Horizonte der FTIPolitik aus Sicht der Europischen Kommission

  • Slides: 28
Download presentation
“Horizonte der FTI-Politik aus Sicht der Europäischen Kommission” Dr. Anneli Pauli, Deputy Director-General European

“Horizonte der FTI-Politik aus Sicht der Europäischen Kommission” Dr. Anneli Pauli, Deputy Director-General European Commission, DG Research & Innovation Europa-Tagung 2011 Wien, 18 November 2011 1

The Horizon for the Research, Development and Innovation in Europe • Horizon 2020 The

The Horizon for the Research, Development and Innovation in Europe • Horizon 2020 The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014 -2020) : Financial pillar and incentives of the Union's actions to create the Innovation Union • ERA Framework Non-Funding pillar of the Innovation Union research policy component (various “soft”/ “hard” law measures) 2

Europe 2020 : smart, sustainable and inclusive growth Seven Flagship Initiatives • Smart growth

Europe 2020 : smart, sustainable and inclusive growth Seven Flagship Initiatives • Smart growth Digital agenda for Europe Innovation Union Youth on the move • Sustainable growth Resource efficient Europe An industrial policy for the globalisation era • Inclusive growth An agenda for new skills and jobs European platform against poverty 3

Horizon 2020 – The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014 -2020) Why, What

Horizon 2020 – The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014 -2020) Why, What and When? 4

What’s new ? Real integration of existing programmes (1) • The 7 th Framework

What’s new ? Real integration of existing programmes (1) • The 7 th Framework Programme (FP 7) for research, technological development and demonstration • Innovation elements from Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) – Non-innovation elements to be included in a new “Competitiveness and SMEs” programme • EU funding for European Institute for Innovation and Technology (EIT) Strengthening complementarities with the Structural Funds 5

What’s new ? : Key common features (2) • Clear set of objectives based

What’s new ? : Key common features (2) • Clear set of objectives based on Europe 2020 and Innovation Union • Integrating research and innovation in a seamless programme • Focus on overall policy priorities – using a challenge based approach • Programme structured by objectives • Common toolkit of funding schemes 6

Why? Added value of EU R&I funding • Pan-European competition in research and innovation,

Why? Added value of EU R&I funding • Pan-European competition in research and innovation, thereby raising levels of excellence • Addressing pan-European and global grand challenges • Cross-border pooling of public and private resources to achieve critical mass and sharing of knowledge • Leveraging private investments, increasing efficiency • Enhancement of Europe’s international attractiveness 7

Horizon 2020 – Objectives and structure Europe 2020 priorities European Research Area International cooperation

Horizon 2020 – Objectives and structure Europe 2020 priorities European Research Area International cooperation Shared objectives and principles Common rules, toolkit of funding schemes - Tackling Societal Challenges Health, demographic change and wellbeing Food security, sustainable agriculture and the bio-based economy Secure, clean and efficient energy Smart, green and integrated transport Climate action & Resource Efficiency including Raw Materials Inclusive, innovative and secure societies - Industrial Leadership and Competitive Frameworks - Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies (ICT, nano, materials, bio, manufacturing, space) - Access to risk finance - Innovation in SMEs Excellent Science Base European Research Council Future and Emerging Technologies Marie Curie actions on skills, training and career development Research infrastructures Supporting the objectives: Simplified access European Institute for Innovation and Technology Joint Research Centre 8 Dissemination & knowledge transfer

Simplification • Single set of rules for eligibility, accounting, reporting, auditing • Simplified cost-reimbursement

Simplification • Single set of rules for eligibility, accounting, reporting, auditing • Simplified cost-reimbursement approach • Broader acceptance of usual accounting practice, greater use of lump sums and flat rates • Shorter negotiation and selection phases • Unique IT portal, common support structures, guidance • External management: learning from experience with executive agencies, public private partnerships, public to public partnerships, financial instruments 9

Horizon 2020 - Next steps • Negotiations on EU budget 2014 -2020 • Commission

Horizon 2020 - Next steps • Negotiations on EU budget 2014 -2020 • Commission proposals for Horizon 2020: before end 2011 • FP 7 2013 Work Programmes, to bridge towards Horizon 2020 • Legislative decisions on Horizon 2020 by the Council and European Parliament (2012 -13) • Horizon 2020 (from 2014) 10

Outline I. What is ERA? II. What has been achieved to date? III. ERA

Outline I. What is ERA? II. What has been achieved to date? III. ERA Framework – taking ERA to a new level 11

I. What is ERA? 12

I. What is ERA? 12

ERA – raising quality, impact & relevance and attractiveness of research in Europe via

ERA – raising quality, impact & relevance and attractiveness of research in Europe via cross-border synergies Private R&D & public-private cooperation Intergovernmental initiatives EU research policies & programmes Individual researchers ERA A ‘unified’ research area (all MSs, AC & regions) embedded in society • Efficiency • Interoperability • Critical mass • Mobility Research Organisations & universities Funders Public authorities MS research policies & programmes Excellent science World-leading innovation 13 Firms

ERA in concrete terms … • A single market for knowledge (=high value for

ERA in concrete terms … • A single market for knowledge (=high value for money) • Cross-border. . . flows of researchers and scientific knowledge. . . access to research infrastructures, results and data. . . funding. . . cooperation, critical mass. . . opening of national programmes, pooling of resources. . . strategies and alliances between research stakeholders • EU-level governance – managing the European partnership with MS • Transnational and cross-sectoral policy priorities, prioritization, coordination, monitoring and evaluation 14

II. What has been achieved to date? 15

II. What has been achieved to date? 15

ERA key milestones 2000 ERA & Lisbon Strategy 2002 6 th Framework Programme &

ERA key milestones 2000 ERA & Lisbon Strategy 2002 6 th Framework Programme & 3% target 2003 3% Action Plan & Open Method of Coordination 2007 ERA Green Paper & 7 th Framework Programme 2008 European Council: 5 th freedom Council: Ljubljana Process & ERA 2020 Vision 2009 Lisbon Treaty 2010 Europe 2020 & Innovation Union 2011 European Council : complete ERA by 2014 Commission proposal for HORIZON 2020 16

ERA “instruments” Funding • Indirect FP funding Ø Collaborative research (€ 19 Bn FP

ERA “instruments” Funding • Indirect FP funding Ø Collaborative research (€ 19 Bn FP 7 so far) Ø Marie Curie actions (€ 1. 7 Bn) Ø SME support Delegated/externalised: Ø European Research Council (€ 2. 9 Bn) Ø Public Private Partnerships (3) & Joint Technology Initiatives (5) Ø Art. 185 Initiatives (4) Ø Risk Sharing Finance Facility (€ 7 Bn) Coordination / optimisation Legislation • Direct Funding - Joint Research Centre (€ 2, 268 Bn) • ERA Partnership Initiatives & Open method of coordination • ERA-NETs (€ 340 M) • European Technology Platforms • Third country researchers Directive 2005/71 • Researchers' labour market related legislation • Competition and internal market related legislation • Regulation for European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) 17

The five ERA partnership initiatives 1. European Partnership for Researchers • • 2. •

The five ERA partnership initiatives 1. European Partnership for Researchers • • 2. • Research infrastructures • • • 3. 4. 5. National Action Plans European research career framework, principles for doctoral training, strategy towards Europe-wide online job publications Feasibility study on and support for setting up pan-European pension funds ESFRI Roadmap (19 national roadmaps completed) ESFRI projects : 48 projects in the ESFRI roadmap, 10 are already in implementation phase + 19 to be implemented by 2015 to achieve the target of 60% ERIC regulation in place incl. practical guidelines : 1 st ERIC awarded in March 2011(3 more in the pipeline + 20 ERICs in total expected to be launched by 2015) Joint Programming • • 4 launched, 6 more selected in 2010 Guidelines for framework conditions for implementing JPIs • • National legislation adopted/ in preparation in several countries Guidelines for international knowledge transfer Common set of indicators (to be developped) [EU patent, by enhanced cooperation] • India pilot – development of a strategic research & innovation agenda; focus on water, bio-resources, health, energy, ICT China pilot – development of EU/MS roadmap for Europe-China strategy, possible focus on urbanisation and framework conditions (IPR, etc. ) USA pilot – launch first initiative to raise the attractiveness of Europe, work towards a strategic research & innovation agenda (e. g. energy, health, ageing) Knowledge sharing: open access and knowledge transfer (chair Georg Buchtela) Global cooperation, SFIC • • 18

Overall evaluation of progress • Need for ERA acknowledged by stakeholders • Promising initiatives:

Overall evaluation of progress • Need for ERA acknowledged by stakeholders • Promising initiatives: ERA partnerships, ERC, ERANETs, . . . • Overall progress too slow and piecemeal • • Few / weak systemic links between MSs and EU / MSs • Obstacles to openness, free circulation and difficulties in cross-border actions • Perception of a fragmented and complex patchwork of initiatives and instruments • Involvement of stakeholders in governance not systematic or well structured • Benefits to MSs of ERA unclear Limitations of voluntary approach 19 19

III. The ERA Framework – taking ERA to a new level 20

III. The ERA Framework – taking ERA to a new level 20

Taking ERA to a new level Politically. . . • Knowledge at core of

Taking ERA to a new level Politically. . . • Knowledge at core of Europe 2020 • Innovation Union "an ERA Framework and supporting measures to remove obstacles to mobility and crossborder co-operation” • European Council Feb 2011 “complete ERA by 2014” • Fiscal austerity & innovation gap 21

Taking ERA to a new level Legally, the Lisbon Treaty. . . • .

Taking ERA to a new level Legally, the Lisbon Treaty. . . • . . . makes ERA an explicit objective of the Union “The Union shall have the objective of strengthening its scientific and technological bases by achieving a European research area in which researchers, scientific knowledge and technology circulate freely, … ” (TFEU Art. 179. 1) • … gives the Union legislative powers to reach this objective “As a complement to the activities planned in the multiannual framework programme, the European Parliament and Council, … shall establish the measures necessary for the implementation of the European research area. ”(TFEU Art. 182. 5) 22

Towards an ERA Framework Evidence-based approach (ex ante Impact Assessment ) • Take stock

Towards an ERA Framework Evidence-based approach (ex ante Impact Assessment ) • Take stock of progress and on-going work • Substantiate obstacles/problems, their size, importance in terms of benefits & underlying causes; • Principles of proportionality, subsidiarity • Map how research in the MSs is governed / regulated Options • Policy options based on problem analysis and the outcome of the public consultation • Identify measures to address the key problems • Funding, soft-law, regulation • Overarching, issue-specific or both • Assess benefits and costs, and all significant impacts 23

Possible content & structure • Set overall ERA architecture - definition, objectives, actors, principles,

Possible content & structure • Set overall ERA architecture - definition, objectives, actors, principles, measures • Address cross-cutting & thematic co-ordination and systemic failures • Aim at achieving substantial progress overall and in particular in specific priority issues The challenge is to balance. . . Ambition feasibility Evidence-based justification political acceptability Comprehensiveness concrete “big ticket” approach Binding voluntary etc. … while keeping improvement of Europe’s research performance as the overriding criterion 24

Theme-specific key issues in the ERA consultation Researchers: career prospects/ employment conditions, cross border

Theme-specific key issues in the ERA consultation Researchers: career prospects/ employment conditions, cross border & intersectoral mobility Cross-border operation: combining effort on major challenges; differences between systems, rules, definitions, priorities, etc. Infrastructures: Knowledge circulation: exponential growth of research data, sub-optimal exploitation of RIs, sustainability, development of new RIs lack of common strategic approaches on KT, use of public research by industry & level of cooperation; OA International dimension: under-exploitation of potential; disconnection between EU & MS; lack of critical mass for joint EU-MS initiatives; insufficient info sharing Managing ERA partnership: clear definitions & objectives, political will to use instruments, taking EU perspective into account nationally, benefits of ERA to MS, few & weak systemic links EU-MS & MS - MS 25

Timing ERA Framework and supporting measures (2012) • Present: problem analysis, collecting data &

Timing ERA Framework and supporting measures (2012) • Present: problem analysis, collecting data & relevant EU and national studies, mapping national legal situation, pre-consultation discussions (e. g. with Member States in ERA Committee) • Public stakeholder consultation: Sept - Nov 2011 • Consultation wrap-up event: Jan 2012 • Finish Impact Assessment: Spring 2012 • ERA Framework Commission Proposal: Summer 2012 26

Governance and Coordination are keys for an effective ERA Framework Nature shows us the

Governance and Coordination are keys for an effective ERA Framework Nature shows us the way: Birds coordinating their efforts 71 % gain of efficiency ! 27

We need a more research and innovation intensive, integrated and attractive European Research Area

We need a more research and innovation intensive, integrated and attractive European Research Area Excellent Research Attracts http: //ec. europa. eu/research/era 28 28