IIMM REVIEW RESHAPE RESHAPE is about adaptation DISCOVERING
IIMM REVIEW RESHAPE
RESHAPE is about adaptation
DISCOVERING THE PROBLEM § The current IIMM manual is § bulky and difficult to navigate § not aligned with ISO 55000 § not kept pace with industry • The NAMS manuals are § out of date § Inconsistent • IIMMS/ NAMS at risk of losing their international reputation
RESHAPE Online. Relevant. Recognised.
RESHAPE OBJECTIVES New Format Updated content Up to date Increased sales
RESHAPE Home FORMAT § Online –but printable § Branded § Interactive accessible and user friendly § References, hyperlinks, searchable § Tools to help the user Contents Case Studies Supporting Documents Log In
RESHAPE Home Contents Case Studies. Supporting Documents Log out Asset Management overview CONTENTS Understanding and Defining Requirements Lifecycle Planning Asset Management Enablers § Refreshed, relevant, up to date. § Case studies from a wider variety of industries and countries § Aligned with other asset management documents Asset Management leadership Developing Asset Management Plans Asset Management Systems Service Delivery Models
RESHAPE Home Contents Case Studies. Supporting Documents ISO 55000 CONTENTS § Refreshed, relevant, up to date. § Aligned with other asset management documents § Case studies from a wider variety of industries and countries NAMS Documents Treasury documents Log out
RESHAPE Home CONTENTS § Refreshed, relevant, up to date. § Aligned with other asset management documents § Case studies from a wider variety of industries and countries Contents Case Studies. Supporting Documents Log out
RESHAPE Home Contents Case Studies Supporting Documents UP-TO-DATE ∙ ∙ Live document Continually updated Reflects the latest thinking Users can provide feedback, suggestions and examples Share your project - tell us more! Log out
RESHAPE Home Contents Case Studies Supporting Documents Increased Sales § Maintain IIMMS brand credibility § Maintain market position § Brand loyalty § Relevance to wider infrastructure providers § Wider global utilisation § Increased revenue Talk to Al Munro 021234567 Al@nams. nz Tools to help you Join up now! Log out
ASSESSMENT AGAINST INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE Comparison with Status Quo:
ASSESSMENT AGAINST KEY SUCCESS FACTORS Comparison with Status Quo:
Where to from here? 3 6 9 12 Approvals Rollout months Project team Provider appointed Online system & content developed Industry test & review months
OUR TEAM BRIAN SHARMAN • Colin Gerrard • David Jeffery • Grant Holland • Greg Preston • Hanish Arora • Jamie Cable • Michael Van Tilburg • Murray Erbs • Nicci Wood • Nina Sardareva • Raymond Tan • Tracy Massam
RESHAPE Online. Relevant. Recognised.
RESHAPE Home Contents Case Studies Supporting Documents Log out Asset Management Road Map Levels of Service Lifecycle Planning Council Meeting + Oral Submissions Strategic Fit Budgets Other Community Inputs Final Council Decision
POTENTIAL MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
REQUIRED SERVICES • Programme Steering Group • Programme Manager • Panel of Subject Matter Experts • Specialist web-based / on-line systems developer • Content coordinator • Industry / country coordinator • Marketing advisor
- Slides: 19