If You Dont Build It They Wont Come
If You Don’t Build It, They Won’t Come: Customized Library Resources for Online Learning Angie Gerrard, MLIS & Dirk Morrison, Ed. D. TLT Conference University of Saskatchewan April 30 -May 2, 2006
Introduction n Current undergrad and IT trends n Role of the Library
Introduction n “Students arrive at the library Web site with expectations raised by these numerous personalized and customized systems. When they do not find resources that appear to be tailored specifically for their information needs, they move on to other information resources. ” n Reeb & Gibbons (2004), pp. 126
U of S Context: Evolution of Course Pages n Information Literacy & Library Instruction
HTML Course Page: Psyc 213. 3
HTML Course Page: Hist 152. 3
HTML Course Page – Use of Tabs
U of S Context: Evolution of Course Pages n PAWS (Personalized Access to Web Services) n Library’s Integrated Plan n Resource Management System
RMS n Admin view n User view
Admin View
Adding Resources
Assigning Resource Type
Subject Pages
Editing Subject Pages
Editing Subject Pages…
Course Pages
Editing Course Pages
Editing Course Pages…
Access to Subject & Courses Pages via PAWS
Access to Subject & Course Pages via Web. CT
Access to Subject & Course Pages via Library
Subjects Page
Psychology Subject Page
Course Pages
Course Page for ECNT 810
Course Page for ECNT 810
Course Page for ECNT 810
Course Page for ECNT 810
Course Page for ECNT 810
Course Page for ECNT 810
Benefits n Students n Faculty n Librarians
Benefits: Students n Ease of access n Filtered, relevant resources (customized) n Decreased confusion n Better resources=better research=better grades
Benefits: Faculty n Collaboration with liaison librarian n Learn about new products & services n Improved quality of resources n Refined assignments
Benefits: Librarians n Increased visibility of resources & services n Seen as relevant information source n Opportunity to forge relationships & collaboration n Increased familiarity with curriculum n Rich database developed
Issues to Consider n Database constraints n Lack of formal assessment n Workload
Conclusions n U of S Library is a partner in online learning n Fosters collaboration and innovation cycles n Future: n n n Students as researchers Students as course contributors Students as evaluators
References n n n Gibbons, S. (2003). Building upon the My. Library concept to better meet the information needs of college students. D-Lib Magazine, 9(3), March. Jones, S. (2002). The internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today’s technology. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved March 8, 2002 from http: //www. pewinternet. org/reports/pdfs/PIP_College_Report. pdf Lippincott, S. and Kyrillidou, M. (2004). How ARL university communities access information: Highlights from Lib. QUAL+. ARL Bimonthly Report 236, October. Reeb, B. and Gibbons, S. (2004). Student, librarians, and subject guides: Improving a poor rate of return. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4(1), pp. 123 -130. Spool, J. (2003). Getting confidence from Lincoln. User Interface Engineering (n. d. ). Retrieved October, 2003 from http: //world. std. com/uieweb/Articles/getting_confidence. htm The 2003 OCLC Environmental Scan: Pattern Recognition. Executive Summary. http: /www. oclc. org/reports/escan/downloads/escansummary_en. pdf
- Slides: 37