http tecfa unige ch Virtual Campus JeanCristophe Brouze
http: //tecfa. unige. ch Virtual Campus Jean-Cristophe Brouze Pierre Dillenbourg Patrick Jermann Fabrice Joye Philippe Lemay Sylvère Martin-Michiellot François Lombard Patrick Mendelsohn David Ott Daniel Peraya Allison Piguet Cyril Roiron Daniel Schneider Didier Strasser P. Dillenbourg
What's a virtual campus? a web site for distance & présence higher education covers a curriculum + a spatial metaphor an opportunity to + student change education managment P. Dillenbourg
TEACHING RESEARCH Master degree Computer based on the Web Supported since 1994 Collaborative Learning P. Dillenbourg
Structure of our Master Degree @university @home/@work P. Dillenbourg
Problems & Solutions Technical bases “install” effect Projects Cumulated overload “back home” effect P. Dillenbourg
Flexibity ≠ Workload Time is our bottleneck (more than bandwidth) P. Dillenbourg
Integrate time in the design Add time managment tools P. Dillenbourg
Would you take the plane if pilots were trained on the Web ? P. Dillenbourg
Constructivism ≠ Learner Control Creativity is our bottleneck (especially for presence activities) P. Dillenbourg
Argue. Graph Phase 1 P. Dillenbourg
Argue. Graph Phase 2 P. Dillenbourg
Argue. Graph Phase 3 P. Dillenbourg
Argue. Graph Phase 4 Theories Behavioursim Design choices Immediate FB Constructivism Metacognition Delayed FB Microworld FB P. Dillenbourg
Argue. Graph Data (Exp. 3) At least one new idea. . . Restatment of the question Reformulation Justification Solo 57 % 43 % Duo 15 % 85 % P. Dillenbourg
Argue. Graph Data (Exp. 3) "We answer 2 if the learner is a child but we answer 3 for adult learners" "We choose 3 because 2 does not work" Accept Condition Discard No Conflict 28 1 3 Conflict 23 11 1 "We answer 3 because motivation is important" P. Dillenbourg
Argue. Graph Data (Exp. 3) Arg(AB) ≠Arg(A) & Arg(AB) ≠ Arg(B Arg(AB) =Arg(A) or Arg(AB) =Arg(B ) Arg(AB)=Arg(A) U Arg(B ) New Union Victory No Conflict 6 16 10 Conflict 14 8 13 X 2=6. 2, p<. 05) P. Dillenbourg
New version of Argue. Graph P. Dillenbourg
What's the problem with exp 4 ? Exp 1 -3 pseudo-task Exp 4 pseudo-task Coffee-break debriefing 1 week debriefing P. Dillenbourg
Debriefing collectively remote individual/collaborative work (Again, timing is difficult to tune) P. Dillenbourg
Resources ≠ Activities P. Dillenbourg
P. Dillenbourg
Balance knowledge magagement & pedagogical diversity (Participatory Design) P. Dillenbourg
Virtual Space & Learning Communities P. Dillenbourg
Space => Navigation (? ) P. Dillenbourg
Space => Group Coordination 20 pairs on 20 distributed their work spatially Collaborative problem solving in a MUD virtual space P. Dillenbourg
Space => Group Communication Acknowledgment Delay: 59 sec. 39 sec Acknowledgment Rate: 34 % 50% P. Dillenbourg
TECFA Virtual Campus, Zone 12, Building 1209. Could you help me on exercice 4. 3? Room Exercices 1. 1 -1. 9 1 Exercices 2. 1 -2. 7 2 Exercices 3. 1 -3. 9 3 Exercices 4. 1 -4. 6 4 Exercices 5. 1 -5. 8 5 Exercices 6. 1 -6. 3 6 P. Dillenbourg
Space => Grounding He lies! P. Dillenbourg
Space => Grounding . 206** Ott, 1999 P. Dillenbourg
But: • These observations from synchronous interactions do no transfer well to asynchronous environments • It’s not any space, effects are bound to some specific design. P. Dillenbourg
E-Mail does not per se produce learning! Subject: Smart. Mail Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11: 31: 27 +0200 From: Pierre Dillenbourg <Pierre. Dillenbourg@tecfa. unige. ch> Organization: TECFA (Educational Technology Unit) To: professor@tecfa. unige. ch Dear Professor, Following the Nasdaq crisis, my grandmother's dog is very depressive. . . . . . . …. . . Hence, I will only be able to send you my work next week. . . Student P. Dillenbourg
Video is not much better! "I could readily tell when my partner was concentrating on what I was saying”(Watts, Monk and Daly-Jones; 1996). mutuality Head turns Eye. Contact regulation turn taking P. Dillenbourg
! The more F 2 F-like is not necessarily the better Phillips B. , Should we take Turns ? , CHI 2000 P. Dillenbourg
! The more F 2 F-like is not necessarily the better Phillips B. , Should we take Turns ? , CHI 2000 P. Dillenbourg
! The more F 2 F-like is not necessarily the better Phillips B. , Should we take Turns ? , CHI 2000 P. Dillenbourg
Interwoven Turns 88. 5 r 1 H page sherlock but what about the gun? 88. 8 Priv S 'Hercule which motive jealousy? He would have killed hans no? 89. 3 Priv S 'Hercule he stole it when the colonel was in the bar 90. 3 r 1 H page sherlock Giuzeppe wanted to avoid that one discovers that the painting was fake. HSSH turns (from Pair 11, translated ) 43. 5 Bar H Why does Heidi have a motive ? 43. 6 Bar S How do you propose we should go further? 43. 9 Bar H Should we merge our note books? 44. 1 Bar S She said that she didn't like her (and Hans) HSHS turns (from Pair 12 ) P. Dillenbourg
Bootnap experiments, Dillenbourg & Traum, 1997 Index of complexity Low acknowledgers: High acknowledgers: 0. 9 P. Dillenbourg
Knowledge Whiteboard Display Persistent Non-Persistent Non Persistent MOO dialogues P. Dillenbourg
CMC is a different system from F 2 F Persistency Contexuality H page sherlock but what about the gun? S 'Hercule which motive jealousy? He would have killed hans no? S 'Hercule he stole it when the colonel was in the bar H page sherlock Giuzeppe wanted to avoid that one Reflexivity P. Dillenbourg
CMC is a different system from F 2 F Persistency Contexuality Reflexivity P. Dillenbourg
CMC is a different system from F 2 F Persistency Contexuality Reflexivity E. Churchill et al, FX Palo Alto Lab P. Dillenbourg
CMC is a different system from F 2 F Persistency Contexuality Reflexivity Argue. Graph P. Dillenbourg
CMC is a different system from F 2 F Persistency Contexuality Reflexivity Lehtinen et al. (1999) P. Dillenbourg
CMC is a different system from F 2 F Persistency Contexuality Reflexivity R. Rodenstein & J. Donath, MIT Media Lab P. Dillenbourg
CMC is a different system from F 2 F Persistency Contexuality Reflexivity Patrick Jermann (TECFA/LRDC) P. Dillenbourg
The CMC tools is a part of the distributed cognitive system Tool features • Persistency • Reflexivity • Contextuality Distributed Cognitive System • Group memory • Group regulation • Group understanding P. Dillenbourg
DISCLAIMER There is no guarantee that collaborative learning works (Design environment = Structure teamwork) P. Dillenbourg
P. Dillenbourg « Courseware Design Studio »
COMPUTER SUPPORTED Semi-structured interfaces WYSIWIS Awareness ty i l a tu u M COLLABORATIVE LEARNING Explanation Persistency Reflectivity Contextuality ctu on i t ra u r t S n io t a l gu e R Argumentation Grounding Mutual Regulation P. Dillenbourg
News CSCL Book Series (Kluwer) Euro-CSCL Conference: Maastricht, NL, March 2001 Job opportunities: Geneva Interaction Lab P. Dillenbourg
- Slides: 50