Intentional Relationship Model The Therapeutic Relationship The therapeutic

  • Slides: 9
Download presentation
Intentional Relationship Model

Intentional Relationship Model

The Therapeutic Relationship • “The therapeutic relationship is a socially defined and personally interpreted

The Therapeutic Relationship • “The therapeutic relationship is a socially defined and personally interpreted interactive process between therapist and a client” (Taylor, 2008, p. 54). During client-therapist interactions, it is therapist’s responsibility to foster therapeutic relationship and develop the client’s occupational engagement. Every action, including verbal and nonverbal communication from therapist is purposeful and aims to facilitate occupational engagement with the client. • References • Taylor, R. R. (2008). The intentional relationship: Occupational therapy and use of self. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.

The Modes • • • The Intentional Relationship Model defines six modes of relating

The Modes • • • The Intentional Relationship Model defines six modes of relating to a client that have been identified in occupational therapy practice. These modes are: Advocating: understanding that disability is a result of environmental barriers and as a therapist responding to physical, social, and environmental barriers that a client encounters. Collaborating: making decisions jointly with the client and involving the client in reasoning, expectations, and having the client participate actively in these decisions. Empathizing: bearing witness to and fully understanding a client’s physical, psychological, interpersonal and emotional experience. Encouraging: providing the client with hope, courage, and the will to explore or perform a given activity. Instructing: educating the client in therapy and assume a teaching style in their interactions with the client. Problem-Solving: relying heavily on using reason and logic in their relationships with the client. Each therapist has their own preference based on personality traits and characteristics (Taylor, 2008). While therapist has a preference, therapist should also attempt to best align the mode with the client’s preference within his or her personality and maintaining authenticity when relating to a client. References Taylor, R. R. (2008). The intentional relationship: Occupational therapy and use of self. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.

The Client • • Each client is equipped with a unique set of experiences,

The Client • • Each client is equipped with a unique set of experiences, challenges presently being faced, and an individual interpretation of any given situation. In addition, each client has his or her own set of interpersonal characteristics that are interpreted by therapist (Taylor, 2008). There are 12 categories of interpersonal characteristics: Communication style: the clients’ approaches to a formally spoken or signed language Capacity for trust: trust is built over the course of a therapeutic relationship, clients may have cautions or difficulty with trust Need for control: the degree to which a client attempts to assume control over what is said and done during therapy Capacity to assert needs: the clients’ ability to discuss what they want from therapist openly and directly Response to change or challenge: how the client responds when presented with change or challenge Affect: the clients’ expression of emotion Predisposition to giving feedback: the degree to which the client is comfortable with and predisposed towards appropriately providing feedback Capacity to receive feedback: the clients’ level of comfort with receiving positive or constructive feedback and the clients’ response to this feedback Response to human diversity: the clients’ response to a wide range of differences that distinguish individuals from one another Orientation toward relating: the level at which the client expects and prefers therapeutic relationship to be conducted. This varies between clients Preference for touch: the clients’ personal preference and interpretation of touch Capacity for reciprocity: the capacity of giving and sharing between client and therapist • • • References Taylor, R. R. (2008). The intentional relationship: Occupational therapy and use of self. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis. start footer • • •

The Inevitable Interpersonal Events of Therapy • • • • • The interpersonal events

The Inevitable Interpersonal Events of Therapy • • • • • The interpersonal events are described as “naturally occurring communications, reactions, processes, tasks, or general circumstances that take place within the context of the client-therapist interaction” (Taylor, 2008, p. 117). There are 11 categories of interpersonal events: Expression of strong emotion: The client’s external displays of internal feelings that are shown with a level of intensity beyond usual cultural norms for interactions. Intimate self-disclosure: The client’s statements or stories that reveal something unobservable, private, or sensitive about the person making the disclosure. Power dilemmas: The dilemma is characterized by an undeniable power difference between the client and therapist. Nonverbal cues: The client’s communications that do not involve the use of formal language such as facial expression or body posture. Crisis points: An unanticipated, stressful events that cause clients to become distracted and/or that temporarily interfere with the clients’ ability for occupational engagement. Resistance and reluctance: Resistance is a client’s passive or active refusal to participate in some or all aspects of therapy for reasons linked to therapeutic relationship. Reluctance is disinclination toward some aspect of therapy for reasons outside therapeutic relationship. Boundary testing: Boundaries provide limitations and help the client to understand what to expect during therapy sessions; boundary testing is when a client behavior violates or asks therapist to act in ways that are not part of therapeutic relationship. Empathetic breaks: Occur when a therapist fails to notice or understand a communication from a client or initiates a communication or behavior that is perceived by the client as hurtful or insensitive. Emotionally charged therapy tasks and situations: Activities or circumstances that can lead clients to become overwhelmed or experience uncomfortable emotional reactions such as embarrassment, humiliation, or shame. Limitations of therapy: The client’s restrictions on the available or possible services, time, resources, or therapist actions. Contextual inconsistencies: Any aspect of a client’s interpersonal or physical environment that changes during the course of therapy. These events typically consist of emotion, threat, and opportunity for the client and therapist with the potential of harming the client-therapist relationship if not handled appropriately. It is therapist’s responsibility to navigate the inevitable interpersonal event with the client appropriately. The therapist’s role is to maintain and foster the client-therapist relationship. References Taylor, R. R. (2008). The intentional relationship: Occupational therapy and use of self. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis. start footer navigation object : Below Left Navigation

The Therapist • The therapist is not only delivering the technical aspects, but also

The Therapist • The therapist is not only delivering the technical aspects, but also responsible for facilitating and providing intentional therapeutic encounters with the client (Taylor, 2008). The AOTA Practice Framework outlines the use of self as skill within the scope of practice for occupational therapy practitioners (American Occupational Therapy Association, 2008). • References • American Occupational Therapy Association (2008). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (2 nd ed). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 625 -683. • Taylor, R. R. (2008). The intentional relationship: Occupational therapy and use of self. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.

The Modes • • • The Intentional Relationship Model defines six modes of relating

The Modes • • • The Intentional Relationship Model defines six modes of relating to a client that have been identified in occupational therapy practice. These modes are: Advocating: understanding that disability is a result of environmental barriers and as a therapist responding to physical, social, and environmental barriers that a client encounters. Collaborating: making decisions jointly with the client and involving the client in reasoning, expectations, and having the client participate actively in these decisions. Empathizing: bearing witness to and fully understanding a client’s physical, psychological, interpersonal and emotional experience. Encouraging: providing the client with hope, courage, and the will to explore or perform a given activity. Instructing: educating the client in therapy and assume a teaching style in their interactions with the client. Problem-Solving: relying heavily on using reason and logic in their relationships with the client. Each therapist has their own preference based on personality traits and characteristics (Taylor, 2008). While therapist has a preference, therapist should also attempt to best align the mode with the client’s preference within his or her personality and maintaining authenticity when relating to a client. References Taylor, R. R. (2008). The intentional relationship: Occupational therapy and use of self. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.

Assessments • The Self-Assessment of Modes Questionnaire – Version II was designed to assist

Assessments • The Self-Assessment of Modes Questionnaire – Version II was designed to assist therapists in identifying preferred mode use during therapy sessions. The Self-Assessment of Modes Questionnaire – Version II continues to be researched for reliability and validity. This is available as a free download. • SELF-ASSESSMENT OF MODES QUESTIONNAIRE - VERSION II • Self-administered to determine preferential mode use as a therapist during interactions with a client. • Therapeutic Mode Use Scoring Key • Taylor, R. R. , Ivey, C. , Shepherd, J. , Simons, D. , Brown, J. , Huddle, M. , Kardouni, N. , Kirby, M. , La. Rue, C. , Steele, R. (2013). Self-assessment of modes questionnaire – version II. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago.