INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Fourth Edition EUN RESNICK 10

Management of Translation Exposure Chapter Objective: 10 Chapter Ten INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT This chapter

Chapter Outline l l l Translation Methods FASB Statement 8 FASB Statement 52 Management

Translation Methods l l Current/Noncurrent Method Monetary/Nonmonetary Method Temporal Method Current Rate Method 10

Current/Noncurrent Method l The underlying principal is that assets and liabilities should be translated

Current/Noncurrent Method l Current assets translated at the spot rate. e. g. € 2=$1

Monetary/Nonmonetary Method l l l The underlying principle is that monetary accounts have a

Monetary/Nonmonetary Method l l All monetary balance sheet accounts are translated at the current

Temporal Method l l l The underlying principal is that assets and liabilities should

Temporal Method l l Items carried on the books at their current value are

Current Rate Method l l l All balance sheet items (except for stockholder’s equity)

Current Rate Method l l All balance sheet items (except for stockholder’s equity) are

How Various Translation Methods Deal with a Change from € 3 to € 2

FASB Statement 8 l Essentially the temporal method, with some subtleties. n l l

FASB Statement 52 l The Mechanics of the FASB 52 Translation Process n n

The Mechanics of FASB Statement 52 l Function Currency n l The currency that

The Mechanics of FASB Statement 52 l Two-Stage Process n n n 10 -28

The Mechanics of FASB Statement 52 Parent’s currency Foreign entity’s books kept in? Nonparent

Highly Inflationary Economies l Foreign entities are required to remeasure financial statements using the

Management of Translation Exposure l l Translation Exposure vs. Transaction Exposure Hedging Translation Exposure

Translation Exposure versus Transaction Exposure l Translation Exposure n n l Transaction Exposure n

Hedging Translation Exposure l If the managers of the firm wish to manage their

Balance Sheet Hedge l l Eliminates the mismatch between net assets and net liabilities

Derivatives Hedge l l An example would be the use of forward contracts with

Translation Exposure versus Operating Exposure l l The effect that unanticipated changes in exchange

Empirical Analysis of the Change from FASB 8 to FASB 52 l l There

End Chapter Ten 10 -38 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Slides: 39

Download presentation

Management of Translation Exposure Chapter Objective: 10 Chapter Ten INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT This chapter discusses the impact that unanticipated changes in exchange rates may Fourth Edition have on the consolidated financial statements of the multinational company. EUN / RESNICK 10 - Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Chapter Outline l l l Translation Methods FASB Statement 8 FASB Statement 52 Management of Translation Exposure Empirical Analysis of the Change from FASB 8 to FASB 52 10 -2 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Current/Noncurrent Method l The underlying principal is that assets and liabilities should be translated based on their maturity. n n l Current assets translated at the spot rate. Noncurrent assets translated at the historical rate in effect when the item was first recorded on the books. This method of foreign currency translation was generally accepted in the United States from the 1930 s until 1975, at which time FASB 8 became effective. 10 -4 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Current/Noncurrent Method l Current assets translated at the spot rate. e. g. € 2=$1 l Noncurrent assets translated at the historical rate in effect when the item was first recorded on the books. e. g. € 3=$1 10 -5 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Monetary/Nonmonetary Method l l l The underlying principle is that monetary accounts have a similarity because their value represents a sum of money whose value changes as the exchange rate changes. All monetary balance sheet accounts (cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable, etc. ) of a foreign subsidiary are translated at the current exchange rate. All other (nonmonetary) balance sheet accounts (owners’ equity, land) are translated at the historical exchange rate in effect when the account was first recorded. 10 -6 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Monetary/Nonmonetary Method l l All monetary balance sheet accounts are translated at the current exchange rate. e. g. € 2=$1 All other balance sheet accounts are translated at the historical exchange rate in effect when the account was first recorded. e. g. € 3=$1 10 -7 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Temporal Method l l l The underlying principal is that assets and liabilities should be translated based on how they are carried on the firm’s books. Balance sheet account are translated at the current spot exchange rate if they are carried on the books at their current value. Items that are carried on the books at historical costs are translated at the historical exchange rates in effect at the time the firm placed the item on the books. 10 -8 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Temporal Method l l Items carried on the books at their current value are translated at the spot exchange rate. e. g. € 2=$1 Items that are carried on the books at historical costs are translated at the historical exchange rates. e. g. € 3=$1 10 -9 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Current Rate Method l l l All balance sheet items (except for stockholder’s equity) are translated at the current exchange rate. Very simple method in application. A “plug” equity account named cumulative translation adjustment is used to make the balance sheet balance. 10 -10 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Current Rate Method l l All balance sheet items (except for stockholder’s equity) are translated at the current exchange rate. A “plug” equity account named cumulative translation adjustment is used to make the balance sheet balance 10 -11 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

How Various Translation Methods Deal with a Change from € 3 to € 2 = $1 Book value of inventory historic rate Book value of inventory at spot exchange rate 10 -13 Current value of inventory at spot exchange rate. Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

How Various Translation Methods Deal with a Change from € 3 to € 2 = $1 Under the current rate method, a “plug” equity account named cumulative translation adjustment makes the balance sheet balance. 10 -19 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

How Various Translation Methods Deal with a Change from € 3 to € 2 = $1 Sales translate at average exchange rate over the period, € 2. 50 = $1 For notes, see Exhibit 14. 1 10 -20 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

How Various Translation Methods Deal with a Change from € 3 to € 2 = $1 Translate at € 2. 50 = $1 Translate at new exchange rate, € 2. 00 = $1 For notes, see Exhibit 14. 1 10 -21 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

How Various Translation Methods Deal with a Change from € 3 to € 2 = $1 Translate at € 3 = $1 10 -22 Translate at average exchange rate, € 2. 5 = $1 For notes, see Exhibit 14. 1 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

How Various Translation Methods Deal with a Change from € 3 to € 2 = $1 Note the effect on after-tax profit. 10 -23 For notes, see Exhibit 14. 1 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

How Various Translation Methods Deal with a Change from € 3 to € 2 = $1 Note the effect that foreign exchange gains (losses) has on net income. For notes, see Exhibit 14. 1 10 -24 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

FASB Statement 8 l Essentially the temporal method, with some subtleties. n l l l Such as translating inventory at historical rates, which is a hassle. Requires taking foreign exchange gains and losses through the income statement. This leads to variability in reported earnings. Which leads to irritated corporate executives. 10 -25 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

FASB Statement 52 l The Mechanics of the FASB 52 Translation Process n n l Function Currency Reporting Currency Highly Inflationary Economies 10 -26 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

The Mechanics of FASB Statement 52 l Function Currency n l The currency that the business is conducted in. Reporting Currency n 10 -27 The currency in which the MNC prepares its consolidated financial statements. Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

The Mechanics of FASB Statement 52 l Two-Stage Process n n n 10 -28 First, determine in which currency the foreign entity keeps its books. If the local currency in which the foreign entity keeps its books is not the functional currency, remeasurement into the functional currency is required. Second, when the foreign entity’s functional currency is not the same as the parent’s currency, the foreign entity’s books are translated using the current rate method. Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

The Mechanics of FASB Statement 52 Parent’s currency Foreign entity’s books kept in? Nonparent Currency Functional Currency? Parent’s Currency Local currency Third currency Temporal Remeasurement Current Rate Translation Parent’s Currency 10 -29 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Highly Inflationary Economies l Foreign entities are required to remeasure financial statements using the temporal method “as if the functional currency were the reporting currency”. 10 -30 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Management of Translation Exposure l l Translation Exposure vs. Transaction Exposure Hedging Translation Exposure n n l Balance Sheet Hedge Derivatives Hedge Translation Exposure vs. Operating Exposure 10 -31 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Translation Exposure versus Transaction Exposure l Translation Exposure n n l Transaction Exposure n n l The effect that unanticipated changes in exchange rates has on the firm’s consolidated financial statements. An accounting issue. The effect that unanticipated changes in exchange rates has on the firm’s cash flows. A finance issue and the subject of Chapter 13. It is generally not possible to eliminate both translation exposure and transaction exposure. 10 -32 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Hedging Translation Exposure l If the managers of the firm wish to manage their accounting numbers as well as their business, they have two methods for dealing with translation exposure. n n 10 -33 Balance Sheet Hedge Derivatives Hedge Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Balance Sheet Hedge l l Eliminates the mismatch between net assets and net liabilities denominated in the same currency. May create transaction exposure, however. 10 -34 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Derivatives Hedge l l An example would be the use of forward contracts with a maturity of the reporting period to attempt to manage the accounting numbers. Using a derivatives hedge to control translation exposure really involves speculation about foreign exchange rate changes, however. 10 -35 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Translation Exposure versus Operating Exposure l l The effect that unanticipated changes in exchange rates has on the firm’s ongoing operations. Operating exposure is a substantive issue with which the management of the firm should concern itself with. 10 -36 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Empirical Analysis of the Change from FASB 8 to FASB 52 l l There did not appear to be a revaluation of firms’ values following the change. This suggests that market participants do not react to cosmetic earnings changes. Other researchers have found similar results when investigating other accounting changes. This highlights the futility of attempting to manage translation gains and losses. 10 -37 Copyright © 2007 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.