Impact cycle begins Research is done Researchers write



Ⅰ. 인터넷의 발전과 학술커뮤니케이션의 변화 과거 Impact cycle begins: Research is done Researchers write pre-refereeing “Pre-Print” 12 -18 Months Submitted to Journal Pre-Print reviewed by Peer Experts – “Peer. Review” Pre-Print revised by article’s Authors Refereed “Post-Print” Accepted, Certified, Published by Journal Researchers can access the Post-Print if their university has a subscription to the Journal New impact cycles: New research builds on existing research <출처 : Brody, T. and S. Harnad. 2001. The Research-Impact Cycle. http: //www. ecs. soton. ac. uk/~harnad/Temp/openaccess. ppt>. 2

Ⅰ. 인터넷의 발전과 학술커뮤니케이션의 변화(계속) 현재 Impact cycle begins: 12 -18 Months Research is done Researchers write pre-refereeing Pre-Print is self“Pre-Print” archived in University’s Eprint Archive Submitted to Journal Pre-Print reviewed by Peer Experts – “Peer. Review” Pre-Print revised by article’s Authors Refereed “Post-Print” Accepted, Certified, Published by Journal Researchers can access the Post-Print if their university has a subscription to the Journal Post-Print is self-archived in University’s Eprint Archive New impact cycles: Self-archived research impact is greater (and faster) because access is maximized (and accelerated) New impact cycles: New research builds on existing research 3

Ⅰ. 인터넷의 발전과 학술커뮤니케이션의 변화(계속) 학술커뮤니케이션의 변화 v 수직독점적 모델에서 분산형 모델로의 변화 v 등록(Registration), 인정(Certification), 통지(Awareness), 보존(Archiving) 단계로 REGISTRATION CERTIFICATION 등록 인정 Establishing Certifying the intellectual quality/validity Priority of the research AWARENESS 통지 Assuring accessibility of research ARCHIVING 보존 Preserving research for future use 4












V. 아카이브 구축 프로젝트(계속) Ohio State Univ. 의 Knowledge Bank https: //kb. osu. edu/index. jsp 16

V. 아카이브 구축 프로젝트(계속) JISC FAIR Project q 개요 v Joint Information Systems Committee(JISC)에서 주관하는 FAIR (Focus on Access to Institutional Resources)프로젝트 v 기관에서 생산된 정보자원의 공유 활성화를 위한 방안에 관한 연구프로젝 트 q 프로젝트들 v DAEDALUS v e. Prints UK v Ro. MEO(Rights(of) Metadata for Open Access) v SHERPA v TARDis 17


V. 아카이브 구축 프로젝트(계속) OAI 아카이브 현황 v OAI service provider인 OAIster 분석 § 2004년 9월 2일 현재, 347개 기관으로부터 3, 488, 842 레코드 제공 § 사이트 당 레코드 분포 다양성 발견 5건 미만에서 265, 462건(Cite. Base) <source : Mark Ware Consulting Ltd. 2004. Pathfinder Research on Web-based Repositories, Final Report> 19





감사합니다! Questions /Comment 24
- Slides: 25