IDS 120 h GEOMETRY WITH SHIELDING VESSELS SHIELDING

IDS 120 h GEOMETRY WITH SHIELDING VESSELS SHIELDING MATERIAL: 60% W + 40% He vs. 60% WC + 40% H 2 O USING Be FOR PART OF BP 1 AND BP 2 SIMULATIONS FOR 60% W + 40% He SHIELDING WITH SUPPORTING RIBS FOR VESSELS Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/15/2011) 1

IDS 120 h with shielding vessels. # Different cases of shielding material. # N = 500, 000 events simulation for 60% W + 40% He and 60% W + 40% H 2 O shielding. # BP 1 and BP 2 with Be sections (N=100, 000). # N = 100, 000 simulation with supporting ribs for vessels. >mars 1510/MCNP >10 -11 Me. V NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING: 60% W + 40% He , 60% WC + 40% H 2 O (WITH W VESSELS) >4 MW proton beam, Np = 100, 000/500, 000 >PROTONS ENERGY E = 8 Ge. V. >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σx = σy = 0. 12 cm. 2

IDS 120 h: SHIELDING VESSELS ( USING W ). Bob Weggel(7/26/11) SC 1 BEAM PIPE BP 1: 1 cm STST → 1 cm W BP 2/BP 3: 1 cm STST → 2 cm STST SC 2 TUBE 1 (= BP 1) AND TUBE 2 WITH 1 cm AND 2 cm THIKNESS IN THE SH 1 VESSEL ARE MADE OF W TO FURTHER REDUCE THE POWER DEPOSITED IN THE RESISTIVE COILS. SC 3 SC 4 SC 5 6 cm 15 cm 4 cm SC 6 5 cm 4 cm SC 7 5 cm 4 cm SH 4 5 cm DISTANCE BETWEEN VESSELS AND SC COILS FOR CRYOGENIC COOLING COMPONENTS 10 cm 2 cm 3 cm 10 cm RS: 1 -5 2 cm 5 cm 10 cm SH 1 BP 1 2 cm 1 cm SH 2 2 cm BP 2 SH 3 10 cm 0. 5 cm SPACE BETWEEN TUBE 2 OF SH 1 AND RS 1, AND 1. 0 cm BETWEEN TUBE 1 OF SH 4 AND RS 5 BP 3 W 3

IDS 120 h: SHIELDING VESSELS DETAIL PLOTS. SH 1 SH 2 SH 3 SH 4 SH 5 SH 6 SH 7 SHVS 4 SHVS 3 SH 4 RS#3+4 RS#3 SH 8 SH 9 SH 2 SH 3 RS#1+2 SH 1 SHVS 2 BP 3 BP 1 4

IDS 120 h WITH SHIELDING VESSELS: N = 500, 000 EVENT SIMULATIONS 60% W + 40% He vs. 60% WC + 40% H 2 O 5

POWER DEPOSITED IN THE SC COILS SC 1: 0. 141 k. W --> 0. 258 k. W SC 1 -6: 0. 175 k. W --> 0. 339 k. W SC#1 -19: 0. 307 k. W --> 0. 515 k. W. 6

POWER DEPOSITED IN THE SHIELDING (SH#), SHIELDING VESSELS (SHVS#), AND SH 1 W TUBE 2 (SH 1 T 2) MORE POWER IN SH#1 -4 SH#1: 867. 50 k. W --> 893. 50 k. W (+26. 00 k. W) SH#2: 746. 00 k. W --> 802. 00 k. W (+56. 00 k. W) SH#1 -4: 1666. 85 k. W --> 1766. 87 k. W (+100. 20 k. W) TWO SH 1 STST FLANGES: 60. 45 k. W --> 82. 10 k. W (+21. 65 k. W) SH 1 2 cm W TUBE#2: 45. 63 k. W --> 68. 95 k. W (+23. 32 k. W) 7

POWER DEPOSITED IN RESISTIVE MAGNETS (RS#) AND BEAM PIPE (BP#). MORE POWER IN RS#1 -5 RS#1+2: 79. 00 k. W --> 91. 15 k. W (+12. 15 k. W) RS#1 -5: 164. 68 k. W --> 186. 08 k. W (+21. 40 k. W) MORE POWER IN BP#1, BP#2 BP#1: 4 27. 70 k. W --> 452. 45 k. W (+24. 75 k. W) BP#2: 278. 60 k. W --> 285. 65 k. W (+7. 05 k. W) BP#1 -3: 715. 19 k. W --> 746. 85 k. W (+31. 66 k. W) 8

TOTAL POWER DEPOSITED IN DIFFERENT AREAS AND SC#1 -11 PEAK VALUES. MORE POWER IN SC#1 -19: 0. 307 k. W --> 0. 515 k. W (+0. 208 k. W) MORE POWER IN SH#1 -4: 1666. 85 k. W --> 1766. 87 k. W (+100. 02 k. W) MORE POWER IN RS#1 -5: 164. 68 k. W --> 186. 08 k. W (+21. 40 k. W) MORE POWER IN BP#1 -3: 715. 19 k. W- -> 746. 85 k. W (+31. 66 k. W) TOTAL POWER IS TRG STATION: 3356. 06 k. W --> 3590. 17 k. W (+234. 11 k. W) SC#1 PEAK: 0. 022 --> 0. 025 m. W/g ~ NO CHANGE SC#1 -19 PEAK: ~ SMALL DIFFERENCE 9

IDS 120 h WITH SHIELDING VESSELS: N = 100, 000 EVENT SIMULATIONS SH = 88% W + 18% He, BP 1: LAST 50 cm Be, BP 2: FIRST 10 cm Be 10

BP 1: 60 cm W BP 1: 50 cm Be BP 2: 10 cm Be BP 2: STST 11

POWER DEPOSITED IN THE SC COILS. SC 1: 0. 061 k. W --> 0. 062 k. W SC 1 -6: 0. 076 k. W 0. 085 k. W SC#1 -19: 0. 228 k. W --> 0. 261 k. W. SLIGHT INCREASE IN THE TDP. 12

POWER DEPOSITED IN THE SHIELDING (SH#), SHIELDING VESSELS (SHVS#), AND SH 1 W TUBE 2 (SH 1 T 2) MORE POWER IN SH#1, SH#2 SH#1: 721. 00 k. W --> 926. 00 k. W (+205. 00 k. W) SH#2: 706. 00 k. W --> 775. 00 k. W (+69. 00 k. W) SH#1 -4: 1474. 27 k. W --> 1750. 25 k. W (+275. 98 k. W) MORE POWER IN SHVS#1 SHVS#2 SHVS#1: 82. 00 k. W- -> 112. 60 k. W (+3. 6 k. W) SHVS#1 -4: 158. 83 k. W --> 228. 66 k. W (+69. 83 k. W) SH 1 2 cm W TUBE#2: 53. 40 k. W --> 68. 95 k. W (+15. 55 k. W) 13

POWER DEPOSITED IN RESISTIVE MAGNETS (RS#) AND BEAM PIPE (BP#). MORE POWER IN RS#1 -5 RS#1+2: 104. 90 k. W --> 137. 95 k. W (+33. 05 k. W) RS#1 -5: 208. 02 k. W --> 248. 53 k. W (+40. 51 k. W) MUCH LESS POWER IN BP#1: 437. 05 k. W --> 79. 00 k. W (-358. 00 k. W) BP#2: 285. 10 k. W --> 291. 74 k. W (+6. 640 k. W) BP#1 -3: 730. 74 k. W--> 379. 41 k. W (-351. 33 k. W) 14

TOTAL POWER DEPOSITED IN DIFFERENT AREAS AND SC#1 -11 PEAK VALUES. ~SAME POWER IN SC#1 -19: 0. 228 k. W --> 0. 261 k. W MORE POWER IN SH#1 -4: 1474. 27 k. W --> 1750. 25 k. W (+275. 98 k. W) MORE POWER IN RS#1 -5: 208. 02 k. W --> 248. 53 k. W (+40. 51 k. W) MUCH LESS POWER IN BP#1 -3: 730. 74 k. W --> 379. 41 k. W (-351. 33 k. W) TOTAL POWER IS TRG STATION : 3249. 29 k. W --> 3293. 43 k. W (+44. 14 k. W) SC#1 PEAK : 0. 022 --> 0. 025 m. W/g ~ NO CHANGE SC#1 -19 PEAK: ~ SMALL DIFFERENCE SC#11 ------WTH !!? ? 15

ENERGY FLOW FOR IDS 120 h FOR 88% W + 12%He, WITH BP 1, BP 2 PARTIAL Be, FROM 100, 000 EVENTS 146. 90 / 146. 79 k. W At R= 2 m 436. 99 / 432. 08 k. W at z = 19 m 182. 16 / 164. 75 k. W at z = -2. 5 m 146. 90 / 146. 79 k. W At R = 2 m TOTAL POWER GOING THROUGH THE SURFACES: 766. 05 / 743. 62 k. W TOTAL POWER IN TARGET STATION: 4015. 34 / 4037. 05 k. W POWER DIFFERENCE FROM 4 MW ~ +15. 34 / 37. 05 k. W SH 1, SH 2 TDP PEAK SLIGTLY HIGHER ~ 11 W/g BP 1, BP 2 TDP PEAKS ABOUT THE SAME, BINS SIZE PROBLEMS FURTHER INVESTIGATION REQUIRED. 16

IDS 120 h WITH SHIELDING VESSELS: N = 100, 000 EVENT SIMULATION SH = 60% W + 40% He, INTRODUCING SH VESSELS STST SUPPORT RIBS 17

SH 2 --> 2 cm THICK STSTS SLAB ALONG y-z PLANE. SH 3 --> 2 cm THICK STST DISCS EVERY 100 cm. SH 4 --> 2 cm THICK STST DISCS EVERY 10 cm. 18

SH 2 --> 2 cm THICK STST SLAB ALONG y-z PLANE. SH 3 --> 2 cm THICK STST DISCS EVERY 100 cm. SH 4 --> 2 cm THICK STST DISCS EVERY 10 cm. SH 2, SH 3, SH 4 RIBS DETAILS SH 2 RIB DETAILS (Longitudinal) SH 3 RIB DETAILS (Transverse) SH 4 RIB DETAILS (Transverse) 19

POWER DEPOSITED IN THE SC COILS. SC 1: 0. 190 k. W --> 0. 236 k. W SC 1 -6: 0. 286 k. W--> 0. 294 k. W SC#1 -19: 0. 459 k. W --> 0. 471 k. W. SLIGHT INCREASE IN THE TDP. 20

POWER DEPOSITED IN THE SHIELDING (SH#), SHIELDING VESSELS (SHVS#), AND SH 1 W TUBE 2 (SH 1 T 2) LESS POWER IN SH#1, SH#2, SH#4 SH#1: 727. 00 k. W --> 697. 00 k. W (-29. 50 k. W) !!? ? SH#2: 752. 00 k. W --> 745. 50 k. W (-6. 50 k. W) SH#1 -4: 1537. 34 k. W --> 1494. 62 k. W (-42. 72 k. W) MUCH MORE POWER IN SHVS#1: 58. 40 k. W --> 80. 55 k. W (+22. 15 k. W) !!? ? SHVS#1 -4: 147. 82 k. W --> 171. 04 k. W (+23. 22 k. W) SH 1 2 cm W TUBE#2 ~THE SAME 21

POWER DEPOSITED IN RESISTIVE MAGNETS (RS#) AND BEAM PIPE (BP#). ~ SAME POWER IN RS#1 -5 ~ SAME POWER IN BP#1 -3 22

TOTAL POWER DEPOSITED IN DIFFERENT AREAS AND SC#1 -11 PEAK VALUES. ~SAME POWER IN SC#1 -19: 0. 459 k. W --> 0. 471 k. W SLIGHTLY LESS POWER IN SH#1 -4: 1537. 34 k. W --> 1494. 62 k. W (-42. 73 k. W) ~SAME POWER IN RS#1 -5: 221. 71 k. W --> 222. 75 k. W ~SAME POWER IN BP#1 -3: 737. 32 k. W --> 736. 43 k. W SLIGHTLY MORE POWER IN SHVS#1 -4: 147. 82 k. W --> 171. 04 k. W (+23. 22 k. W) ~SAME TOTAL POWER IS TRG STATION: 3341. 12 k. W --> 3332. 80 k. W SC#1 PEAK : 0. 045 --> 0. 044 m. W/g ~ NO CHANGE SC#1 -19 PEAK: ~ SMALL DIFFERENCES SC#11 ------WTH !!? ? 23

ENERGY FLOW FOR IDS 120 h FOR 60% W + 40% He SHIELDING FROM 100, 000 EVENTS: WOR / WR 144. 85 / 141. 63 k. W At R = 2 m 432. 53 / 431. 33 k. W at z = 19 m 175. 45 / 173. 56 k. W at z = -2. 5 m 144. 85 / 141. 63 k. W At R = 2 m TOTAL POWER GOING THROUGH THE SURFACES: 732. 83 / 746. 52 k. W TOTAL POWER IN TARGET STATION: 4093. 95 / 4079. 32 k. W POWER GAP: +93. 95 / +79. 32 k. W 24