Improved dualimage reversible data hiding method using the
Improved dual-image reversible data hiding method using the selection strategy of shiftable pixels' coordinates with minimum distortion Source: Signal Processing, Vol. 135, pp. 26 -35, June 2017. Authors: Heng Yao, Chuan Qin, Zhenjun Tang, Ying Tian Speaker: Jia-Long Lin Date: 2017/02/23
Outline l Related Work l Proposed Scheme l Experimental Results l References l Comments 1
Related Work [22] Tzu-Chuen Lu, Jhih-Huei Wu, Chun-Chih Huang “Dual-image-based reversible data hiding method using center folding strategy” Signal Processing, vol. 115, pp. 195 -213, 2015 45 Original image 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 2
Related Work 45 43 46 3
Related Work 4
Proposed Scheme 45 46 44 5
Proposed Scheme 45 45 44 46 44 6
Proposed Scheme 44 46 46 45 44 45 7
Proposed Scheme Lu et al. ’s method [1] Proposed method 8
Proposed Scheme Proposed method k=2 k=3 Lu et al. ’s method [22] Message xi' xi" 00 xi xi 00 xi− 1 xi+1 01 xi− 1 xi 10 xi xi− 1 10 xi xi 110 xi− 1 xi+1 11 xi xi− 1 111 xi+1 xi− 1 000 xi xi 000 xi− 2 xi+2 001 xi− 1 xi 001 xi− 2 xi+1 010 xi xi− 1 010 xi− 1 xi+1 011 xi− 1 xi 100 xi+1 xi− 1 100 xi xi 101 xi− 2 xi+1 101 xi xi− 1 110 xi+1 xi− 2 110 xi+1 xi− 1 1110 xi− 2 xi+2 111 xi+1 xi− 2 1111 xi+2 xi− 2 9
Experimental Results 10
Experimental Results Method Measure PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) Lena 48. 14 524, 288 1. 00 Baboon 48. 14 524, 288 1. 00 Peppers 48. 13 524, 288 1. 00 Barbara 48. 13 524, 288 1. 00 Boat 48. 13 524, 288 1. 00 Goldhill 48. 14 524, 288 1. 00 Chang et al. [16] PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) 39. 89 802, 895 1. 53 39. 91 802, 524 1. 53 39. 94 799, 684 1. 53 39. 89 802, 888 1. 53 39. 89 802, 716 1. 53 39. 90 802, 698 1. 53 Qin et al. [17] PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) 46. 85 557, 052 1. 06 46. 80 557, 096 1. 06 46. 39 557, 245 1. 06 46. 85 557, 339 1. 06 46. 84 557, 194 1. 06 46. 85 557, 194 1. 06 Lu et al. [18] PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) 49. 21 524, 288 1. 00 49. 21 524, 204 1. 00 49. 20 524, 192 1. 00 49. 21 524, 288 1. 00 49. 21 524, 284 1. 00 49. 21 524, 288 1. 00 Jafar et al. [19] PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) 48. 71 650, 369 1. 24 48. 71 650, 799 1. 24 48. 71 627, 637 1. 19 48. 71 650, 781 1. 24 48. 71 651, 093 1. 24 48. 72 650, 726 1. 24 Proposed (k=1) PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) 54. 16 393, 099 0. 75 54. 15 393, 235 0. 75 54. 17 392, 785 0. 75 54. 16 392, 918 0. 75 54. 14 393, 673 0. 75 54. 16 393, 210 0. 75 Proposed (k=2) PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) 51. 14 589, 659 1. 12 51. 15 589, 394 1. 12 51. 15 589, 570 1. 12 51. 14 589, 819 1. 13 51. 14 589, 969 1. 13 51. 14 589, 709 1. 12 Proposed (k=3) PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) 46. 37 819, 356 1. 56 46. 37 819, 080 1. 56 46. 38 818, 342 1. 56 46. 38 819, 156 1. 56 46. 37 819, 036 1. 56 46. 37 819, 269 1. 56 Chang et al. [15] 11
Experimental Results Method Measure PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) Lena 52. 39 393, 276 0. 75 Baboon 52. 39 393, 212 0. 75 Peppers 52. 39 393, 490 0. 75 Barbara 52. 39 393, 270 0. 75 Boat 52. 39 593, 040 0. 75 Goldhill 52. 39 393, 078 0. 75 Lee & Huang [21] PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) 49. 63 560, 801 1. 07 49. 62 560, 686 1. 07 49. 64 560, 572 1. 07 49. 63 561, 223 1. 07 49. 63 561, 255 1. 07 49. 63 560, 740 1. 07 Lu et al. [22] (k=2) PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) 51. 14 524, 288 1. 00 51. 14 524, 210 1. 00 51. 15 524, 240 1. 00 51. 14 524, 288 1. 00 51. 15 524, 286 1. 00 51. 14 524, 288 1. 00 Lu et al. [22] (k=3) PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) 46. 37 786, 432 1. 50 46. 38 786, 258 1. 50 46. 37 785, 670 1. 50 46. 38 786, 432 1. 50 46. 38 786, 429 1. 50 46. 36 786, 432 1. 50 Proposed (k=1) PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) 54. 16 393, 099 0. 75 54. 15 393, 235 0. 75 54. 17 392, 785 0. 75 54. 16 392, 918 0. 75 54. 14 393, 673 0. 75 54. 16 393, 210 0. 75 Proposed (k=2) PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) 51. 14 589, 659 1. 12 51. 15 589, 394 1. 12 51. 15 589, 570 1. 12 51. 14 589, 819 1. 13 51. 14 589, 969 1. 13 51. 14 589, 709 1. 12 Proposed (k=3) PSNR* (d. B) capacity (bit) embedding rate (bpp) 46. 37 819, 356 1. 56 46. 37 819, 080 1. 56 46. 38 818, 342 1. 56 46. 38 819, 156 1. 56 46. 37 819, 036 1. 56 46. 37 819, 269 1. 56 Lee et al. [20] 12
References [15] C. C. Chang, Y. C. Chou, T. D. Kieu Information Hiding in Dual Images with Reversibility in: Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering MUE '09, 2009, pp. 145– 152, . [16] C. C. Chang, T. C. Lu, G. Hong, Y. H. Huang, Y. M. Hsu A high payload data embedding scheme using dual stego-images with reversibility in: Proceedings of the 9 th International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing (ICICS), 2013, pp. 1 -5. [17] C. Qin, C. C. Chang, T. J. Hsu Reversible data hiding scheme based on exploiting modification direction with two steganographic images Multimed. Tools Appl. , 74 (2015), pp. 5861– 5872 [18] T. C. Lu, C. Y. Tseng, J. H. Wu Dual imaging-based reversible hiding technique using LSB matching Signal Process. , 108 (2015), pp. 77– 89 [19] I. F. Jafar, K. A. Darabkh, R. T. Al-Zubi, R. R. Saifan An efficient reversible data hiding algorithm using two steganographic images Signal Process. , 128 (2016), pp. 98– 109 [20] C. F. Lee, K. H. Wang, C. C. Chang, and Y. L. Huang A reversible data hiding scheme based on dual steganographic images Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, 2009, pp. 228237 [21] C. F. Lee, Y. L. Huang Reversible data hiding scheme based on dual stegano-images using orientation combinations Telecommun. Syst. , 52 (2013), pp. 2237– 2247 13
Comments ü From another point of view to find more space to embed information. ü Messages of different lengths are noteworthy. 14
- Slides: 15