HMA Product Metadata Workshop CNES and CLS remarks

  • Slides: 14
Download presentation
HMA Product Metadata Workshop CNES and CLS remarks on altimetry specificities HMA Product Metadata

HMA Product Metadata Workshop CNES and CLS remarks on altimetry specificities HMA Product Metadata Workshop /

Table of content ■ Objectives and introduction ■ Context of the study ■ Altimetry

Table of content ■ Objectives and introduction ■ Context of the study ■ Altimetry specificities (JASON) ■ Altimetry specificities ■ Work done : metadata comparison ■ Conclusions from metadata comparison HMA Product Metadata Workshop 2

Objectives and introduction ■ The objectives of this study is w to provide inputs

Objectives and introduction ■ The objectives of this study is w to provide inputs for the integration of altimetry thematic in HMA ■ In CNES, w we have started to implement HMA compliant interfaces for HMA-OPT product · SPOT and PLEIADES data w We have a generic data valorization tool : SIPAD-NG · Used for Mercator, CDPP, SMOS, SSALTO · And soon on ICARE, DECLIC, SERAD w We want to implement a HMA compliant interface to our generic tool · Activity started in the frame of ICARE with POLDER data – We have started the development linked to POLDER · Activity started in the frame of SSALTO in altimetry thematic – Need for a specialization of HMA metadata for altimetry HMA Product Metadata Workshop 3

Context of the study ■ The target of our study is w Nadir altimeter

Context of the study ■ The target of our study is w Nadir altimeter like JASON 1, JASON 2, … ■ The reference taken for this study is w JASON 2 · Most recent altimeter · Most complete metadata ■ Our feeling is that HMA is more mature for OPT products w Work is to be done in the other thematics · ATM · ALT ■ Altimetry is different from OPT w Then these differences / specificities have to be taken into account HMA Product Metadata Workshop 4

Altimetry specificities (JASON) ■ High altitude : 1336 km w To minimise interactions with

Altimetry specificities (JASON) ■ High altitude : 1336 km w To minimise interactions with atmosphere and Earth gravity field w To improve orbite determination ■ Inclination : 66° w Allow to cover most of non frozen seas ■ Repeatable orbit w Roughly 10 days (10 days minus 2 h) w The satellite measure the same points every 10 days · With a 1 km precision w Non heliosynchroneous orbit HMA Product Metadata Workshop 5

Altimetry specificities HMA Product Metadata Workshop 6

Altimetry specificities HMA Product Metadata Workshop 6

Altimetry specificities ■ The elementary measure is a point ■ Measures can be taken

Altimetry specificities ■ The elementary measure is a point ■ Measures can be taken at various frequencies w 1 Hz : 1 measure per second w 20 Hz : 20 measures per second w It is possible to find products with both frequencies ■ Data are gathered in files : one file per track w One track is a half-orbit (descending or ascending) w A cycle is composed of 254 tracks and covers one revisit period of time ■ One track is a line, not a surface w The altimeter measure do not have any width w This is a specificity versus OPT measures HMA Product Metadata Workshop 7

HMA Product Metadata Workshop 8

HMA Product Metadata Workshop 8

Altimetry specificities ■ Data can be produced in several modes w Delayed. Time, ,

Altimetry specificities ■ Data can be produced in several modes w Delayed. Time, , NRT, non. Time. Critical, real. Time, short. Time. Critical w Delay versus quality ■ Specific Ellipsoid w No EPSG code : TOPEX w Geolocalisation metadata available in other ellipsoids (WGS 84, …)? ? ■ Specific level of products w L 0, L 1 a, L 1 b, L 2, L 3, L 4 w Not the same meaning as for OPT thematic w L 1, L 2 or L 3/L 4 users are not the same · Which data have to be taken into account by HMA? HMA Product Metadata Workshop 9

Work done ■ Excel sheet w displaying differences and correspondences between HMA and JASON

Work done ■ Excel sheet w displaying differences and correspondences between HMA and JASON 2 metadata (on SIPAD-NG) w Discussed with EUMETSAT · The identified differences are available in the ISO 19115 · If mandatory some fields could be available in both ISO 19115 and HMA metadata w is available on demand HMA Product Metadata Workshop 10

Conclusions from metadata comparison : data organization ■ It should be checked that the

Conclusions from metadata comparison : data organization ■ It should be checked that the specific altimetry product data organization can be represented with HMA w Cycle / track notions w Cycle_min, Cycle_max · <eop: Earth. Observation. Equipment>, with orbit information ■ What is the granularity of the data handled with HMA ■ What is the product levels that have to be considered? w L 1 w L 2 w L 3/L 4 w Beta product ? HMA Product Metadata Workshop 11

Conclusions from metadata comparison : processing info ■ Is it possible to represent the

Conclusions from metadata comparison : processing info ■ Is it possible to represent the processing temporal mode / timeline information w NRT, real. Time, … w there are some existing definition in the frame of SENTINEL program using the concepts of ‘short time/non time critical’. w also something identified within My. Ocean project w To be added in EOP · <eop: Earth. Observation. Result> (with version) · or <eop: Earth. Observation. Metadata with creation date ■ Is the meaning of the altimetry product level compliant with the one defined by HMA Product Metadata Workshop 12

Conclusions from metadata comparison : data content ■ Is it possible to use TOPEX

Conclusions from metadata comparison : data content ■ Is it possible to use TOPEX ellipsoid w There is no EPSG code for TOPEX! ■ Resolution information as a sampling frequency (1 Hz, 20 Hz, both) to be added? ■ The altimetry products provides several variables w Sea surface height, wave, wind, … w Correction measurements (meteo fields, tides, …) w Standardization of this has already been done in CF metadata · CF Climate and Forecast · already used for Jason-2 products · For each geophysical variable there is one CF standard_name (see screen capture j 2 metadata. jpeg). Each standard name correspond to one entry in CF, with a definition (see cfssh. jpg). HMA Product Metadata Workshop 13

Conclusions from metadata comparison : info representation ■ How to take into account that

Conclusions from metadata comparison : info representation ■ How to take into account that the measure is a line? ■ Is it required to produce thumbnail / quicklook ■ description + vocabularies • Eop: Earth. Observation. Equipment • platform/sensor/instrument • just take care to take the same references (My. Ocean project). • Some OWL/SKOS vocabularies would be a good thing. HMA Product Metadata Workshop 14