In the name of God Peptic Ulcer Disease

  • Slides: 48
Download presentation
In the name of God Peptic Ulcer Disease By: E. Salehifar (Clinical Pharmacist)

In the name of God Peptic Ulcer Disease By: E. Salehifar (Clinical Pharmacist)

Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD) l l l PUD: 10% of the people in their

Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD) l l l PUD: 10% of the people in their lifetime Prevalence of active disease: 1 -2% Duodenal ulcers Gastric ulcers Others: Ulcers of esophagus Zollinger-Ellison (gastrin-producing tumor)

Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Dyspepsia l l l 25 -55% of the people in their

Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Dyspepsia l l l 25 -55% of the people in their lifetime Abdominal pain or discomfort Symptoms of early satiety, bloating, nausea & vomiting l Nonulcer Dyspepsia: 60% l PUD: 20% l GERD: 20%

GERD Backflow of GI contents into the esophagus resulting in esophagitis l Classic symptom:

GERD Backflow of GI contents into the esophagus resulting in esophagitis l Classic symptom: Heartburn or burping up of stomach contents into the mouth l Major concern: Barrett’s esophagus (a predisposing factor for esophagus cancer) l

Mucus secreting cells Antrum: G cells (Gastrin) Body: Parietal cells (H+, IF), chief cells

Mucus secreting cells Antrum: G cells (Gastrin) Body: Parietal cells (H+, IF), chief cells (Pepsinogen)

Stomach physiology l l l Fundus (mucus-secreting cells) Body (80 -90%) Parietal cells (acid,

Stomach physiology l l l Fundus (mucus-secreting cells) Body (80 -90%) Parietal cells (acid, intrinsic factor) Chief cells (pepsinigen) Antrum (10 -20%) G cells (gastrin)

Regulation of acid secretion l Increase l Decrease l ACH Histamine Gastrin l PGE

Regulation of acid secretion l Increase l Decrease l ACH Histamine Gastrin l PGE Cholecystokinin Glucagon VIP l l l

What is the cause of PUD? l No acid, No Ulcer! (PH) l Helicobacter

What is the cause of PUD? l No acid, No Ulcer! (PH) l Helicobacter pylori (HP) l NSAIDs l Cigarette Smoking

HP: A Gram negative spiral bacteria

HP: A Gram negative spiral bacteria

HP l l l Was isolated in 1983 (Campylobacter pylori) Infection is more common

HP l l l Was isolated in 1983 (Campylobacter pylori) Infection is more common in older individual Person to person transmission Is found most consistently in gastric antrum pathogenesis: Urease (↑NH 3), cytotoxin, inflammation, breakdown of mucosal defense

Why HP is implicated in PUD? l l 90% of PUD, in the absent

Why HP is implicated in PUD? l l 90% of PUD, in the absent of NSAIDs exposure, are associated with HP Is found in 90% of DU & 70% of GU patients Eradication of HP accelerates the ulcer healing and decreases the recurrence rate PUD in HP negatives is rare

HP: Is not a single cause of PUD! l l HP positive: 50 -90%

HP: Is not a single cause of PUD! l l HP positive: 50 -90% of general population 15 -30%: PUD 20 -40%: Nonulcer dyspepsia 30 -65%: Asymptomatic HP infection is not associated with acute perforated DU

When PUD occurs? Aggressive factors Defensive factors HP l H+ l Pepsin l NSAIDs

When PUD occurs? Aggressive factors Defensive factors HP l H+ l Pepsin l NSAIDs (Direct, ↓PGE) l Smoking (↑H+ & bile salt reflux, ↓PGE & mucosal blood flow) l l l l PGE Somatostatin Mucus HCO 3¯ Mucosal blood flow Rapid regeneration Resitution

Clinical presentation l l The most common symptom: epigastric pain Pain is not well

Clinical presentation l l The most common symptom: epigastric pain Pain is not well localized DU pain commonly occurs with empty stomach and relieves by food antacid GU pain occurs at any time frequently immediately or 1 -3 hours after a meal

Clinical presentation (continue) l l l Pain dose not always correlate with ulcer especially

Clinical presentation (continue) l l l Pain dose not always correlate with ulcer especially in elderly taking analgesics and in patients with high pain tolerance Other symptoms: nausea, vomiting, belching, bloating & anorexia endoscopy is needed for definitive diagnosis

PUD: Is there any role for foods? l l Caffeine, milk, alcohol, spicy foods

PUD: Is there any role for foods? l l Caffeine, milk, alcohol, spicy foods increase acid secretion and cause dyspepsia, but they can not increase risk of PUD Acute alcohol ingestion can damage the gastric mucosa, leading to GI bleeding, however alcohol has not been proven to cause PUD

PUD: Genetic association l 20 -50% of patients with DU have a positive family

PUD: Genetic association l 20 -50% of patients with DU have a positive family history of PUD

PUD: Association with Stressful life l Stressful life events thought by some to exacerbate

PUD: Association with Stressful life l Stressful life events thought by some to exacerbate PUD

Epidemiology (incidence & prevalence) l l l Increase in PUD during the beginning of

Epidemiology (incidence & prevalence) l l l Increase in PUD during the beginning of the 20 th century with a peak in 1950 s Over the past 2 decade, DU have declined (both outpatient & inpatient episodes) GU has remained stable perhaps due to aging & use of ulcerogenic drugs

PUD (Geographic variation) l l In Japan, GU is 5 -10 times more common

PUD (Geographic variation) l l In Japan, GU is 5 -10 times more common In the US & European countries, DU is 2 times more common

PUD (gender) l l In 1968, rate of PUD in men was twice, but

PUD (gender) l l In 1968, rate of PUD in men was twice, but now is similar for men & women Hospitalization of women with GU have increased markedly for patients older than 65

PUD (age) l l GU is rare before age 40, and the peak incidence

PUD (age) l l GU is rare before age 40, and the peak incidence occurs from ages 55 -65 The incidence of DU increase with age until the age of 60 years

PUD (morbidity & mortality) l l l Mortality of PUD has declined during the

PUD (morbidity & mortality) l l l Mortality of PUD has declined during the past 20 years Less than 2% of patients receiving therapy are expected to have a complication One of the most common GI diseases that results in loss of work and high-cost service

Comparison of DU & GU l l l l l DU Increases with age

Comparison of DU & GU l l l l l DU Increases with age Common in US Hyperacidity Hypergastrinemia ↑ parietal cell mass Genetic influence Incidence ↓ ↑ frequency in cirrhosis More common in blood O l l l l l GU Rare before 40 Common in Japan Normal or low acid Normal or sl. ↑ gastrin Normal parietal cell mass No genetic influence No ↓ in incidence No ↑frequency in cirrhosis More common in blood A

Treatment l. Goals l l l Relief of symptoms Promotion of ulcer healing Prevention

Treatment l. Goals l l l Relief of symptoms Promotion of ulcer healing Prevention of ulcer recurrence and complications

Treatment l l l Eradication of HP (seropositive DU & GU) Acid suppression (DU)

Treatment l l l Eradication of HP (seropositive DU & GU) Acid suppression (DU) PPIs H 2 -blockers Antiacids Enhancing mucosal defenses (GU, DU) Sucralfate

Treatment l In HP (+) patients: l Eradication of HP l l l In

Treatment l In HP (+) patients: l Eradication of HP l l l In HP (–) patients: H 2 blockers, Sucralfate & antacid are equally effective, but H 2 blockers are much easier to use with less drug interactions PPIs may be slightly more effective than H 2 blocker and should be reserved for refractory cases

H 2 Blockers Cimetidine (Tagamet) Tab: 200 mg, Inj: 200 mg/2 ml l Ranitidine

H 2 Blockers Cimetidine (Tagamet) Tab: 200 mg, Inj: 200 mg/2 ml l Ranitidine (Zantac) Tab: 150 mg, Inj: 50 mg/2 ml l Famotidine Tab: 20 mg, 40 mg l B B B

H 2 Blockers (indications) l l l l DU GU GERD ZE have equal

H 2 Blockers (indications) l l l l DU GU GERD ZE have equal efficacy (70 -95% healing rate after 4 -8 weeks of therapy) Potency & duration of action of famotidine (& nizatidine) is greater, but all can be used once daily In GERD, all H-2 blockers should be used before meals

H 2 Blocker dosage for DU & GU l l l Cimetidine: 300 mg

H 2 Blocker dosage for DU & GU l l l Cimetidine: 300 mg QID, 400 mg BD, 800 mg HS Ranitidine: 150 mg BD, 300 mg HS Famotidine: 20 mg BD, 40 mg HS -Dosage adjustment in moderate to severe renal insufficiency -Sr Cr may increase with cimetidine

H 2 Blockers (Adverse Effects) Are remarkably safe l Common: GI (diarrhea, constipation), CNS

H 2 Blockers (Adverse Effects) Are remarkably safe l Common: GI (diarrhea, constipation), CNS (confusion, headache, dizziness, drowsiness), Rash l Gynecomastia & Impotence: Cimetidine l Heptotoxicity: Ranitidine l

Drug interactions l l l Cimetidine: Phenytoin, Warfarine, theophylline Cimetidine & Ranitidine: Procainamide &

Drug interactions l l l Cimetidine: Phenytoin, Warfarine, theophylline Cimetidine & Ranitidine: Procainamide & NAPA (↓tubular secretion) All H 2 -Blockers: Ketokonazole, Fe

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) l l Omeprazole (Prilosec®) Cap: 10, 20 mg Lansoprazole (Prevacid®)

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) l l Omeprazole (Prilosec®) Cap: 10, 20 mg Lansoprazole (Prevacid®) Cap: 15, 30 mg Rabeprazole (Aciphex®) Tab: 20 mg Pantoprazole (Protonix®) Tab: 20, 40 mg - PPIs relieve symptoms and heal ulcer more quickly than H 2 Blockers (2 -4 W compared to 4 -8 W)

PPIs (Pharmacokinetic) l l l Enteric-coated granules within capsule Bioavailability: 30 -80% Omeprazole &

PPIs (Pharmacokinetic) l l l Enteric-coated granules within capsule Bioavailability: 30 -80% Omeprazole & lansoprazole are prodrugs for O. sulfonamide, L. sulfone, hydroxy lansoprazole Despite the short t 1/2, antisecretory effects is present 72 hr No dosage adjustment in renal disease

PPIs (ADRs) l l l ADRs are relatively negligible Include GI (nausea, diarrhea, abdominal

PPIs (ADRs) l l l ADRs are relatively negligible Include GI (nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain), CNS (dizziness, headache), rash, gynecomastia, ↑ SGOT, SGPT No risk of hyperplasia and carcinoid tumor in spite of hypergastrinemia

PPIs (Drug Interactions) l l Omeprazole decreases metabolism of diazepam, phenytoin, warfarin (2 C

PPIs (Drug Interactions) l l Omeprazole decreases metabolism of diazepam, phenytoin, warfarin (2 C 9) Less interaction with Lansoprazole Pantoprazole also is metabolized by sulfotransferase, it appears to interact less with cyp 450 Rabeprazole can modestly increase Dig

Sucralfate (Carafate®) Protects ulcerated tissue from aggressive factors (pepsin, acid, bile salts) l PH

Sucralfate (Carafate®) Protects ulcerated tissue from aggressive factors (pepsin, acid, bile salts) l PH 2 -2. 5 → forms a physical barrier to injury l Not absorbed systemically l Other protective actions on the mucosa (PG, bicarbonate) l Duodenal ulcer (active, maintenance) & Gu l

Sucralfate (ADR) l l Constipation Dry mouth Nausea Rash

Sucralfate (ADR) l l Constipation Dry mouth Nausea Rash

Eradication of H. Pylori Monotherapy not recommended l PPI or bismuth + two antibiotics

Eradication of H. Pylori Monotherapy not recommended l PPI or bismuth + two antibiotics l l l Amoxicillin Clarithromycin Metronidazole Tetracycline

OCA (10 days) Omeprazole: 20 mg BD l Clarithromycin: 500 mg BD l Amoxicillin:

OCA (10 days) Omeprazole: 20 mg BD l Clarithromycin: 500 mg BD l Amoxicillin: 1000 mg BD l

LAC (14 days) l Lansoprazole 30 mg bid before meals l Amoxicillin 1000 mg

LAC (14 days) l Lansoprazole 30 mg bid before meals l Amoxicillin 1000 mg bid with meals l Clarithromycin 500 mg bid with meals

OC l Omeprazole 20 mg BID, 30 days l Clarithromycin 500 mg TID, 14

OC l Omeprazole 20 mg BID, 30 days l Clarithromycin 500 mg TID, 14 days

LCM, OCM (14 days) l l l PPI: (Lansoprazole 30 mg BD or Omeprazole

LCM, OCM (14 days) l l l PPI: (Lansoprazole 30 mg BD or Omeprazole 20 mg BD), 2 weeks Clarithromycin: 500 mg BD, 2 weeks Metronidazole: 500 mg BD, 2 weeks

Summary l Importance of HP in development of PUD l Clinical symptoms of DU

Summary l Importance of HP in development of PUD l Clinical symptoms of DU & GU l Treatment principles