Intercity Bus Study 5311Update Dr Thomas Pogue Associate
Intercity Bus Study 5311/Update Dr. Thomas Pogue Associate Director Center for Business and Policy Research University of the Pacific Cal. ACT 2017 Fall Conference, November 3, 2017
California Statewide Rural Intercity Bus Study (CIBS) 2017 Update Background Contextual Analysis October Needs Assessment April – July 2017 Stakeholder and public outreach August – November 2017 Planning Integration & Action Plan April 2016 – March 2017 – December 2017 Updated Statewide CIBS January 2017 – March 2018
Stakeholder and public outreach Steering Committee MPO/RTPA Survey Transit Agency Survey Follow-up discussions on surveys Structured interviews validating Needs Report Outreach Workshops
What matters? Priorities in intercity bus service? Capital Operating Planning/Marketing Coordination Intermodalism and essential transportation services Strategic corridors and/or unmet needs
Initial findings Should inter-city transit funding focus on developing and sustaining movement along the interregional corridors identified in the 2015 ITSP? Maybe; 46% No; 5% Yes; 49%
Initial findings If the 2015 ITSP Corridors are targeted should certain other interregional needs, be given interregional funding resources even if they are not part of an ITSP Corridor? ? – but its complicated No; 19% Yes; 81%
Initial findings Rank of Intercity Bus Goals (4= Most Important): Providing a seamless inter-regional service 3. 3 Enhancing and expanding regional bus service 3. 0 Inter-agency coordination 2. 5 Marketing and informational network development 1. 3
Initial findings Importance of these objectives? (5=Most Important): Ensuring intercity bus service connects to key primary destinations (i. e. medical facilities, educational institutions, etc. ) 4. 4 Ensuring intercity stations/terminals are part of or connect to larger regional/national systems of intercity travel 4. 2 Ensuring intercity bus service connects to other modes of transportation 4. 1 Ensuring intercity stations/terminals are a primary destination 3. 8 Ensuring coordination, ridership, mobility, quality and efficiency of service are enhanced through informational outreach and marketing
Initial findings Importance of 5311(f) eligibility? (5=Most Important): Operating Assistance Vehicle (Bus) Purchase Intercity Bus Transit Infrastructure 4. 0 Bus Related Equipment Planning and Marketing Studies 3. 1 4. 8 4. 3 3. 8
Initial findings Importance of 5311(f) objectives? (5=Most Important): Supporting services to meet the intercity travel needs of residents in nonurbanized areas 4. 68 Supporting connection between non-urbanized areas and the larger regional/national system of intercity bus service 4. 65 Supporting the intercity bus network's growth to address service gaps 4. 56 Supporting the intercity bus network's infrastructure through capital investment in facilities 3. 96 Supporting the intercity bus network's infrastructure through planning and
Initial findings Support or oppose the following (5=Highest Support): Allow 5311(f) funding to favor intercity bus routes that are part of the corridors identified in the 2015 ITSP, but also allocate a fixed share or value of funding to intercity bus routes in rural areas outside of those corridors. 3. 9 Prioritizing 5311(f) funding to intercity bus services based on measures related to the program's objectives, such as inter-modal connectivity, resident needs, and key locations served by the intercity service. 3. 6 Allow 5311(f) funding to prioritize existing intercity bus services, but also allocate a fixed share or value of funding to expanding or developing new intercity bus services 3. 1 Focus 5311(f) funding on intercity bus services that are part of the corridors identified in the 2015 ITSP - whether they are existing, expanding or new - before any funding goes to intercity bus services in other areas. 3. 0 Making 5311(f) funding available only to existing intercity bus services, with only funds left
Initial findings Provider type emphasis? (5=Greatest Emphasis): Public transit providers Public-private partnerships 3. 7 Private transit providers 3. 4 4. 3
THANK YOU!
- Slides: 14