HPPC Process Evaluation MidYear Update 1 Process Evaluation

HPPC Process Evaluation Mid-Year Update 1

Process Evaluation Purpose & Goals Ì Make sure that the HPPC is working efficiently and effectively. Ì Assist the HPPC in supporting what is working well and address any issues that might arise by identifying and tracking key process elements at the Full Council, Steering, and Co-Chair meetings. Ì Work closely with HPS staff to ensure that data collection and reporting are timely, efficient, and tailored to the needs of the HPPC. 2

Process Evaluation Survey Approach Ì Distribute, collect, and analyze Full Council process evaluation surveys. Ì Review Steering and other committee surveys. Ì Provide on-going support to Co-Chairs and HPS. Ì Prepare brief evaluation summaries. Ì Prepare quarterly, mid-year, and year-end overviews. 3

Process Evaluation Response Rates Ì The ideal survey response rate should be as close to 100 percent as possible. Ì To date, the average response rate is 79 percent, with a month-to-month breakdown as follows: January 83 % 24 / 29 February 84 % 27 / 32 March 78 % 25 / 32 April 90 % 26 / 29 May 13 th (Special) 67 % 16 / 24 May 24 th (Joint) 73 % 16 / 22 4

Process Evaluation Three Words Ì On your evaluation form, we ask you to write three words that describe your experience of the meeting. Ì Thus far, we have collected a total of 145 words. Ì Top words: Informative n=24 Interesting n=8 Community n=3 Engaging n=3 Excited n=3 5

Process Evaluation Wordle 6

Process Evaluation Meeting Characteristics Ì We also ask you to rate a set of meeting characteristics, including: materials, presentations, discussion, participation, facilitation, decisionmaking, importance to HIV prevention, etc. Ì Average ratings by month on a scale of 1 (low) to 4 (high): January 3. 7 February 3. 8 March 3. 8 April 3. 5 May (24 th) 3. 7 7

Contact Nayeli Cerpas ncerpas@harderco. com Nicole Pritchard npritchard@harderco. com 415. 522. 5400 harderco. com 8