IMPACT Project Workshop Wallingford 2002 Breach Formation Theme
IMPACT Project Workshop, Wallingford 2002 Breach Formation Theme Formulation of a New Breach Model for Embankments
Introduction Do we need a new model?
The Ph. D Project • Started on 1 st of October 1998 • Ended on the 31 st of January 2002 • Objectives: – Improve the understanding of the process embankment breaching. – Develop a model based on that understanding
The HR Breach Model • Lateral and Longitudinal Breach Growth • Flow Equations • Sediment Transport Equations
Lateral Growth (existing models). • Uniform Erosion • Constant Shape. • Top Width Adjustment • Constant bottom width • Most stable section • Assuming a shape • Slope Instability (some)
Breach Growth (Real Cases 1)
Breach Growth (Real Cases 2)
Breach Growth (Real Cases 3)
Breach Growth (Physical Modeling at HR)
Growth Mechanisms • Continuous Erosion – Computed using a sediment transport equation. • Mass Failure – Shear failure – Bending failure
Shear Failure (1)
Shear Failure (2)
Bending Failure (1)
Bending Failure (2)
Longitudinal Breach Growth (New Model) • The sediment transport continuity equation.
Sediment Transport Equations • Difficult to decide which one? • Selected Equations: – Yang 1979 (Non Cohesive) – Visser 1998 (Non Cohesive) – Chen and Anderson 1986 (Non Cohesive)
Flow Equations • Weir Equation • Flow over the crest and on the downstream face • Bernoulli Equation • Hydraulic calculations on the crest and the downstream face
Material Uncertainty
Composite Embankments (1)
Composite Embankments (2) • Core Failure Modes: – Sliding – Overturning – Bending
Piping (1)
Piping (2) • Processes – Flow through the pipe – Pipe widening and deepening – Failure of the material above the pipe – Failure of the top of the dam – Similar processes to overtopping
Numerical Model Results
Case Study (1)
Case Study (1) Comparison
Case Study (2) Central
Case Study (2) Side
And. . Finally • An acceptable approach has been achieved for a new breach model • More research is needed
- Slides: 28