IEEE C 802 20 0404 Project IEEE 802

IEEE C 802. 20 -04/04 Project IEEE 802 Executive Committee Study Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access <http: //ieee 802. org/20> Title Evaluation Methodology: Phased Approach Date Submitted 2004 -01 -04 Source(s) Mike Youssefmir Array. Comm Inc 2480 N. First Street, Suite 200 San Jose, CA 95131 -1014 Voice: N/A Fax: 408 -428 -9083 Email: mike@arraycomm. com Reza Arefi Voice: 571 275 7312 Email: reza. arefi@ieee. org Todd Chauvin Array. Comm Inc 2480 N. First Street, Suite 200 San Jose, CA 95131 -1014 Voice: 408 -952 -1829 Fax: 408 -428 -9083 Email: chauvin@arraycomm. com Arnab Das Flarion Technologies Bedminster One 135 Route 202/206 South Bedminster One, NJ 07921 Voice: 908 -997 -2003 Fax: 908 -947 -7090 Email: arnab@flarion. com Shigeru Kimura Kyocera Corp office phone: +81 -45 -943 -8019 fax phone : +81 -45 -943 -6175 Email: shigeru_kimura@csg. kyocera. co. jp Kazuhiro Murakami Kyocera Corp. Voice: +81 -45 -943 -6102 Fax: +81 -45 -943 -6123 Email: kazuhiro_murakami@csg. kyocera. co. jp YUZA Masaaki, NECinfrontia 2 -6 -1 Kitamikata Takatsu Kawasaki 2138511 Japan E-mail: yuzam@pb. jp. nec. com tel: +81 -44 -820 -4682(office) fax: +81 -44 -820 -4555 1

IEEE C 802. 20 -04/04 Re: 802. 20 WG Call for Contributions Abstract This document provides summary of delay profiles that major international standard organizations suggested. Purpose Contribute to the discussion and development of the 802. 20 Requirements and Channel Model. Notice This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE 802. 20 Working Group. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802 MBWA ECSG. Patent Policy The contributor is familiar with IEEE patent policy, as outlined in Section 6. 3 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual <http: //standards. ieee. org/guides/opman/sect 6. html#6. 3> and in Understanding Patent Issues During IEEE Standards Development <http: //standards. ieee. org/board/pat/guide. html>. 2

Phased Approach • • Discussed on evaluation group call Propose three phased approach to evaluation Progressively build sophistication in each phase Benefits – Ensures progressive “apples to apples” comparisons between proposals – Obtain early view of air interface performance without data overload 3

Phased Approach • Details to be determined by evaluation group • For example, build sophistication progressively in structured way • First phase, key system level performance metrics are gathered with simplified traffic, channel, and network models. – Traffic model: simplified, eg. hungry user – Channel model: simplified, eg. one model – Network model: simplified eg. No network delay • Second phase impact of air interface on higher layers incorporated – Traffic model: extended eg. ftp or http – Channel model: extended eg. A few models – Network model: simplified • Third phase: complete end to end model 4