Integrated Justice Models Integrated Justice Two types of
- Slides: 23
Integrated Justice Models
Integrated Justice Two types of integration: l Vertical – The upward sharing of information between agencies to facilitate workflow l Horizontal – Data sharing between like agencies usually limited to real time inquiries
Integrated Justice Principle Architectures Central Repository l Unified data base l Collects and stores information from multiple agencies l Each component of the justice system enters and retrieves data from the same computer system Distributed Systems l No central repository l Each agency maintains its own system l Users view published data directly or thru middleware server l WAN l Portal to access state level systems l Can also support county integration
Integrated Justice Central Repository l Law Enforcement l Jail Management l Courts State’s Attorney l Probation l l. Law Enforcement l. Criminal l. Civil l. Juvenile l. Jury
Integrated Justice Washington DC Participants l DC Police l US Attorney l Public Defender l Courts l Probation l Corrections Functionality – Access to l. Arrest Data Transfer l. DMV l. Mug l. Sex Shots Offenders l. Wanted Persons l. Juvenile History l. Public Access
Integrated Justice Washington DC Systems Architecture l Hub and Spoke – Justice Server as hub WAN connectivity l 5 formats to exchange data including XML l Predefined queries l – Allow access to data in other agency systems Core Arrest Data l DC police gather core data and forward to Core Data Transfer l Data available to all JUSTIS agencies who can download data into their legacy system server
Integrated Justice Participants l All justice agencies Functionality l “Google for Cops” Information available l Booking Photos l Arrest Warrants l Wanted Persons l DMV l Sex Offender, Gang, Parole l 911 CAD Data San Diego Systems Architecture l Sun Ultra 10 Web Servers l INFOTECH Software l WAN l COTS Web Browser l MDT accessible l 2500 workstations l Public Access
Integrated Justice Colorado Functionality Participants l CICJIS Queries l Law Enforcement – Criminal History l District & County – Driver’s License Courts – Warrants l Youth Corrections l Data Transfer l District Attorneys – Arrest Information l Department of – Case Filings Corrections – Amended Charges l Colorado Bureau of – Court Scheduling Investigation – Dispositions & Sentencing
Integrated Justice Colorado Systems Architecture l Middleware Solution l Virtual Database l Sybase Omni Connect software l Each agency maintains its own legacy system l Connected by central index Central Indexed by SID l Information is routed according to business rules l Real time data exchange
Integrated Justice Minnesota Participants l Police & Sheriffs l City & County Prosecutors l Public Defenders l District & Supreme Courts l Corrections l Sentencing Commission Functionality Access to: l Court Information l Arrest Photos l Booking Information l Victim Notification l DMV l Pawnshop l Agency data sharing
Integrated Justice Minnesota Systems Architecture l Local agencies connect thru Integration hub l Each hub contains business rules to share justice data within that jurisdiction l Hub also provides means to share information with local systems, the integration backbone, and pointers to additional data Key Components l State managed Integration Backbone l Regional, county, & locally managed Integration Middleware and Web Services hubs. l State Criminal Justice Data Network
Integrated Justice Nebraska Participants l Law Enforcement l Prosecutors l Public Defenders l Courts l Probation l Jails and Corrections l Parole l Social Services Functionality – Access to: l Criminal History l Local Jail Bookings l Mug shots l DMV l Sex Offenders l Orders of Protection l Standardized Case Management Systems – Police – Prosecutors – Jail
Integrated Justice Nebraska Systems Architecture l Internet Technology l WAN l Data copied to NCJIS server or directly accessed thru central index l Data files remain under control of participating agency
Integrated Justice Pennsylvania Participants l 32 State Agencies – State Police – DMV – Corrections – Probation & Parole 27 counties l 300 Police Departments l Functionality –Access to: l Criminal History l Juvenile Arrests l DL Photos l Inmate Locator l Query justice data in local systems l Court Case Status l Share documents between agencies
Integrated Justice Pennsylvania County Justice Hub l Provides single data integration platform to support local information sharing l Messaging Infrastructure – Enables integration of separate computer systems by sending – Data mapping, conversion, and integration messages to each other l Application Adapters l Case File Transfer – Interfaces & format XML – Transfer of pertinent data from l GUI one agency to another as offender progresses through l WAN justice system Systems Architecture l JNET pulls together legacy systems over middleware l Business to Business Platform
Integrated Justice Kansas Participants l State Police l Sheriffs and Local Police l Courts l District Attorneys l Department of Corrections l DMV l Juvenile Justice l Kansas Bureau of Investigation Functionality Access to: l Criminal History l Missing Persons l Wanted Persons l Registered Offenders l DMV l Incident Reporting l Email
Integrated Justice Kansas Systems Architecture l Integration of existing applications thru Omni Connect and SQL databases l Internet and Intranet l Middleware server l Web Services
- Modal and semi modals
- Integrated justice system
- Social justice awareness
- Examples of intermediate sanctions
- Team nursing and modular nursing
- Types of logic models
- Disadvantages of taba model
- Advantages of wireframe modelling
- Linguistic models in hci
- Dml commands in sql with examples
- Types of forecasting models
- Hunkins model of curriculum development
- Types of logic models
- Types of assignment model
- Urban land use
- Types of regression models
- Types of mathematical models
- Types of pharmaceutical business models
- Two nonadjacent angles formed by two intersecting lines
- Two little feet go tap tap tap
- Osha 1910 134
- Two two four cryptarithmetic solution
- The author of both passages agree that
- Describing congruent angle relationships