IEEE C 802 20 0579 Project IEEE 802

  • Slides: 35
Download presentation
IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Project IEEE 802. 20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Project IEEE 802. 20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access <http: //grouper. ieee. org/groups/802/20/> Title BEST-WINE: Technology Performance Presentation 1 Date Submitted 2005 -OCT-28 Source(s) Radhakrishna Canchi 2480 N. First Street #280 San Jose, CA 95131 Kazuhiro Murakami 2 -1 -1 Kagahara, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama, KANAGAWA 224 -8502, JAPAN Miinako Kithara 2 -1 -1 Kagahara, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama, KANAGAWA 224 -8502, JAPAN Re: MBWA Call for Proposal Abstract This document presents the Technology Performance and Evaluation Crtieria Report 1 of the Tehcnlogy Proposal BEST-WINE for IEEE 802. 20 MBWA Purpose To disucus and Adopt BEST-WINE for Draft Specfications of IEEE 802. 20 MBWA Notice This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE 802. 20 Working Group. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802. 20. Patent Policy The contributor is familiar with IEEE patent policy, as outlined in Section 6. 3 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual <http: //standards. ieee. org/guides/opman/sect 6. html#6. 3> and in Understanding Patent Issues During IEEE Standards Development <http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat/guide. html>. Submission Voice: +1 -408 -952 -4701 Fax: +1 -408 -954 -8709 Email: [email protected] com Voice: +81 45 943 6130 Fax: +81 45 943 6175 Email: [email protected] kyocera. co. jp Voice: +81 45 943 6102 Fax: +81 45 943 6175 Email: minako. kitahara. [email protected] jp R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 BEST-WINE (Broadband Mobil. E Spa. Tial Wireless Inter. Net

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 BEST-WINE (Broadband Mobil. E Spa. Tial Wireless Inter. Net Ac. Eess ) Technology Performance Presentation IEEE 802. 20 Plenary Meeting Vancouver, Canada November 14 -18, 2005 Submission 2 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 BEST-WINE (Broadband Mobil. E Spa. Tial Wireless Inter. Net

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 BEST-WINE (Broadband Mobil. E Spa. Tial Wireless Inter. Net Ac. Eess ) · Proposed Draft Technology Specifications ■ Enhanced MAC Layer and PHY layer Draft Specifications to the base specifications of HC-SDMA* AND ■ ● Base Technical Specifications “ATIS-PP-0700004 -2005, High Capacity-Spatial Division Multiple Access (HC-SDMA)*”. ● * The copyright of this document is owned by the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions. Any request to reproduce this document, or portion thereof, shall be directed to ATIS, 1200 G Street, NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005. * For Electornic Downloads, Paper Copy or CD-ROM please follow the link https: //www. atis. org/atis/docstore/doc_display. asp? ID=3617 ● Submission 3 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

BEST-WINE · · · IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Technology Performance Outline of Presentation

BEST-WINE · · · IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Technology Performance Outline of Presentation System Model RF Parameters Link budget Basic PHY layer (link level) information Simulation environment Simulation Results ■ Link Level ■ System Level · Conclusion Submission 4 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 System Calibration Model BS/MS MAP for IEEE 802. 20

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 System Calibration Model BS/MS MAP for IEEE 802. 20 7. 0 6. 0 5. 0 4. 0 3. 0 Y-axis [km] 2. 0 1. 0 0. 0 -11. 0 -10. 0 -9. 0 -8. 0 -7. 0 -6. 0 -5. 0 -4. 0 -3. 0 -2. 0 -1. 0 0. 0 -1. 0 2. 0 3. 0 4. 0 5. 0 6. 0 7. 0 8. 0 9. 0 10. 0 11. 0 MS BS -2. 0 -3. 0 -4. 0 -5. 0 -6. 0 -7. 0 X-axis [km] Submission 5 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 System Model Submission 6 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 System Model Submission 6 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 RF Parameters # RF Parameter TDD System BW 1

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 RF Parameters # RF Parameter TDD System BW 1 2 3 Transmitter Power -- BS Transmitter Power -- MS Out of Band emission limits – BS and MS (emission measured in 1 MHz resolution bandwidth) 4* ACLR - Attenuation of emissions into an adjacent channel (same Ch BW) – BS ACLR - Attenuation of emissions into an adjacent channel (same Ch BW) – MS Receiver noise figure -- BS Receiver noise figure -- MS Receiver reference sensitivity (to be proposed by each technology) Receiver Selectivity -- BS Receiver Selectivity -- MS 5* 6 7 8 9* 10* # 11[*] 12[*] Submission Base Value 1 MHz Channel Frequency offset for Blocking Receiver Blocking – BS (level of same technology blocking signal at frequency offset of 2 times Channel BW) Receiver Blocking – MS (level of same technology blocking signal at frequency offset of 2 times Channel BW) 7 2. 5 MHz TDD SYSTEM 43 d. Bm/MHz 27 d. Bm Attenuation of the transmit power P by: 43 +10 log(P) d. B 43 d. B +44 d. Bm +27 d. Bm -13 d. Bm 36. 8 d. B 35. 4 d. B 5 d. B 10 d. B Specify at BER of 0. 1% 5 d. B 10 d. B See linkbudget Mod 1 /Mod 7 : 30 d. B Mod 1 : 30 d. B Mod 8 : 27 d. B 4 MHz off Mod 1 : -49. 6 d. Bm Mod 7 : -35. 6 d. Bm 30 d. B 27 d. B 5 MHz off -49. 6 d. Bm -35. 6 d. Bm Mod 1 : -57. 5 d. Bm Mod 8 : - 41. 6 d. Bm -57. 5 d. Bm -41. 6 d. Bm 50. 2 d. B R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 BEST-WINE System’s PHY and MAC Layer information · Channel

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 BEST-WINE System’s PHY and MAC Layer information · Channel Configuration 625 k. Hz frequency 2. 5 MHz Submission 8 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 BEST-WINE System’s PHY and MAC Layer information · Modulation

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 BEST-WINE System’s PHY and MAC Layer information · Modulation class *1 24 QAM+ perform error coding which has 3/4 coding rate. *2 64 QAM perform error coding which has 5/6 coding rate. Submission 9 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Simulation Channel Environments · Suburban Macro at 3 KMPH

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Simulation Channel Environments · Suburban Macro at 3 KMPH · Suburban Macro at 120 KMPH Submission 10 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Basic PHY layer (link level) information · Link Level

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Basic PHY layer (link level) information · Link Level simulation Parameters ■ TDD /TDMA system ■ 3 timeslot structure ■ BS antenna number 12 antennas ■ UT antenna number 4 antennas ■ Tx 1 antenna / Rx 4 or 1 antennas ■ Adaptive Array Antenna (MMSE) ■ Equalizer : Equalizer has been employed to over come multipath Distortion effects. Submission 11 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Channel models used in Link Level Simulations · Link

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Channel models used in Link Level Simulations · Link Level simulation specified channel model Submission 12 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Sub-path Spatial parameters Ao. D and Ao. A offset

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Sub-path Spatial parameters Ao. D and Ao. A offset · sub-path Ao. D and Ao. A offset Submission 13 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 System level Simulation environment · simulation target feature TDD

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 System level Simulation environment · simulation target feature TDD system 3 timeslot structure Spatial Divison multiple Access feature (Max. 4 ) Power control Link adaptation Submission 14 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 System level Simulation environment simulation parameters • BS antenna

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 System level Simulation environment simulation parameters • BS antenna number 12 antennas (10λ) • UT antenna number 4 antennas(0. 5λ) • 19 BS 3 sector • BS max Tx power 39 d. Bm/12 ant • UT max Tx power 27 d. Bm • BS antenna gain 17 d. Bi • UT antenna gain 0 d. Bi • BS NF 5 d. B • UT NF 10 d. B • Temperature 15℃ • BS cable loss 3 d. B • UT body loss 3 d. B • 1 carrier (625 KHz). Simulation ( 1. 25 MHz BW= 625 k. Hz × 4 carrier) Submission 15 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 System level simulation channel model · channel model Submission

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 System level simulation channel model · channel model Submission 16 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Uplink (Vehicular. B model)

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Uplink (Vehicular. B model) FER vs SINR Performance Submission 17 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Downlink (Vehicular B model)

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Downlink (Vehicular B model) FER vs SINR Performance Submission 18 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Uplink (Pedestrian. B model)

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Uplink (Pedestrian. B model) FER vs SINR Performance Submission 19 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Downlink (Pedestrian. B model)

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Downlink (Pedestrian. B model) FER vs SINR Performance Submission 20 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Uplink (Vehicular B model)

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Uplink (Vehicular B model) Throughput vs SINR Submission 21 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Downlink( Vehicular B model)

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Downlink( Vehicular B model) Throughput vs SINR Submission 22 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Uplink (Pedestrian B model)

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Uplink (Pedestrian B model) Throughput vs SINR Submission 23 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Downlink (Pedestrian B model)

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Link level simulation Result · Downlink (Pedestrian B model) Throughput vs SINR Submission 24 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 System level simulation calibration result · System level simulation

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 System level simulation calibration result · System level simulation calibration condition and parameters Path number: 1 Environment: Suburban macro BS & MS antenna number: 1 Inter BS separation: 2. 5 km 1 carrier(625 k. Hz). 1 user/timeslot @sector user 1 (-60, R/2) @timeslot 1 user 2 (0, R/2)@timeslot 2 user 3 (60, R)@ timeslot 3 (degree, distance from the BS) Submission 25 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 System level simulation result · User Date Rate CDF

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 System level simulation result · User Date Rate CDF Submission 26 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 · 120 km/h  User Date Rate CDF Blue line

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 · 120 km/h  User Date Rate CDF Blue line shows downlink throughput CDF. Red line shows uplink throughput CDF. Submission 27 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 · 3 km/h Uplink and Downlink Blue line shows

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 · 3 km/h Uplink and Downlink Blue line shows downlink throughput CDF. Red line shows uplink throughput CDF. Submission R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 · Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation Downlink 3

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 · Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation Downlink 3 Kmph Submission R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 · Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation Downlink 120

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 · Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation Downlink 120 Kmph Submission R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 · Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation Uplink 3

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 · Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation Uplink 3 Kmph Submission R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 · Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation Uplink 120

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 · Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation Uplink 120 Kmph Submission R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 · Fairness criteria The CDF of the Normalized throughput

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 · Fairness criteria The CDF of the Normalized throughput with Respect to average user throughput was deatermined for Cell radius 1 km. Table 8‑ 1 Suburban Pedestrian B Case Normalized throughput with Respect to average user throughput <0. 1 <0. 2 <0. 5 Uplink Downlink 0. 142% 0. 285% 0. 0% 0. 142% Table 8‑ 2  Suburban Vehicular B Case Normalized throughput with Respect to average user throughput <0. 1 <0. 2 <0. 5 Submission Uplink Downlink 0% 0% 0. 432% 0 0 0. 519% R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Summary Results-Simulation Submission Spectral Efficiency @pedestrian B Spectral Efficiency

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Summary Results-Simulation Submission Spectral Efficiency @pedestrian B Spectral Efficiency @Vehicular B Uplink 3. 155 2. 592 Downlin k 4. 248 1. 776 34 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Practical System Results Data Flow Direction Typical/Terminal Total Data

IEEE C 802. 20 -05/79 Practical System Results Data Flow Direction Typical/Terminal Total Data Rates/Basestation Spectrum Efficiency (bit/sec/Hz/sector) Downlink 942 kbps 22. 6 Mbps 6. 8 Uplink 290 kbps 1, 232 kbps 7. 0 Mbps 29. 6 Mbps 4. 2 5. 9 Figure 7‑ 14: Date Rate and Spectrum Efficency Test Results of HC-SDMA in Australia Submission 35 R. Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA