Institutional Effectiveness Spring 2020 Update Institutional Research Achieving

Institutional Effectiveness Spring 2020 Update

Institutional Research Achieving the Dream - Equity Data Disaggregation Campus Voices Institutional Assessment: Mission, Vision, and Values

Data Disaggregation - THREE YEAR GRADUATION RATE FALL 2014 - FALL 2018 – RACE & ETHNICITY Three Year Graduation Rates 50. 0% Fall Entry Year: 2011 Asian 31. 4% Black 20. 6% Hispanic 22. 6% White 29. 9% Total 25. 6% 45. 0% 40. 0% 35. 0% 30. 0% 25. 0% 20. 0% 15. 0% 10. 0% 5. 0% 0. 0% Fall 2014 Fall 2015 Asian Black Fall 2016 Hispanic Fall 2017 White Total Fall 2018 Fall 2012 27. 8% 23. 8% 27. 4% 33. 2% 28. 0% Fall 2013 31. 5% 20. 7% 27. 2% 32. 8% 27. 5% Fall 2014 42. 4% 25. 9% 30. 7% 33. 7% 31. 8% Fall 2015 42. 0% 25. 4% 29. 7% 32. 5% 31. 0%

Institutional Research – Campus Voices Faculty Staff Satisfaction Survey - Administered in Fall 2018 and Fall 2019 - N 2018 = 396 - N 2019 = 389 Student Equity Survey - Administered in Fall/Spring 2018 -19 - Will be administered again in March 2020 - N 2018 -19 = 607 Structured conversations with students were held during the Spring 2019 and Fall 2019 semesters regarding their equity experiences on campus. A total of 5 sessions have been held with 50+ students.

100. 0% Faculty/Staff Satisfaction Survey Overall Job Satisfaction 2018 -2019 90. 0% 80. 0% 70. 0% 60. 0% 50. 0% 40. 0% 30. 0% 20. 0% 10. 0% Faculty Non-Teaching Instructional Staff Classified Staff 2018 2019 Executive Total

Faculty/Staff Satisfaction Survey Fall 2019: Changes from Fall 2018 • Satisfaction with college leadership increased from 45% to 53%, primarily due to movement of 7% from neutral to positive. The percentage dissatisfied with college leadership remained at 26%. • The following are still concerns but satisfaction did improve: • Internal campus communication from 40% to 51%. • Bathrooms from 22% to 31%. • Website from 42% to 48%. • Physical condition of classrooms from 25% to 32%.

Student Equity Survey Do your instructors create and environment that supports diversity, respects differences, and makes all students feel welcome? Least often: Black men Are your instructors open to hearing the ideas and experiences of all students? Least often: Black and white men Do you complete assignments on time? Least often: Black and Hispanic men Do you study for tests? Least often: Asian, Black, and Hispanic men; Black and Hispanic women

Campus Voices - Office of Institutional Effectiveness – Faculty Advisory Board (OIE-FAB) OIE-FAB Mission The mission of the Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Advisory Board (OIE-FAB) is to provide a structure through which administrators, faculty, and students can collaborate in collecting, interpreting, and disseminating data. Through this collaboration, we seek to address the many aspects of student success, and are guided by the ultimate goal of serving our students equitably and effectively. OIE-FAB Goals - Provide faculty with more access to institutional data and reports - Provide faculty with a voice regarding the analysis and reporting of college data - Discover ways to add meaning to data - Promote opportunities for faculty-centered interpretations of data - Increase the qualitative, quantitative, and research design literacy of faculty and administrators

Institutional Assessment – Mission, Vision, Values Faculty/Staff Satisfaction Survey What is going on at Kingsborough? Faculty Advisory Board / Administrative Partners / Campus Climate Committee Structured Conversations Are we living up to our Mission, Vision, and Values?

Assessment – Administrative, Educational, and Student Support (AES) – 2019 -2020 Service. issues@kbcc. cuny. edu - build campus awareness Registrar – - concerns with waiting time, follow-up Access. Ability – universal design Student Life – redesign leadership training

Governance Review College Council Steering Committee • President Schrader • Prof. Ed Martin • Prof. Paul Ricciardi • Prof. Rick Repetti • Prof. Michael Sokolow • VP Richard Fox

Governance Review Sources of recommendations • Research by the committee • Suggestions from faculty and staff • Secondary recommendations from potential consultants

Governance Review Consultants being considered: • Academic Innovators / President Emeritus • Higher Ed faculty member • College president Second-round interviews are being scheduled

Strategic Planning - Committee

Strategic Plan – Preliminary Framework - Student Success Operational Excellence Governance and Planning Community and Communications Workforce Development & Strategic Partnerships - Academic Innovation (Academic Plan) Equity Enrollment

Strategic Plan – Preliminary Framework • The Strategic Plan is just as it says – a plan that allows us to be strategic about the directions we would like the College to move in the next five years. • The Strategic Planning committee was formed through an election, volunteer, and appointment process that ensured a representative group. • The committee has composed a broad framework consisting of the 6 areas listed before. It is now in the process of gathering feedback from the campus community to improve definitions of the areas. Please fill out the survey. • Once that survey is closed, the committee will organize conversations with the campus community to operationalize the framework by coming up with strategies and activities that will allow us to collaboratively address the framework, and strategically allocate resources.

Planning & Accreditation • Standard I – Mission and Goals • Standard II – Ethics and Integrity • Standard III – Design and Delivery of the Student Learning Experience • Standard IV – Support of the Student Experience • Standard V – Educational Effectiveness Assessment • Standard VI – Planning, Resources, and Institutional Improvement • Standard VII – Governance, Leadership, and Administration

Planning & Accreditation • Completed the new-format Annual Institutional Update • Midpoint Peer Review 2020 -2021 • Self-Study and Team Visit 2024 -2025 • We have formed a team to begin compiling documentation of compliance with the new standards.

The End