House of Quality Example An interactive HOQ example

  • Slides: 5
Download presentation
House of Quality Example • An interactive HOQ example – by Professor Robert Hunt,

House of Quality Example • An interactive HOQ example – by Professor Robert Hunt, C/-Macquarie University Graduate School of Management Macquarie University New South Wales Australia • HOQ template

Metrics calculation Priorities calculation

Metrics calculation Priorities calculation

Kano’s Model • Reference: Integrating Kano’s model in the planning matrix of quality function

Kano’s Model • Reference: Integrating Kano’s model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment; K. C. Tan, X. X. Shen, Total Quality Management, Vol: 11 No: 8 (2000) 1141 -1151 • The quality of a product/service determined by customer satisfaction factor this into the planning matrix of the QFD process • Kano’s model characterizes three distinct attributes through which the customer satisfaction is affected Attractive Satisfaction One-dimensional Must-be Performance

Kano’s Model • One-dimensional attributes: customer satisfaction is proportional to the level of performance.

Kano’s Model • One-dimensional attributes: customer satisfaction is proportional to the level of performance. Ex: mileage/gallon for a new car • Attractive attributes: criteria will greatly, positively influence the satisfactory level of customers. Ex: add-on features of a car, GPS system, etc. . • Must be attributes: criteria must have for a product. These are usually taken for granted and the fulfillment of these will not lead to more satisfaction. Ex: safety of a product, seat belt/airbag • It can be integrated into the QFD by modifying the Improvement ratio (IR) using the following formula – (IR)adjusted=(IR)k, where k is a parameter determined by the designer – k=1/2 for Must be, =1 for One-D, =2 for Attractive – IR is calculated directly as the ratio between the planned rating (PR) and our product (OP) – Ex: item 5: IR=5/2=2. 5, this is a must-be for the customer, use k=1/2 (2. 5)1/2=1. 58, close to the IF=1. 6 used. item 1: IR=4/3=1. 3, it is deemed an attractive attribute, use k=2 (1. 3)2=1. 8 higher than IF=1. 2 using the original formula

Application of QFD process sequentially to structure product, part, process, and production Process Planning

Application of QFD process sequentially to structure product, part, process, and production Process Planning Production characteristics Part Design Process characteristics Product Planning Part characteristics Engineering characteristics Targets Customer requirements Production Planning