Internal Staff Development Time Effort Effective Schools Framework

Internal Staff Development

Time & Effort

Effective Schools Framework https: //texasesf. org/

Effective Schools Framework Introduction What is the ESF and why was it created? 4

The Effective Schools Framework An aspirational framework that describes the highest leverage school practices that can be implemented to improve student outcomes

Why was the ESF created? 6

The Effective Schools Framework aims to address gaps in the previous state framework From To Broad categories open to individual interpretation across stakeholders (LEAs, ESCs, PSPs, TEA) More focused and normed understanding of best practices Greater chance of schools not knowing where to start in their improvement paths Guidance for schools toward effective prioritization An emphasis on the campus principal and the individual school An emphasis on the district conditions necessary for campuses to succeed

The Effective Schools Framework aims to better support how campuses approach improvement From To Products Practices Quick Fixes Long-term Solutions Isolated Acts of Improvement Integrated Strategy

A Common Vision of School Best Practices Working together as an integrated whole, centered around the instructional core. Prioritized Levers > District Commitments > Essential Actions 9 > Key Practices

5 Prioritized Levers The foundational levers effective schools pull in order to ensure that students receive an excellent education The levers work together as integrated whole, centered around the instructional core. 10

13 Essential Actions Prioritized Lever 1: Strong School Leadership and Planning ❑ Develop campus instructional leaders (principal, assistant principal, teacher leaders) with clear roles and responsibilities ❑ Focused plan development and regular monitoring of implementation and outcomes Prioritized Lever 2: Effective, Well-Supported Teachers ❑ Recruit, select, assign, induct, and retain a full staff of highly qualified educators ❑ Build teacher capacity through observation and feedback cycles Prioritized Lever 3: Positive School Culture ❑ Compelling and aligned vision, mission, goals, values focused on a safe environment and high expectations ❑ Explicit behavioral expectations and management systems for students and staff ❑ Proactive and responsive student support services ❑ Involving families and community Prioritized Lever 4: High-Quality Curriculum ❑ Curriculum and assessments aligned to TEKS with a year-long scope and sequence Prioritized Lever 5: Effective Instruction ❑ Objective-driven daily lesson plans with formative assessments ❑ Effective classroom routines and instructional strategies ❑ Data-driven instruction ❑ RTI for students with learning gaps

How does the ESF strengthen the continuous improvement process? Increased focus on campus practices in addition to data Identify Needs Focused plan with support from aligned capacity building Implement and Monitor Plan Narrow focus on highest leverage areas for improvement

Goal of the ESF Diagnostic Process ü Identify campus and district strengths and areas for growth in alignment with ESF essential actions ü Determine 2 -3 highest leverage focus areas for improvement ü Support the connection to a capacity builder with expertise in these focus area 13

Moving to Action If districts and schools. . . Understand highest leverage school practices Plan to improve school practice Connect to effective & specialized support providers Assess current state of school practice Prioritize gaps in practice to strengthen Then school and student outcomes will improve

Stay Up To Date on ESF Texas. ESF. org @Texas. ESF

Capacity Builders Mónica Jaloma, Esther Mc. Carthy Jesse Teran Manuel Aldaco, Rachel Anderson, Josie Perez, Eliza Simental, Nellie Ugarte

Capacity Builders Action Coaching Student Culture Effective Schools Framework • Data-Driven Instruction Coming Soon: • Lesson Planning • Formative Assessments

Leading the Learning Co. Op

Leading the Learning Co-Op Fall 2019 Spring 2020 • Data-Driven Instruction • Data Analysis for Student Success • Interim and Local Assessments • Effective Coaching Skills Through T-TESS • Scope & Sequence TEKS RS • Giving Effective Feedback: See It, Name It, Do it • Refining Campus’ Vision, Mission and Goal Setting • Principal Supervisors Building Systems of School Support • Leading & Managing Change • Building a Strong School and Student Culture

Prioritized Lever 5: Effective Instruction

Essential Action 3: Data-driven instruction • Campus instructional leaders review disaggregated data to track and monitor the progress of all students, including students with disabilities and English learners among other student groups, and provide evidence-based feedback to teachers. • Teachers use a corrective instruction action planning process, individually and in PLCs to analyze data, identify trends in student misconceptions, determine the root cause as to why students may not have learned the concept, and create plans to reteach. • Teacher teams have protected time built into the master schedule to meet frequently and regularly for in-depth conversations about formative and interim student data, effective instructional strategies, and possible adjustments to instructional delivery focused on meeting the needs of both struggling learners and learners needing acceleration. • Student progress toward measurable goals (e. g. , % of class and individual student mastering of objectives, individual student fluency progress, etc. ) is visible in each and every classroom and throughout the school to foster student ownership and goal setting.

Essential Actions Foundational Essential Action 2. Effective classroom routines and instructional strategies 3. RTI for students with learning gaps

Effective Schools Framework Prioritized Lever 1: Strong School Leadership and Planning • District provides effective governance to support and promote student outcomes.

Student Outcome Goals 1. Students scoring in the meets grade level performance range across STAAR Reading/Writing/ELAR will increase from 28% to 58% by the end of school year 2020 -2021. 2. Students scoring in the meets grade level performance range across STAAR Mathematics will increase from 19% in Spring 2017 to 60% by the end of school year 2020 -2021. 3. High school students graduating College, Career, or Military Ready will increase from 18% in December 2018 to 50% in May 2021.

Student Outcome Goals 1. Students in 3 rd grade Mathematics through Algebra I performing at Masters Level on STAAR / EOC will increase from 19% to 38% by June 2022. 2. Students in 3 rd grade Reading through English II performing at Masters Level on STAAR / EOC will increase from 10% to 30% by June 2022. 3. Students graduating college, career and military ready will increase from 65% to 75% by June 2022.

Student Outcome Goals 1. Students performing at the Meets Grade Level Standard on STAAR Reading grade 3 rd-8 th, EOC English I & II will increase from 27% to 67% by May 2022. 2. Students performing at the Meets Grade Level Standard on STAAR Math grades 3 rd-8 th and EOC Algebra 1 will increase from 33% to 70% by May 2022. 3. Students reading on grade level (as Measured by Istation in K -2 will increase from 49% to 90% by May 2022.

Connections • How can your expertise and experience be channeled towards the implementation of ESF? • How can your products and services align to districts implementing Lone Star Governance/student outcome goals? • How may ESF and LSG enhance the focus of your organization?

Accountability • TXschools. gov

Accountability • 9 of the 12 districts increased their overall score

Accountability • 6 Districts and Charters with an “A” • 9 Districts and Charters with an “B” • 2 Districts and Charters with an “C” • 2 Districts and Charters with a “D” or “F” District BURNHAM WOOD CHARTER SCHOOL DISTRI PASO DEL NORTE ACADEMY CHARTER DIS EL PASO ACADEMY HARMONY SCIENCE ACAD (EL PASO) LA FE PREPARATORY SCHOOL VISTA DEL FUTURO CHARTER SCHOOL EL PASO LEADERSHIP ACADEMY CLINT ISD EL PASO ISD FABENS ISD SAN ELIZARIO ISD YSLETA ISD ANTHONY ISD CANUTILLO ISD TORNILLO ISD SOCORRO ISD FT HANCOCK ISD SIERRA BLANCA ISD DELL CITY ISD Overall Rating * A A C A F A B B B B A B C D

Accountability • 55 schools (21% of the region) have an “A” rating • 144 schools (55% of the region) have a “B” rating • 36 schools (14% of the region) have a “C” rating 95% of schools in ESC Region 19 have a “C” or higher rating

Accountability and CCMR

Accountability Terrace Hills M. S. CCTA Canyon Hills M. S. • 2018 Overall 66 (D) • Comprehensive Support • 2018 Overall 59(F) • Comprehensive Support • 2018 Overall 60 (D) • Comprehensive • ESC 19 served at PSP • External PSP • 2019 Overall 79 (C) • Comprehensive Progress • 2019 Overall 63 (D) • Comprehensive Reidentified • 2019 Overall 64 (D) • Comprehensive Reidentified Support

Accountability

Accountability Options H. S. • 2018 Overall 62 (D) • Comprehensive Support • ESC 19 served at PSP • 2019 Overall 91 (A) • Comprehensive Progress

Accountability and Interventions Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1

Accountability Tier 3 Overall F Rating Comprehensive Support Overall D Rating Tier 2 Targeted Support or any Domain with a D Rating Tier 1 Additional Targeted Support

Accountability TIER 1 - Interventions • Additional Targeted Support Schools Campus HARMONY SCHOOL OF INNOVATION - EL RED SANDS EL HART EL HILLSIDE EL MACARTHUR EL-INT SCHUSTER EL TRAVIS EL BRADLEY EL HACIENDA HEIGHTS EL TORNILLO H S HURSHEL ANTWINE SCHOOL BENITO MARTINEZ EL District HARMONY SCIENCE ACAD (EL PASO) CLINT ISD EL PASO ISD EL PASO ISD YSLETA ISD TORNILLO ISD SOCORRO ISD FT HANCOCK ISD

Accountability • Targeted Support Schools TIER 2 - Interventions

TIER 2 - Interventions Accountability • Targeted Support Schools

TIER 2 - Interventions Accountability • Targeted Support Schools

Accountability • Overall D of F Schools Campus LA FE PREPARATORY SCHOOL COLLEGE CAREER TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY CANYON HILLS MIDDLE GUILLEN MIDDLE ARMENDARIZ MIDDLE ALTA VISTA EL HART EL SCHUSTER EL TRAVIS EL WHITAKER EL H R MOYE EL PLATO ACADEMY TORNILLO INT BENITO MARTINEZ EL DELL CITY SCHOOL TIER 3 - Interventions Overall Rating * F D D F D D

TIER 3 - Interventions Accountability • Comprehensive Schools Campus Support Label PASO DEL NORTE ACADEMY-MESA CHARTE Comprehensive Reidentified PASEO DEL NORTE ACADEMY-VISTA DEL Comprehensive Identified EL PASO ACADEMY Comprehensive Progress EL PASO ACADEMY WEST LA FE PREPARATORY SCHOOL Comprehensive Reidentified Comprehensive Identified COLLEGE CAREER TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY Comprehensive Reidentified CANYON HILLS MIDDLE Comprehensive Reidentified TERRACE HILLS MIDDLE Comprehensive Progress ARMENDARIZ MIDDLE Comprehensive Identified OPTIONS H S Comprehensive Progress PREMIER H S Comprehensive Reidentified

Accountability • We have 130 schools that will need to engage school improvement interventions based ATS, or CS labels • ESF Overview • ESF Self Assessment • ESF Aligned TIP • As we begin the 2019 – 2020 school year, it will be critical to align our services to the Effective Schools Framework and provide the needed interventions as capacity builders.

ESF Alignment Tool • Please go to the following link to enter your department’s session information. http: //bit. ly/2 L 8 MO 9 J