Innovations in scholarly communication Reconsidering your workflow Bianca
Innovations in scholarly communication Reconsidering your workflow Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman, Utrecht University Library ECTH 2016 conference, The Hague, September 28, 2016 (except logo’s) @Ms. Phelps @jeroenbosman
Global survey 2015 -2016 20, 663 respondents 1174 postdocs/Ph. D students in Medicine
Discovery Analysis Writing Publication Outreach Assessment
Discovery Analysis Writing Publication Outreach Assessment
Discovery Analysis Writing Publication Outreach Assessment
Simple or complicated? A model of the research cycle Preparation: • Define & crowdsource research priorities / ideas / collaborations preparation • Get funding / contract Discovery: Assessment: • Search literature / data / code / … • Comment / peer review • Getdiscovery access assessment • Determine impact of research • Get alerts / recommendations output • Read / view Outreach: • Determine impact of researchers Analysis: • Annotate • Archive/share posters • Collect / mine / extract data analysis • Archive/share presentations outreach • Share protocols / notebooks / workflows • Tell about research outside academia • Analyze • Researcher. Publication: profiles/networks Writing: • Archive / share publications • Write / code • Archive / share data & code • Visualize writing publication • Select journal to submit to • Cite • Publish • Translate
Simple or complicated? A model of the research cycle preparation Rounds of grant writing and application assessment discovery outreach analysis Submit, peer review, rejection, resubmitting publication writing Iterations of search and reading Rounds of experiments and measurements Drafting, receiving comments, rewriting
What tools are you curious about? http: //tinyurl. com/ECTHtools
http: //tinyurl. com/ECTHtools
Tool alternatives for WRITING
What do your peers do? Survey results Word Google Drive 1138 247 La. Te. X 112 (and also) others 78 25 Scrivener Overleaf 13 Authorea 7 Scalar 3
Tool alternatives for ANALYSIS
What do your peers do? Survey results Excel 908 SPSS 699 (and also) others 428 R 269 Mat. Lab 165 i. Python Notebooks 13 ROpen. Sci 7 DHBox 2
Tool alternatives for PUBLICATION
What do your peers do? Survey results Topical journal (trad. publisher) 884 Topical journal (OA publisher) 534 Megajournal (OA publisher) 313 Megajournal (trad. publisher) 273 (and also) others 28 F 1000 Research 27 Datajournal 8 Winnower 2
Tool alternatives for MEASURING IMPACT
What do your peers do? Survey results JCR (impact factor) 451 Web of Science 371 Scopus 233 Altmetric 136 PLOS article-level metrics 97 (and also) others 52 Impact. Story Harzing Publish-or-Perish 22 10
The research cycle as a workflow
The research cycle as a workflow: interoperability
The research cycle as a workflow: general requirements available for your OS / browser available in your language low cost / free easy to learn high performance / speed security / privacy
The research cycle as a workflow Traditional Innovative y y y
Constraining and enabling contexts for changing your workflow
Constraining and enabling contexts for open and reproducible workflows • • • assessment criteria institutional policies/culture PI demands learning curves agreements with collaborators uncertainty over effects & legitimacy political support at (inter)national level • pressure from funders • public stance on Open Science by institution • user-friendly and powerful tools • interoperability • role models • attention for positive effects •
http: //www. bbc. com/news/business-34877507
http: //101 innovations. wordpress. com j. m. bosman@uu. nl b. m. r. kramer@uu. nl
Data sharing Dataset Data Note Dashboard http: //101 innovations. wordpress. com Scripts
- Slides: 28