International trade theory and challenges Extra credit opportunity

  • Slides: 44
Download presentation
International trade - theory and challenges

International trade - theory and challenges

Extra credit opportunity Presentations on ◦ a country or ◦ a region (even a

Extra credit opportunity Presentations on ◦ a country or ◦ a region (even a town/city in U. S. ) ◦ some other subject in global business An especially good chance to discuss your home or your ancestors’ home

 We’re can schedule some now, and we’ll be continuing through the term ◦

We’re can schedule some now, and we’ll be continuing through the term ◦ I had allotted some time for these the last two sessions of the term, but better to do them earlier Length – ◦ 6 to 10 minutes (individual) ◦ Up to 18 minutes (group)

 A country presentation can describe ◦ The economic environment How do people live?

A country presentation can describe ◦ The economic environment How do people live? What is GNI per capita Provide both unadjusted and purchasing power parity (PPP) adjusted statistics How does GNI per capita level affect life? ◦ The political environment How is the country/region governed?

◦ Something of the cultural environment You can’t summarize the culture; just say one

◦ Something of the cultural environment You can’t summarize the culture; just say one or two things that strike you as important ◦ The country or region’s role in international business What does the country or region produce? How important is it to people elsewhere? Can you tell what is likely to happen in the future?

Overview of Trade Theory Free Trade occurs when a government does not attempt to

Overview of Trade Theory Free Trade occurs when a government does not attempt to influence, through tariffs, quotas, or other means, ◦ what citizens can buy from other countries or ◦ produce and sell to other countries The Benefits of Trade allow countries to be richer by specializing in products they can produce most efficiently

Trade Theory-Overview There are lots of problems with trade ◦ There may be some

Trade Theory-Overview There are lots of problems with trade ◦ There may be some ways that some governments can make things better by intervening (that is, by not practicing free trade) But government intervening in free trade is definitely dangerous Restrictions on trade have kept some countries very poor contributed to huge depressions

Mercantilism: Mid-16 th Century A nation’s wealth depends on accumulated “treasure” ◦ Gold and

Mercantilism: Mid-16 th Century A nation’s wealth depends on accumulated “treasure” ◦ Gold and silver are the currency of trade Mercantilists sought what we now call ‘development’ They argued their countries should run a trade surplus ◦ Maximize export through subsidies ◦ Minimize imports through tariffs and quotas Flaw: “zero-sum game” ◦ Mercantilists neglected to see the benefits of trade

But there was a flaw in the mercantilists’ argument They assumed that trade was

But there was a flaw in the mercantilists’ argument They assumed that trade was a zero-sum game As England, France, and the Netherlands competed with each other, many thought only about advantage for their country

Theory of Absolute Advantage Adam Smith argued (Wealth of Nations, 1776): Capability of one

Theory of Absolute Advantage Adam Smith argued (Wealth of Nations, 1776): Capability of one country to produce more of a product with the same amount of input can vary ◦ A country should produce only goods where it is most efficient, and trade for those goods where it is not efficient Trade between countries is, therefore, beneficial ◦ Example: Ghana/cocoa vs. South Korea/rice

Absolute Advantage and the Gains From Trade

Absolute Advantage and the Gains From Trade

Theory of Absolute Advantage

Theory of Absolute Advantage

There may also be long-term benefits to free trade As people specialize and seek

There may also be long-term benefits to free trade As people specialize and seek higher incomes, they may learn to do their specialties better

Comparative Advantage Suppose one country is more efficient than another in everything? There are

Comparative Advantage Suppose one country is more efficient than another in everything? There are still global gains to be made if a country specializes in products it produces relatively more efficiently than other products

 David Ricardo (Principles of Political Economy, 1817): ◦ A country should import products

David Ricardo (Principles of Political Economy, 1817): ◦ A country should import products for which it is relatively inefficient even if the country is more efficient in the product’s production than country from which it is buying Trade is a positive-sum game

Comparative Advantage and the Gains From Trade

Comparative Advantage and the Gains From Trade

Theory of Comparative Advantage

Theory of Comparative Advantage

 Countries have comparative advantage in goods for which the opportunity cost of production

Countries have comparative advantage in goods for which the opportunity cost of production is relatively low ◦ That is, those that can be produced by giving up relatively little in production of other goods

 This means your country has comparative advantage in the product or service where

This means your country has comparative advantage in the product or service where the ratio Resources required in your country. Resources required in the other country is low

How Comparative Advantage works Ghana has absolute advantage in both cocoa and rice, but

How Comparative Advantage works Ghana has absolute advantage in both cocoa and rice, but its comparative advantage is in cocoa. Cocoa Korea has comparative advantage in rice. 20 tons 15 tons Let Korea specialize in rice – Ghana expands Ghana cocoa production to replace all Korean cocoa production lost Then Ghana can replace all Korean cocoa production and the countries have more of both goods. Korea 10 tons 3. 75 tons 18 tons 15 tons Rice

The country less efficient in everything will be poor … But it would be

The country less efficient in everything will be poor … But it would be even poorer if it did not trade

Smith, Ricardo advocated free competition in the economy They believed that if people were

Smith, Ricardo advocated free competition in the economy They believed that if people were left to trade on their own, they would naturally trade the goods in which their countries had comparative advantage ◦ “Every individual seeks the most advantageous employment for his capital…. ◦ “Study of his own advantage necessarily leads him to prefer that employment most advantageous to society” - Adam Smith, 1776

Assumptions This is a very simple case, but the basic conclusions are generally valid

Assumptions This is a very simple case, but the basic conclusions are generally valid ◦ We’re assuming no transportation costs ◦ We’re simplifying by not talking about currencies ◦ We’re assuming constant returns to scale ◦ We’re assuming resources can move freely from production of one good to another ◦ We’re not thinking about effects on income distribution

 Under free trade, the country that is less efficient will have low wages

Under free trade, the country that is less efficient will have low wages It will be able to sell the products where it has comparative advantage without any special tariff or subsidy protection

 But it may need to work on infrastructure – roads, railroads, ports, airports

But it may need to work on infrastructure – roads, railroads, ports, airports ◦ “Infrastructure” = the basic equipment and structures (such as roads, bridges) that are needed for a country, region, etc. to function properly Note: This may not be in the reading ◦ China, India both sell cheap manufactured goods ◦ China sells more because it has better transportation infrastructure and government that supports manufactured exports

 It will need education for its people And it will need institutions for

It will need education for its people And it will need institutions for trade ◦ Banks, government agencies who can process exports work with foreigners ◦ Honest banks and agencies

Moral element of liberal economies Successful trading states have to have “two cultures” ◦

Moral element of liberal economies Successful trading states have to have “two cultures” ◦ In commercial culture, people trade for profit, and we hope honesty will be prized largely because it’s good business ◦ But successful economies also need guardian culture – government servants who can use force, but won’t sell themselves to the highest bidder

As we alter the Comparative Advantage Model toward realism, we get complexity Immobile resources:

As we alter the Comparative Advantage Model toward realism, we get complexity Immobile resources: ◦ Resources do not always move easily from one economic activity to another So some rice farms will persist in Ghana no matter what (Rice farmers will be losers as cheap rice comes from Korea) Diminishing returns: ◦ Diminishing returns to specialization suggests that after some point, the more units of a good the country produces, the greater the additional resources required to produce an additional unit So comparative advantage will vary with production

Production Possibility Frontier Under Diminishing Returns

Production Possibility Frontier Under Diminishing Returns

Simple Extensions of the Comparative Advantage Model Free trade has additional effects in open

Simple Extensions of the Comparative Advantage Model Free trade has additional effects in open economies: ◦ Free trade might increase a country’s stock of resources (as labor and capital arrives from abroad) ◦ It could also increase the efficiency of resource utilization inside each country as well as between them ◦ It causes knowledge to move between countries It also changes tastes and cultures

Influence of Free Trade on PPF

Influence of Free Trade on PPF

When might government intervention help a country? The infant industry argument: There may be

When might government intervention help a country? The infant industry argument: There may be industries that are uncompetitive today but could become competitive if protected for a while ◦ Oldest argument - Alexander Hamilton, 1792 ◦ Only succeeds if industry makes itself efficient ◦ Japanese automakers – were protected with ‘infant industry’ tariffs for 20+ years, became world leaders ◦ ◦ Brazil automakers - 10 th largest - wilted when protection eliminated

‘New Trade Theory’ (developed 1970 s & after) In industries with high fixed costs:

‘New Trade Theory’ (developed 1970 s & after) In industries with high fixed costs: ◦ Specialization increases output, ◦ The ability to achieve economies of scale increases through exporting ◦ Learning effects are high. These cost savings come from “learning by doing”

New Trade Theory-Applications In many industries, world demand will support few competitors Successful firms

New Trade Theory-Applications In many industries, world demand will support few competitors Successful firms may emerge because of “First-mover advantage” ◦ Economies of scale may preclude new entrants ◦ Role of the government becomes significant Some argue that it generates a need for government intervention and strategic trade policy

 Slides below are not required

Slides below are not required

These economists favored free competition They thought if businesspeople were left alone, they would

These economists favored free competition They thought if businesspeople were left alone, they would naturally export what their nations could produce cheaply

 The U. S. seems to be good at inventing new products The important

The U. S. seems to be good at inventing new products The important factors may be highly specialized ◦ Software design engineers Or the U. S. may have a unique constellation of factors that produces new products Production of the new products tends to be labor intensive at first ◦ The U. S. imports older, heavy industrial products