INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Fifth Edition EUN RESNICK Mc

INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Fifth Edition EUN / RESNICK Mc. Graw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The Mc. Graw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Globalization and the Multinational Firm 1 Chapter One Chapter Objectives: Understand why it is important to study international finance. Distinguish international finance from domestic finance. 1 -1

Chapter One Outline l l l 1 -2 What’s Special about “International” Finance? Goals for International Financial Management Globalization of the World Economy Multinational Corporations Organization of the Text Summary

What’s Special about “International” Finance? l l 1 -3 Foreign Exchange Risk Political Risk Market Imperfections Expanded Opportunity Set

What’s Special about “International” Finance? l Foreign Exchange Risk l l 1 -4 The risk that foreign currency profits may evaporate in dollar terms due to unanticipated unfavorable exchange rate movements. Suppose $1 = ¥ 100 and you buy 10 shares of Toyota at ¥ 10, 000 per share. One year later the investment is worth ten percent more in yen: ¥ 110, 000 But, if the yen has depreciated to $1 = ¥ 120, your investment has actually lost money in dollar terms.

What’s Special about “International” Finance? l Political Risk l 1 -5 Sovereign governments have the right to regulate the movement of goods, capital, and people across their borders. These laws sometimes change in unexpected ways.

What’s Special about “International” Finance? l 1 -6 Market Imperfections l Legal restrictions on the movement of goods, people, and money l Transactions costs l Shipping costs l Tax arbitrage

The Example of Nestlé’s Market Imperfection l Nestlé used to issue two different classes of common stock bearer shares and registered shares. l l 1 -7 Foreigners were only allowed to buy bearer shares. Swiss citizens could buy registered shares. The bearer stock was more expensive. On November 18, 1988, Nestlé lifted restrictions imposed on foreigners, allowing them to hold registered shares as well as bearer shares.

Nestlé’s Foreign Ownership Restrictions 12, 000 10, 000 Bearer share SF 8, 000 6, 000 4, 000 Registered share 2, 000 0 11 20 31 9 Source: Financial Times, November 26, 1988 p. 1. Adapted with permission. 1 -8 18 24

The Example of Nestlé’s Market Imperfection l Following this, the price spread between the two types of shares narrowed dramatically. l l l 1 -9 This implies that there was a major transfer of wealth from foreign shareholders to Swiss shareholders. Foreigners holding Nestlé bearer shares were exposed to political risk in a country that is widely viewed as a haven from such risk. The Nestlé episode illustrates both the importance of considering market imperfections and the peril of political risk.

What’s Special about “International” Finance? l 1 -10 Expanded Opportunity Set l It doesn’t make sense to play in only one corner of the sandbox. l True for corporations as well as individual investors.

Goals for International Financial Management l l l 1 -11 The focus of the text is to equip the reader with the “intellectual toolbox” of an effective global manager—but what goal should this effective global manager be working toward? Maximization of shareholder wealth? or Other Goals?

Maximize Shareholder Wealth l 1 -12 Long accepted as a goal in the Anglo-Saxon countries, but complications arise. l Who are and where are the shareholders? l In what currency should we maximize their wealth?

Other Goals l In other countries shareholders are viewed as merely one among many “stakeholders” of the firm including: l l 1 -13 Employees Suppliers Customers In Japan, managers have typically sought to maximize the value of the keiretsu—a family of firms to which the individual firms belongs.

Other Goals l l 1 -14 As shown by a series of recent corporate scandals at companies like Enron, World. Com, and Global Crossing, managers may pursue their own private interests at the expense of shareholders when they are not closely monitored. These calamities have painfully reinforced the importance of corporate governance i. e. the financial and legal framework for regulating the relationship between a firm’s management and its shareholders.

Other Goals l l 1 -15 These types of issues can be much more serious in many other parts of the world, especially emerging and transitional economies, such as Indonesia, Korea, and Russia, where legal protection of shareholders is weak or virtually non-existing. No matter what the other goals, they cannot be achieved in the long term if the maximization of shareholder wealth is not given due consideration.

Globalization of the World Economy: Major Trends l l 1 -16 Emergence of Globalized Financial Markets Emergence of the Euro as a Global Currency Trade Liberalization and Economic Integration Privatization

Emergence of Globalized Financial Markets l l l Deregulation of Financial Markets coupled with Advances in Technology have greatly reduced information and transactions costs, which has led to: Financial Innovations, such as l l 1 -17 Currency futures and options Multi-currency bonds Cross-border stock listings International mutual funds

Emergence of the Euro as a Global Currency l l 1 -18 A momentous event in the history of world financial systems. Currently more than 300 million Europeans in 15 countries are using the common currency on a daily basis. In May 2004, 10 more countries joined the European Union and adopted the euro. The “transaction domain” of the euro may become larger than the U. S. dollar’s in the near future.

Euro Area l l l l Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, l l l l 1 -19 Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, The Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain

Value of the Euro in U. S. Dollars 1 -20

Economic Integration l l 1 -21 Over the past 50 years, international trade increased about twice as fast as world GDP. There has been a sea change in the attitudes of many of the world’s governments who have abandoned mercantilist views and embraced free trade as the surest route to prosperity for their citizenry.

Liberalization of Protectionist Legislation l l 1 -22 The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) a multilateral agreement among member countries has reduced many barriers to trade. The World Trade Organization has the power to enforce the rules of international trade. On January 1, 2005 the end of the era of quotas on imported textiles ended. This is an event of historic proportions.

NAFTA l l l 1 -23 The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) calls for phasing out impediments to trade between Canada, Mexico and the United States over a 15 -year period beginning in 1994. For Mexico, the ratio of export to GDP has increased dramatically from 2. 2% in 1973 to 29% in 2006. The increased trade has resulted in increased numbers of jobs and a higher standard of living for all member nations.

Privatization l l 1 -24 The selling off state-run enterprises to investors is also known as “Denationalization”. Often seen in socialist economies in transition to market economies. By most estimates this increases the efficiency of the enterprise. Often spurs a tremendous increase in cross-border investment.

Multinational Corporations l l l 1 -25 A firm that has incorporated on one country and has production and sales operations in other countries. There about 60, 000 MNCs in the world. Many MNCs obtain raw materials from one nation, financial capital from another, produce goods with labor and capital equipment in a third country and sell their output in various other national markets.

Top 10 MNCs 1 -26 1 General Electric United States 2 Vodafone Group PLC United Kingdom 3 General Motors United States 4 British Petroleum Co. PLC United Kingdom 5 Royal Dutch/Shell Group UK/Netherlands 6 Exxon. Mobile Corporation United States 7 Toyota Motor Corporation Japan 8 Ford Motor Company United States 9 Total France 10 Eléctricité de France

End Chapter One …the following slides cover the appendix to chapter 1. 1 -27

The Theory of Comparative Advantage l 1 -28 Definition: a comparative advantage exists when one party can produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than another party.

The Geometry of Comparative Advantage l l l 1 -29 Consider the example given in appendix 1 A. There are two countries, A and B, who can each produce only food and textiles. Initially they do not trade with one another.

The Geometry of Comparative Advantage Textiles 180 A production possibilities curve shows the various amounts of food or textiles that each country can make. The production possibilities of country A are such that if they concentrated 100% of their resources into the production of textiles, they could produce 180 million yards of textiles. If country A chose to concentrate 100% of their resources into the production of food, they could produce as much as 300 million pounds of food. Food 300 1 -30 Country A can produce any combination of food and textiles between these two points.

The Geometry of Comparative Advantage Textiles As a practical matter, the citizens of country A must choose a point along their production possibilities curve; initially they choose 200 million pounds of food, and 60 million yards of textiles. 180 60 Food 200 300 1 -31

The Geometry of Comparative Advantage Textiles 240 180 The production possibilities of country B are such that if they concentrated 100% of their resources into the production of textiles, they could produce 240 million yards of textiles. If country B chose to concentrate 100% of their resources into the production of food, they could produce as much as 900 million pounds of food. 60 Food 200 300 1 -32 900 1, 200

The Geometry of Comparative Advantage Textiles As a practical matter, the citizens of country B must choose a point along their production possibilities curve; initially they choose 600 million pounds of food, and 80 million yards of textiles. 240 180 80 60 Food 200 300 1 -33 600 900 1, 200

The Geometry of Comparative Advantage Textiles 240 180 80 60 1 -34 Country A enjoys a comparative advantage in textiles because they have to give up food at a lower rate than B when making textiles. Put another way, country B enjoys a comparative advantage in food because they have to give up textiles at a lower rate than A when making more food. Geometrically, a comparative advantage exists because the slopes of the production possibilities differ. Food 200 300 600 900

The Geometry of Comparative Advantage Textiles If the countries specialize according to their comparative advantage, then country A should make textiles and trade for food, while country B should grow food and trade for textiles. 240 180 80 60 Food 200 300 1 -35 600 900

The Geometry of Comparative Advantage Textiles 420 240 180 Before trade, if both countries made only textiles, the combined production would be 420 million yards of textiles = 240 + 180. Before trade, if both countries made only food, the combined production would be 1, 200 million pounds of food = 900 + 300. 80 60 Food 200 300 1 -36 600 900 1, 200

The Geometry of Comparative Advantage Textiles The combined production possibilities curve of country A and B without trade are shown in the green line. 420 240 180 80 60 Food 200 300 1 -37 600 900 1, 200

The Geometry of Comparative Advantage Textiles Before trade, the combined production is 800 million lbs of food and 140 million yards of textiles. 420 240 180 140 80 60 Food 200 300 1 -38 600 800 900 1, 200

The Geometry of Comparative Advantage Textiles 420 County B can produce food at a lower opportunity cost, so let B produce the first 900 million pounds of food. Country A can produce textiles at a lower opportunity cost, so let them produce the first 180 million yards of textiles. 240 180 140 80 60 Food 200 300 1 -39 600 800 900 1, 200

The Geometry of Comparative Advantage Textiles The combined production possibilities curve with trade is composed of the original curves joined as shown. 420 240 180 140 80 60 Food 200 300 1 -40 600 800 900 1, 200

The Geometry of Comparative Advantage Textiles 420 The gains from trade are shown by the increase in consumption available—an extra 100 million pounds of food and 40 million yards of textiles are now available in excess of the pre-trade consumption. 240 180 140 80 60 Food 200 300 1 -41 600 800 900 1, 200

Arguments in Favor of Free Trade l l Both partners gain from trade: we have more material goods. “Freedom” in a good thing in itself. l 1 -42 In this case consumers freedom to choose imported goods and producers freedom to choose to sell to foreigners.

End Appendix One 1 -43