Installation Planning Integration process IMT update Installation Planning

Installation Planning • Integration process – IMT update • Installation Planning & Schedules – 2007 Installations – BTH -> FEH “ 2008” Installation October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 1 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

Integration Management Team Overview • IMT Organization – Integration Area managers are points of contact for changes and schedules – Changes are documented in a Design Change Request (DCR) form – Signatures from Integration Area Managers and System Managers assures acknowledgement and communication across systems – Project Office final approval – assures funding path is known and approved – DCR to CF provides clear direction that action on change is approved and can begin – Budget Change Request (BCR) to be submitted by group performing work (normally CF) October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 2 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

System Design/Construction Integration • Integration Management process – Integration Management Team • Established core team to ensure systems wide communication • Review and approve change requests to CF from technical groups • Review Issue For Construction (IFC) drawings for technical requirements and compatibility • Review installation plans and provide input on integration activities • Document change requests that are cross divisional (affecting more than one system) – Processes • A Design Change Request, once approved, gets turned into a BCR by group doing work • Technical requirement documents are tracked by the QA Manager; Engineering Specification Document (ESD), Physics Requirement Document (PRD), Room Data Sheet (RDS), Interface Control Document (ICD) October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 3 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

Integration Management Team IMT Design Topics and Issues to date DCRs complete & approved Service Building Power: IMT-DCR-1006 -01 Offset Mirror support pad relocation: IMT-DCR-1006 -02 Electron Beam dump: IMT-DCR-1106 -01 (Linac-CF) NEH Concrete Wall Penetrations: IMT-DCR-0207 -01 Beam Dump Crane: IMT-DCR-0507 -02 NEH Hutch cable trays: IMT-DCR-0607 -01 Undulator Hall electrical power dist: IMT-DCR-0807 -01 LCW for LTU: IMT-DCR-0907 -01 NEH Laser bay/FEE cable trays: IMT-DCR-1007 -01 FEE Fiber Optic cable penetrations: IMT-DCR-1007 -02 DCRs in process FEE Electrical Alcove: IMT-DCR-0307 -01 Issues being worked PPS requirements for CF (lighting controls, AC power, HVAC/ventilation controls, etc) Service Building cable tray height changes The process is working well and continues with weekly meetings October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 4 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

Shutdown Planning & Installation Schedule • Installation Planning & Schedules – Install org chart & planning – 2007 & 2008 Installations October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 5 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

* * * October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 6 Denotes IMT member Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

Installation Planning • 2007 SLAC Shutdown –SLAC downtime – September, October, November 2007 • 2007 Installation Planning (more details in breakouts) – Installation through BC 2 & all cable plant; including cables through the BSY into the BTH West – Using SLAC Schedule process for SLAC resource loading • 2008 Installation Planning – LCLS installations begin at Early Occupancy dates defined by TCCo & LCLS – 2008 Installation schedule developed to begin detailed planning & integration process – refined by the rebaseline • Early Co-Occupancy dates being defined • Will follow on 2007 Installation learning curve and use P 3 for detailed install schedule (shift work, multiple calendars, etc) • Schedule shows Metrology work starting as early as December 2007 October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 7 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

2007 Installation Planning • 2007 Installation Planning – A 2007 Installation Schedule Readiness Review was held on March 16 - report determined that: • Integrated schedule is needed; amount of work shown by independent schedules does not match downtime duration and conflict with each other • Majority of system will be ready for the down; just need to fit into the timeline – Detailed schedule being developed in MS Project • Integration of individual system schedules • Weekly LCLS Installation meetings held • Weekly SLAC Downtime meetings held • SLAC Directors Readiness Review held on May 16 – report confirmed the LCLS plan and schedule is sound and will maintain the downtime dates as published • LCLS is major focus of downtime, confirms laboratory support October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 8 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

Shutdown Planning & Installation Schedule • Installation Planning & Schedules – BTH -> FEH; aka “ 2008” Installation October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 9 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

2008 Installation Planning • 2008 Installation Planning – LCLS installations begin at Early Occupancy dates defined by TCCo • BTH, Undulator Hall & Service Buildings available as early as December 5, 2007; NEH 12/21/07; X-ray tunnel 1/8/08; FEH 3/24/08; SB 2. 3 late December • TCCo has priority over co-occupied space until B. O. – BTH-NEH B. O. 3/21/08; X-ray tunnel – FEH B. O. 6/23/08 • Subcontract SOWs are being prepared October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 10 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

2008 LCLS Installation Schedule 1 of 7 2008 Schedule • Co-Occupancy dates defined • Major subcontracts used for installations • First activity is Metrology network installation 2007 Downtime LTU components connect to cables installed through BSY in 2007 downtime October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 11 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

LTU Hardware contained inside BTH West and BTH Entry areas are East & West mazes, and openings at headhouse Will plan access areas to limit interferences with Undulator and LTU installation phases West Maze entry point Headhouse entry East Maze – Undulator entry point SB 2. 1 SB 2. 2 BTH West tunnel October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review SB 2. 3 12 Undulator Hall Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

2008 LCLS Installation Schedule 2 of 7 LTU components installed in BTH Undulator girder installation October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 13 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS UNDULATOR SYSTEM 33 rf Beam Position Monitors 33 Beam Finder Wires Wire Position Monitor Hydro static level system 33 Undulators 33 Quadrupoles/Correctors EM air-cooled 10 Long breaks 22 Short Breaks Supports with movers 5 DOF plus horizontal slider Vacuum System interconnects October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 14 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

2008 LCLS Installation Schedule 3 of 7 E- Dump components installed FEE installation (Phase 3 & 4 delayed until FY 09) October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 15 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS 2008 Installation schedule FEE systems are well along in the planning stages October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 16 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

2008 LCLS Installation Schedule 4 of 7 NEH Installations; most of which are delayed into FY 09 October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 17 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS 2008 Installation schedule NEH overview NEH Hutches October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 18 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

2008 LCLS Installation Schedule 5 of 7 X-Ray tunnel and FEH installation delayed until FY 2009 October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 19 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

2008 LCLS Installation Schedule 6 of 7 Summary of PPS and System Tests October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 20 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

2008 LCLS Installation Schedule 7 of 7 2008 Downtime Systems ready for first electron beam into LTU & dump by 10/22/08 Commissioning activities leading to CD-4 2009 Downtime October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 21 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

Summary • 2008 Installation Planning – Early occupancy of Conventional Facilities will begin the installation process for technical systems – Does not require Linac/PEPII down for LCLS installations • BTH West installation puts some limits on beam operation to other areas like ESA – Need to coordinate several subcontracts (~3 -4? ) to install mechanical systems and cable plant simultaneously – Detailed Installation planning in process by coordinators October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 22 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu

End of Presentation October 29 -31, 2007 FAC Review 23 Richard M. Boyce boyce@slac. stanford. edu