 (03) 45] 1/Nc [Pobylitsa, hep-ph/0301236] Diquark [Bacchetta et al. , P. L. B 578 (04) 109 1 p. T 2 Ge. V/c Bianconi & Radici P. R. D 71 (05) 074014 Lu & Ma, P. R. D 70 (04) 094044] PYTHIA simulation [Sissakian et al. , E. P. J. C 46 (06) 147] Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 26

Diquark-model-driven fit of • one-gluon approx. of gauge link; in SIDIS, T-odd structure from

Diquark-model-driven fit of • one-gluon approx. of gauge link; in SIDIS, T-odd structure from interference diagram • propagator of diquark in Light-Cone (LC) gauge (only polarized states to momentum; consistent with LCwf of Brodsky [N. P. B 593 (01) 311] ) • esploration of several p-q-D form factors • calculations of f 1 T q and h 1 q ; signs consistent with lattice Conti, Bacchetta, Radici in preparation [Haegler (QCDSF/UKQCD), hep-ph/0612032] Procedure: • take f 1(x, p. T) from model at Q 02 = 0. 1 Ge. V 2; calculate f 1(x) = dp. T f 1(x, p. T) • evolve f 1(x) to Q 2=16 Ge. V 2 [ q evolution (f 1) Kumano, C. P. C. 94 (96) 185 q evolution (h 1, h 1 ) Kumano, C. P. C. 111 (98) 150 ] • fit result with N x (1 -x) • change sign in h from SIDIS to Drell-Yan 1 • add factorized q. T dependence fitted to (q. T) from Q 2 NA 10 data, i. e. c 2 of previous slide • “consistency” of generated asymmetries Q 0 2 h 1 and h 1 x h 1 u Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 27

100 K events (no dilut. ) Ebeam=100 Ge. V s=200 Ge. V 2 4

100 K events (no dilut. ) Ebeam=100 Ge. V s=200 Ge. V 2 4 M 9 Ge. V 60 o 120 o Δ NA 10 fit 2 q. T 3 Ge. V/c Δ Diquark 2 q. T 3 Ge. V/c ▲ Diquark 1 q. T 3 Ge. V/c running time with anti-p beam? see Denisov talk Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 28

SSA from the Boer-Mulders effect h 1 q, h 1 q, f 1 q

SSA from the Boer-Mulders effect h 1 q, h 1 q, f 1 q from Diquark model with factorized evolved x dependence and NA 10 -fitted q. T dependence c 4 input output SSA see also PYTHIA simulation Bianconi & Radici P. R. D 73 (06) 114002 [Sissakian et al. , E. P. J. C 46 (06) 147] Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 29

200 K events (dilut. factor ¼) s=100 Ge. V 2 1. 5 M 2.

200 K events (dilut. factor ¼) s=100 Ge. V 2 1. 5 M 2. 5 Ge. V 60 o 120 o 200 K events s=200 Ge. V 2 4 M 9 Ge. V ▲ 1 q. T 3 Δ 2 q. T 3 Ge. V/c running time with anti-p beam? see Denisov talk Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 30

parton-parton correlator gauge link • decomposition of (z, k. T) upon • hermiticity •

parton-parton correlator gauge link • decomposition of (z, k. T) upon • hermiticity • parity invariance correlator at leading twist including transverse momentum & no polarization number density of h in q 2 combinations: Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 31

Collins effect in SIDIS e p e’ X chiral odd need knowledge of k.

Collins effect in SIDIS e p e’ X chiral odd need knowledge of k. T ~ - Ph. T/z Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 32

uld er s er -M Bo ers Siv s llin Co but all rely

uld er s er -M Bo ers Siv s llin Co but all rely on a factorization theorem for p. T-dependent PDF which has not yet been proven! but also in p p X Adams et al. (STAR), P. R. L. 92 (‘ 04) 171801 d ~ 1/Ph. T in p. QCD with collinear approx. (q helicity flip and ampl. interference suppressed) more complicated elementary mechanism : Qiu-Sterman (twist-3) effect ? [ Qiu & Sterman, P. R. L. 67 (91) 2264 Kouvaris et al. , P. R. D 74 (06) 114013 ] look for simpler situations! Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 33

Collins effect asymmetric azimuthal orientation of plane with collinear system of two hadrons produced,

Collins effect asymmetric azimuthal orientation of plane with collinear system of two hadrons produced, e. g. , in e p e’ ( 1 2) X p p ( 1 2) X … survives sdk. T • decomposition of (z, , k. T, R) upon with hermiticity and parity invariance [ twist 2 Bianconi et al. , P. R. D 62 (00) 034008 twist 3 Bacchetta & Radici, Intern. Workshop on Structure & P. R. D 69 (04) 074026 ] Spectroscopy 34

first suggestion [ Konishi et al. , P. L. B 78 (78) 243 ]

first suggestion [ Konishi et al. , P. L. B 78 (78) 243 ] SSA in e p" ! e’ (h 1 h 2) X [ Collins et al. , N. P. B 420 (94) 565 Jaffe et al. , P. R. L. 80 (98) 1166 Radici et al. , P. R. D 65 (02) 074031 ] at leading twist from e+e- → (h 1 h 2) (h 1’ h 2’) X (BELLE) Grosse-Perdekamp talk ? checked universality in SIDIS and e+e- at twist 2 [ Boer et al. , P. R. D 67 (03) 094003 ] evolution equations with explicit Mh dependence just as simple as PDF [ Ceccopieri, Radici, Bacchetta, in preparation ] Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy or models ! 35

Before HERMES & COMPASS data (Jaffe, Jin, Tang, P. R. L. 80 (98) 1166)

Before HERMES & COMPASS data (Jaffe, Jin, Tang, P. R. L. 80 (98) 1166) • s-p interference from - elastic scattering phase shifts only; sign change from Re[ ] (Radici, Jakob, Bianconi, P. R. D 65 (02) 074031 ) spectator model interference ~ (s) – Im[ ] P. van der Nat DIS 2005 Trento conventions ! £ (– 8/ ) Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 37

upgraded spectator model [ Bacchetta & Radici, P. R. D 74 (06) 114007 ]

upgraded spectator model [ Bacchetta & Radici, P. R. D 74 (06) 114007 ] 1. background ≡ q → π+π- X 1 2. q → ρ X 2 → π+π- X 2 3. q → ω X 3 → π+π- X 3 4. q → ω X’ 4 → π+π- (π0 X’ 4) no resonance → real s-wave channel X 1 = X 2 = X 3 = X 4 = X p-wave channel = coherent sum |2. +3. +4. | Warning: ω → [(π π)L=1 π]J=1 X 4 max number of (π+π-) pairs in s-p interference ~ Im [ p-wave channel ] parameters s-wave p-wave Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 38

fit PYTHIA distributions of pair invariant mass and z 2. +3. +4. p-wave 1.

fit PYTHIA distributions of pair invariant mass and z 2. +3. +4. p-wave 1. background s-wave Total + 5. +6. [ Bacchetta & Radici, P. R. D 74 (06) 114007 ] Mh Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy z 39

spin asymmetry 0. 023<x<0. 4 ; 0. 1<y<0. 85 Q 2>1 Ge. V 2

spin asymmetry 0. 023<x<0. 4 ; 0. 1<y<0. 85 Q 2>1 Ge. V 2 s=56. 2 Ge. V 2 ρ → π+ π- HERMES 6. 6% scale PRELIMINARY uncertainty ω → (π+π-) π0 Mh bins 0. 15 0. 22 1. 23 Mh Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 41

spin asymmetry @ COMPASS deuteron 0. 1<y<0. 9 Q 2>1 Ge. V 2 s=604

spin asymmetry @ COMPASS deuteron 0. 1<y<0. 9 Q 2>1 Ge. V 2 s=604 Ge. V 2 0. 004<x<0. 4 Mh Joosten – DIS 2005 0. 03<x<0. 4 Mh z Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 42

spin asymmetry @ COMPASS proton 0. 1<y<0. 9 Q 2>1 Ge. V 2 s=301

spin asymmetry @ COMPASS proton 0. 1<y<0. 9 Q 2>1 Ge. V 2 s=301 Ge. V 2 0. 004<x<0. 4 …. . Mh 0. 03<x<0. 4 Mh z Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 43

 (p) p(" ) ! ( ) X Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy

(p) p(" ) ! ( ) X Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 45

 (p) p ! (π π)C (π π)D X self-consistent extraction of Intern. Workshop

(p) p ! (π π)C (π π)D X self-consistent extraction of Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 46

Conclusions: perspectives for ( polarized) hadronic collisions at COMPASS 1. Drell-Yan • large asymmetries

Conclusions: perspectives for ( polarized) hadronic collisions at COMPASS 1. Drell-Yan • large asymmetries expected because of leading-twist TMD f 1 T , h 1 , and chiral-odd transversity h 1 (see Haegler talk) • target dilution factor (NH 3 ) and exp. constraints (NA 10, E 615, . . ) reduce size of asymmetry, but • outcome of MC simulation: good statistics in short running time (preliminary & optimistic see Denisov talk) allows to disentangle bulk features of most important effects: violation of Lam-Tung sum rule, sign change of f 1 T and h 1 in SIDIS Drell-Yan, . . , alternative source of info on h 1 ? 2. Semi-inclusive production of low p. T pion pairs • induced asymmetry already measured in SIDIS • hadronic collisions: possibility of self-consistent extraction of all unknowns (Dihadron fragmentation functions) alternative source of info on h 1 • requires q in the “target fragmentation region” check acceptance (see Denisov talk) Intern. Workshop on Structure & Spectroscopy 48