Hosted and Sponsored by Civil Land Development Summit

Agenda 09: 00 09: 15 Introduction Bart De Lathouwer 09: 15 10: 00 Building Smart tbd Report from Waltham Building. SMART meeting (incl OGC) 10: 00 10: 45 11: 00 Geonovum Pause Marcel Reuvers Standards from a policy and Law perspective 11: 00 11: 30 Oranjewoud 11: 30 12: 00 Esri Jeanne Foust Vendor and customer viewpoint 12: 00 12: 30 12: 45 13: 55 Via. Nova Discussion Lunch Heidi Berg All Vendor and customer viewpoint 14: 00 14: 30 Autodesk x Jack Strongitharm Vendor and customer viewpoint 14: 30 15: 00 FP 7 x Martin Ford Building a smarter city using OGC standards 15: 00 15: 30 16: 00 Cyclomedia Spare Bart Beers 16: 00 16: 30 Conclusions Bart De Lathouwer Feedback to the DWG OGC x Richard de Nier Viewpoint of engineering company interoperability gaps in workflow Standard proposal for Panoramic Imagery ® Copyright © 2013 Open Geospatial Consortium

Introduction • Geospatial – Civil – BIM coming together – Interoperability challenges / gaps • • CAD – GIS Indoor - Outdoor Are the stars aligning? Files – Database – Web. Service – Tightly coupled vs loosly coupled OGC ® Copyright © 2013 Open Geospatial Consortium

Building. SMART • Moving from human readable formats to machine readable formats – 30% productive, 70% unproductive (moving stuff) – Building industry now implementing IT (on site) • BIM – – – Technology / mind set Solved on site Try to do more before, than during (costs increase) Currently delivered as bulk on site, shift towards prebuilt No vendor lock in Information exchange not service oriented (sneaker net) • Building. SMART – 14 chapter – each chapter independent • Open. INFRA • Mo. U – ISO/TC 211, SC 13, building. SMART International, OGC ® Copyright © 2013 Open Geospatial Consortium

Geonovum - Government • • including comments from Chris Body (Office of spatial policy) Risk averse – need confidence when choosing technology Reuse of Gov issued geo information is lacking Overlap Geo and Civil workflows, and Civil and BIM workflows – Using the same concepts – different syntax – Loss of information during workflow when switching technology • Confusion on the use of Land. XML – OGC or Building. SMART • Concept Library – IFC Data Dictionary (Geonovum bought license) • Confusion around Open. INFRA • No mention of OGC • A lot of standard initiatives – Land. XML, City. GML, IFC, IFD, …. – Need guidance OGC ® Copyright © 2013 Open Geospatial Consortium

Oranjewoud - Engineering • Engineering company – 10000 employees, 10 B turnover • Also represents contractors and DEME • Use / Need interoperability in projects with City of Rotterdam, Pro. Rail • Little BIM is a fact • Big BIM is wanted – future • Land. XML suitable for surfaces, alignment and profiles – Not so much for 3 D model (solids) • 3 D Model of a road – Need more in Land. XML (cross section / multiple layers) OGC ® Copyright © 2013 Open Geospatial Consortium

Esri - vendor • Link indoor – outdoor • Take Revit, overlay on GIS • Which standards to implement – Important decision – engineering resources are spares • Support for information exchange via Interoperability Extensions – Native schema – and multiple foreign schemas • Customers asking for insides of a building • City. Engine – 3 D City Content • Bring CAD and BIM into GIS • Initiative: – Geo. Design summit (http: //www. geodesignsummit. com) OGC ® Copyright © 2013 Open Geospatial Consortium

Via. Nova - Vendor • New TC Member • In Norway BIM approach mandatory – Little BIM has crossed the chasm • No complete models that cover entire workflow at this stage – Pragmatic approach based on standards • Using TC 211, IFC and OGC standards • Can’t share a full design (Big BIM) – Can’t round trip – information loss when changing technology • Parametric designs are hard to exchange – Share static content – Mapping parametric objects between implementations OGC ® Copyright © 2013 Open Geospatial Consortium

Autodesk - Vendor • BIM, next big thing after analog / digital drawing • UK mandates BIM in 2016 – You must BIM – COBie • Planning and conceptual design using Infrastructure Modeller • Sharing of information between various ‘roles’ – Designer to planner and user • Move to solids for design – From an ‘engineering’-view to a ‘Real World Object’-view OGC ® Copyright © 2013 Open Geospatial Consortium

Conclusions • Cyclomedia – Panoramic imagery • Draping on 3 D Models • Used in civil workflows • i-Scope – 3 City. GML Application Domain Extensions • Mobility of aging population – Incl practices for wheelchairs and blind • Energy consumption • Noise mapping – BIM – Geospatial integration – City. GML not CEN or ISO standards – Need to maintain a registry of growing ADE’s OGC ® Copyright © 2013 Open Geospatial Consortium

Conclusions • ISO/TC 211, SC 13, building. SMART International, OGC – Mo. U – Establish ad hoc group • Make Short term and Long term Roadmap – Drive government policy – Drive product management – … – Part of OWS-10? • BIM track – Roadmap for “product library” – Make sure we have made significant progress in September • Next Building. SMART – OGC meeting • Registry for ADE’s – Martin Ford will send Carsten email with request OGC ® Copyright © 2013 Open Geospatial Consortium