Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in

  • Slides: 28
Download presentation
Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in a Rural Upper Midwest Federally Qualified

Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in a Rural Upper Midwest Federally Qualified Health Center: An Evidence Based Project Kayla M. Abrahamson, RN, BSN, FNP-S & Mc. Kenzie R. Peterson, RN, BSN, FNP-S University of Mary Project Chair: Dr. Billie Madler 2 nd Reader: Dr. Annie Gerhardt

Problem Identification • Colorectal cancer (CRC) - 2 nd leading cause of cancerrelated deaths

Problem Identification • Colorectal cancer (CRC) - 2 nd leading cause of cancerrelated deaths • Risk starts increasing at age 40 and drastically rises at age 50 • Healthy People 2020 goal: >70% screening for those eligible • ND ranked 42 nd out of 51 in CRCS rates • CRC is preventable with routine screening • Estimated 50, 000+ deaths a year related to CRC • >60% are preventable ACS, 2014; CDC, 2016

Proposed Solution/PICO Question How does the implementation of a CRC screening program in a

Proposed Solution/PICO Question How does the implementation of a CRC screening program in a Midwestern, rural healthcare system impact screening and surveillance rates as compared to screening and surveillance rates prior to this program?

Literature Search Databases searched • • • Keywords utilized Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Literature Search Databases searched • • • Keywords utilized Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Academic Search Premier CINAHL Pub. Med National Guideline Clearinghouse MEDLINE • • colorectal cancer and screening colorectal cancer and surveillance colorectal cancer and screening program colorectal cancer screening and quality improvement colorectal cancer screening colorectal cancer surveillance colorectal cancer and prevention Limiters • • • 10 years Academic or Peer-Reviewed Journals English Language United States Adults - 19 -79 years of age

Literature Synthesis • Themes – Colorectal Cancer Screening (CRCS) Methods – Barriers to CRCS

Literature Synthesis • Themes – Colorectal Cancer Screening (CRCS) Methods – Barriers to CRCS – CRCS screening program recommendations

Theoretical Framework • Pender’s Health Promotion Model – Social Cognitive Theory – The Expectancy

Theoretical Framework • Pender’s Health Promotion Model – Social Cognitive Theory – The Expectancy Value Theory – Centers around health behavior and the influence personal experience has on health Heydari & Khorashadizadeh, 2014; Pender, 2011; Peterson & Bredow, 2013

Theoretical Framework Pender’s Health Promotion Model Pictorial representation of the Health Promotion Model (Adapted

Theoretical Framework Pender’s Health Promotion Model Pictorial representation of the Health Promotion Model (Adapted from “Nola Pender: The Health Promotion Model” by Gonzalo, A. , 2011. Retrieved on 6 April 2016 from http: //nursingtheories. weebly. com/nola-pender. html)

Project Recommendation #1 • Clinical policy and procedure development and implementation • Includes a

Project Recommendation #1 • Clinical policy and procedure development and implementation • Includes a screening algorithm • “Academic Detailing” Cole et al. , 2015; Corey et al. , 2009; Davis et al. , 2013; Sarfaty, 2008

Project Recommendation #2 • Optimize the EMR to support improved CRCS rates – Documentation

Project Recommendation #2 • Optimize the EMR to support improved CRCS rates – Documentation protocol – Patient reminder system – Clinical Decision Support Rule – Surveillance Protocol Atlas et al. , 2014; Berkowitz et al. , 2015; Cole, Esplin, & Baldwin, 2015; Geller et al. , 2008; Green et al. , 2013; Kern, Edwards, & Kaushal, 2014; Levy et al. , 2013

Project Recommendation #3 • Clinical Navigation – Workflow analysis to identify staff available to

Project Recommendation #3 • Clinical Navigation – Workflow analysis to identify staff available to assist in navigation – Navigation involves tracking CRCS – Patient reminder letter Green et al. , 2013; Levy et al. , 2013

Project Recommendation #4 • CRCS Outreach Events – Patient outreach letters – Flu/FIT campaign

Project Recommendation #4 • CRCS Outreach Events – Patient outreach letters – Flu/FIT campaign – FIT cards in place of FOBT Berkowitz et al. , 2015; Cole et al. , 2015; Daly et al. , 2010; Escoffrey et al. , 2014; Green et al. , 2013; Kern, Edwards, & Kaushal, 2014; Lee et al. , 2014; Levy et al. , 2013; Potter et al. , 2013; Xu et al. , 2015

Knowledge Translation • Needs Assessment – Population – Stakeholders – SWOT

Knowledge Translation • Needs Assessment – Population – Stakeholders – SWOT

Implementation Plan

Implementation Plan

Change Theory • • Diffusion of Innovation Published by Everett Rogers in 1962 4

Change Theory • • Diffusion of Innovation Published by Everett Rogers in 1962 4 Concepts of Innovation is a 5 Step Process – – – Knowledge Persuasion Decision Implementation Confirmation (Kaminski, 2016; Rogers, 1983, Sanson-Fischer, 2004)

Diffusion of Innovation Model Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovation Model [Digital image].

Diffusion of Innovation Model Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovation Model [Digital image]. Retrieved June 17, 2016, from http: //phdadventure. webs. com/diffusionofinnovation. htm

Diffusion of Innovation Adopter Categories Kaminski, J. (2016). Diffusion of Innovation Theory. [Digital image]

Diffusion of Innovation Adopter Categories Kaminski, J. (2016). Diffusion of Innovation Theory. [Digital image] Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 6(2), Retrieved on 17 June 2016 from cjninet/journal/? p=1444

Project Implementation • Institutional Review Board – Evidence-based project – No IRB at Northland

Project Implementation • Institutional Review Board – Evidence-based project – No IRB at Northland – Obtained IRB approval 9/30/16 • Threats and Barriers – High staff turnover – Change in routine – Increased workflow expectations

Project Implementation • Monitoring – October - March monitoring period – Telephone, email, or

Project Implementation • Monitoring – October - March monitoring period – Telephone, email, or on-site visits • Closure – Compare pre-implementation CRCS rates to postimplementation CRCS rates – Formative survey distribution

Project Results

Project Results

Project Results

Project Results

Project Evaluation • Project Recommendation #1 – CRCS Policy and Procedure – Provider Screening

Project Evaluation • Project Recommendation #1 – CRCS Policy and Procedure – Provider Screening Algorithm – Academic Detailing • Project Recommendation #2 – Optimizing EMR – Standardizing Documentation – Clinical Decision Support Rule

Project Evaluation • Project Recommendation #3 – Clinical Navigation • Project Recommendation #4 –

Project Evaluation • Project Recommendation #3 – Clinical Navigation • Project Recommendation #4 – Flu/FIT – Outreach Letter and Patient Education

Project Evaluation • Process Improvement Data – Need for staff for Clinical Navigation –

Project Evaluation • Process Improvement Data – Need for staff for Clinical Navigation – Improved EMR optimization – Continued Staff Education on Documentation Requirements

Project Dissemination • Dissemination of Results – Presented at Colloquium – Email to NCHC

Project Dissemination • Dissemination of Results – Presented at Colloquium – Email to NCHC staff – Presented to NCHC Board – Submission to Scholarly Journal • Future Directions – Continue Flu/FIT, expand to Lab-only Encounter

Conclusion • CRC is 2 nd leading cause of preventable death in the U.

Conclusion • CRC is 2 nd leading cause of preventable death in the U. S. (ACS, 2014 a) • The CRCS program improved CRCS rates • Project Interventions: – – Policy & Procedure EMR Optimization Patient Navigation Outreach Efforts • Strategies have potential to improve healthcare quality and outcomes

References • • American Cancer Society (2014). Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2014 -2016.

References • • American Cancer Society (2014). Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2014 -2016. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society. Retrieved from http: //www. aacr. org/Newsroom/Pages/News. Release. Detail. aspx? Item. ID=795#. Vrk. LOea. Crb. V Atlas, S. J. , Zai, A. H. , Ashburner, J. M. , Chang, Y. , Percac-Lima, S. , Levy, D. E. , . . . & Grant, R. W. (2014). Nonvisit based cancer screening using a novel population management system. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 27(4), 474 -485 Berkowitz, S. A. , Percac-Lima, S. , Ashburner, J. M. , Chang. Y. , Zai, A. H. , He, W. , . . . Atlas, S. J. (2015). Building equity improvement into quality improvement: Reducing socioeconomic disparities in colorectal cancer screening as part of population health management. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30(7), 942949. doi: 10. 1007/s 11606 -015 -3227 -4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2014). Colorectal (Colon) Cancer: Colorectal Cancer Rates by State. Retrieved from http: //www. cdc. gov/cancer/colorectal/statistics/state. htm Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2016). Colorectal Cancer Statistics. Retrieved from https: //www. cdc. gov/cancer/colorectal/statistics/ Cole, A. M. , Esplin, A. , & Baldwin, L. (2015). Adaptation of an evidence-based colorectal cancer screening program using the consolidated framework for implementation research. Preventing Chronic Disease, 12(e 213). doi: http: /dx. doi. org/10. 5888/pcd 12. 150300 Corey, P. , Gorski, J. , Schaper, A. , & Newberry, S. (2009). Nurses use motivational interviewing to improve colorectal cancer screening rates. Oncology Nursing Forum, 36(3), 24. Davis, T. , Arnold, C. , Rademaker, A. , Bennett, C. , Bailey, S. , Platt, D. , . . . Wolf, M. (2013). Improving colon cancer screening in community clinics. Cancer, 119, 3879 -3889. Doi: 10. 1002/cncr. 28272

 • • References Escoffery, C. , Rodgers, K. C. , Kegler, M. C.

• • References Escoffery, C. , Rodgers, K. C. , Kegler, M. C. , Haardorfer, R. , Howard, D. H. , Liang, S. , . . . Coronado, G. D. (2014). A systematic review of special events to promote breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in the United States. BMC Public Health, 14 (274), 1 -13. Retrieved from http: //www. biomedcentral/14712458/14/274 Green, B. B. , Wang, C. -Y. , Anderson, M. L. , Chubak, J. , Meenan, R. T. , Vernon, S. W. , & Fuller, S. (2013). An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening. Annals of Internal Medicine, 158(5), 301 -311. Healthy People 2020 (2016). Cancer. Retrieved from the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion website at http: //www. healthypeople. gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/cancer Heydari, A. , & Khorashadizadeh, F. (2014). Pender’s health promotion model in medical research. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 64(9), 1067 -1074. Retrieved from http: //jpma. org. pk/Pdf. Download/6937. pdf HRSA Health Center Program (2014). 2014 Health Center Profile: Northland Health Partners Community Health Center Turtle Lake, ND. Retrieved from the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services at http: //bphc/hrsa/uds/datacenter. aspx? q=d&bid=0810710&state=ND&year=2014 Kaminski, J. (2016). Diffusion of Innovation theory. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatic, 6(2), Retrieved from the Theory in Nursing Informatics Column at http: //cjni. net. journal/? p=1444 Kern, L. M. , Edwards, A. , & Kaushal, R. (2014). The Patient-Centered Medical Home, electronic health records, and quality of care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 160(11), 741 -749. doi: 10. 7326/M 13 -1798 Levy, B. T. , Daly, J. M. , Schmidt, E. J. , & Xu, Y. (2012). The need for office systems to improve colorectal cancer screening. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 3(3), 180 -186. doi: 10. 1177/2150131911423103.

References • • Pender, N. (2011). Health Promotion Model Manual. University of Michigan. Retrieved

References • • Pender, N. (2011). Health Promotion Model Manual. University of Michigan. Retrieved from https: //deepblue. lib. umich. edu/bitstream/handle/2027. 42/85350/HEALTH_PROMOTION_ MANUAL_Rev_5 -2011. pdf Peterson, S. J. , & Bredow, T. S. (2013). Middle Range Theories: Application to Nursing Research, (3 rd, ed. ). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Potter, M. B. , Ackerson, L. M. , Gomez, V. , Walsh, J. M. E. , Green, L. W. , Levin, T. R. , & Somkin, C. P. (2013). Effectiveness and reach of the FLU-FIT Program in an integrated health care: A multisite randomized trial. American Journal of Public Health, 103(6), 1128 -1133. Doi: 10. 2105/AJPH. 2012. 300998 Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusions of Innovation (3 rd ed. ). New York, NY: The Free Press. Retrieved from https: //teddykw 2. files. wordpress. com/2012/07/everett-m-rogers-diffusionof-innovations. pdf Sanson-Fischer, R. W. (2004). Diffusion of innovation theory for clinical change. The Medical Journal of Australia, 180(6 suppl), S 55. Retrieved from https: //www. mja. com. au/journal/2004/180/6/diffusioninnovation-theory-clinical-change Sarfaty, M. (2008). How to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in practice: A primary care clinician’s evidence-based toolkit and guide. The National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Retrieved from http: //www. cancer. org/acs/groups/content/documents/document/acspc-024588. pdf Xu, Y. , Levy, B. T. , Daly, J. M. , Bergus, G. R. , & Dunkelberg, J. C. (2015). Comparison of patient preferences for fecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy using the analytic hierarchy process. BMC Health Services Research, 15, 175 -184. doi: 10. 1186/s 12913 -015 -0841 -0.