Home Depot Windows Autumn Glenn Phil Harris ME

  • Slides: 9
Download presentation
Home Depot Windows Autumn Glenn Phil Harris ME 340 – Winter 2009

Home Depot Windows Autumn Glenn Phil Harris ME 340 – Winter 2009

Introduction • Validate Home Depot Claims – Justification • Economic troubles lead people to

Introduction • Validate Home Depot Claims – Justification • Economic troubles lead people to look for ways to significantly save money • Sometimes advertising draws people to a product for only marginal benefits • Validate Calculator model they used

Home Depot Claim Single vs. Double 6500 Series Vinyl Window Premium Line with Argon

Home Depot Claim Single vs. Double 6500 Series Vinyl Window Premium Line with Argon gas • Calculator • • ** Percentages very similar**

Heat Transfer Problem • Analyze Single and Double Paned Windows, Compare • Analyze Single

Heat Transfer Problem • Analyze Single and Double Paned Windows, Compare • Analyze Single Pane Outside Inside T ∞ = 293 K hi = 100 W/m 2 K T ∞ = 273 K ho = 250 W/m 2 K – Forced Convection Inside and Outside Forced Convection – No Free Convection (Inside or Outside) – Radiation Forced Convection Wall to Window – Wall Inside to Window – Window to Wall – No Solar Radiation – Conduction through the window Window to Wall Conduction εwall =. 89 ε window =. 9

Heat Transfer Problem Outside • Analyze Double Pane – No Free Convection (Inside or

Heat Transfer Problem Outside • Analyze Double Pane – No Free Convection (Inside or Outside) – Radiation – – – T ∞ = 273 K ho = 250 W/m 2 K Forced Convection Argon k=. 0156 W/m 2 K Free Convection (based on single pane results 277. 8 – 276) T ∞ = 293 K hi = 100 W/m 2 K Forced Convection Wall Inside to Window to Wall Inside Pane 1 to Pane 2 to Pane 1 No Solar Radiation – Free convection inside the window – Forced Convection Inside and Outside – No Conduction Inside Wall to Window to Wall Pane 1 to Pane 2 to Pane 1 εwall =. 89 ε window =. 9

Results of Analysis • Single Pane – Heat Loss, q = 2, 361 Watts

Results of Analysis • Single Pane – Heat Loss, q = 2, 361 Watts • Double Pane – Heat Loss, q = 807 Watts • Projected Savings of Double vs. Single – (807/2, 361) = 34. 2% • Error = Assumptions and Simplifications

Berkeley National Laboratory • Contributing Factors – House type • Single-story or Two-story Geographic

Berkeley National Laboratory • Contributing Factors – House type • Single-story or Two-story Geographic location Orientation, Electricity and gas cost, Building configuration details (such as wall, floor, and HVAC system type) – Windows – – • Size • Shading • Thermal properties

Conclusion and Recommendations • Conclusion – Double pane are more energy efficient – Home

Conclusion and Recommendations • Conclusion – Double pane are more energy efficient – Home Depot's results are reasonable – Accurate Calculator • Recommendations – High cost of more efficient windows may not be realized for years – Do research – Use the tools out there – Be an Engineer • Link To Calculator (Named “RESFEN”) http: //windows. lbl. gov/software/resfen/31/default. htm

Appendix Math. Cad Screen Shot

Appendix Math. Cad Screen Shot