INCOSE 2004 TOULOUSE FRANCE Teaching Continuous Risk Management

  • Slides: 17
Download presentation
INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE

INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE

Teaching Continuous Risk Management Using A Requirements Management Tool James C. Helm Associate Professor,

Teaching Continuous Risk Management Using A Requirements Management Tool James C. Helm Associate Professor, Systems Engineering School of Science and Computer Engineering 2700 Bay Area Boulevard Houston, Texas 77058 -1098 VPN 281 -283 -3875 FAX 281 -283 -3870 helm@cl. uh. edu http: //sce. cl. uh. edu/helm INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE

Overview u Risk Management Paradigm & Functions u Risk Statement by Paradigm function u

Overview u Risk Management Paradigm & Functions u Risk Statement by Paradigm function u Rational Requisite. Pro Requirements Tool u Requisite. Pro Applied to Continuous Risk Management Your Logo here INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 3

Introduction u Current risk management tools essentially capture and track risks early in a

Introduction u Current risk management tools essentially capture and track risks early in a project’s life cycle but fall short of supporting the ongoing activities of tracking, mitigating and documenting the artifacts involved with the entire continuous risk management process u Apply a requirements management tool, Requisite. Pro [Rational, 2003] to a Continuous Risk Management (CRM) paradigm [Dorofee, 96]. u The requirement management Tool Requisite. Pro is designed to support the entire requirements management process throughout a project’s life cycle INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 4

Risk Management Paradigm INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 5

Risk Management Paradigm INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 5

Components of Risk Management - 1 Identify • Search for and locate risks before

Components of Risk Management - 1 Identify • Search for and locate risks before they become problems Analyze • Convert risk data into useable information for determining priorities and making decisions Plan • Translate risk information into planning decisions and mitigating actions (both present and future), and implement those actions INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 6

Components of Risk Management - 2 Track • Monitor risk indicators and mitigation actions

Components of Risk Management - 2 Track • Monitor risk indicators and mitigation actions Control • Correct for deviations from the risk mitigation plans and decide on future actions Communicate & Document • Provide information and feedback to the project on the risk activities, current risks, emerging risks, and Project Documents INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 7

Risk Information Sheet RISK ID Risk Information Sheet Priority Risk Statement Date Identified: Probability

Risk Information Sheet RISK ID Risk Information Sheet Priority Risk Statement Date Identified: Probability Impact Timeframe Originator Classification Assigned to: Context Approach: Research / Accept / Watch / Mitigate Contingency Plan and Trigger Status Date_____ Lessons Learned Approval INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE Closing Date Closing Rationale 8

Rational Requisite. Pro Requirements Tool Requisite. Pro has the ability to: • • •

Rational Requisite. Pro Requirements Tool Requisite. Pro has the ability to: • • • instantiate template documents track the progress of each individual risk taken from an information sheet track, watch, and mitigate risk, as a team evaluates risks activities maintain schedules and traceability of risks tracked, watched, or mitigated maintains this information in a user selected database INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 9

Requirement Management Tool Applied to Continuous Risk Management Microsoft Access Risk Management Document Database

Requirement Management Tool Applied to Continuous Risk Management Microsoft Access Risk Management Document Database INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 10

Requirements Management Tool Applied to Continuous Risk Management Identify Risk Properties Dialogue Box -

Requirements Management Tool Applied to Continuous Risk Management Identify Risk Properties Dialogue Box - View INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 11

Requirements Management Tool Applied to Continuous Risk Management Analyze Risk List Attribute Matrix INCOSE

Requirements Management Tool Applied to Continuous Risk Management Analyze Risk List Attribute Matrix INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 12

Requirements Management Tool Applied to Continuous Risk Management Plan Risk Mitigation Attribute Matrix INCOSE

Requirements Management Tool Applied to Continuous Risk Management Plan Risk Mitigation Attribute Matrix INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 13

Requirements Management Tool Applied to Continuous Risk Management – Track Mitigation Traced From Risk

Requirements Management Tool Applied to Continuous Risk Management – Track Mitigation Traced From Risk Matrix INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 14

Requirements Management Tool Applied to Continuous Risk Management Control Risk Actions Traced Into Risks

Requirements Management Tool Applied to Continuous Risk Management Control Risk Actions Traced Into Risks INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 15

Summary u The overall process flow for the continuous risk management paradigm was presented.

Summary u The overall process flow for the continuous risk management paradigm was presented. u Each stage of the paradigm was dissected and the activities inserted into a requirements management tool -- Requisite. Pro. u Requisite. Pro is a powerful requirement tool, which was easily applied to risk management. u The tool helps teams manage project risks comprehensively, promotes communication and collaboration among team members, and reduces project uncertainty. u Requisite. Pro offers the power of documentation and a database linked to all items of a Project. u A very important feature of Requisite. Pro is that, if any item in a View is changed, the associated items are simultaneously changed in all the other Project Package Views. INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 16

u Dorofee, A. J. ; Walker, J. A. ; Alberts, C. J. ; Higuera,

u Dorofee, A. J. ; Walker, J. A. ; Alberts, C. J. ; Higuera, R. P. ; Murphy, R. L. ; Williams, R. C. , Continuous Risk Management Guidebook, Pittsburgh, Pa. : Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1996. u Hall, Elaine M. ; “Managing risk: Methods for Software Systems Development. ” Addison-Wesley, 1998, Page 195. u NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 2003 http: //smo. gsfc. nasa. gov/crm/ u Rational Software, “Rational Requisite. Pro, ” 18880 Homestead Road, Cupertino CA 95014, URL www. rational. com. u Royce, W. W. (1970). Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques. Proc. IEEE WESTCON, Los Angeles, 1 -9 [9] [SEI 92] Software Engineering Institute. "The SEI Approach to Managing Software Technical Risks. " Bridge (October 1992): 19 -21. u u Van Epps, Cindy, “Automating Risk Management with Rational Requisite. Pro, ” Rational Users Conference, Session RM 01, 2000. u Van Scoy, Roger L. Software Development Risk: Opportunity, Not Problem. (CMU/SEI-92 -TR-30, ADA 256743). Pittsburgh, Pa. : Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute, 1992. INCOSE 2004 - TOULOUSE - FRANCE 17