Interactive graphics Understanding OLS regression Normal approximation to

  • Slides: 21
Download presentation
Interactive graphics Understanding OLS regression Normal approximation to the Binomial distribution

Interactive graphics Understanding OLS regression Normal approximation to the Binomial distribution

General Stats Software example: OLS regression example: Poisson regression as well as specialized software

General Stats Software example: OLS regression example: Poisson regression as well as specialized software

Specialized software Testing: • Classical test theory – ITEMIN • Item response theory –

Specialized software Testing: • Classical test theory – ITEMIN • Item response theory – – BILOG-MG PARSCALE MULTILOG TESTFACT

Specialized software Structural equation modeling (SEM) – – –

Specialized software Structural equation modeling (SEM) – – –

Specialized software Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) – –

Specialized software Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) – –

Open data

Open data

Run simple linear regression

Run simple linear regression

Analyze Regression Linear

Analyze Regression Linear

Enter the DV and IV

Enter the DV and IV

Check for confidence intervals

Check for confidence intervals

Output Age accounts for about 37. 9% of the variability in Gesell score The

Output Age accounts for about 37. 9% of the variability in Gesell score The regression model is significant, F(1, 19) = 13. 202, p =. 002 The regression equation: Y’=109. 874 -1. 127 X Age is a significant predictor, t(9)=-3. 633, p=. 002. As age in months at first word increases by 1 month, the Gesell score is estimated to decrease by about 1. 127 points (95% CI: -1. 776, -. 478)

Click to execute Enter the data Fit a Poisson loglinear model: log(Y/pop) = +

Click to execute Enter the data Fit a Poisson loglinear model: log(Y/pop) = + 1(Fredericia) + 2(Horsens) + 3(Kolding) + 4(Age)

G 2 = 46. 45, df = 19, p <. 01 City doesn’t seem

G 2 = 46. 45, df = 19, p <. 01 City doesn’t seem to be a significant predictor, whereas Age does.

Plot of the observed vs. fitted values--obviously model not fit

Plot of the observed vs. fitted values--obviously model not fit

Fit another Poisson model: log(Y/pop) = + 1(Fredericia) + 2(Horsens) + 3(Kolding) + 4(Age)

Fit another Poisson model: log(Y/pop) = + 1(Fredericia) + 2(Horsens) + 3(Kolding) + 4(Age) + 5(Age)2 Both (Age) and (Age)2 are significant predictors.

Plot of the observed vs. fitted values: model fits better

Plot of the observed vs. fitted values: model fits better

Fit a third Poisson model (simpler): log(Y/pop) = + 1(Fredericia) + 2(Age) + 3(Age)2

Fit a third Poisson model (simpler): log(Y/pop) = + 1(Fredericia) + 2(Age) + 3(Age)2 All three predictors are significant.

Plot of the observed vs. fitted values: much simpler model

Plot of the observed vs. fitted values: much simpler model

Item Response Theory Person Ability Easy item Item Difficulty Hard item Low ability person:

Item Response Theory Person Ability Easy item Item Difficulty Hard item Low ability person: easy item - 50% chance

Item Response Theory Person Ability Easy item Item Difficulty Hard item Low High ability

Item Response Theory Person Ability Easy item Item Difficulty Hard item Low High ability person: person, moderately difficult item - 10% 90% chance

Probability of success 100% - 50% - Item Response Theory -3 -2 -1 0

Probability of success 100% - 50% - Item Response Theory -3 -2 -1 0 Item 1 2 Item difficulty/ 3 Person ability