International Political Relations 3 Jan Brzozowski Ph D

International Political Relations 3 Jan Brzozowski, Ph. D Department of European Studies

Liberalism and contemporary theories of IR • Liberal approach in IR • Neorealism x Neoliberalism • Interdependence and its consequences

The paradox of liberal thought • At a first glance, the world is more democratic than ever • 76 countries (34. 1%) at least flawed democracies, with Democracy Index >=6 (in scale 0 -10) and populated by 49. 3% of the world’s population in 2016 • This might suggest a gradual absorption of liberal values by societies across the world

Democracy Index Map 2016 Source: Economist IU

Yet… 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2006 2008 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Northern America Western Europe Latin America and the Caribbean Asia and Australasia Central and Eastern Europe Sub-Saharan Africa Middle East and North Africa World 2015 2016

• After the Arab Spring (2010 -2013) the democracy is not gaining more influence • On the contrary, a small reduction can be increased • Which factors contributed to this process?

Discrepancy betwen domestic and foreign policy • Even if almost 50% of world population leaves in relative democracy, the liberal values can hardly ever dominate in IR • ‘international affairs have been the nemesis of Liberalism’ (…) ‘The essence of Liberalism’ (…) ‘is self-restraint, moderation, compromise and peace’ whereas ‘the essence of international politics is exactly the opposite: troubled peace, at best, or the state of war’ (Hoffmann 1987: 396)

Liberalism Fall of comunism and The End of History Creation of UN Idealism (1919 -1939) 2 nd World War Realism Cold War 11. 09. 2001

Internal liberalism (main components) • All citizens are juridically equal and possess certain basic rights to education, access to a free press, and religious toleration. • The legislative assembly of the state possesses only the authority invested in it by the people, whose basic rights it is not permitted to abuse. • A key dimension of the liberty of the individual is the right to own property, including productive forces. • Liberalism contends that the most effective system of economic exchange is one that is largely market driven and not one that is subordinate to bureaucratic regulation and control, either domestically or internationally.

Liberalism in IR (main characteristics) • liberalism aims to incorporate values of order, liberty, justice, and toleration into international relations • Emphasis on institutions and their efficiency at domestic and international level: they are crucial to protect and strenghten these values • Institutions create rules of the game (international law), but also provide a platform for peacful interaction between nation-states: a precodition for peacful co-existence • Cooperation vital in many aspects of IR: also cultural, sports etc. , as enable negotiations in BIG POLITICS

Example: ping-pong diplomacy • Since communist revolution (1949) PRC and US were not keeping diplomatic relations • China was part of the communist block and an open enemy of Americans during the Korean War (1950 -1953) • Yet in the 1960 s the relations between USSR and China started to deteriorate • Richard Nixon administration has seen a chance to insert the wedge between Chinese-Soviet troubled relations

But there is no single liberalism Heterogenous/rival concepts exist Even on most important issues such as the origins of war

Images of liberalism Public figure/period Causes of conflict Determinants of peace First image (Human nature) Richard Cobden (mid-19 th century) Individual liberty, free trade, prosperity, interdependence Second image (The state) Woodrow Wilson Undemocratic nature of (early 20 th century) international politics, especially foreign policy and the balance of power National selfdetermination; open governments responsive to public opinion; collective security Third image (The structure of the system) J. A. Hobson (early 20 th century) A world government, with powers to mediate and enforce decisions Interventions by governments domestically and internationally disturbing the natural order The balance of power system Source: Dunne

Neorealism x Neoliberalism • In order to understand most modern approaches to IR theory, we need to understand • The end of cold war finishes the bipolar model of IR • During cold war: rivalization of two superpowers (the US and USSR) and two blocks • Long term aliances within blocks, avoidance of direct confrontations between blocks • Paradoxically, the system of IR was relatively stable

Post-cold war international system • Relative dominance of the US • Quasi-unipolarity: no single superpower / no alliance of regional powers exist to balance the American power • AS IR research is Western-biased and often aims to consult Western politics, this situation is relativelly advantageous

Piorities in contemporary IR research • Keeping the current status-quo and the current distribution of power between the states • Identyfying potential threats to the stability of the system • Instead of changing the system: problem-soving theories • Partial convergence between liberal and rational paradigms • Security, conflict and cooperation between actors of IR: main aim of analyses • Inclusion of behavioral approaches and rational choice theory

Neorealism • Emphasis on (military) security and military conflicts • Investigation of power distribution and survival of states in a hostile and anarchic (no supreme power) international system

• The logic of international system depends on the distribution of power across nation-states • Power = capabilities of the state, mostly military but also economic, technological etc. • Power of the country determines its’ position in the hierarchy/structure of international system • Place in the hierarchy influences the behavior of the state

• There is room for cooperation, but the problem of absolute and relative benefits exists • The countries interested in increasing their power/capabilities through cooperation (absolute benefits) • But cooperation increases the capabilities of other partners: therefore, the notion of relative benefits is crucial • States will default/exit from alliances when they will see that their partners gain more relative to their absolute benefits • So the cooperation is often short-lived and trust in a partner usually does not exist

Neoliberalism • Even in anarchic system of international relations cooperation between countries can be beneficial and long-lasting • Cooperation should be built from the economic level, and then extended on other areas (security and military cooperation is one of the most sensitive issues in this regard)

Interdependence • In globalized world it is very difficult for a single nationstate to achieve its goals (national interests) • Increased role of non-traditional actors, such as international organizations, NGOs, MNCs • Avoiding cooperation can be very costly, as interdependence brings not only benefits, but also threats/challenges • For instance: international security threats (terrorism)

Fukuyama: extension of republican liberalism • The end of history: triumph of liberal democracy is a historical fact • Linkage between capitalism and democracy • Promotion of free-market economy and human rights – a golden rule for peacful coexistence in 21 st Century