IMPORTANT SUPREME COURT CASES TO KNOW MARSHALL COURT

  • Slides: 41
Download presentation
IMPORTANT SUPREME COURT CASES TO KNOW

IMPORTANT SUPREME COURT CASES TO KNOW

MARSHALL COURT • Chief Justice John Marshall served as Chief Justice from 1801 -1835.

MARSHALL COURT • Chief Justice John Marshall served as Chief Justice from 1801 -1835. His “tenure” on the Supreme Court expanded the authority of the federal government. • KNOW THIS FACT FOR THE IMPORTANCE OF THE COURT. KEY MARSHALL CASES TO KNOW

MARBURY v. MADISON 1803 • • Midnight Judges Adams and Jefferson Writ Judicial Review

MARBURY v. MADISON 1803 • • Midnight Judges Adams and Jefferson Writ Judicial Review

Mc. CULLOCH v. MARYLAND 1819

Mc. CULLOCH v. MARYLAND 1819

Mc. CULLOCH v. MARYLAND 1819 • National Bank • Can a State Tax? •

Mc. CULLOCH v. MARYLAND 1819 • National Bank • Can a State Tax? • Necessary and Proper…implied powers of govt. • Supremacy Clause

GIBBONS v. OGDEN 1824

GIBBONS v. OGDEN 1824

GIBBONS v. OGDEN 1824 • NY State gives Gibbons license for ferry • Federal

GIBBONS v. OGDEN 1824 • NY State gives Gibbons license for ferry • Federal Govt gives Ogden license for ferry • Congress has exclusive control over INTERSTATE COMMERCE

WARREN COURT • Earl Warren served as Chief Justice from 1954 -1969. His “tenure”

WARREN COURT • Earl Warren served as Chief Justice from 1954 -1969. His “tenure” on the Supreme Court expanded the rights of individuals in criminal procedures and first amendment rights. • KNOW THIS FACT FOR THE IMPORTANCE OF THE COURT. KEY WARREN COURT CASES TO KNOW

CRIMINAL DUE PROCESS

CRIMINAL DUE PROCESS

GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT 1963

GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT 1963

GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT 1963 • Pool Hall Break In • Arrested and Convicted •

GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT 1963 • Pool Hall Break In • Arrested and Convicted • Write letter to Supreme Court • Right to an attorney in all cases-state must provide

MAPP v. OHIO 1961

MAPP v. OHIO 1961

MAPP v. OHIO 1961 • Mapp arrested for obscene materials • Police were looking

MAPP v. OHIO 1961 • Mapp arrested for obscene materials • Police were looking for a fugitive • Evidence without a warrant tossed • EXCLUSIONARY RULE

MIRANDA v. ARIZONA 1966

MIRANDA v. ARIZONA 1966

MIRANDA v. ARIZONA 1966 • Arrested & Convicted for kidnapping and rape • No

MIRANDA v. ARIZONA 1966 • Arrested & Convicted for kidnapping and rape • No attorney present • Signed a confession • MIRANDA WARNING

ESCOBEDO V. ILLINOIS 1964

ESCOBEDO V. ILLINOIS 1964

ESCOBEDO V. ILLINOIS 1964 • Right to an attorney during questioning

ESCOBEDO V. ILLINOIS 1964 • Right to an attorney during questioning

STUDENT RIGHTS CASES

STUDENT RIGHTS CASES

TINKER v. DES MOINES 1969

TINKER v. DES MOINES 1969

TINKER v. DES MOINES 1969 • Black Armbands protest Vietnam War • Suspended •

TINKER v. DES MOINES 1969 • Black Armbands protest Vietnam War • Suspended • Student Right to Free Speech Symbolic Speech • Not disruptive to the school day

NJ v TLO 1983

NJ v TLO 1983

NJ v TLO 1983

NJ v TLO 1983

ENGEL v. VITALE 1962 • Remo • NY started school day with a prayer

ENGEL v. VITALE 1962 • Remo • NY started school day with a prayer from the Regents. Court ruled unconstitutional as a violation of first amendment.

VERNONIA v. ACTON • Students were required to take a drug test prior to

VERNONIA v. ACTON • Students were required to take a drug test prior to participating in school sports. Parents sued as 4 th amendment (illegal search). Court rules schools may require drug tests for students.

POTTAWOTOMIE v. EARLS • Students were required to take a drug test prior to

POTTAWOTOMIE v. EARLS • Students were required to take a drug test prior to participation in EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES. Parents sued as 4 th amendment (illegal search). Court rules schools may require drug tests for students.

IMPORTANT HISTORICAL CASES

IMPORTANT HISTORICAL CASES

ROE v. WADE 1973 • Norma Mc. Corvey (seen below) (AKA Jane Roe) was

ROE v. WADE 1973 • Norma Mc. Corvey (seen below) (AKA Jane Roe) was denied an abortion by the State of Texas. Challenged Texas law. Supreme Court ruled a woman has a right to choose as a right of privacy.

NY TIMES v. SULLIVAN • NY T Times not liable for an ad/article that

NY TIMES v. SULLIVAN • NY T Times not liable for an ad/article that has incorrect information. That was a “reasonable” error. It protects newspaper from liable…. Being sued and harming a free press.

NY TIMES v. US • Pentagon Papers case…limits govt restriction of a free press

NY TIMES v. US • Pentagon Papers case…limits govt restriction of a free press as Nixon tried to stop publication of classified documents about Vietnam War.

US v. NIXON 1974

US v. NIXON 1974

SCHENCK v. UNITED STATES • WW I Clear and present danger case…Schecnk urged people

SCHENCK v. UNITED STATES • WW I Clear and present danger case…Schecnk urged people to oppose the draft and war…violated Sedition Act …speech may be limited during a crisis. Free speech is not absolute.

DRED SCOTT CASE 1857 Scott sued for freedom on basis of living in a

DRED SCOTT CASE 1857 Scott sued for freedom on basis of living in a free state. Court ruled slaves did not have rights, Constitution did not apply, equated to property. Congress could not restrict expansion of slavery

PLESSY v. FERGUSON

PLESSY v. FERGUSON

PLESSY v. FERGUSON • Segregation • Jim Crow • 14 th Amendment • SEPARATE

PLESSY v. FERGUSON • Segregation • Jim Crow • 14 th Amendment • SEPARATE BUT EQUAL

BROWN v. BOARD of EDUCATION (of Topeka KS)

BROWN v. BOARD of EDUCATION (of Topeka KS)

KOREMATSU v. UNITED STATESupholds the internment of Japanese -Americans during WWII

KOREMATSU v. UNITED STATESupholds the internment of Japanese -Americans during WWII

BUSH v. GORE

BUSH v. GORE

SWANN v. CHARLOTTEMECKLENBURG 1970

SWANN v. CHARLOTTEMECKLENBURG 1970

LOVING v. VIRGINIA 1967 • Virginia law that prohibited people from different races to

LOVING v. VIRGINIA 1967 • Virginia law that prohibited people from different races to marry violates the 14 th Amendment. (See Richard and Mildred Loving below)

TEXAS v. JOHNSON- flag burning is protected as a type of free speech…symbolic speech

TEXAS v. JOHNSON- flag burning is protected as a type of free speech…symbolic speech used for political protest.